Best of both worlds: Acclimation to fluctuating environments confers advantages and minimizes costs of constant environments

Thermal acclimation is often considered critical in organismal responses to novel thermal conditions. Our understanding of the physiological implications of acclimation is largely derived from lab studies that either manipulate daytime basking availability or use of constant thermal regimes. In cont...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Functional ecology 2024-04, Vol.38 (4), p.724-738
Hauptverfasser: Hodgson, Mitchell J., Schwanz, Lisa E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 738
container_issue 4
container_start_page 724
container_title Functional ecology
container_volume 38
creator Hodgson, Mitchell J.
Schwanz, Lisa E.
description Thermal acclimation is often considered critical in organismal responses to novel thermal conditions. Our understanding of the physiological implications of acclimation is largely derived from lab studies that either manipulate daytime basking availability or use of constant thermal regimes. In contrast, the importance of the nocturnal thermal environment (e.g. the extent of thermal respite) is often overlooked yet could play a vital role in thermal acclimation in the wild. To fill this gap, we acclimated lizards ( Amphibolurus muricatus ) under three thermal regimes (Hot Constant, Cold Constant and Alternating) and compared their physiological responses (Metabolic Rate, Sprint Speed, Thermal Preferences and Thermal Limits). We found that animals maintained constantly at hot temperatures (preferred temperature, 35°C) gained sprint performance increases and exhibited shifts in thermal optima not seen in those maintained constantly at cold temperatures (20°C), yet suffered costs to growth (in smaller animals) and maintenance (mass loss in larger animals). Animals maintained at alternating temperatures (12 h 20°C; 12 h 35°C) had performance benefits similar to animals in the hot treatment, without experiencing reductions in juvenile growth and adult mass. Animals acclimated under hot temperatures showed a significant lower preferred and voluntary maximum temperatures compared to animals acclimated under a cold temperature regime. We found no impact of acclimation treatment on behavioural thermal limits or standard metabolic rate. Overall, we show that alternating between access to preferred temperatures and having periods of energetic rest confer the greatest benefits for our animals. These results highlight the importance of natural body temperature variation for enhancing overall ectotherm performance and physiology, and the costs of novel thermal environments that fail to provide this variation. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/1365-2435.14522
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3030960310</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3030960310</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c310t-cdffb26d90ce4fddabd9cb4315d2358d478543aec01d7afa2d1d64d5e897104b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkEtLAzEURoMoWKtrtwHX0-Y5nXFXiy8ouNF1yORRp8wkNclUFH-8GSuCd5N7w8l3yQHgEqMZzjXHtOQFYZTPMOOEHIHJ380xmCBS1kXFSnoKzmLcIoTqDE3A142JCXoLG59e4bsPnY7XcKlU1_Yytd7B5KHtBpWGPLoNNG7fBu9641KEyjtrQoRS76VLcmNy6zTsW9f27acZgZixHJ_JmDLz7_05OLGyi-bi95yCl7vb59VDsX66f1wt14WiGKVCaWsbUuoaKcOs1rLRtWoYxVwTyivNFhVnVBqFsF5IK4nGumSam6peYMQaOgVXh9xd8G9D_rDY-iG4vFJQRFFdorwnU_MDpYKPMRgrdiFLCB8CIzEqFqNQMQoVP4rpNx-9cds</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3030960310</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Best of both worlds: Acclimation to fluctuating environments confers advantages and minimizes costs of constant environments</title><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Hodgson, Mitchell J. ; Schwanz, Lisa E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hodgson, Mitchell J. ; Schwanz, Lisa E.</creatorcontrib><description>Thermal acclimation is often considered critical in organismal responses to novel thermal conditions. Our understanding of the physiological implications of acclimation is largely derived from lab studies that either manipulate daytime basking availability or use of constant thermal regimes. In contrast, the importance of the nocturnal thermal environment (e.g. the extent of thermal respite) is often overlooked yet could play a vital role in thermal acclimation in the wild. To fill this gap, we acclimated lizards ( Amphibolurus muricatus ) under three thermal regimes (Hot Constant, Cold Constant and Alternating) and compared their physiological responses (Metabolic Rate, Sprint Speed, Thermal Preferences and Thermal Limits). We found that animals maintained constantly at hot temperatures (preferred temperature, 35°C) gained sprint performance increases and exhibited shifts in thermal optima not seen in those maintained constantly at cold temperatures (20°C), yet suffered costs to growth (in smaller animals) and maintenance (mass loss in larger animals). Animals maintained at alternating temperatures (12 h 