Ecological significance of marcescence in Himalayan plants: Why is standing dead phytomass more important in demanding, resource‐limited environments?

Understanding mechanisms allowing plants to thrive in challenging conditions is critical for predicting their responses to global environmental change. An often overlooked ecological adaptation is marcescence, where leaves and stems are retained beyond their typical shedding time, with implications...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Functional ecology 2024-04, Vol.38 (4), p.942-954
Hauptverfasser: Chondol, Thinles, Korznikov, Kiril A., Doležal, Jiří
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 954
container_issue 4
container_start_page 942
container_title Functional ecology
container_volume 38
creator Chondol, Thinles
Korznikov, Kiril A.
Doležal, Jiří
description Understanding mechanisms allowing plants to thrive in challenging conditions is critical for predicting their responses to global environmental change. An often overlooked ecological adaptation is marcescence, where leaves and stems are retained beyond their typical shedding time, with implications for nutrient recycling and carbon sequestration. Marcescence can be expected in plants with conservative resource‐use strategies, especially in environments with limited resources and marked seasonality, such as deserts and alpine regions. However, the extent to which marcescence occurs in different taxa across different habitats and its relationship to seasonality and plant functioning as reflected in ecophysiological traits remains understudied. We studied 600 individuals across 40 Himalayan herb species found in desert, steppe, alpine and subnival habitats, spanning 3000–5400 m elevation. Marcescence was observed in 37 of the 40 species evaluated, with 57% of the sampled individuals displaying dead phytomass, indicating the widespread nature of this phenomenon in Himalayan ecosystems. Environment and plant traits emerged as significant factors influencing the amount of dead‐standing biomass. These findings remained robust after accounting for intraspecific variation and phylogenetic inertia. Desert and steppe species exhibited greater marcescent biomass, characterized by 10‐fold more dead stem biomass than alpine and subnival plants. In contrast, the proportion of dead phytomass increased with elevation due to increased dead leaf fraction. Taller desert species with heavily lignified stems and limited nitrogen and phosphorus content had high levels of stem marcescence, which not only may aid litter photodegradation and nutrient recycling but also deter herbivory and promote seed dispersal (tumbleweed). Conversely, slow‐growing alpine and subnival plants with higher water‐use efficiency, foliar C:N ratios and parenchymatic storage tissue rich in mobile carbohydrates had a high proportion of marcescent leaves, which may aid survival in these resource‐limited environments by providing delayed nutrients through moisture‐conserving mulch that also provides insulation and protection from frost. This study provides new insights into the complex interplay of habitat, seasonality and plant traits in dead phytomass retention in Himalayan plants. Marcescence is prevalent in resource‐conservative species in highly seasonal, resource‐limited habitats and may significantly
doi_str_mv 10.1111/1365-2435.14513
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3030959800</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3030959800</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c269t-db1d5728e9ffcb1aee9b61b30c3594f543e6cd843dac3d1c9923a73b8e35644c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kLFOwzAQhi0EEqUws1piJa0dO2nCglBVKFIlFhCj5diX1lViBztF6sYjMPJ8PAkORXg53-m__-4-hC4pmdD4ppTlWZJylk0ozyg7QqP_yjEakTQvk4Ln7BSdhbAlhJRZmo7Q10K5xq2Nkg0OZm1NHb9WAXY1bqVXEBQMqbF4aVrZyL20uGuk7cMNft3ssQk49NJqY9dYg9S42-x718oQcOt8bGw756OgHyw0tAfpNfYQ3C76f398NqY1PWgM9t14Z1uI5rfn6KSWTYCLvzhGL_eL5_kyWT09PM7vVomKF_WJrqjOZmkBZV2rikqAssppxYhiWcnrjDPIlS4401IxTVVZpkzOWFUAy3LOFRujq4Nv593bDkIvtnEvG0cKRlikVBaERNX0oFLeheChFp2POPxeUCIG_GKALQbY4hc_-wEBXnxK</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3030959800</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ecological significance of marcescence in Himalayan plants: Why is standing dead phytomass more important in demanding, resource‐limited environments?