Intergroup contact and intended actions in support of disadvantaged groups: The role of affective processes and feelings of solidarity
Intergroup contact is a well-established basis of prejudice reduction. However, less is known about its potential to motivate people to act in support of disadvantaged groups. We investigated the associations of both positive and negative intergroup contact with action intentions for disadvantaged g...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Group processes & intergroup relations 2024-04, Vol.27 (3), p.471-496 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 496 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 471 |
container_title | Group processes & intergroup relations |
container_volume | 27 |
creator | Özkan, Zafer Dhont, Kristof Abrams, Dominic |
description | Intergroup contact is a well-established basis of prejudice reduction. However, less is known about its potential to motivate people to act in support of disadvantaged groups. We investigated the associations of both positive and negative intergroup contact with action intentions for disadvantaged groups among members of ethnic majority groups from different intergroup contexts, including non-WEIRD samples. Furthermore, we tested the role of affective processes and feelings of solidarity as psychological processes explaining these associations. In three cross-sectional studies (total N = 962) from Greece, Thailand, and Turkey, positive and negative contact experiences were associated with, respectively, stronger and weaker intended actions. These associations were particularly pronounced for positive contact. Contact measures were also related to stronger intentions to donate and distribute money in favor of the disadvantaged group (Study 3). A three-wave longitudinal study conducted in the UK (Study 4, N = 603) confirmed the association for positive contact but not for negative contact. Feelings of solidarity emerged as the most consistent mediator, followed by outgroup empathy and, to a lesser extent, group-based anger. Together, these findings show that contact can be an important factor motivating advantaged group members to act in solidarity with disadvantaged groups, and highlight the mediating factors in this process. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/13684302231174402 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3031574975</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_13684302231174402</sage_id><sourcerecordid>3031574975</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-134668159612daaed36a34ca77f7421b9f3352e6cc0c1ff4c6fa0e3befd53523</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1OwzAQhC0EEqXwANwscU7xxo6dckMVP5Uqcek9cu11SRXiYCeV-gI8N06LxAFxsj37zaw1hNwCmwEodQ9cloKzPOfpKQTLz8gEhIRMQVmep3uaZyNwSa5i3DHGchBsQr6WbY9hG_zQUePbXpue6tbSOsmtRUuTUPs2JoHGoet86Kl31NZR271O_DYxR3t8oOt3pME3OBLaOUzWPdIueIMxYjwGO8SmbrdxZKJvaqtD3R-uyYXTTcSbn3NK1s9P68Vrtnp7WS4eV5nhRdFnwIWUJRRzCbnVGi2XmgujlXJK5LCZO86LHKUxzIBzwkinGfINOlukAZ-Su1Ns-tPngLGvdn4IbdpYccahUGKuikTBiTLBxxjQVV2oP3Q4VMCqse3qT9vJMzt5YmrkN_V_wzf4f4F6</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3031574975</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Intergroup contact and intended actions in support of disadvantaged groups: The role of affective processes and feelings of solidarity</title><source>SAGE Complete</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Özkan, Zafer ; Dhont, Kristof ; Abrams, Dominic</creator><creatorcontrib>Özkan, Zafer ; Dhont, Kristof ; Abrams, Dominic</creatorcontrib><description>Intergroup contact is a well-established basis of prejudice reduction. However, less is known about its potential to motivate people to act in support of disadvantaged groups. We investigated the associations of both positive and negative intergroup contact with action intentions for disadvantaged groups among members of ethnic majority groups from different intergroup contexts, including non-WEIRD samples. Furthermore, we tested the role of affective processes and feelings of solidarity as psychological processes explaining these associations. In three cross-sectional studies (total N = 962) from Greece, Thailand, and Turkey, positive and negative contact experiences were associated with, respectively, stronger and weaker intended actions. These associations were particularly pronounced for positive contact. Contact measures were also related to stronger intentions to donate and distribute money in favor of the disadvantaged group (Study 3). A three-wave longitudinal study conducted in the UK (Study 4, N = 603) confirmed the association for positive contact but not for negative contact. Feelings of solidarity emerged as the most consistent mediator, followed by outgroup empathy and, to a lesser extent, group-based anger. Together, these findings show that contact can be an important factor motivating advantaged group members to act in solidarity with disadvantaged groups, and highlight the mediating factors in this process.