20°C; 12 h 35°C) had performance benefits similar to animals in the hot treatment, without experiencing reductions in juvenile growth and adult mass. Animals acclimated under hot temperatures showed a significant lower preferred and voluntary maximum temperatures compared to animals acclimated under a cold temperature regime. We found no impact of acclimation treatment on behavioural thermal limits or standard metabolic rate. Overall, we show that alternating between access to preferred temperatures and having periods of energetic rest confer the greatest benefits for our animals. These results highlight the importance of natural body temperature variation for enhancing overall ectotherm performance and physiology, and the costs of novel thermal environments that fail to provide this variation. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0269-8463</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2435</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/1365-2435.14522</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Acclimation ; Acclimatization ; Animals ; Body temperature ; Cold ; Lizards ; Metabolic rate ; Metabolism ; Physiological responses ; Physiology ; Temperature ; Thermal environments ; Thermoregulatory behavior</subject><ispartof>Functional ecology, 2024-04, Vol.38 (4), p.724-738</ispartof><rights>2024. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c310t-cdffb26d90ce4fddabd9cb4315d2358d478543aec01d7afa2d1d64d5e897104b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c310t-cdffb26d90ce4fddabd9cb4315d2358d478543aec01d7afa2d1d64d5e897104b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8203-0224 ; 0000-0001-5864-7112</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hodgson, Mitchell J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schwanz, Lisa E.</creatorcontrib><title>Best of both worlds: Acclimation to fluctuating environments confers advantages and minimizes costs of constant environments</title><title>Functional ecology</title><description>Thermal acclimation is often considered critical in organismal responses to novel thermal conditions. Our understanding of the physiological implications of acclimation is largely derived from lab studies that either manipulate daytime basking availability or use of constant thermal regimes. In contrast, the importance of the nocturnal thermal environment (e.g. the extent of thermal respite) is often overlooked yet could play a vital role in thermal acclimation in the wild. To fill this gap, we acclimated lizards ( Amphibolurus muricatus ) under three thermal regimes (Hot Constant, Cold Constant and Alternating) and compared their physiological responses (Metabolic Rate, Sprint Speed, Thermal Preferences and Thermal Limits). We found that animals maintained constantly at hot temperatures (preferred temperature, 35°C) gained sprint performance increases and exhibited shifts in thermal optima not seen in those maintained constantly at cold temperatures (20°C), yet suffered costs to growth (in smaller animals) and maintenance (mass loss in larger animals). Animals maintained at alternating temperatures (12 h 20°C; 12 h 35°C) had performance benefits similar to animals in the hot treatment, without experiencing reductions in juvenile growth and adult mass. Animals acclimated under hot temperatures showed a significant lower preferred and voluntary maximum temperatures compared to animals acclimated under a cold temperature regime. We found no impact of acclimation treatment on behavioural thermal limits or standard metabolic rate. Overall, we show that alternating between access to preferred temperatures and having periods of energetic rest confer the greatest benefits for our animals. These results highlight the importance of natural body temperature variation for enhancing overall ectotherm performance and physiology, and the costs of novel thermal environments that fail to provide this variation. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.</description><subject>Acclimation</subject><subject>Acclimatization</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Body temperature</subject><subject>Cold</subject><subject>Lizards</subject><subject>Metabolic rate</subject><subject>Metabolism</subject><subject>Physiological responses</subject><subject>Physiology</subject><subject>Temperature</subject><subject>Thermal environments</subject><subject>Thermoregulatory behavior</subject><issn>0269-8463</issn><issn>1365-2435</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVkEtLAzEURoMoWKtrtwHX0-Y5nXFXiy8ouNF1yORRp8wkNclUFH-8GSuCd5N7w8l3yQHgEqMZzjXHtOQFYZTPMOOEHIHJ380xmCBS1kXFSnoKzmLcIoTqDE3A142JCXoLG59e4bsPnY7XcKlU1_Yytd7B5KHtBpWGPLoNNG7fBu9641KEyjtrQoRS76VLcmNy6zTsW9f27acZgZixHJ_JmDLz7_05OLGyi-bi95yCl7vb59VDsX66f1wt14WiGKVCaWsbUuoaKcOs1rLRtWoYxVwTyivNFhVnVBqFsF5IK4nGumSam6peYMQaOgVXh9xd8G9D_rDY-iG4vFJQRFFdorwnU_MDpYKPMRgrdiFLCB8CIzEqFqNQMQoVP4rpNx-9cds</recordid><startdate>202404</startdate><enddate>202404</enddate><creator>Hodgson, Mitchell J.</creator><creator>Schwanz, Lisa E.