</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Chondol, Thinles ; Korznikov, Kiril A. ; Doležal, Jiří</creator><creatorcontrib>Chondol, Thinles ; Korznikov, Kiril A. ; Doležal, Jiří</creatorcontrib><description>Understanding mechanisms allowing plants to thrive in challenging conditions is critical for predicting their responses to global environmental change. An often overlooked ecological adaptation is marcescence, where leaves and stems are retained beyond their typical shedding time, with implications for nutrient recycling and carbon sequestration. Marcescence can be expected in plants with conservative resource‐use strategies, especially in environments with limited resources and marked seasonality, such as deserts and alpine regions. However, the extent to which marcescence occurs in different taxa across different habitats and its relationship to seasonality and plant functioning as reflected in ecophysiological traits remains understudied. We studied 600 individuals across 40 Himalayan herb species found in desert, steppe, alpine and subnival habitats, spanning 3000–5400 m elevation. Marcescence was observed in 37 of the 40 species evaluated, with 57% of the sampled individuals displaying dead phytomass, indicating the widespread nature of this phenomenon in Himalayan ecosystems. Environment and plant traits emerged as significant factors influencing the amount of dead‐standing biomass. These findings remained robust after accounting for intraspecific variation and phylogenetic inertia. Desert and steppe species exhibited greater marcescent biomass, characterized by 10‐fold more dead stem biomass than alpine and subnival plants. In contrast, the proportion of dead phytomass increased with elevation due to increased dead leaf fraction. Taller desert species with heavily lignified stems and limited nitrogen and phosphorus content had high levels of stem marcescence, which not only may aid litter photodegradation and nutrient recycling but also deter herbivory and promote seed dispersal (tumbleweed). Conversely, slow‐growing alpine and subnival plants with higher water‐use efficiency, foliar C:N ratios and parenchymatic storage tissue rich in mobile carbohydrates had a high proportion of marcescent leaves, which may aid survival in these resource‐limited environments by providing delayed nutrients through moisture‐conserving mulch that also provides insulation and protection from frost. This study provides new insights into the complex interplay of habitat, seasonality and plant traits in dead phytomass retention in Himalayan plants. Marcescence is prevalent in resource‐conservative species in highly seasonal, resource‐limited habitats and may significantly shape the functioning and biodiversity of Himalayan ecosystems. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0269-8463</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2435</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/1365-2435.14513</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Alpine regions ; Biodiversity ; Biomass ; Carbohydrates ; Carbon sequestration ; Deserts ; Ecological adaptation ; Ecosystems ; Environmental changes ; Frost ; Frost protection ; Habitats ; Herbivory ; Insulation ; Leaves ; Nutrients ; Photodegradation ; Phylogeny ; Plants (botany) ; Recycling ; Seasonal variations ; Seed dispersal ; Species ; Stems ; Steppes</subject><ispartof>Functional ecology, 2024-04, Vol.38 (4), p.942-954</ispartof><rights>2024 British Ecological Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c269t-db1d5728e9ffcb1aee9b61b30c3594f543e6cd843dac3d1c9923a73b8e35644c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c269t-db1d5728e9ffcb1aee9b61b30c3594f543e6cd843dac3d1c9923a73b8e35644c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1054-9980 ; 0000-0002-5829-4051 ; 0000-0003-2850-1483</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chondol, Thinles</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Korznikov, Kiril A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doležal, Jiří</creatorcontrib><title>Ecological significance of marcescence in Himalayan plants: Why is standing dead phytomass more important in demanding, resource‐limited environments?</title><title>Functional ecology</title><description>Understanding mechanisms allowing plants to thrive in challenging conditions is critical for predicting their responses to global environmental change. An often overlooked ecological adaptation is marcescence, where leaves and stems are retained beyond their typical shedding time, with implications for nutrient recycling and carbon sequestration. Marcescence can be expected in plants with conservative resource‐use strategies, especially in environments with limited resources and marked seasonality, such as deserts and alpine regions. However, the extent to which marcescence occurs in different taxa across different habitats and its relationship to seasonality and plant functioning as reflected in ecophysiological traits remains understudied. We studied 600 individuals across 40 Himalayan herb species found in desert, steppe, alpine and subnival habitats, spanning 3000–5400 m elevation. Marcescence was observed in 37 of the 40 species evaluated, with 