Optimization of volatile organic compounds sampling from dairy cow exhaled breath using polymer-based solid-phase extraction cartridges for gas chromatographic analysis

We explored appropriate technical setups for the detection of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from exhaled cow breath by comparing six different polymer-based solid-phase extraction (SPE) cartridges currently on the market for gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC-MS) screening. Exhaled breath...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of breath research 2024-07, Vol.18 (3), p.36001
Hauptverfasser: Eichinger, Julia, Reiche, Anna-Maria, Dohme-Meier, Frigga, Fuchsmann, Pascal
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 3
container_start_page 36001
container_title Journal of breath research
container_volume 18
creator Eichinger, Julia
Reiche, Anna-Maria
Dohme-Meier, Frigga
Fuchsmann, Pascal
description We explored appropriate technical setups for the detection of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from exhaled cow breath by comparing six different polymer-based solid-phase extraction (SPE) cartridges currently on the market for gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC-MS) screening. Exhaled breath was sampled at a single timepoint from five lactating dairy cows using six different SPE cartridges (Bond Elut ENV (ENV); Chromabond HRX (HRX); Chromabond HRP (HRP); Chromabond HLB (HLB); Chromabond HR-XCW (XCW) and Chromabond HR-XAW (XAW)). The trapped VOCs were analyzed by dynamic headspace vacuum in-tube extraction GC-MS (DHS-V-ITEX-GC-MS). Depending on the SPE cartridge, we detected 1174-1312 VOCs per cartridge. Most VOCs were alkenes, alkanes, esters, ketones, alcohols, aldehydes, amines, nitriles, ethers, amides, carboxylic acids, alkynes, azoles, terpenes, pyridines, or sulfur-containing compounds. The six SPE cartridges differed in their specificity for the chemical compounds, with the XAW cartridge showing the best specificity for ketones. The greatest differences between the tested SPE cartridges appeared in the detection of specific VOCs. In total, 176 different VOCs were detected with a match factor >80%. The greatest number of specific VOCs was captured by XAW (149), followed by ENV (118), HLB (117), HRP (115), HRX (114), and XCW (114). We conclude that the tested SPE cartridges are suitable for VOC sampling from exhaled cow breath, but the SPE cartridge choice enormously affects the detected chemical groups and the number of detected VOCs. Therefore, an appropriate SPE adsorbent cartridge should be selected according to our proposed inclusion criteria. For targeted metabolomics approaches, the SPE cartridge choice depends on the VOCs or chemical compound groups of interest based on our provided VOC list. For untargeted approaches without information on the animals' metabolic condition, we suggest using multi-sorbent SPE cartridges or multiple cartridges per animal.
doi_str_mv 10.1088/1752-7163/ad38d5
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3039930534</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3022572040</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-222ec9ccc0c745038cf6dcd373740c294fcf19e6ca592f8a7da04fa85246f14c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kUmP1DAQhSMEYoaBOydkiQMcCOM1yxGN2KSR5gJnq9pL4pYTGzsZaH4RPxOHHhoJwamqXF-9Z-lV1VOCXxPcdZekFbRuScMuQbNOi3vV-enp_qkX4qx6lPMe44bjrn9YnbFO8FYwel79uImLm9x3WFyYUbDoNvjSe4NCGmB2CqkwxbDOOqMMU_RuHpBNYUIaXDqU7Vdkvo3gjUa7ZGAZ0Zo3JgZ_mEyqd5DLKgfvdB3HMhR8SaB--SlIS3J6MBnZkNAAGamxiMMShgRxLPYwgz9klx9XDyz4bJ7c1Yvq87u3n64-1Nc37z9evbmuFevJUlNKjeqVUli1XGDWKdtopVnLWo4V7blVlvSmUSB6ajtoNWBuoROUN5ZwxS6ql0fdmMKX1eRFTi4r4z3MJqxZMkypaCnmuKDP_0L3YU3lvxvF-p5hwXih8JFSKeScjJUxuQnSQRIstxTlFpPcIpPHFMvJszvhdTcZfTr4HVsBXhwBF-If0_0uSdJJJjFrMCYyalvIV_8g_-v8E0Idt-Y</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3039930534</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Optimization of volatile organic compounds sampling from dairy cow exhaled breath using polymer-based solid-phase extraction cartridges for gas chromatographic analysis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>IOP Publishing Journals</source><source>Institute of Physics (IOP) Journals - HEAL-Link</source><creator>Eichinger, Julia ; Reiche, Anna-Maria ; Dohme-Meier, Frigga ; Fuchsmann, Pascal</creator><creatorcontrib>Eichinger, Julia ; Reiche, Anna-Maria ; Dohme-Meier, Frigga ; Fuchsmann, Pascal</creatorcontrib><description>We explored appropriate technical setups for the detection of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from exhaled cow breath by comparing six different polymer-based solid-phase extraction (SPE) cartridges currently on the market for gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC-MS) screening. Exhaled breath was sampled at a single timepoint from five lactating dairy cows using six different SPE cartridges (Bond Elut ENV (ENV); Chromabond HRX (HRX); Chromabond HRP (HRP); Chromabond HLB (HLB); Chromabond HR-XCW (XCW) and Chromabond HR-XAW (XAW)). The trapped VOCs were analyzed by dynamic headspace vacuum in-tube extraction GC-MS (DHS-V-ITEX-GC-MS). Depending on the SPE cartridge, we detected 1174-1312 VOCs per cartridge. Most VOCs were alkenes, alkanes, esters, ketones, alcohols, aldehydes, amines, nitriles, ethers, amides, carboxylic acids, alkynes, azoles, terpenes, pyridines, or sulfur-containing compounds. The six SPE cartridges differed in their specificity for the chemical compounds, with the XAW cartridge showing the best specificity for ketones. The greatest differences between the tested SPE cartridges appeared in the detection of specific VOCs. In total, 176 different VOCs were detected with a match factor &gt;80%. The greatest number of specific VOCs was captured by XAW (149), followed by ENV (118), HLB (117), HRP (115), HRX (114), and XCW (114). We conclude that the tested SPE cartridges are suitable for VOC sampling from exhaled cow breath, but the SPE cartridge choice enormously affects the detected chemical groups and the number of detected VOCs. Therefore, an appropriate SPE adsorbent cartridge should be selected according to our proposed inclusion criteria. For targeted metabolomics approaches, the SPE cartridge choice depends on the VOCs or chemical compound groups of interest based on our provided VOC list. For untargeted approaches without information on the animals' metabolic condition, we suggest using multi-sorbent SPE cartridges or multiple cartridges per animal.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1752-7155</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1752-7163</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1088/1752-7163/ad38d5</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38547532</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JBROBW</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: IOP Publishing</publisher><subject>Animals ; Breath Tests - methods ; Cattle ; exhalomics ; Female ; Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry - methods ; GC-MS ; Ketones ; Lactation ; ruminant ; Solid Phase Extraction ; VOCs ; Volatile organic compounds ; Volatile Organic Compounds - analysis ; volatilome</subject><ispartof>Journal of breath research, 2024-07, Vol.18 (3), p.36001</ispartof><rights>2024 The Author(s). Published by IOP Publishing Ltd</rights><rights>Creative Commons Attribution license.</rights><rights>2024 The Author(s). Published by IOP Publishing Ltd. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-222ec9ccc0c745038cf6dcd373740c294fcf19e6ca592f8a7da04fa85246f14c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1013-5657</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1752-7163/ad38d5/pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Giop$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,53821,53868</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38547532$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Eichinger, Julia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reiche, Anna-Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dohme-Meier, Frigga</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fuchsmann, Pascal</creatorcontrib><title>Optimization of volatile organic compounds sampling from dairy cow exhaled breath using polymer-based solid-phase extraction cartridges for gas chromatographic analysis</title><title>Journal of breath research</title><addtitle>JBR</addtitle><addtitle>J. Breath Res</addtitle><description>We explored appropriate technical setups for the detection of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from exhaled cow breath by comparing six different polymer-based solid-phase extraction (SPE) cartridges currently on the market for gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC-MS) screening. Exhaled breath was sampled at a single timepoint from five lactating dairy cows using six different