Dorm augmented college assignments
In college assignments, a common practice is that students receive their dorm allocation after the realization of college placements. This causes wasted resources and unfair allocation. To fix this, we consider a college assignment problem where students simultaneously receive their college and dorm...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Social choice and welfare 2024-05, Vol.62 (3), p.609-627 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 627 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 609 |
container_title | Social choice and welfare |
container_volume | 62 |
creator | Afacan, Mustafa Oǧuz |
description | In college assignments, a common practice is that students receive their dorm allocation after the realization of college placements. This causes wasted resources and unfair allocation. To fix this, we consider a college assignment problem where students simultaneously receive their college and dorm assignments. We first introduce the so-called “
Dorm Augmented Deferred Acceptance
” (
DDA
) and show that it is stable and efficient. However, it is not student-optimal stable. We then introduce our next mechanism, “
Student-Improving Dorm Augmented Deferred Acceptance
” (
SDDA
). It is mainly built on
DDA
, but with some extra steps to neutralize the student-harming rejection cycles. We show that
SDDA
is student-optimal stable, efficient, and unanimously preferred to
DDA
by students. Stability and strategy-proofness are incompatible, implying that neither of these mechanisms is strategy-proof. None of these mechanisms is more manipulable than the other; hence
SDDA
improves the students’ welfare without an extra strategic cost. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00355-024-01510-9 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3041049658</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3041049658</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-bc817510cf52dfd60483cbc8b32bc49519de0c57abc95bd66a09a671f64c80a53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE9LAzEUxIMoWKtfwNOi5-h7-Z-jVKtCwYuCt5DNZpeWdrcm7cFvb-oKvXl6MO83MzCEXCPcIYC-zwBcSgpMUECJQO0JmaDgjDLUn6dkAqgVRY3inFzkvAIAxoSZkJvHIW0qv-82sd_FpgrDeh27WPmcl11_EPMlOWv9OservzslH_On99kLXbw9v84eFjQIEDtaB4O6VIdWsqZtFAjDQxFrzuogrETbRAhS-zpYWTdKebBeaWyVCAa85FNyO-Zu0_C1j3nnVsM-9aXScRAIwippCsVGKqQh5xRbt03LjU_fDsEdtnDjFq5s4X63cLaYqtEUw9Av89FibCFQGigIH5Fcnn0X07H9n-AfoOxqfA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3041049658</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Dorm augmented college assignments</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Afacan, Mustafa Oǧuz</creator><creatorcontrib>Afacan, Mustafa Oǧuz</creatorcontrib><description>In college assignments, a common practice is that students receive their dorm allocation after the realization of college placements. This causes wasted resources and unfair allocation. To fix this, we consider a college assignment problem where students simultaneously receive their college and dorm assignments. We first introduce the so-called “
Dorm Augmented Deferred Acceptance
” (
DDA
) and show that it is stable and efficient. However, it is not student-optimal stable. We then introduce our next mechanism, “
Student-Improving Dorm Augmented Deferred Acceptance
” (
SDDA
). It is mainly built on
DDA
, but with some extra steps to neutralize the student-harming rejection cycles. We show that
SDDA
is student-optimal stable, efficient, and unanimously preferred to
DDA
by students. Stability and strategy-proofness are incompatible, implying that neither of these mechanisms is strategy-proof. None of these mechanisms is more manipulable than the other; hence
SDDA
improves the students’ welfare without an extra strategic cost.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0176-1714</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-217X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00355-024-01510-9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Acceptance ; Allocation ; Assignment ; Augmentation ; College students ; Economic Theory/Quantitative Economics/Mathematical Methods ; Economics ; Economics and Finance ; Equity ; Game Theory ; Hochschule ; International Political Economy ; Original Paper ; Public Finance ; Resource allocation ; Social and Behav. Sciences ; Social Policy ; Students ; Studierende ; USA ; Welfare</subject><ispartof>Social choice and welfare, 2024-05, Vol.62 (3), p.609-627</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2024</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2024. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-bc817510cf52dfd60483cbc8b32bc49519de0c57abc95bd66a09a671f64c80a53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00355-024-01510-9$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00355-024-01510-9$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Afacan, Mustafa Oǧuz</creatorcontrib><title>Dorm augmented college assignments</title><title>Social choice and welfare</title><addtitle>Soc Choice Welf</addtitle><description>In college assignments, a common practice is that students receive their dorm allocation after the realization of college placements. This causes wasted resources and unfair allocation. To fix this, we consider a college assignment problem where students simultaneously receive their college and dorm assignments. We first introduce the so-called “
Dorm Augmented Deferred Acceptance
” (
DDA
) and show that it is stable and efficient. However, it is not student-optimal stable. We then introduce our next mechanism, “
Student-Improving Dorm Augmented Deferred Acceptance
” (
SDDA
). It is mainly built on
DDA
, but with some extra steps to neutralize the student-harming rejection cycles. We show that
SDDA
is student-optimal stable, efficient, and unanimously preferred to
DDA