57% of the sampled individuals displaying dead phytomass, indicating the widespread nature of this phenomenon in Himalayan ecosystems. Environment and plant traits emerged as significant factors influencing the amount of dead‐standing biomass. These findings remained robust after accounting for intraspecific variation and phylogenetic inertia. Desert and steppe species exhibited greater marcescent biomass, characterized by 10‐fold more dead stem biomass than alpine and subnival plants. In contrast, the proportion of dead phytomass increased with elevation due to increased dead leaf fraction. Taller desert species with heavily lignified stems and limited nitrogen and phosphorus content had high levels of stem marcescence, which not only may aid litter photodegradation and nutrient recycling but also deter herbivory and promote seed dispersal (tumbleweed). Conversely, slow‐growing alpine and subnival plants with higher water‐use efficiency, foliar C:N ratios and parenchymatic storage tissue rich in mobile carbohydrates had a high proportion of marcescent leaves, which may aid survival in these resource‐limited environments by providing delayed nutrients through moisture‐conserving mulch that also provides insulation and protection from frost. This study provides new insights into the complex interplay of habitat, seasonality and plant traits in dead phytomass retention in Himalayan plants. Marcescence is prevalent in resource‐conservative species in highly seasonal, resource‐limited habitats and may significantly shape the functioning and biodiversity of Himalayan ecosystems. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.</description><subject>Alpine regions</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Biomass</subject><subject>Carbohydrates</subject><subject>Carbon sequestration</subject><subject>Deserts</subject><subject>Ecological adaptation</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Environmental changes</subject><subject>Frost</subject><subject>Frost protection</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>Herbivory</subject><subject>Insulation</subject><subject>Leaves</subject><subject>Nutrients</subject><subject>Photodegradation</subject><subject>Phylogeny</subject><subject>Plants (botany)</subject><subject>Recycling</subject><subject>Seasonal variations</subject><subject>Seed dispersal</subject><subject>Species</subject><subject>Stems</subject><subject>Steppes</subject><issn>0269-8463</issn><issn>1365-2435</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kLFOwzAQhi0EEqUws1piJa0dO2nCglBVKFIlFhCj5diX1lViBztF6sYjMPJ8PAkORXg53-m__-4-hC4pmdD4ppTlWZJylk0ozyg7QqP_yjEakTQvk4Ln7BSdhbAlhJRZmo7Q10K5xq2Nkg0OZm1NHb9WAXY1bqVXEBQMqbF4aVrZyL20uGuk7cMNft3ssQk49NJqY9dYg9S42-x718oQcOt8bGw756OgHyw0tAfpNfYQ3C76f398NqY1PWgM9t14Z1uI5rfn6KSWTYCLvzhGL_eL5_kyWT09PM7vVomKF_WJrqjOZmkBZV2rikqAssppxYhiWcnrjDPIlS4401IxTVVZpkzOWFUAy3LOFRujq4Nv593bDkIvtnEvG0cKRlikVBaERNX0oFLeheChFp2POPxeUCIG_GKALQbY4hc_-wEBXnxK</recordid><startdate>202404</startdate><enddate>202404</enddate><creator>Chondol, Thinles</creator><creator>Korznikov, Kiril A.</creator><creator>Doležal, Jiří</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1054-9980</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5829-4051</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2850-1483</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202404</creationdate><title>Ecological significance of marcescence in Himalayan plants: Why is standing dead phytomass more important in demanding, resource‐limited environments?</title><author>Chondol, Thinles ; Korznikov, Kiril A. ; Doležal, Jiří</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c269t-db1d5728e9ffcb1aee9b61b30c3594f543e6cd843dac3d1c9923a73b8e35644c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Alpine regions</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Biomass</topic><topic>Carbohydrates</topic><topic>Carbon sequestration</topic><topic>Deserts</topic><topic>Ecological adaptation</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Environmental changes</topic><topic>Frost</topic><topic>Frost protection</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>Herbivory</topic><topic>Insulation</topic><topic>Leaves</topic><topic>Nutrients</topic><topic>Photodegradation</topic><topic>Phylogeny</topic><topic>Plants (botany)</topic><topic>Recycling</topic><topic>Seasonal variations</topic><topic>Seed dispersal</topic><topic>Species</topic><topic>Stems</topic><topic>Steppes</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chondol, Thinles</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Korznikov, Kiril A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doležal, Jiří</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Functional ecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chondol, Thinles</au><au>Korznikov, Kiril A.