SPE cartridges (Bond Elut ENV (ENV); Chromabond HRX (HRX); Chromabond HRP (HRP); Chromabond HLB (HLB); Chromabond HR-XCW (XCW) and Chromabond HR-XAW (XAW)). The trapped VOCs were analyzed by dynamic headspace vacuum in-tube extraction GC-MS (DHS-V-ITEX-GC-MS). Depending on the SPE cartridge, we detected 1174-1312 VOCs per cartridge. Most VOCs were alkenes, alkanes, esters, ketones, alcohols, aldehydes, amines, nitriles, ethers, amides, carboxylic acids, alkynes, azoles, terpenes, pyridines, or sulfur-containing compounds. The six SPE cartridges differed in their specificity for the chemical compounds, with the XAW cartridge showing the best specificity for ketones. The greatest differences between the tested SPE cartridges appeared in the detection of specific VOCs. In total, 176 different VOCs were detected with a match factor &gt;80%. The greatest number of specific VOCs was captured by XAW (149), followed by ENV (118), HLB (117), HRP (115), HRX (114), and XCW (114). We conclude that the tested SPE cartridges are suitable for VOC sampling from exhaled cow breath, but the SPE cartridge choice enormously affects the detected chemical groups and the number of detected VOCs. Therefore, an appropriate SPE adsorbent cartridge should be selected according to our proposed inclusion criteria. For targeted metabolomics approaches, the SPE cartridge choice depends on the VOCs or chemical compound groups of interest based on our provided VOC list. For untargeted approaches without information on the animals' metabolic condition, we suggest using multi-sorbent SPE cartridges or multiple cartridges per animal.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Breath Tests - methods</subject><subject>Cattle</subject><subject>exhalomics</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry - methods</subject><subject>GC-MS</subject><subject>Ketones</subject><subject>Lactation</subject><subject>ruminant</subject><subject>Solid Phase Extraction</subject><subject>VOCs</subject><subject>Volatile organic compounds</subject><subject>Volatile Organic Compounds - analysis</subject><subject>volatilome</subject><issn>1752-7155</issn><issn>1752-7163</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>O3W</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kUmP1DAQhSMEYoaBOydkiQMcCOM1yxGN2KSR5gJnq9pL4pYTGzsZaH4RPxOHHhoJwamqXF-9Z-lV1VOCXxPcdZekFbRuScMuQbNOi3vV-enp_qkX4qx6lPMe44bjrn9YnbFO8FYwel79uImLm9x3WFyYUbDoNvjSe4NCGmB2CqkwxbDOOqMMU_RuHpBNYUIaXDqU7Vdkvo3gjUa7ZGAZ0Zo3JgZ_mEyqd5DLKgfvdB3HMhR8SaB--SlIS3J6MBnZkNAAGamxiMMShgRxLPYwgz9klx9XDyz4bJ7c1Yvq87u3n64-1Nc37z9evbmuFevJUlNKjeqVUli1XGDWKdtopVnLWo4V7blVlvSmUSB6ajtoNWBuoROUN5ZwxS6ql0fdmMKX1eRFTi4r4z3MJqxZMkypaCnmuKDP_0L3YU3lvxvF-p5hwXih8JFSKeScjJUxuQnSQRIstxTlFpPcIpPHFMvJszvhdTcZfTr4HVsBXhwBF-If0_0uSdJJJjFrMCYyalvIV_8g_-v8E0Idt-Y</recordid><startdate>20240701</startdate><enddate>20240701</enddate><creator>Eichinger, Julia</creator><creator>Reiche, Anna-Maria</creator><creator>Dohme-Meier, Frigga</creator><creator>Fuchsmann, Pascal</creator><general>IOP Publishing</general><scope>O3W</scope><scope>TSCCA</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1013-5657</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240701</creationdate><title>Optimization of volatile organic compounds sampling from dairy cow exhaled breath using polymer-based solid-phase extraction cartridges for gas chromatographic analysis</title><author>Eichinger, Julia ; Reiche, Anna-Maria ; Dohme-Meier, Frigga ; Fuchsmann, Pascal</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-222ec9ccc0c745038cf6dcd373740c294fcf19e6ca592f8a7da04fa85246f14c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Breath Tests - methods</topic><topic>Cattle</topic><topic>exhalomics</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry - methods</topic><topic>GC-MS</topic><topic>Ketones</topic><topic>Lactation</topic><topic>ruminant</topic><topic>Solid Phase Extraction</topic><topic>VOCs</topic><topic>Volatile organic compounds</topic><topic>Volatile Organic Compounds - analysis</topic><topic>volatilome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Eichinger, Julia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reiche, Anna-Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dohme-Meier, Frigga</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fuchsmann, Pascal</creatorcontrib><collection>IOP Publishing Free Content</collection><collection>IOPscience (Open