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1368-4302</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1461-7188</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/13684302231174402</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Anger ; Associations ; Cross-sectional studies ; Disadvantaged ; Emotions ; Empathy ; Ethnic groups ; Group identity ; Intergroup contact ; Intergroup relations ; Majority groups ; Minority groups ; Money ; Prejudice ; Psychological processes ; Social contact</subject><ispartof>Group processes & intergroup relations, 2024-04, Vol.27 (3), p.471-496</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2023</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-134668159612daaed36a34ca77f7421b9f3352e6cc0c1ff4c6fa0e3befd53523</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-134668159612daaed36a34ca77f7421b9f3352e6cc0c1ff4c6fa0e3befd53523</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7831-2491 ; 0000-0002-2113-4572</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/13684302231174402$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/13684302231174402$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21799,27903,27904,33753,43600,43601</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Özkan, Zafer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dhont, Kristof</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abrams, Dominic</creatorcontrib><title>Intergroup contact and intended actions in support of disadvantaged groups: The role of affective processes and feelings of solidarity</title><title>Group processes & intergroup relations</title><description>Intergroup contact is a well-established basis of prejudice reduction. However, less is known about its potential to motivate people to act in support of disadvantaged groups. We investigated the associations of both positive and negative intergroup contact with action intentions for disadvantaged groups among members of ethnic majority groups from different intergroup contexts, including non-WEIRD samples. Furthermore, we tested the role of affective processes and feelings of solidarity as psychological processes explaining these associations. In three cross-sectional studies (total N = 962) from Greece, Thailand, and Turkey, positive and negative contact experiences were associated with, respectively, stronger and weaker intended actions. These associations were particularly pronounced for positive contact. Contact measures were also related to stronger intentions to donate and distribute money in favor of the disadvantaged group (Study 3). A three-wave longitudinal study conducted in the UK (Study 4, N = 603) confirmed the association for positive contact but not for negative contact. Feelings of solidarity emerged as the most consistent mediator, followed by outgroup empathy and, to a lesser extent, group-based anger. Together, these findings show that contact can be an important factor motivating advantaged group members to act in solidarity with disadvantaged groups, and highlight the mediating factors in this process.</description><subject>Anger</subject><subject>Associations</subject><subject>Cross-sectional studies</subject><subject>Disadvantaged</subject><subject>Emotions</subject><subject>Empathy</subject><subject>Ethnic groups</subject><subject>Group identity</subject><subject>Intergroup contact</subject><subject>Intergroup relations</subject><subject>Majority groups</subject><subject>Minority groups</subject><subject>Money</subject><subject>Prejudice</subject><subject>Psychological processes</subject><subject>Social contact</subject><issn>1368-4302</issn><issn>1461-7188</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFRWT</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kM1OwzAQhC0EEqXwANwscU7xxo6dckMVP5Uqcek9cu11SRXiYCeV-gI8N06LxAFxsj37zaw1hNwCmwEodQ9cloKzPOfpKQTLz8gEhIRMQVmep3uaZyNwSa5i3DHGchBsQr6WbY9hG_zQUePbXpue6tbSOsmtRUuTUPs2JoHGoet86Kl31NZR271O_DYxR3t8oOt3pME3OBLaOUzWPdIueIMxYjwGO8SmbrdxZKJvaqtD3R-uyYXTTcSbn3NK1s9P68Vrtnp7WS4eV5nhRdFnwIWUJRRzCbnVGi2XmgujlXJK5LCZO86LHKUxzIBzwkinGfINOlukAZ-Su1Ns-tPngLGvdn4IbdpYccahUGKuikTBiTLBxxjQVV2oP3Q4VMCqse3qT9vJMzt5YmrkN_V_wzf4f4F6</recordid><startdate>202404</startdate><enddate>202404</enddate><creator>Özkan, Zafer</creator><creator>Dhont, Kristof</creator><creator>Abrams, Dominic</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>AFRWT</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K7.