</au><au>Doležal, Jiří</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ecological significance of marcescence in Himalayan plants: Why is standing dead phytomass more important in demanding, resource‐limited environments?</atitle><jtitle>Functional ecology</jtitle><date>2024-04</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>942</spage><epage>954</epage><pages>942-954</pages><issn>0269-8463</issn><eissn>1365-2435</eissn><abstract>Understanding mechanisms allowing plants to thrive in challenging conditions is critical for predicting their responses to global environmental change. An often overlooked ecological adaptation is marcescence, where leaves and stems are retained beyond their typical shedding time, with implications for nutrient recycling and carbon sequestration. Marcescence can be expected in plants with conservative resource‐use strategies, especially in environments with limited resources and marked seasonality, such as deserts and alpine regions. However, the extent to which marcescence occurs in different taxa across different habitats and its relationship to seasonality and plant functioning as reflected in ecophysiological traits remains understudied. We studied 600 individuals across 40 Himalayan herb species found in desert, steppe, alpine and subnival habitats, spanning 3000–5400 m elevation. Marcescence was observed in 37 of the 40 species evaluated, with 57% of the sampled individuals displaying dead phytomass, indicating the widespread nature of this phenomenon in Himalayan ecosystems. Environment and plant traits emerged as significant factors influencing the amount of dead‐standing biomass. These findings remained robust after accounting for intraspecific variation and phylogenetic inertia. Desert and steppe species exhibited greater marcescent biomass, characterized by 10‐fold more dead stem biomass than alpine and subnival plants. In contrast, the proportion of dead phytomass increased with elevation due to increased dead leaf fraction. Taller desert species with heavily lignified stems and limited nitrogen and phosphorus content had high levels of stem marcescence, which not only may aid litter photodegradation and nutrient recycling but also deter herbivory and promote seed dispersal (tumbleweed). Conversely, slow‐growing alpine and subnival plants with higher water‐use efficiency, foliar C:N ratios and parenchymatic storage tissue rich in mobile carbohydrates had a high proportion of marcescent leaves, which may aid survival in these resource‐limited environments by providing delayed nutrients through moisture‐conserving mulch that also provides insulation and protection from frost. This study provides new insights into the complex interplay of habitat, seasonality and plant traits in dead phytomass retention in Himalayan plants. Marcescence is prevalent in resource‐conservative species in highly seasonal, resource‐limited habitats and may significantly shape the functioning and biodiversity of Himalayan ecosystems. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/1365-2435.14513</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1054-9980</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5829-4051</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2850-1483</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0269-8463
ispartof Functional ecology, 2024-04, Vol.38 (4), p.942-954
issn 0269-8463
1365-2435
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_3030959800
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Alpine regions
Biodiversity
Biomass
Carbohydrates
Carbon sequestration
Deserts
Ecological adaptation
Ecosystems
Environmental changes
Frost
Frost protection
Habitats
Herbivory
Insulation
Leaves
Nutrients
Photodegradation
Phylogeny
Plants (botany)
Recycling
Seasonal variations
Seed dispersal
Species
Stems
Steppes
title Ecological significance of marcescence in Himalayan plants: Why is standing dead phytomass more important in demanding, resource‐limited environments?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T09%3A54%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ecological%20significance%20of%20marcescence%20in%20Himalayan%20plants:%20Why%20is%20standing%20dead%20phytomass%20more%20important%20in%20demanding,%20resource%E2%80%90limited%20environments?&rft.jtitle=Functional%20ecology&rft.au=Chondol,%20Thinles&rft.date=2024-04&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=942&rft.epage=954&rft.pages=942-954&rft.issn=0269-8463&rft.eissn=1365-2435&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/1365-2435.14513&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3030959800%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3030959800&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true