Optimization of volatile organic compounds sampling from dairy cow exhaled breath using polymer-based solid-phase extraction cartridges for gas chromatographic analysis
We explored appropriate technical setups for the detection of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from exhaled cow breath by comparing six different polymer-based solid-phase extraction (SPE) cartridges currently on the market for gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC-MS) screening. Exhaled breath...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of breath research 2024-07, Vol.18 (3), p.36001 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 36001 |
container_title | Journal of breath research |
container_volume | 18 |
creator | Eichinger, Julia Reiche, Anna-Maria Dohme-Meier, Frigga Fuchsmann, Pascal |
description | We explored appropriate technical setups for the detection of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from exhaled cow breath by comparing six different polymer-based solid-phase extraction (SPE) cartridges currently on the market for gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC-MS) screening. Exhaled breath was sampled at a single timepoint from five lactating dairy cows using six different SPE cartridges (Bond Elut ENV (ENV); Chromabond HRX (HRX); Chromabond HRP (HRP); Chromabond HLB (HLB); Chromabond HR-XCW (XCW) and Chromabond HR-XAW (XAW)). The trapped VOCs were analyzed by dynamic headspace vacuum in-tube extraction GC-MS (DHS-V-ITEX-GC-MS). Depending on the SPE cartridge, we detected 1174-1312 VOCs per cartridge. Most VOCs were alkenes, alkanes, esters, ketones, alcohols, aldehydes, amines, nitriles, ethers, amides, carboxylic acids, alkynes, azoles, terpenes, pyridines, or sulfur-containing compounds. The six SPE cartridges differed in their specificity for the chemical compounds, with the XAW cartridge showing the best specificity for ketones. The greatest differences between the tested SPE cartridges appeared in the detection of specific VOCs. In total, 176 different VOCs were detected with a match factor >80%. The greatest number of specific VOCs was captured by XAW (149), followed by ENV (118), HLB (117), HRP (115), HRX (114), and XCW (114). We conclude that the tested SPE cartridges are suitable for VOC sampling from exhaled cow breath, but the SPE cartridge choice enormously affects the detected chemical groups and the number of detected VOCs. Therefore, an appropriate SPE adsorbent cartridge should be selected according to our proposed inclusion criteria. For targeted metabolomics approaches, the SPE cartridge choice depends on the VOCs or chemical compound groups of interest based on our provided VOC list. For untargeted approaches without information on the animals' metabolic condition, we suggest using multi-sorbent SPE cartridges or multiple cartridges per animal. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1088/1752-7163/ad38d5 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3039930534</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3022572040</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-222ec9ccc0c745038cf6dcd373740c294fcf19e6ca592f8a7da04fa85246f14c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kUmP1DAQhSMEYoaBOydkiQMcCOM1yxGN2KSR5gJnq9pL4pYTGzsZaH4RPxOHHhoJwamqXF-9Z-lV1VOCXxPcdZekFbRuScMuQbNOi3vV-enp_qkX4qx6lPMe44bjrn9YnbFO8FYwel79uImLm9x3WFyYUbDoNvjSe4NCGmB2CqkwxbDOOqMMU_RuHpBNYUIaXDqU7Vdkvo3gjUa7ZGAZ0Zo3JgZ_mEyqd5DLKgfvdB3HMhR8SaB--SlIS3J6MBnZkNAAGamxiMMShgRxLPYwgz9klx9XDyz4bJ7c1Yvq87u3n64-1Nc37z9evbmuFevJUlNKjeqVUli1XGDWKdtopVnLWo4V7blVlvSmUSB6ajtoNWBuoROUN5ZwxS6ql0fdmMKX1eRFTi4r4z3MJqxZMkypaCnmuKDP_0L3YU3lvxvF-p5hwXih8JFSKeScjJUxuQnSQRIstxTlFpPcIpPHFMvJszvhdTcZfTr4HVsBXhwBF-If0_0uSdJJJjFrMCYyalvIV_8g_-v8E0Idt-Y</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3039930534</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Optimization of volatile organic compounds sampling from dairy cow exhaled breath using polymer-based solid-phase extraction cartridges for gas chromatographic analysis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>IOP Publishing Journals</source><source>Institute of Physics (IOP) Journals - HEAL-Link</source><creator>Eichinger, Julia ; Reiche, Anna-Maria ; Dohme-Meier, Frigga ; Fuchsmann, Pascal</creator><creatorcontrib>Eichinger, Julia ; Reiche, Anna-Maria ; Dohme-Meier, Frigga ; Fuchsmann, Pascal</creatorcontrib><description>We explored appropriate technical setups for the detection of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from exhaled cow breath by comparing six different polymer-based solid-phase extraction (SPE) cartridges currently on the market for gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC-MS) screening. Exhaled breath was sampled at a single timepoint from five lactating dairy cows using six different SPE cartridges (Bond Elut ENV (ENV); Chromabond HRX (HRX); Chromabond HRP (HRP); Chromabond HLB (HLB); Chromabond HR-XCW (XCW) and Chromabond HR-XAW (XAW)). The trapped VOCs were analyzed by dynamic headspace vacuum in-tube extraction GC-MS (DHS-V-ITEX-GC-MS). Depending on the SPE cartridge, we detected 1174-1312 VOCs per cartridge. Most VOCs were alkenes, alkanes, esters, ketones, alcohols, aldehydes, amines, nitriles, ethers, amides, carboxylic acids, alkynes, azoles, terpenes, pyridines, or sulfur-containing compounds. The six SPE cartridges differed in their specificity for the chemical compounds, with the XAW cartridge showing the best specificity for ketones. The greatest differences between the tested SPE cartridges appeared in the detection of specific VOCs. In total, 176 different VOCs were detected with a match factor >80%. The greatest number of specific VOCs was captured by XAW (149), followed by ENV (118), HLB (117), HRP (115), HRX (114), and XCW (114). We conclude that the tested SPE cartridges are suitable for VOC sampling from exhaled cow breath, but the SPE cartridge choice enormously affects the detected chemical groups and the number of detected VOCs. Therefore, an appropriate SPE adsorbent cartridge should be selected according to our proposed inclusion criteria. For targeted metabolomics approaches, the SPE cartridge choice depends on the VOCs or chemical compound groups of interest based on our provided VOC list. For untargeted approaches without information on the animals' metabolic condition, we suggest using multi-sorbent SPE cartridges or multiple cartridges per animal.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1752-7155</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1752-7163</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1088/1752-7163/ad38d5</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38547532</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JBROBW</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: IOP Publishing</publisher><subject>Animals ; Breath Tests - methods ; Cattle ; exhalomics ; Female ; Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry - methods ; GC-MS ; Ketones ; Lactation ; ruminant ; Solid Phase Extraction ; VOCs ; Volatile organic compounds ; Volatile Organic Compounds - analysis ; volatilome</subject><ispartof>Journal of breath research, 2024-07, Vol.18 (3), p.36001</ispartof><rights>2024 The Author(s). Published by IOP Publishing Ltd</rights><rights>Creative Commons Attribution license.</rights><rights>2024 The Author(s). Published by IOP Publishing Ltd. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-222ec9ccc0c745038cf6dcd373740c294fcf19e6ca592f8a7da04fa85246f14c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1013-5657</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1752-7163/ad38d5/pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Giop$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,53821,53868</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38547532$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Eichinger, Julia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reiche, Anna-Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dohme-Meier, Frigga</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fuchsmann, Pascal</creatorcontrib><title>Optimization of volatile organic compounds sampling from dairy cow exhaled breath using polymer-based solid-phase extraction cartridges for gas chromatographic analysis</title><title>Journal of breath research</title><addtitle>JBR</addtitle><addtitle>J. Breath Res</addtitle><description>We explored appropriate technical setups for the detection of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from exhaled cow breath by comparing six different polymer-based solid-phase extraction (SPE) cartridges currently on the market for gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC-MS) screening. Exhaled breath was sampled at a single timepoint from five lactating dairy cows using six different SPE cartridges (Bond Elut ENV (ENV); Chromabond HRX (HRX); Chromabond HRP (HRP); Chromabond HLB (HLB); Chromabond HR-XCW (XCW) and Chromabond HR-XAW (XAW)). The trapped VOCs were analyzed by dynamic headspace vacuum in-tube extraction GC-MS (DHS-V-ITEX-GC-MS). Depending on the SPE cartridge, we detected 1174-1312 VOCs per cartridge. Most VOCs were alkenes, alkanes, esters, ketones, alcohols, aldehydes, amines, nitriles, ethers, amides, carboxylic acids, alkynes, azoles, terpenes, pyridines, or sulfur-containing compounds. The six SPE cartridges differed in their specificity for the chemical compounds, with the XAW cartridge showing the best specificity for ketones. The greatest differences between the tested SPE cartridges appeared in the detection of specific VOCs. In total, 176 different VOCs were detected with a match factor >80%. The greatest number of specific VOCs was captured by XAW (149), followed by ENV (118), HLB (117), HRP (115), HRX (114), and XCW (114). We conclude that the tested SPE cartridges are suitable for VOC sampling from exhaled cow breath, but the SPE cartridge choice enormously affects the detected chemical groups and the number of detected VOCs. Therefore, an appropriate SPE adsorbent cartridge should be selected according to our proposed inclusion criteria. For targeted metabolomics approaches, the SPE cartridge choice depends on the VOCs or chemical compound groups of interest based on our provided VOC list. For untargeted approaches without information on the animals' metabolic condition, we suggest using multi-sorbent SPE cartridges or multiple cartridges per animal.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Breath Tests - methods</subject><subject>Cattle</subject><subject>exhalomics</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry - methods</subject><subject>GC-MS</subject><subject>Ketones</subject><subject>Lactation</subject><subject>ruminant</subject><subject>Solid Phase Extraction</subject><subject>VOCs</subject><subject>Volatile organic compounds</subject><subject>Volatile Organic Compounds - analysis</subject><subject>volatilome</subject><issn>1752-7155</issn><issn>1752-7163</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>O3W</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kUmP1DAQhSMEYoaBOydkiQMcCOM1yxGN2KSR5gJnq9pL4pYTGzsZaH4RPxOHHhoJwamqXF-9Z-lV1VOCXxPcdZekFbRuScMuQbNOi3vV-enp_qkX4qx6lPMe44bjrn9YnbFO8FYwel79uImLm9x3WFyYUbDoNvjSe4NCGmB2CqkwxbDOOqMMU_RuHpBNYUIaXDqU7Vdkvo3gjUa7ZGAZ0Zo3JgZ_mEyqd5DLKgfvdB3HMhR8SaB--SlIS3J6MBnZkNAAGamxiMMShgRxLPYwgz9klx9XDyz4bJ7c1Yvq87u3n64-1Nc37z9evbmuFevJUlNKjeqVUli1XGDWKdtopVnLWo4V7blVlvSmUSB6ajtoNWBuoROUN5ZwxS6ql0fdmMKX1eRFTi4r4z3MJqxZMkypaCnmuKDP_0L3YU3lvxvF-p5hwXih8JFSKeScjJUxuQnSQRIstxTlFpPcIpPHFMvJszvhdTcZfTr4HVsBXhwBF-If0_0uSdJJJjFrMCYyalvIV_8g_-v8E0Idt-Y</recordid><startdate>20240701</startdate><enddate>20240701</enddate><creator>Eichinger, Julia</creator><creator>Reiche, Anna-Maria</creator><creator>Dohme-Meier, Frigga</creator><creator>Fuchsmann, Pascal</creator><general>IOP Publishing</general><scope>O3W</scope><scope>TSCCA</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1013-5657</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240701</creationdate><title>Optimization of volatile organic compounds sampling from dairy cow exhaled breath using polymer-based solid-phase extraction cartridges for gas chromatographic analysis</title><author>Eichinger, Julia ; Reiche, Anna-Maria ; Dohme-Meier, Frigga ; Fuchsmann, Pascal</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-222ec9ccc0c745038cf6dcd373740c294fcf19e6ca592f8a7da04fa85246f14c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Breath Tests - methods</topic><topic>Cattle</topic><topic>exhalomics</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry - methods</topic><topic>GC-MS</topic><topic>Ketones</topic><topic>Lactation</topic><topic>ruminant</topic><topic>Solid Phase Extraction</topic><topic>VOCs</topic><topic>Volatile organic compounds</topic><topic>Volatile Organic Compounds - analysis</topic><topic>volatilome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Eichinger, Julia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reiche, Anna-Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dohme-Meier, Frigga</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fuchsmann, Pascal</creatorcontrib><collection>IOP Publishing Free Content</collection><collection>IOPscience (Open Access)</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of breath research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Eichinger, Julia</au><au>Reiche, Anna-Maria</au><au>Dohme-Meier, Frigga</au><au>Fuchsmann, Pascal</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Optimization of volatile organic compounds sampling from dairy cow exhaled breath using polymer-based solid-phase extraction cartridges for gas chromatographic analysis</atitle><jtitle>Journal of breath research</jtitle><stitle>JBR</stitle><addtitle>J. Breath Res</addtitle><date>2024-07-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>36001</spage><pages>36001-</pages><issn>1752-7155</issn><eissn>1752-7163</eissn><coden>JBROBW</coden><abstract>We explored appropriate technical setups for the detection of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from exhaled cow breath by comparing six different polymer-based solid-phase extraction (SPE) cartridges currently on the market for gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC-MS) screening. Exhaled breath was sampled at a single timepoint from five lactating dairy cows using six different SPE cartridges (Bond Elut ENV (ENV); Chromabond HRX (HRX); Chromabond HRP (HRP); Chromabond HLB (HLB); Chromabond HR-XCW (XCW) and Chromabond HR-XAW (XAW)). The trapped VOCs were analyzed by dynamic headspace vacuum in-tube extraction GC-MS (DHS-V-ITEX-GC-MS). Depending on the SPE cartridge, we detected 1174-1312 VOCs per cartridge. Most VOCs were alkenes, alkanes, esters, ketones, alcohols, aldehydes, amines, nitriles, ethers, amides, carboxylic acids, alkynes, azoles, terpenes, pyridines, or sulfur-containing compounds. The six SPE cartridges differed in their specificity for the chemical compounds, with the XAW cartridge showing the best specificity for ketones. The greatest differences between the tested SPE cartridges appeared in the detection of specific VOCs. In total, 176 different VOCs were detected with a match factor >80%. The greatest number of specific VOCs was captured by XAW (149), followed by ENV (118), HLB (117), HRP (115), HRX (114), and XCW (114). We conclude that the tested SPE cartridges are suitable for VOC sampling from exhaled cow breath, but the SPE cartridge choice enormously affects the detected chemical groups and the number of detected VOCs. Therefore, an appropriate SPE adsorbent cartridge should be selected according to our proposed inclusion criteria. For targeted metabolomics approaches, the SPE cartridge choice depends on the VOCs or chemical compound groups of interest based on our provided VOC list. For untargeted approaches without information on the animals' metabolic condition, we suggest using multi-sorbent SPE cartridges or multiple cartridges per animal.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>IOP Publishing</pub><pmid>38547532</pmid><doi>10.1088/1752-7163/ad38d5</doi><tpages>17</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1013-5657</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1752-7155 |
ispartof | Journal of breath research, 2024-07, Vol.18 (3), p.36001 |
issn | 1752-7155 1752-7163 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_3039930534 |
source | MEDLINE; IOP Publishing Journals; Institute of Physics (IOP) Journals - HEAL-Link |
subjects | Animals Breath Tests - methods Cattle exhalomics Female Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry - methods GC-MS Ketones Lactation ruminant Solid Phase Extraction VOCs Volatile organic compounds Volatile Organic Compounds - analysis volatilome |
title | Optimization of volatile organic compounds sampling from dairy cow exhaled breath using polymer-based solid-phase extraction cartridges for gas chromatographic analysis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T15%3A55%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Optimization%20of%20volatile%20organic%20compounds%20sampling%20from%20dairy%20cow%20exhaled%20breath%20using%20polymer-based%20solid-phase%20extraction%20cartridges%20for%20gas%20chromatographic%20analysis&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20breath%20research&rft.au=Eichinger,%20Julia&rft.date=2024-07-01&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=36001&rft.pages=36001-&rft.issn=1752-7155&rft.eissn=1752-7163&rft.coden=JBROBW&rft_id=info:doi/10.1088/1752-7163/ad38d5&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3022572040%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3039930534&rft_id=info:pmid/38547532&rfr_iscdi=true |