Living a Path of Mutual Respect: Technological Stone Ontologies in the Horn of Africa

Boreda Indigenous knowledge prescribed that humans respect all entities with whom they co-inhabit, including stone. Humans, stone, and water’s reciprocal relationships prompted their participation in each other becoming fetuses, infants, children, youth, married adults, mature adults, elders, and an...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:	Archaeologies 2024-04, Vol.20 (1), p.327-351
1. Verfasser:	Arthur, Kathryn Weedman
Format:	Artikel
Sprache:	eng
Schlagworte:	Anthropology Archaeology Cultural Heritage Indigenous knowledge Social Sciences
Online-Zugang:	Volltext
Tags:	Tag hinzufügen Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!

container_end_page	351
container_issue	1
container_start_page	327
container_title	Archaeologies
container_volume	20
creator	Arthur, Kathryn Weedman
description	Boreda Indigenous knowledge prescribed that humans respect all entities with whom they co-inhabit, including stone. Humans, stone, and water’s reciprocal relationships prompted their participation in each other becoming fetuses, infants, children, youth, married adults, mature adults, elders, and ancestors. Life was a co-production between humans and non-humans, such that stone and water could inflict harm or bring well-being to humans. Non-human beings, such as flaked stone tools, were evidence of engaging in correct interaction ‘practice’ (time, place, and actor) with other beings—a process of mutual respect and responsibility and one in which there was no end or final “product.”
doi_str_mv	10.1007/s11759-024-09500-0
format	Article
fullrecord	<record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3034029502</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3034029502</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c270t-4fd5342dd99f05bb4308ef5045fbefe63de92458453663b7fd902e4892371c403</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWKt_wFPA8-rka3fjrRS1QqWi7TnsR9JuqUlNsoL_3rQrePM0w_C878CD0DWBWwJQ3AVCCiEzoDwDKQAyOEEjIpnImCyL07QLIbIyp_QcXYSwBRBcSjJCq3n31dk1rvBrFTfYGfzSx77a4Tcd9rqJ93ipm411O7fumnR-j85qvLDxeNEBdxbHjcYz5-0hPTE-cZfozFS7oK9-5xitHh-W01k2Xzw9TyfzrKEFxIybVjBO21ZKA6KuOYNSGwFcmFobnbNWS8pFyQXLc1YXppVANS8lZQVpOLAxuhl699599jpEtXW9t-mlYsA40OSCJooOVONdCF4btffdR-W_FQF10KcGfSrpU0d96lDNhlBIsF1r_1f9T-oHDZJxAA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3034029502</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Living a Path of Mutual Respect: Technological Stone Ontologies in the Horn of Africa</title><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Arthur, Kathryn Weedman</creator><creatorcontrib>Arthur, Kathryn Weedman</creatorcontrib><description>Boreda Indigenous knowledge prescribed that humans respect all entities with whom they co-inhabit, including stone. Humans, stone, and water’s reciprocal relationships prompted their participation in each other becoming fetuses, infants, children, youth, married adults, mature adults, elders, and ancestors. Life was a co-production between humans and non-humans, such that stone and water could inflict harm or bring well-being to humans. Non-human beings, such as flaked stone tools, were evidence of engaging in correct interaction ‘practice’ (time, place, and actor) with other beings—a process of mutual respect and responsibility and one in which there was no end or final “product.”</description><identifier>ISSN: 1555-8622</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1935-3987</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11759-024-09500-0</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Anthropology ; Archaeology ; Cultural Heritage ; Indigenous knowledge ; Social Sciences</subject><ispartof>Archaeologies, 2024-04, Vol.20 (1), p.327-351</ispartof><rights>World Archaeological Congress 2024. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c270t-4fd5342dd99f05bb4308ef5045fbefe63de92458453663b7fd902e4892371c403</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2955-6080</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11759-024-09500-0$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11759-024-09500-0$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Arthur, Kathryn Weedman</creatorcontrib><title>Living a Path of Mutual Respect: Technological Stone Ontologies in the Horn of Africa</title><title>Archaeologies</title><addtitle>Arch</addtitle><description>Boreda Indigenous knowledge prescribed that humans respect all entities with whom they co-inhabit, including stone. Humans, stone, and water’s reciprocal relationships prompted their participation in each other becoming fetuses, infants, children, youth, married adults, mature adults, elders, and ancestors. Life was a co-production between humans and non-humans, such that stone and water could inflict harm or bring well-being to humans. Non-human beings, such as flaked stone tools, were evidence of engaging in correct interaction ‘practice’ (time, place, and actor) with other beings—a process of mutual respect and responsibility and one in which there was no end or final “product.”