by students. Stability and strategy-proofness are incompatible, implying that neither of these mechanisms is strategy-proof. None of these mechanisms is more manipulable than the other; hence
SDDA
improves the students’ welfare without an extra strategic cost.</description><subject>Acceptance</subject><subject>Allocation</subject><subject>Assignment</subject><subject>Augmentation</subject><subject>College students</subject><subject>Economic Theory/Quantitative Economics/Mathematical Methods</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Economics and Finance</subject><subject>Equity</subject><subject>Game Theory</subject><subject>Hochschule</subject><subject>International Political Economy</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Public Finance</subject><subject>Resource allocation</subject><subject>Social and Behav. Sciences</subject><subject>Social Policy</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Studierende</subject><subject>USA</subject><subject>Welfare</subject><issn>0176-1714</issn><issn>1432-217X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE9LAzEUxIMoWKtfwNOi5-h7-Z-jVKtCwYuCt5DNZpeWdrcm7cFvb-oKvXl6MO83MzCEXCPcIYC-zwBcSgpMUECJQO0JmaDgjDLUn6dkAqgVRY3inFzkvAIAxoSZkJvHIW0qv-82sd_FpgrDeh27WPmcl11_EPMlOWv9OservzslH_On99kLXbw9v84eFjQIEDtaB4O6VIdWsqZtFAjDQxFrzuogrETbRAhS-zpYWTdKebBeaWyVCAa85FNyO-Zu0_C1j3nnVsM-9aXScRAIwippCsVGKqQh5xRbt03LjU_fDsEdtnDjFq5s4X63cLaYqtEUw9Av89FibCFQGigIH5Fcnn0X07H9n-AfoOxqfA</recordid><startdate>20240501</startdate><enddate>20240501</enddate><creator>Afacan, Mustafa Oǧuz</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>OQ6</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K9.</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240501</creationdate><title>Dorm augmented college assignments</title><author>Afacan, Mustafa Oǧuz</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-bc817510cf52dfd60483cbc8b32bc49519de0c57abc95bd66a09a671f64c80a53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Acceptance</topic><topic>Allocation</topic><topic>Assignment</topic><topic>Augmentation</topic><topic>College students</topic><topic>Economic Theory/Quantitative Economics/Mathematical Methods</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Economics and Finance</topic><topic>Equity</topic><topic>Game Theory</topic><topic>Hochschule</topic><topic>International Political Economy</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Public Finance</topic><topic>Resource allocation</topic><topic>Social and Behav. Sciences</topic><topic>Social Policy</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Studierende</topic><topic>USA</topic><topic>Welfare</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Afacan, Mustafa Oǧuz</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>ECONIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><jtitle>Social choice and welfare</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Afacan, Mustafa Oǧuz</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Dorm augmented college assignments</atitle><jtitle>Social choice and welfare</jtitle><stitle>Soc Choice Welf</stitle><date>2024-05-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>62</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>609</spage><epage>627</epage><pages>609-627</pages><issn>0176-1714</issn><eissn>1432-217X</eissn><abstract>In college assignments, a common practice is that students receive their dorm allocation after the realization of college placements. This causes wasted resources and unfair allocation. To fix this, we consider a college assignment problem where students simultaneously receive their college and dorm assignments. We first introduce the so-called “
Dorm Augmented Deferred Acceptance
” (
DDA
) and show that it is stable and efficient. However, it is not student-optimal stable. We then introduce our next mechanism, “
Student-Improving Dorm Augmented Deferred Acceptance
” (
SDDA
). It is mainly built on
DDA
, but with some extra steps to neutralize the student-harming rejection cycles. We show that
SDDA
is student-optimal stable, efficient, and unanimously preferred to
DDA
by students. Stability and strategy-proofness are incompatible, implying that neither of these mechanisms is strategy-proof. None of these mechanisms is more manipulable than the other; hence
SDDA
improves the students’ welfare without an extra strategic cost.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><doi>10.1007/s00355-024-01510-9</doi><tpages>19</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0176-1714 |
ispartof | Social choice and welfare, 2024-05, Vol.62 (3), p.609-627 |
issn | 0176-1714 1432-217X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_3041049658 |
source | Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; SpringerNature Journals |
subjects | Acceptance Allocation Assignment Augmentation College students Economic Theory/Quantitative Economics/Mathematical Methods Economics Economics and Finance Equity Game Theory Hochschule International Political Economy Original Paper Public Finance Resource allocation Social and Behav. Sciences Social Policy Students Studierende USA Welfare |
title | Dorm augmented college assignments |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-31T00%3A36%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Dorm%20augmented%20college%20assignments&rft.jtitle=Social%20choice%20and%20welfare&rft.au=Afacan,%20Mustafa%20O%C7%A7uz&rft.date=2024-05-01&rft.volume=62&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=609&rft.epage=627&rft.pages=609-627&rft.issn=0176-1714&rft.eissn=1432-217X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00355-024-01510-9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3041049658%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3041049658&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |