Why not work with anthropomorphic collaborative robots? The mediation effect of perceived intelligence and the moderation effect of self‐efficacy
Collaborative robots (cobots) are an essential component of intelligent manufacturing. However, employees working alongside them have negative attitudes toward cobots that assist humans' work. To address this industrial human–robot interaction problem, this study adopted the idea of cognitive e...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Human factors and ergonomics in manufacturing & service industries 2024-05, Vol.34 (3), p.241-260 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 260 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 241 |
| container_title | Human factors and ergonomics in manufacturing & service industries |
| container_volume | 34 |
| creator | Liao, Shilong Lin, Long Chen, Qin Pei, Hairun |
| description | Collaborative robots (cobots) are an essential component of intelligent manufacturing. However, employees working alongside them have negative attitudes toward cobots that assist humans' work. To address this industrial human–robot interaction problem, this study adopted the idea of cognitive ergonomics research, invited 323 participants, and conducted an empirical study using an experimental vignette methodology. This study found that (1) perceived intelligence plays a mediating role in the relationship between cobots anthropomorphism and negative attitudes toward cobots; (2) perceived intelligence and perceived threat play a serial mediating role in the relationship between cobots anthropomorphism and negative attitudes toward cobots; (3) robot use self‐efficacy plays a moderating role in the relationship between perceived threat and negative attitudes toward cobots. The results provide a mechanistic explanation and related measures to eliminate the negative attitudes toward cobots. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1002/hfm.21024 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3020759337</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3020759337</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2574-9905292b31282e04efd147c5788b851800e2cc0ee48912c85cd992229247d1893</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMFKw0AQhoMoWKsH32DBk4e0s5uk2T2JFGuFipeKx5BsJmZrko2brSU3H0HwDX0St8aT4GmG4fv-gd_zzilMKACblkU9YRRYeOCNaMTAn0Wz8NDtIMDnYUyPvZOu2wBAQGk88j6fyp402pKdNi9kp2xJ0saWRre61qYtlSRSV1WaaZNa9YbE6Ezb7oqsSyQ15spddUOwKFBaogvSopHowJyoxmJVqWdsJLrQnNi9onM0f50Oq-Lr_cMdlExlf-odFWnV4dnvHHuPi5v1fOmvHm7v5tcrX7IoDn0hIGKCZQFlnCGEWOQ0jGUUc57xiHIAZFICYsgFZZJHMheCMaeEcU65CMbexZDbGv26xc4mG701jXuZBMAgjkQQxI66HChpdNcZLJLWqDo1fUIh2XeeuM6Tn84dOx3Ynaqw_x9Mlov7wfgGKxKFTw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3020759337</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Why not work with anthropomorphic collaborative robots? The mediation effect of perceived intelligence and the moderation effect of self‐efficacy</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Journals</source><creator>Liao, Shilong ; Lin, Long ; Chen, Qin ; Pei, Hairun</creator><creatorcontrib>Liao, Shilong ; Lin, Long ; Chen, Qin ; Pei, Hairun</creatorcontrib><description>Collaborative robots (cobots) are an essential component of intelligent manufacturing. However, employees working alongside them have negative attitudes toward cobots that assist humans' work. To address this industrial human–robot interaction problem, this study adopted the idea of cognitive ergonomics research, invited 323 participants, and conducted an empirical study using an experimental vignette methodology. This study found that (1) perceived intelligence plays a mediating role in the relationship between cobots anthropomorphism and negative attitudes toward cobots; (2) perceived intelligence and perceived threat play a serial mediating role in the relationship between cobots anthropomorphism and negative attitudes toward cobots; (3) robot use self‐efficacy plays a moderating role in the relationship between perceived threat and negative attitudes toward cobots. The results provide a mechanistic explanation and related measures to eliminate the negative attitudes toward cobots.