The association between boredom and creativity in educational contexts: A scoping review on research approaches and empirical findings

Assumptions around the association between boredom and creativity are contentious. Although studies suggest positive effects of boredom, it is also considered a negative predictor of creativity. Researchers also assume that creativity reduces boredom, but boredom can also occur during creative tasks...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Review of education (Oxford) 2024-04, Vol.12 (1), p.n/a
Hauptverfasser: Zeißig, Anke, Kansok‐Dusche, Julia, Fischer, Saskia M., Moeller, Julia, Bilz, Ludwig
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page n/a
container_issue 1
container_start_page
container_title Review of education (Oxford)
container_volume 12
creator Zeißig, Anke
Kansok‐Dusche, Julia
Fischer, Saskia M.
Moeller, Julia
Bilz, Ludwig
description Assumptions around the association between boredom and creativity are contentious. Although studies suggest positive effects of boredom, it is also considered a negative predictor of creativity. Researchers also assume that creativity reduces boredom, but boredom can also occur during creative tasks. In this review, we identify and systematise the empirical evidence available to date on the association between creativity and boredom in educational contexts. The string‐guided electronic search yielded 2849 publications. Nineteen publications based on 27 empirical studies met the inclusion criteria. Two reviewers extracted definitions, theories, methods, operationalisations, measurement instruments, and outcomes from the studies using a coding scheme. We identified a range of different theoretical and methodological approaches. The largest cache of empirical evidence was obtained from experimental and quasi‐experimental studies (five positive associations, four negative, two contradictory, and three insignificant results). Correlation studies identified three negative, one contradictory, and seven insignificant correlations between boredom and creativity. In addition, two studies with exploratory, statistically not relevant results contributed to the body of research. The results from the identified and evaluated studies argue both for and against the sensitivity of creative processes in relation to boredom—but a clear causal, positive or negative effect of boredom on creativity is not currently supported by the empirical evidence available. Previous research has also not yet demonstrated an apparent effect of creative states or traits on academic boredom. Future research should aim to explore under what circumstances different relationships between boredom and creativity can be observed and reliably replicated.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/rev3.3470
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3040187383</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3040187383</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2920-5e7a384a11b6fe706b91b1fd8af01519a43ec48332639ad757c6b56f0cf1c3693</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE9LAzEQxYMoWGoPfoOAJw9rJ5vdbNdbKfUPFASpXkM2O7Ep7WZNtq39An5u09aDF08zML_3ePMIuWZwxwDSocctv-NZAWekl0JWJkIwfv5nvySDEJYAwBjkvOQ98j1fIFUhOG1VZ11DK-x2iHE6j7VbU9XUVHuMx63t9tQ2FOuNPrJqRbVrOvzqwj0d06Bda5sPGlNY3NHo5TGg8npBVdt6p_QCw9EP1631Vke9sU0dNeGKXBi1Cjj4nX3y9jCdT56S2cvj82Q8S3RappDkWCg-yhRjlTBYgKhKVjFTj5QBlrNSZRx1NuI8FbxUdZEXWlS5MKAN01yUvE9uTr4xz-cGQyeXbuPjJ0FyyICNCh7VfXJ7orR3IXg0svV2rfxeMpCHpuWhaXloOrLDE7uzK9z_D8rX6Ts_Kn4ATX6Bng</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3040187383</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The association between boredom and creativity in educational contexts: A scoping review on research approaches and empirical findings</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Zeißig, Anke ; Kansok‐Dusche, Julia ; Fischer, Saskia M. ; Moeller, Julia ; Bilz, Ludwig</creator><creatorcontrib>Zeißig, Anke ; Kansok‐Dusche, Julia ; Fischer, Saskia M. ; Moeller, Julia ; Bilz, Ludwig</creatorcontrib><description>Assumptions around the association between boredom and creativity are contentious. Although studies suggest positive effects of boredom, it is also considered a negative predictor of creativity. Researchers also assume that creativity reduces boredom, but boredom can also occur during creative tasks. In this review, we identify and systematise the empirical evidence available to date on the association between creativity and boredom in educational contexts. The string‐guided electronic search yielded 2849 publications. Nineteen publications based on 27 empirical studies met the inclusion criteria. Two reviewers extracted definitions, theories, methods, operationalisations, measurement instruments, and outcomes from the studies using a coding scheme. We identified a range of different theoretical and methodological approaches. The largest cache of empirical evidence was obtained from experimental and quasi‐experimental studies (five positive associations, four negative, two contradictory, and three insignificant results). Correlation studies identified three negative, one contradictory, and seven insignificant correlations between boredom and creativity. In addition, two studies with exploratory, statistically not relevant results contributed to the body of research. The results from the identified and evaluated studies argue both for and against the sensitivity of creative processes in relation to boredom—but a clear causal, positive or negative effect of boredom on creativity is not currently supported by the empirical evidence available. Previous research has also not yet demonstrated an apparent effect of creative states or traits on academic boredom. Future research should aim to explore under what circumstances different relationships between boredom and creativity can be observed and reliably replicated.