The Effect of Intergroup Ostracism on Identity and Affective Responses: Exploring the Role of Perceived Discrimination
Objectives: While the effects of interindividual ostracism have been widely studied, the effects of intergroup ostracism have received less attention. In this study, we are interested in the consequences of intergroup ostracism on perceived discrimination, identity responses and well-being. Method:...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Group dynamics 2024-06, Vol.28 (2), p.71-81 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 81 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 71 |
container_title | Group dynamics |
container_volume | 28 |
creator | Jaubert, Thibault Benchaib, Iness Chekroun, Peggy Légal, Jean-Baptiste |
description | Objectives: While the effects of interindividual ostracism have been widely studied, the effects of intergroup ostracism have received less attention. In this study, we are interested in the consequences of intergroup ostracism on perceived discrimination, identity responses and well-being. Method: A total of 110 participants in psychology were randomly assigned to three ostracism experiences. Participants either shared ostracism with an ingroup member, with an outgroup member, or did not share ostracism. Results: The results show that ostracism, whether shared or not, increases identification but does not increase perceived entitativity of the group. The results also show that when ostracism is shared with an outgroup member-the condition with less perceived discrimination-participants indicate more psychological need satisfaction. Discussion: Taken together, these results shed light the importance of considering attributions to discrimination in the phenomenon of ostracism.
Highlights and Implications
*
Participants who attribute ostracism to discrimination display less psychological need satisfaction than participants who perceived less discrimination.
*
Sharing ostracism (i.e., as a coexperience) did not moderate identity responses as well as psychological need satisfaction.
*
This study highlights the importance of considering perceived discrimination during ostracism even among nonstigmatized groups. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1037/gdn0000216 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3031770435</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3031770435</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a253t-59f33c4844f241087bc28fd2acbb0070ff1338c66f2c3b6adcc45875379f34143</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkE1LAzEQhhdRsH5c_AUBb8Jqvnaz663UqoVCpdRzyGaTmrJN1iRb7L83tULnMnN45p153yy7Q_ARQcKe1q2FqTAqz7IRqgnMWQXxeZphVee4rOvL7CqEDYSIkhqNst3qS4Gp1kpG4DSY2aj82ruhB4sQvZAmbIGzYNYqG03cA2FbMP7DzU6BpQq9s0GFZzD96TvnjV2DmBSXrlMHvQ_lpUpkC15MkN5sjRXROHuTXWjRBXX736-zz9fpavKezxdvs8l4ngtckJgXtSZE0opSjWmywBqJK91iIZsGQga1RoRUsiw1lqQpRSslLSpWEJYWabJ4nd0fdXvvvgcVIt-4wdt0khNIEGOQkiJRD0dKeheCV5r36VXh9xxBfsiVn3I9waIXvA97KXw0slNBDt6nlA4sxxXHnCHyC1EaesQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3031770435</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Effect of Intergroup Ostracism on Identity and Affective Responses: Exploring the Role of Perceived Discrimination</title><source>EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES</source><creator>Jaubert, Thibault ; Benchaib, Iness ; Chekroun, Peggy ; Légal, Jean-Baptiste</creator><contributor>Tasca, Giorgio A ; Bonner, Bryan L</contributor><creatorcontrib>Jaubert, Thibault ; Benchaib, Iness ; Chekroun, Peggy ; Légal, Jean-Baptiste ; Tasca, Giorgio A ; Bonner, Bryan L</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives: While the effects of interindividual ostracism have been widely studied, the effects of intergroup ostracism have received less attention. In this study, we are interested in the consequences of intergroup ostracism on perceived discrimination, identity responses and well-being. Method: A total of 110 participants in psychology were randomly assigned to three ostracism experiences. Participants either shared ostracism with an ingroup member, with an outgroup member, or did not share ostracism. Results: The results show that ostracism, whether shared or not, increases identification but does not increase perceived entitativity of the group. The results also show that when ostracism is shared with an outgroup member-the condition with less perceived discrimination-participants indicate more psychological need satisfaction. Discussion: Taken together, these results shed light the importance of considering attributions to discrimination in the phenomenon of ostracism.
Highlights and Implications
*
Participants who attribute ostracism to discrimination display less psychological need satisfaction than participants who perceived less discrimination.
*
Sharing ostracism (i.e., as a coexperience) did not moderate identity responses as well as psychological need satisfaction.
*
This study highlights the importance of considering perceived discrimination during ostracism even among nonstigmatized groups.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1089-2699</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1930-7802</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/gdn0000216</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Educational Publishing Foundation</publisher><subject>Discrimination ; Emotional Responses ; Female ; Group Identity ; Human ; Ingroup Outgroup ; Intergroup Dynamics ; Male ; Psychological Needs ; Social Isolation</subject><ispartof>Group dynamics, 2024-06, Vol.28 (2), p.71-81</ispartof><rights>2024 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>2024, American Psychological Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><orcidid>0000-0001-6410-3971 ; 0000-0002-2520-2157 ; 0000-0001-7944-1690</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Tasca, Giorgio A</contributor><contributor>Bonner, Bryan L</contributor><creatorcontrib>Jaubert, Thibault</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benchaib, Iness</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chekroun, Peggy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Légal, Jean-Baptiste</creatorcontrib><title>The Effect of Intergroup Ostracism on Identity and Affective Responses: Exploring the Role of Perceived Discrimination</title><title>Group dynamics</title><description>Objectives: While the effects of interindividual ostracism have been widely studied, the effects of intergroup ostracism have received less attention. In this study, we are interested in the consequences of intergroup ostracism on perceived discrimination, identity responses and well-being. Method: A total of 110 participants in psychology were randomly assigned to three ostracism experiences. Participants either shared ostracism with an ingroup member, with an outgroup member, or did not share ostracism. Results: The results show that ostracism, whether shared or not, increases identification but does not increase perceived entitativity of the group. The results also show that when ostracism is shared with an outgroup member-the condition with less perceived discrimination-participants indicate more psychological need satisfaction. Discussion: Taken together, these results shed light the importance of considering attributions to discrimination in the phenomenon of ostracism.