</scope><scope>WZK</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7831-2491</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2113-4572</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202404</creationdate><title>Intergroup contact and intended actions in support of disadvantaged groups: The role of affective processes and feelings of solidarity</title><author>Özkan, Zafer ; Dhont, Kristof ; Abrams, Dominic</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-134668159612daaed36a34ca77f7421b9f3352e6cc0c1ff4c6fa0e3befd53523</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Anger</topic><topic>Associations</topic><topic>Cross-sectional studies</topic><topic>Disadvantaged</topic><topic>Emotions</topic><topic>Empathy</topic><topic>Ethnic groups</topic><topic>Group identity</topic><topic>Intergroup contact</topic><topic>Intergroup relations</topic><topic>Majority groups</topic><topic>Minority groups</topic><topic>Money</topic><topic>Prejudice</topic><topic>Psychological processes</topic><topic>Social contact</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Özkan, Zafer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dhont, Kristof</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abrams, Dominic</creatorcontrib><collection>Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Group processes & intergroup relations</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Özkan, Zafer</au><au>Dhont, Kristof</au><au>Abrams, Dominic</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Intergroup contact and intended actions in support of disadvantaged groups: The role of affective processes and feelings of solidarity</atitle><jtitle>Group processes & intergroup relations</jtitle><date>2024-04</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>471</spage><epage>496</epage><pages>471-496</pages><issn>1368-4302</issn><eissn>1461-7188</eissn><abstract>Intergroup contact is a well-established basis of prejudice reduction. However, less is known about its potential to motivate people to act in support of disadvantaged groups. We investigated the associations of both positive and negative intergroup contact with action intentions for disadvantaged groups among members of ethnic majority groups from different intergroup contexts, including non-WEIRD samples. Furthermore, we tested the role of affective processes and feelings of solidarity as psychological processes explaining these associations. In three cross-sectional studies (total N = 962) from Greece, Thailand, and Turkey, positive and negative contact experiences were associated with, respectively, stronger and weaker intended actions. These associations were particularly pronounced for positive contact. Contact measures were also related to stronger intentions to donate and distribute money in favor of the disadvantaged group (Study 3). A three-wave longitudinal study conducted in the UK (Study 4, N = 603) confirmed the association for positive contact but not for negative contact. Feelings of solidarity emerged as the most consistent mediator, followed by outgroup empathy and, to a lesser extent, group-based anger. Together, these findings show that contact can be an important factor motivating advantaged group members to act in solidarity with disadvantaged groups, and highlight the mediating factors in this process.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/13684302231174402</doi><tpages>26</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7831-2491</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2113-4572</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1368-4302 |
ispartof | Group processes & intergroup relations, 2024-04, Vol.27 (3), p.471-496 |
issn | 1368-4302 1461-7188 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_3031574975 |
source | SAGE Complete; Sociological Abstracts |
subjects | Anger Associations Cross-sectional studies Disadvantaged Emotions Empathy Ethnic groups Group identity Intergroup contact Intergroup relations Majority groups Minority groups Money Prejudice Psychological processes Social contact |
title | Intergroup contact and intended actions in support of disadvantaged groups: The role of affective processes and feelings of solidarity |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T07%3A05%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Intergroup%20contact%20and%20intended%20actions%20in%20support%20of%20disadvantaged%20groups:%20The%20role%20of%20affective%20processes%20and%20feelings%20of%20solidarity&rft.jtitle=Group%20processes%20&%20intergroup%20relations&rft.au=%C3%96zkan,%20Zafer&rft.date=2024-04&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=471&rft.epage=496&rft.pages=471-496&rft.issn=1368-4302&rft.eissn=1461-7188&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/13684302231174402&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3031574975%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3031574975&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_13684302231174402&rfr_iscdi=true |