Access)</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of breath research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Eichinger, Julia</au><au>Reiche, Anna-Maria</au><au>Dohme-Meier, Frigga</au><au>Fuchsmann, Pascal</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Optimization of volatile organic compounds sampling from dairy cow exhaled breath using polymer-based solid-phase extraction cartridges for gas chromatographic analysis</atitle><jtitle>Journal of breath research</jtitle><stitle>JBR</stitle><addtitle>J. Breath Res</addtitle><date>2024-07-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>36001</spage><pages>36001-</pages><issn>1752-7155</issn><eissn>1752-7163</eissn><coden>JBROBW</coden><abstract>We explored appropriate technical setups for the detection of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from exhaled cow breath by comparing six different polymer-based solid-phase extraction (SPE) cartridges currently on the market for gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC-MS) screening. Exhaled breath was sampled at a single timepoint from five lactating dairy cows using six different SPE cartridges (Bond Elut ENV (ENV); Chromabond HRX (HRX); Chromabond HRP (HRP); Chromabond HLB (HLB); Chromabond HR-XCW (XCW) and Chromabond HR-XAW (XAW)). The trapped VOCs were analyzed by dynamic headspace vacuum in-tube extraction GC-MS (DHS-V-ITEX-GC-MS). Depending on the SPE cartridge, we detected 1174-1312 VOCs per cartridge. Most VOCs were alkenes, alkanes, esters, ketones, alcohols, aldehydes, amines, nitriles, ethers, amides, carboxylic acids, alkynes, azoles, terpenes, pyridines, or sulfur-containing compounds. The six SPE cartridges differed in their specificity for the chemical compounds, with the XAW cartridge showing the best specificity for ketones. The greatest differences between the tested SPE cartridges appeared in the detection of specific VOCs. In total, 176 different VOCs were detected with a match factor &gt;80%. The greatest number of specific VOCs was captured by XAW (149), followed by ENV (118), HLB (117), HRP (115), HRX (114), and XCW (114). We conclude that the tested SPE cartridges are suitable for VOC sampling from exhaled cow breath, but the SPE cartridge choice enormously affects the detected chemical groups and the number of detected VOCs. Therefore, an appropriate SPE adsorbent cartridge should be selected according to our proposed inclusion criteria. For targeted metabolomics approaches, the SPE cartridge choice depends on the VOCs or chemical compound groups of interest based on our provided VOC list. For untargeted approaches without information on the animals' metabolic condition, we suggest using multi-sorbent SPE cartridges or multiple cartridges per animal.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>IOP Publishing</pub><pmid>38547532</pmid><doi>10.1088/1752-7163/ad38d5</doi><tpages>17</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1013-5657</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1752-7155
ispartof Journal of breath research, 2024-07, Vol.18 (3), p.36001
issn 1752-7155
1752-7163
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_3039930534
source MEDLINE; IOP Publishing Journals; Institute of Physics (IOP) Journals - HEAL-Link
subjects Animals
Breath Tests - methods
Cattle
exhalomics
Female
Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry - methods
GC-MS
Ketones
Lactation
ruminant
Solid Phase Extraction
VOCs
Volatile organic compounds
Volatile Organic Compounds - analysis
volatilome
title Optimization of volatile organic compounds sampling from dairy cow exhaled breath using polymer-based solid-phase extraction cartridges for gas chromatographic analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T15%3A55%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Optimization%20of%20volatile%20organic%20compounds%20sampling%20from%20dairy%20cow%20exhaled%20breath%20using%20polymer-based%20solid-phase%20extraction%20cartridges%20for%20gas%20chromatographic%20analysis&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20breath%20research&rft.au=Eichinger,%20Julia&rft.date=2024-07-01&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=36001&rft.pages=36001-&rft.issn=1752-7155&rft.eissn=1752-7163&rft.coden=JBROBW&rft_id=info:doi/10.1088/1752-7163/ad38d5&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3022572040%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3039930534&rft_id=info:pmid/38547532&rfr_iscdi=true