Dorm augmented college assignments

In college assignments, a common practice is that students receive their dorm allocation after the realization of college placements. This causes wasted resources and unfair allocation. To fix this, we consider a college assignment problem where students simultaneously receive their college and dorm...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Social choice and welfare 2024-05, Vol.62 (3), p.609-627
1. Verfasser: Afacan, Mustafa Oǧuz
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 627
container_issue 3
container_start_page 609
container_title Social choice and welfare
container_volume 62
creator Afacan, Mustafa Oǧuz
description In college assignments, a common practice is that students receive their dorm allocation after the realization of college placements. This causes wasted resources and unfair allocation. To fix this, we consider a college assignment problem where students simultaneously receive their college and dorm assignments. We first introduce the so-called “ Dorm Augmented Deferred Acceptance ” ( DDA ) and show that it is stable and efficient. However, it is not student-optimal stable. We then introduce our next mechanism, “ Student-Improving Dorm Augmented Deferred Acceptance ” ( SDDA ). It is mainly built on DDA , but with some extra steps to neutralize the student-harming rejection cycles. We show that SDDA is student-optimal stable, efficient, and unanimously preferred to DDA by students. Stability and strategy-proofness are incompatible, implying that neither of these mechanisms is strategy-proof. None of these mechanisms is more manipulable than the other; hence SDDA improves the students’ welfare without an extra strategic cost.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00355-024-01510-9
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3041049658</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3041049658</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-bc817510cf52dfd60483cbc8b32bc49519de0c57abc95bd66a09a671f64c80a53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE9LAzEUxIMoWKtfwNOi5-h7-Z-jVKtCwYuCt5DNZpeWdrcm7cFvb-oKvXl6MO83MzCEXCPcIYC-zwBcSgpMUECJQO0JmaDgjDLUn6dkAqgVRY3inFzkvAIAxoSZkJvHIW0qv-82sd_FpgrDeh27WPmcl11_EPMlOWv9OservzslH_On99kLXbw9v84eFjQIEDtaB4O6VIdWsqZtFAjDQxFrzuogrETbRAhS-zpYWTdKebBeaWyVCAa85FNyO-Zu0_C1j3nnVsM-9aXScRAIwippCsVGKqQh5xRbt03LjU_fDsEdtnDjFq5s4X63cLaYqtEUw9Av89FibCFQGigIH5Fcnn0X07H9n-AfoOxqfA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3041049658</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Dorm augmented college assignments</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Afacan, Mustafa Oǧuz</creator><creatorcontrib>Afacan, Mustafa Oǧuz</creatorcontrib><description>In college assignments, a common practice is that students receive their dorm allocation after the realization of college placements. This causes wasted resources and unfair allocation. To fix this, we consider a college assignment problem where students simultaneously receive their college and dorm assignments. We first introduce the so-called “ Dorm Augmented Deferred Acceptance ” ( DDA ) and show that it is stable and efficient. However, it is not student-optimal stable. We then introduce our next mechanism, “ Student-Improving Dorm Augmented Deferred Acceptance ” ( SDDA ). It is mainly built on DDA , but with some extra steps to neutralize the student-harming rejection cycles. We show that SDDA is student-optimal stable, efficient, and unanimously preferred to DDA by students. Stability and strategy-proofness are incompatible, implying that neither of these mechanisms is strategy-proof. None of these mechanisms is more manipulable than the other; hence SDDA improves the students’ welfare without an extra strategic cost.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0176-1714</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-217X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00355-024-01510-9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Acceptance ; Allocation ; Assignment ; Augmentation ; College students ; Economic Theory/Quantitative Economics/Mathematical Methods ; Economics ; Economics and Finance ; Equity ; Game Theory ; Hochschule ; International Political Economy ; Original Paper ; Public Finance ; Resource allocation ; Social and Behav. Sciences ; Social Policy ; Students ; Studierende ; USA ; Welfare</subject><ispartof>Social choice and welfare, 2024-05, Vol.62 (3), p.609-627</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2024</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2024. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-bc817510cf52dfd60483cbc8b32bc49519de0c57abc95bd66a09a671f64c80a53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00355-024-01510-9$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00355-024-01510-9$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Afacan, Mustafa Oǧuz</creatorcontrib><title>Dorm augmented college assignments</title><title>Social choice and welfare</title><addtitle>Soc Choice Welf</addtitle><description>In college assignments, a common practice is that students receive their dorm allocation after the realization of college placements. This causes wasted resources and unfair allocation. To fix this, we consider a college assignment problem where students simultaneously receive their college and dorm assignments. We first introduce the so-called “ Dorm Augmented Deferred Acceptance ” ( DDA ) and show that it is stable and efficient. However, it is not student-optimal stable. We then introduce our next mechanism, “ Student-Improving Dorm Augmented Deferred Acceptance ” ( SDDA ). It is mainly built on DDA , but with some extra steps to neutralize the student-harming rejection cycles. We show that SDDA is student-optimal stable, efficient, and unanimously preferred to DDA by students. Stability and strategy-proofness are incompatible, implying that neither of these mechanisms is strategy-proof. None of these mechanisms is more manipulable than the other; hence SDDA improves the students’ welfare without an extra strategic cost.