The Semisupervised Weighted Centroid Prototype Network for Fault Diagnosis of Wind Turbine Gearbox

The success of fault diagnosis based on deep learning benefits from a large amount of labeled fault samples. However, the scarcity of labeled fault samples in fault diagnosis of wind turbine gearbox (WTG) makes it difficult to train a satisfactory diagnostic model. To address this issue, this articl...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:IEEE/ASME transactions on mechatronics 2024-04, Vol.29 (2), p.1567-1578
Hauptverfasser: Su, Zuqiang, Zhang, Xiaolong, Wang, Guoyin, Wang, Shuxian, Luo, Maolin, Wang, Xin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The success of fault diagnosis based on deep learning benefits from a large amount of labeled fault samples. However, the scarcity of labeled fault samples in fault diagnosis of wind turbine gearbox (WTG) makes it difficult to train a satisfactory diagnostic model. To address this issue, this article proposed a semisupervised weighted centroid prototype network (SSWCPN) for WTG fault diagnosis. Specifically, SSWCPN is a few-shot semisupervised learning framework, which alleviates the matter of overfitting caused by the lack of supervision information. First, to capture abundant semisupervised information to guide network training, a sample selection model based on the evolution trend of posterior probability is proposed, which could efficiently cherry-pick out the unlabeled samples of high confidence to refine prototypes. Second, a new prototype updating strategy based on a weighted centroid prototype is designed, which controls the prototype drifting issue caused by incorrect pseudolabels and the introduction of new data distribution. Finally, experiments performed on test-bench data and successful application on WTG data show that the proposed SSWCPN-based WTG fault diagnosis achieves the best fault diagnosis performance among the comparison methods.
ISSN:1083-4435
1941-014X
DOI:10.1109/TMECH.2023.3312042