Highlights and Implications
*
Participants who attribute ostracism to discrimination display less psychological need satisfaction than participants who perceived less discrimination.
*
Sharing ostracism (i.e., as a coexperience) did not moderate identity responses as well as psychological need satisfaction.
*
This study highlights the importance of considering perceived discrimination during ostracism even among nonstigmatized groups.</description><subject>Discrimination</subject><subject>Emotional Responses</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Group Identity</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Ingroup Outgroup</subject><subject>Intergroup Dynamics</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Psychological Needs</subject><subject>Social Isolation</subject><issn>1089-2699</issn><issn>1930-7802</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpFkE1LAzEQhhdRsH5c_AUBb8Jqvnaz663UqoVCpdRzyGaTmrJN1iRb7L83tULnMnN45p153yy7Q_ARQcKe1q2FqTAqz7IRqgnMWQXxeZphVee4rOvL7CqEDYSIkhqNst3qS4Gp1kpG4DSY2aj82ruhB4sQvZAmbIGzYNYqG03cA2FbMP7DzU6BpQq9s0GFZzD96TvnjV2DmBSXrlMHvQ_lpUpkC15MkN5sjRXROHuTXWjRBXX736-zz9fpavKezxdvs8l4ngtckJgXtSZE0opSjWmywBqJK91iIZsGQga1RoRUsiw1lqQpRSslLSpWEJYWabJ4nd0fdXvvvgcVIt-4wdt0khNIEGOQkiJRD0dKeheCV5r36VXh9xxBfsiVn3I9waIXvA97KXw0slNBDt6nlA4sxxXHnCHyC1EaesQ</recordid><startdate>20240601</startdate><enddate>20240601</enddate><creator>Jaubert, Thibault</creator><creator>Benchaib, Iness</creator><creator>Chekroun, Peggy</creator><creator>Légal, Jean-Baptiste</creator><general>Educational Publishing Foundation</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6410-3971</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2520-2157</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7944-1690</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240601</creationdate><title>The Effect of Intergroup Ostracism on Identity and Affective Responses: Exploring the Role of Perceived Discrimination</title><author>Jaubert, Thibault ; Benchaib, Iness ; Chekroun, Peggy ; Légal, Jean-Baptiste</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a253t-59f33c4844f241087bc28fd2acbb0070ff1338c66f2c3b6adcc45875379f34143</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Discrimination</topic><topic>Emotional Responses</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Group Identity</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Ingroup Outgroup</topic><topic>Intergroup Dynamics</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Psychological Needs</topic><topic>Social Isolation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jaubert, Thibault</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benchaib, Iness</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chekroun, Peggy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Légal, Jean-Baptiste</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PsycARTICLES (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><jtitle>Group dynamics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jaubert, Thibault</au><au>Benchaib, Iness</au><au>Chekroun, Peggy</au><au>Légal, Jean-Baptiste</au><au>Tasca, Giorgio A</au><au>Bonner, Bryan L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Effect of Intergroup Ostracism on Identity and Affective Responses: Exploring the Role of Perceived Discrimination</atitle><jtitle>Group dynamics</jtitle><date>2024-06-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>71</spage><epage>81</epage><pages>71-81</pages><issn>1089-2699</issn><eissn>1930-7802</eissn><abstract>Objectives: While the effects of interindividual ostracism have been widely studied, the effects of intergroup ostracism have received less attention. In this study, we are interested in the consequences of intergroup ostracism on perceived discrimination, identity responses and well-being. Method: A total of 110 participants in psychology were randomly assigned to three ostracism experiences. Participants either shared ostracism with an ingroup member, with an outgroup member, or did not share ostracism. Results: The results show that ostracism, whether shared or not, increases identification but does not increase perceived entitativity of the group. The results also show that when ostracism is shared with an outgroup member-the condition with less perceived discrimination-participants indicate more psychological need satisfaction. Discussion: Taken together, these results shed light the importance of considering attributions to discrimination in the phenomenon of ostracism.
Highlights and Implications
*
Participants who attribute ostracism to discrimination display less psychological need satisfaction than participants who perceived less discrimination.
*
Sharing ostracism (i.e., as a coexperience) did not moderate identity responses as well as psychological need satisfaction.
*
This study highlights the importance of considering perceived discrimination during ostracism even among nonstigmatized groups.</abstract><pub>Educational Publishing Foundation</pub><doi>10.1037/gdn0000216</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6410-3971</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2520-2157</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7944-1690</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1089-2699 |
ispartof | Group dynamics, 2024-06, Vol.28 (2), p.71-81 |
issn | 1089-2699 1930-7802 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_3031770435 |
source | EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES |
subjects | Discrimination Emotional Responses Female Group Identity Human Ingroup Outgroup Intergroup Dynamics Male Psychological Needs Social Isolation |
title | The Effect of Intergroup Ostracism on Identity and Affective Responses: Exploring the Role of Perceived Discrimination |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T16%3A19%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Effect%20of%20Intergroup%20Ostracism%20on%20Identity%20and%20Affective%20Responses:%20Exploring%20the%20Role%20of%20Perceived%20Discrimination&rft.jtitle=Group%20dynamics&rft.au=Jaubert,%20Thibault&rft.date=2024-06-01&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=71&rft.epage=81&rft.pages=71-81&rft.issn=1089-2699&rft.eissn=1930-7802&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/gdn0000216&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3031770435%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3031770435&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |