Of winners and losers: A commentary of the Bundesverfassungsgericht 'ORD' judgment of 6 December 2022: Cases 2 BvR 547/21 and 2 BvR 798/21, 'Own Resources Decision' Judgment of 6 December 2022
'Alle sind Gewinner' is how the German Tagesschau described the judgment of the Bundesverfassungsgericht upholding the EU's post-Covid recovery plan, NextGeneration EU. On the one hand, the applicants succeeded because the German court imposed conditions on German participation in the...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European constitutional law review 2024-03, Vol.20 (1), p.163-190 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 190 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 163 |
container_title | European constitutional law review |
container_volume | 20 |
creator | Dermine, Paul Bobić, Ana |
description | 'Alle sind Gewinner' is how the German Tagesschau described the judgment of the Bundesverfassungsgericht upholding the EU's post-Covid recovery plan, NextGeneration EU. On the one hand, the applicants succeeded because the German court imposed conditions on German participation in the programme, ensuring that it never turns into a genuine 'transfer union'. On the other hand, the German government, and its European partners, with the traumatic experience of Weiss still fresh in their minds, could celebrate the fact that NextGeneration EU survived, and rejoice that the Bundesverfassungsgericht was apparently retreating from its confrontational attitude. As is often the case when the German court scrutinises EU acts, everyone who was holding their breath while awaiting the judgment could now arguably sit back and relax. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S1574019624000117 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3041172157</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><informt_id>10.3316/informit.T2024051300011091956192443</informt_id><sourcerecordid>3041172157</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c219t-f2e2e0be96b0f257e610cd6e3464626d8434bec3f4dac66ff0e9f07c94bdef8f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1Uc1u1DAQjhBIlJYH4GaJw14I9diOve6t3fJXVVppKVytxBlns2rsxU5a8XY8Wp1dJA4VJ4--v7G-KYp3QD8CBXX-HSolKGjJBKUUQL0oTkAJUVYVVC_znOly5l8Xb1LaUSqA8-qk-LN25LH3HmMitW_JfUh5vCCXxIZhQD_W8TcJjoxbJFeTbzE9YHR1SpPvUoext9uRLNab6wXZTW03O2a5JNdocWgwEkYZuyCrOmEijFw9bEgl1DmDw7ojoPQyAx9yzqMnG0xhijarc0Sf-uAX5Ob_0WfFK1ffJ3z79z0tfnz-dLf6Wt6uv3xbXd6WloEeS8eQIW1Qy4Y6VimUQG0rkQspJJPtUnDRoOVOtLWV0jmK2lFltWhadEvHT4v3x9x9DL8mTKPZ5W_6vNLwXCYolivOKjiqbAwpRXRmH_shd2iAmvlQ5tmhsufn0ROHfjR116f9aBLW0W5N7104wCF2pg39HMM5yH_EXS5B0Ar4IY1q0JUEzYTg_AlfIZ3m</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3041172157</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Of winners and losers: A commentary of the Bundesverfassungsgericht 'ORD' judgment of 6 December 2022: Cases 2 BvR 547/21 and 2 BvR 798/21, 'Own Resources Decision' Judgment of 6 December 2022</title><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>Dermine, Paul ; Bobić, Ana</creator><creatorcontrib>Dermine, Paul ; Bobić, Ana</creatorcontrib><description>'Alle sind Gewinner' is how the German Tagesschau described the judgment of the Bundesverfassungsgericht upholding the EU's post-Covid recovery plan, NextGeneration EU. On the one hand, the applicants succeeded because the German court imposed conditions on German participation in the programme, ensuring that it never turns into a genuine 'transfer union'. On the other hand, the German government, and its European partners, with the traumatic experience of Weiss still fresh in their minds, could celebrate the fact that NextGeneration EU survived, and rejoice that the Bundesverfassungsgericht was apparently retreating from its confrontational attitude. As is often the case when the German court scrutinises EU acts, everyone who was holding their breath while awaiting the judgment could now arguably sit back and relax.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1574-0196</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1744-5515</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S1574019624000117</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Borrowing ; Constitutional law ; Decision making ; Germany. Bundesverfassungsgericht ; Injunctions ; Judicial process ; Liability (Law) ; Macroeconomics ; Pandemics ; Winners</subject><ispartof>European constitutional law review, 2024-03, Vol.20 (1), p.163-190</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of University of Amsterdam. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited. (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dermine, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bobić, Ana</creatorcontrib><title>Of winners and losers: A commentary of the Bundesverfassungsgericht 'ORD' judgment of 6 December 2022: Cases 2 BvR 547/21 and 2 BvR 798/21, 'Own Resources Decision' Judgment of 6 December 2022</title><title>European constitutional law review</title><description>'Alle sind Gewinner' is how the German Tagesschau described the judgment of the Bundesverfassungsgericht upholding the EU's post-Covid recovery plan, NextGeneration EU. On the one hand, the applicants succeeded because the German court imposed conditions on German participation in the programme, ensuring that it never turns into a genuine 'transfer union'. On the other hand, the German government, and its European partners, with the traumatic experience of Weiss still fresh in their minds, could celebrate the fact that NextGeneration EU survived, and rejoice that the Bundesverfassungsgericht was apparently retreating from its confrontational attitude. As is often the case when the German court scrutinises EU acts, everyone who was holding their breath while awaiting the judgment could now arguably sit back and relax.