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8203-0224</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5864-7112</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202404</creationdate><title>Best of both worlds: Acclimation to fluctuating environments confers advantages and minimizes costs of constant environments</title><author>Hodgson, Mitchell J. ; Schwanz, Lisa E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c310t-cdffb26d90ce4fddabd9cb4315d2358d478543aec01d7afa2d1d64d5e897104b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Acclimation</topic><topic>Acclimatization</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Body temperature</topic><topic>Cold</topic><topic>Lizards</topic><topic>Metabolic rate</topic><topic>Metabolism</topic><topic>Physiological responses</topic><topic>Physiology</topic><topic>Temperature</topic><topic>Thermal environments</topic><topic>Thermoregulatory behavior</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hodgson, Mitchell J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schwanz, Lisa E.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Functional ecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hodgson, Mitchell J.</au><au>Schwanz, Lisa E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Best of both worlds: Acclimation to fluctuating environments confers advantages and minimizes costs of constant environments</atitle><jtitle>Functional ecology</jtitle><date>2024-04</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>724</spage><epage>738</epage><pages>724-738</pages><issn>0269-8463</issn><eissn>1365-2435</eissn><abstract>Thermal acclimation is often considered critical in organismal responses to novel thermal conditions. Our understanding of the physiological implications of acclimation is largely derived from lab studies that either manipulate daytime basking availability or use of constant thermal regimes. In contrast, the importance of the nocturnal thermal environment (e.g. the extent of thermal respite) is often overlooked yet could play a vital role in thermal acclimation in the wild. To fill this gap, we acclimated lizards ( Amphibolurus muricatus ) under three thermal regimes (Hot Constant, Cold Constant and Alternating) and compared their physiological responses (Metabolic Rate, Sprint Speed, Thermal Preferences and Thermal Limits). We found that animals maintained constantly at hot temperatures (preferred temperature, 35°C) gained sprint performance increases and exhibited shifts in thermal optima not seen in those maintained constantly at cold temperatures (20°C), yet suffered costs to growth (in smaller animals) and maintenance (mass loss in larger animals). Animals maintained at alternating temperatures (12 h 20°C; 12 h 35°C) had performance benefits similar to animals in the hot treatment, without experiencing reductions in juvenile growth and adult mass. Animals acclimated under hot temperatures showed a significant lower preferred and voluntary maximum temperatures compared to animals acclimated under a cold temperature regime. We found no impact of acclimation treatment on behavioural thermal limits or standard metabolic rate. Overall, we show that alternating between access to preferred temperatures and having periods of energetic rest confer the greatest benefits for our animals. These results highlight the importance of natural body temperature variation for enhancing overall ectotherm performance and physiology, and the costs of novel thermal environments that fail to provide this variation. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/1365-2435.14522</doi><tpages>15</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8203-0224</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5864-7112</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0269-8463
ispartof Functional ecology, 2024-04, Vol.38 (4), p.724-738
issn 0269-8463
1365-2435
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_3030960310
source Wiley Online Library All Journals
subjects Acclimation
Acclimatization
Animals
Body temperature
Cold
Lizards
Metabolic rate
Metabolism
Physiological responses
Physiology
Temperature
Thermal environments
Thermoregulatory behavior
title Best of both worlds: Acclimation to fluctuating environments confers advantages and minimizes costs of constant environments
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T13%3A48%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Best%20of%20both%20worlds:%20Acclimation%20to%20fluctuating%20environments%20confers%20advantages%20and%20minimizes%20costs%20of%20constant%20environments&rft.jtitle=Functional%20ecology&rft.au=Hodgson,%20Mitchell%20J.&rft.date=2024-04&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=724&rft.epage=738&rft.pages=724-738&rft.issn=0269-8463&rft.eissn=1365-2435&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/1365-2435.14522&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3030960310%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3030960310&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true