</description><subject>Acceptance</subject><subject>Allocation</subject><subject>Assignment</subject><subject>Augmentation</subject><subject>College students</subject><subject>Economic Theory/Quantitative Economics/Mathematical Methods</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Economics and Finance</subject><subject>Equity</subject><subject>Game Theory</subject><subject>Hochschule</subject><subject>International Political Economy</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Public Finance</subject><subject>Resource allocation</subject><subject>Social and Behav. Sciences</subject><subject>Social Policy</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Studierende</subject><subject>USA</subject><subject>Welfare</subject><issn>0176-1714</issn><issn>1432-217X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE9LAzEUxIMoWKtfwNOi5-h7-Z-jVKtCwYuCt5DNZpeWdrcm7cFvb-oKvXl6MO83MzCEXCPcIYC-zwBcSgpMUECJQO0JmaDgjDLUn6dkAqgVRY3inFzkvAIAxoSZkJvHIW0qv-82sd_FpgrDeh27WPmcl11_EPMlOWv9OservzslH_On99kLXbw9v84eFjQIEDtaB4O6VIdWsqZtFAjDQxFrzuogrETbRAhS-zpYWTdKebBeaWyVCAa85FNyO-Zu0_C1j3nnVsM-9aXScRAIwippCsVGKqQh5xRbt03LjU_fDsEdtnDjFq5s4X63cLaYqtEUw9Av89FibCFQGigIH5Fcnn0X07H9n-AfoOxqfA</recordid><startdate>20240501</startdate><enddate>20240501</enddate><creator>Afacan, Mustafa Oǧuz</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>OQ6</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K9.</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240501</creationdate><title>Dorm augmented college assignments</title><author>Afacan, Mustafa Oǧuz</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-bc817510cf52dfd60483cbc8b32bc49519de0c57abc95bd66a09a671f64c80a53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Acceptance</topic><topic>Allocation</topic><topic>Assignment</topic><topic>Augmentation</topic><topic>College students</topic><topic>Economic Theory/Quantitative Economics/Mathematical Methods</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Economics and Finance</topic><topic>Equity</topic><topic>Game Theory</topic><topic>Hochschule</topic><topic>International Political Economy</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Public Finance</topic><topic>Resource allocation</topic><topic>Social and Behav. Sciences</topic><topic>Social Policy</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Studierende</topic><topic>USA</topic><topic>Welfare</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Afacan, Mustafa Oǧuz</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>ECONIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><jtitle>Social choice and welfare</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Afacan, Mustafa Oǧuz</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Dorm augmented college assignments</atitle><jtitle>Social choice and welfare</jtitle><stitle>Soc Choice Welf</stitle><date>2024-05-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>62</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>609</spage><epage>627</epage><pages>609-627</pages><issn>0176-1714</issn><eissn>1432-217X</eissn><abstract>In college assignments, a common practice is that students receive their dorm allocation after the realization of college placements. This causes wasted resources and unfair allocation. To fix this, we consider a college assignment problem where students simultaneously receive their college and dorm assignments. We first introduce the so-called “ Dorm Augmented Deferred Acceptance ” ( DDA ) and show that it is stable and efficient. However, it is not student-optimal stable. We then introduce our next mechanism, “ Student-Improving Dorm Augmented Deferred Acceptance ” ( SDDA ). It is mainly built on DDA , but with some extra steps to neutralize the student-harming rejection cycles. We show that SDDA is student-optimal stable, efficient, and unanimously preferred to DDA by students. Stability and strategy-proofness are incompatible, implying that neither of these mechanisms is strategy-proof. None of these mechanisms is more manipulable than the other; hence SDDA improves the students’ welfare without an extra strategic cost.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><doi>10.1007/s00355-024-01510-9</doi><tpages>19</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0176-1714
ispartof Social choice and welfare, 2024-05, Vol.62 (3), p.609-627
issn 0176-1714
1432-217X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_3041049658
source Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; SpringerNature Journals
subjects Acceptance
Allocation
Assignment
Augmentation
College students
Economic Theory/Quantitative Economics/Mathematical Methods
Economics
Economics and Finance
Equity
Game Theory
Hochschule
International Political Economy
Original Paper
Public Finance
Resource allocation
Social and Behav. Sciences
Social Policy
Students
Studierende
USA
Welfare
title Dorm augmented college assignments
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-31T00%3A36%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Dorm%20augmented%20college%20assignments&rft.jtitle=Social%20choice%20and%20welfare&rft.au=Afacan,%20Mustafa%20O%C7%A7uz&rft.date=2024-05-01&rft.volume=62&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=609&rft.epage=627&rft.pages=609-627&rft.issn=0176-1714&rft.eissn=1432-217X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00355-024-01510-9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3041049658%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3041049658&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true