</description><subject>Anthropology</subject><subject>Archaeology</subject><subject>Cultural Heritage</subject><subject>Indigenous knowledge</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><issn>1555-8622</issn><issn>1935-3987</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWKt_wFPA8-rka3fjrRS1QqWi7TnsR9JuqUlNsoL_3rQrePM0w_C878CD0DWBWwJQ3AVCCiEzoDwDKQAyOEEjIpnImCyL07QLIbIyp_QcXYSwBRBcSjJCq3n31dk1rvBrFTfYGfzSx77a4Tcd9rqJ93ipm411O7fumnR-j85qvLDxeNEBdxbHjcYz5-0hPTE-cZfozFS7oK9-5xitHh-W01k2Xzw9TyfzrKEFxIybVjBO21ZKA6KuOYNSGwFcmFobnbNWS8pFyQXLc1YXppVANS8lZQVpOLAxuhl699599jpEtXW9t-mlYsA40OSCJooOVONdCF4btffdR-W_FQF10KcGfSrpU0d96lDNhlBIsF1r_1f9T-oHDZJxAA</recordid><startdate>20240401</startdate><enddate>20240401</enddate><creator>Arthur, Kathryn Weedman</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2955-6080</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240401</creationdate><title>Living a Path of Mutual Respect: Technological Stone Ontologies in the Horn of Africa</title><author>Arthur, Kathryn Weedman</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c270t-4fd5342dd99f05bb4308ef5045fbefe63de92458453663b7fd902e4892371c403</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Anthropology</topic><topic>Archaeology</topic><topic>Cultural Heritage</topic><topic>Indigenous knowledge</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Arthur, Kathryn Weedman</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Archaeologies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Arthur, Kathryn Weedman</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Living a Path of Mutual Respect: Technological Stone Ontologies in the Horn of Africa</atitle><jtitle>Archaeologies</jtitle><stitle>Arch</stitle><date>2024-04-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>327</spage><epage>351</epage><pages>327-351</pages><issn>1555-8622</issn><eissn>1935-3987</eissn><abstract>Boreda Indigenous knowledge prescribed that humans respect all entities with whom they co-inhabit, including stone. Humans, stone, and water’s reciprocal relationships prompted their participation in each other becoming fetuses, infants, children, youth, married adults, mature adults, elders, and ancestors. Life was a co-production between humans and non-humans, such that stone and water could inflict harm or bring well-being to humans. Non-human beings, such as flaked stone tools, were evidence of engaging in correct interaction ‘practice’ (time, place, and actor) with other beings—a process of mutual respect and responsibility and one in which there was no end or final “product.”</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><doi>10.1007/s11759-024-09500-0</doi><tpages>25</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2955-6080</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext	fulltext
identifier	ISSN: 1555-8622
ispartof	Archaeologies, 2024-04, Vol.20 (1), p.327-351
issn	1555-8622 1935-3987
language	eng
recordid	cdi_proquest_journals_3034029502
source	SpringerLink Journals
subjects	Anthropology Archaeology Cultural Heritage Indigenous knowledge Social Sciences
title	Living a Path of Mutual Respect: Technological Stone Ontologies in the Horn of Africa
url	https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T07%3A39%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Living%20a%20Path%20of%20Mutual%20Respect:%20Technological%20Stone%20Ontologies%20in%20the%20Horn%20of%20Africa&rft.jtitle=Archaeologies&rft.au=Arthur,%20Kathryn%20Weedman&rft.date=2024-04-01&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=327&rft.epage=351&rft.pages=327-351&rft.issn=1555-8622&rft.eissn=1935-3987&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11759-024-09500-0&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3034029502%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3034029502&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true