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2049-6613</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2049-6613</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/rev3.3470</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>boredom ; Coding ; Creativity ; education ; Evidence ; Research Methodology ; scoping review</subject><ispartof>Review of education (Oxford), 2024-04, Vol.12 (1), p.n/a</ispartof><rights>2024 The Authors. published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd on behalf of British Educational Research Association.</rights><rights>2024. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2920-5e7a384a11b6fe706b91b1fd8af01519a43ec48332639ad757c6b56f0cf1c3693</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2753-6297 ; 0000-0002-5939-8688 ; 0000-0002-8085-4027 ; 0000-0003-3017-0492 ; 0000-0002-8337-2429</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Frev3.3470$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Frev3.3470$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zeißig, Anke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kansok‐Dusche, Julia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fischer, Saskia M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moeller, Julia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bilz, Ludwig</creatorcontrib><title>The association between boredom and creativity in educational contexts: A scoping review on research approaches and empirical findings</title><title>Review of education (Oxford)</title><description>Assumptions around the association between boredom and creativity are contentious. Although studies suggest positive effects of boredom, it is also considered a negative predictor of creativity. Researchers also assume that creativity reduces boredom, but boredom can also occur during creative tasks. In this review, we identify and systematise the empirical evidence available to date on the association between creativity and boredom in educational contexts. The string‐guided electronic search yielded 2849 publications. Nineteen publications based on 27 empirical studies met the inclusion criteria. Two reviewers extracted definitions, theories, methods, operationalisations, measurement instruments, and outcomes from the studies using a coding scheme. We identified a range of different theoretical and methodological approaches. The largest cache of empirical evidence was obtained from experimental and quasi‐experimental studies (five positive associations, four negative, two contradictory, and three insignificant results). Correlation studies identified three negative, one contradictory, and seven insignificant correlations between boredom and creativity. In addition, two studies with exploratory, statistically not relevant results contributed to the body of research. The results from the identified and evaluated studies argue both for and against the sensitivity of creative processes in relation to boredom—but a clear causal, positive or negative effect of boredom on creativity is not currently supported by the empirical evidence available. Previous research has also not yet demonstrated an apparent effect of creative states or traits on academic boredom. Future research should aim to explore under what circumstances different relationships between boredom and creativity can be observed and reliably replicated.</description><subject>boredom</subject><subject>Coding</subject><subject>Creativity</subject><subject>education</subject><subject>Evidence</subject><subject>Research Methodology</subject><subject>scoping review</subject><issn>2049-6613</issn><issn>2049-6613</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE9LAzEQxYMoWGoPfoOAJw9rJ5vdbNdbKfUPFASpXkM2O7Ep7WZNtq39An5u09aDF08zML_3ePMIuWZwxwDSocctv-NZAWekl0JWJkIwfv5nvySDEJYAwBjkvOQ98j1fIFUhOG1VZ11DK-x2iHE6j7VbU9XUVHuMx63t9tQ2FOuNPrJqRbVrOvzqwj0d06Bda5sPGlNY3NHo5TGg8npBVdt6p_QCw9EP1631Vke9sU0dNeGKXBi1Cjj4nX3y9jCdT56S2cvj82Q8S3RappDkWCg-yhRjlTBYgKhKVjFTj5QBlrNSZRx1NuI8FbxUdZEXWlS5MKAN01yUvE9uTr4xz-cGQyeXbuPjJ0FyyICNCh7VfXJ7orR3IXg0svV2rfxeMpCHpuWhaXloOrLDE7uzK9z_D8rX6Ts_Kn4ATX6Bng</recordid><startdate>202404</startdate><enddate>202404</enddate><creator>Zeißig, Anke</creator><creator>Kansok‐Dusche, Julia</creator><creator>Fischer, Saskia M.</creator><creator>Moeller, Julia</creator><creator>Bilz, Ludwig</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2753-6297</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5939-8688</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8085-4027</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3017-0492</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8337-2429</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202404</creationdate><title>The association between boredom and creativity in educational contexts: A scoping review on research approaches and empirical findings</title><author>Zeißig, Anke ; Kansok‐Dusche, Julia ; Fischer, Saskia M. ; Moeller, Julia ; Bilz, Ludwig</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2920-5e7a384a11b6fe706b91b1fd8af01519a43ec48332639ad757c6b56f0cf1c3693</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>boredom</topic><topic>Coding</topic><topic>Creativity</topic><topic>education</topic><topic>Evidence</topic><topic>Research Methodology</topic><topic>scoping review</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zeißig, Anke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kansok‐Dusche, Julia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fischer, Saskia M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moeller, Julia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bilz, Ludwig</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Review of education (Oxford)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zeißig, Anke</au><au>Kansok‐Dusche, Julia</au><au>Fischer, Saskia M.</au><au>Moeller, Julia</au><au>Bilz, Ludwig</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The association between boredom and creativity in educational contexts: A scoping review on research approaches and empirical findings</atitle><jtitle>Review of education (Oxford)</jtitle><date>2024-04</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>1</issue><epage>n/a</epage><issn>2049-6613</issn><eissn>2049-6613</eissn><abstract>Assumptions around the association between boredom and creativity are contentious. Although studies suggest positive effects of boredom, it is also considered a negative predictor of creativity. Researchers also assume that creativity reduces boredom, but boredom can also occur during creative tasks. In this review, we identify and systematise the empirical evidence available to date on the association between creativity and boredom in educational contexts. The string‐guided electronic search yielded 2849 publications. Nineteen publications based on 27 empirical studies met the inclusion criteria. Two reviewers extracted definitions, theories, methods, operationalisations, measurement instruments, and outcomes from the studies using a coding scheme. We identified a range of different theoretical and methodological approaches. The largest cache of empirical evidence was obtained from experimental and quasi‐experimental studies (five positive associations, four negative, two contradictory, and three insignificant results). Correlation studies identified three negative, one contradictory, and seven insignificant correlations between boredom and creativity. In addition, two studies with exploratory, statistically not relevant results contributed to the body of research. The results from the identified and evaluated studies argue both for and against the sensitivity of creative processes in relation to boredom—but a clear causal, positive or negative effect of boredom on creativity is not currently supported by the empirical evidence available. Previous research has also not yet demonstrated an apparent effect of creative states or traits on academic boredom. Future research should aim to explore under what circumstances different relationships between boredom and creativity can be observed and reliably replicated.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/rev3.3470</doi><tpages>43</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2753-6297</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5939-8688</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8085-4027</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3017-0492</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8337-2429</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2049-6613
ispartof Review of education (Oxford), 2024-04, Vol.12 (1), p.n/a
issn 2049-6613
2049-6613
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_3040187383
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects boredom
Coding
Creativity
education
Evidence
Research Methodology
scoping review
title The association between boredom and creativity in educational contexts: A scoping review on research approaches and empirical findings
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T14%3A56%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20association%20between%20boredom%20and%20creativity%20in%20educational%20contexts:%20A%20scoping%20review%20on%20research%20approaches%20and%20empirical%20findings&rft.jtitle=Review%20of%20education%20(Oxford)&rft.au=Zei%C3%9Fig,%20Anke&rft.date=2024-04&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=1&rft.epage=n/a&rft.issn=2049-6613&rft.eissn=2049-6613&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/rev3.3470&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3040187383%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3040187383&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true