</description><subject>Borrowing</subject><subject>Constitutional law</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Germany. Bundesverfassungsgericht</subject><subject>Injunctions</subject><subject>Judicial process</subject><subject>Liability (Law)</subject><subject>Macroeconomics</subject><subject>Pandemics</subject><subject>Winners</subject><issn>1574-0196</issn><issn>1744-5515</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1Uc1u1DAQjhBIlJYH4GaJw14I9diOve6t3fJXVVppKVytxBlns2rsxU5a8XY8Wp1dJA4VJ4--v7G-KYp3QD8CBXX-HSolKGjJBKUUQL0oTkAJUVYVVC_znOly5l8Xb1LaUSqA8-qk-LN25LH3HmMitW_JfUh5vCCXxIZhQD_W8TcJjoxbJFeTbzE9YHR1SpPvUoext9uRLNab6wXZTW03O2a5JNdocWgwEkYZuyCrOmEijFw9bEgl1DmDw7ojoPQyAx9yzqMnG0xhijarc0Sf-uAX5Ob_0WfFK1ffJ3z79z0tfnz-dLf6Wt6uv3xbXd6WloEeS8eQIW1Qy4Y6VimUQG0rkQspJJPtUnDRoOVOtLWV0jmK2lFltWhadEvHT4v3x9x9DL8mTKPZ5W_6vNLwXCYolivOKjiqbAwpRXRmH_shd2iAmvlQ5tmhsufn0ROHfjR116f9aBLW0W5N7104wCF2pg39HMM5yH_EXS5B0Ar4IY1q0JUEzYTg_AlfIZ3m</recordid><startdate>20240301</startdate><enddate>20240301</enddate><creator>Dermine, Paul</creator><creator>Bobić, Ana</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240301</creationdate><title>Of winners and losers: A commentary of the Bundesverfassungsgericht 'ORD' judgment of 6 December 2022: Cases 2 BvR 547/21 and 2 BvR 798/21, 'Own Resources Decision' Judgment of 6 December 2022</title><author>Dermine, Paul ; Bobić, Ana</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c219t-f2e2e0be96b0f257e610cd6e3464626d8434bec3f4dac66ff0e9f07c94bdef8f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Borrowing</topic><topic>Constitutional law</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Germany. Bundesverfassungsgericht</topic><topic>Injunctions</topic><topic>Judicial process</topic><topic>Liability (Law)</topic><topic>Macroeconomics</topic><topic>Pandemics</topic><topic>Winners</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dermine, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bobić, Ana</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>European constitutional law review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dermine, Paul</au><au>Bobić, Ana</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Of winners and losers: A commentary of the Bundesverfassungsgericht 'ORD' judgment of 6 December 2022: Cases 2 BvR 547/21 and 2 BvR 798/21, 'Own Resources Decision' Judgment of 6 December 2022</atitle><jtitle>European constitutional law review</jtitle><date>2024-03-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>163</spage><epage>190</epage><pages>163-190</pages><issn>1574-0196</issn><eissn>1744-5515</eissn><abstract>'Alle sind Gewinner' is how the German Tagesschau described the judgment of the Bundesverfassungsgericht upholding the EU's post-Covid recovery plan, NextGeneration EU. On the one hand, the applicants succeeded because the German court imposed conditions on German participation in the programme, ensuring that it never turns into a genuine 'transfer union'. On the other hand, the German government, and its European partners, with the traumatic experience of Weiss still fresh in their minds, could celebrate the fact that NextGeneration EU survived, and rejoice that the Bundesverfassungsgericht was apparently retreating from its confrontational attitude. As is often the case when the German court scrutinises EU acts, everyone who was holding their breath while awaiting the judgment could now arguably sit back and relax.</abstract><cop>United Kingdom</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S1574019624000117</doi><tpages>28</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1574-0196 |
ispartof | European constitutional law review, 2024-03, Vol.20 (1), p.163-190 |
issn | 1574-0196 1744-5515 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_3041172157 |
source | Cambridge University Press Journals Complete |
subjects | Borrowing Constitutional law Decision making Germany. Bundesverfassungsgericht Injunctions Judicial process Liability (Law) Macroeconomics Pandemics Winners |
title | Of winners and losers: A commentary of the Bundesverfassungsgericht 'ORD' judgment of 6 December 2022: Cases 2 BvR 547/21 and 2 BvR 798/21, 'Own Resources Decision' Judgment of 6 December 2022 |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T15%3A17%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Of%20winners%20and%20losers:%20A%20commentary%20of%20the%20Bundesverfassungsgericht%20'ORD'%20judgment%20of%206%20December%202022:%20Cases%202%20BvR%20547/21%20and%202%20BvR%20798/21,%20'Own%20Resources%20Decision'%20Judgment%20of%206%20December%202022&rft.jtitle=European%20constitutional%20law%20review&rft.au=Dermine,%20Paul&rft.date=2024-03-01&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=163&rft.epage=190&rft.pages=163-190&rft.issn=1574-0196&rft.eissn=1744-5515&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S1574019624000117&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3041172157%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3041172157&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_informt_id=10.3316/informit.T2024051300011091956192443&rfr_iscdi=true |