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1090-8471</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-6564</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/hfm.21024</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Attitudes ; Cognitive ability ; collaborative robots ; Effectiveness ; Ergonomics ; Intelligence ; Intelligent manufacturing systems ; negative attitudes toward cobots ; perceived intelligence ; perceived threat ; robot use self‐efficacy ; Robots</subject><ispartof>Human factors and ergonomics in manufacturing & service industries, 2024-05, Vol.34 (3), p.241-260</ispartof><rights>2024 Wiley Periodicals LLC.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2574-9905292b31282e04efd147c5788b851800e2cc0ee48912c85cd992229247d1893</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4405-9322</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fhfm.21024$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fhfm.21024$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1416,27923,27924,45573,45574</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Liao, Shilong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Long</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Qin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pei, Hairun</creatorcontrib><title>Why not work with anthropomorphic collaborative robots? The mediation effect of perceived intelligence and the moderation effect of self‐efficacy</title><title>Human factors and ergonomics in manufacturing & service industries</title><description>Collaborative robots (cobots) are an essential component of intelligent manufacturing. However, employees working alongside them have negative attitudes toward cobots that assist humans' work. To address this industrial human–robot interaction problem, this study adopted the idea of cognitive ergonomics research, invited 323 participants, and conducted an empirical study using an experimental vignette methodology. This study found that (1) perceived intelligence plays a mediating role in the relationship between cobots anthropomorphism and negative attitudes toward cobots; (2) perceived intelligence and perceived threat play a serial mediating role in the relationship between cobots anthropomorphism and negative attitudes toward cobots; (3) robot use self‐efficacy plays a moderating role in the relationship between perceived threat and negative attitudes toward cobots. The results provide a mechanistic explanation and related measures to eliminate the negative attitudes toward cobots.</description><subject>Attitudes</subject><subject>Cognitive ability</subject><subject>collaborative robots</subject><subject>Effectiveness</subject><subject>Ergonomics</subject><subject>Intelligence</subject><subject>Intelligent manufacturing systems</subject><subject>negative attitudes toward cobots</subject><subject>perceived intelligence</subject><subject>perceived threat</subject><subject>robot use self‐efficacy</subject><subject>Robots</subject><issn>1090-8471</issn><issn>1520-6564</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kMFKw0AQhoMoWKsH32DBk4e0s5uk2T2JFGuFipeKx5BsJmZrko2brSU3H0HwDX0St8aT4GmG4fv-gd_zzilMKACblkU9YRRYeOCNaMTAn0Wz8NDtIMDnYUyPvZOu2wBAQGk88j6fyp402pKdNi9kp2xJ0saWRre61qYtlSRSV1WaaZNa9YbE6Ezb7oqsSyQ15spddUOwKFBaogvSopHowJyoxmJVqWdsJLrQnNi9onM0f50Oq-Lr_cMdlExlf-odFWnV4dnvHHuPi5v1fOmvHm7v5tcrX7IoDn0hIGKCZQFlnCGEWOQ0jGUUc57xiHIAZFICYsgFZZJHMheCMaeEcU65CMbexZDbGv26xc4mG701jXuZBMAgjkQQxI66HChpdNcZLJLWqDo1fUIh2XeeuM6Tn84dOx3Ynaqw_x9Mlov7wfgGKxKFTw</recordid><startdate>202405</startdate><enddate>202405</enddate><creator>Liao, Shilong</creator><creator>Lin, Long</creator><creator>Chen, Qin</creator><creator>Pei, Hairun</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>C1K</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4405-9322</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202405</creationdate><title>Why not work with anthropomorphic collaborative robots? The mediation effect of perceived intelligence and the moderation effect of self‐efficacy</title><author>Liao, Shilong ; Lin, Long ; Chen, Qin ; Pei, Hairun</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2574-9905292b31282e04efd147c5788b851800e2cc0ee48912c85cd992229247d1893</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Attitudes</topic><topic>Cognitive ability</topic><topic>collaborative robots</topic><topic>Effectiveness</topic><topic>Ergonomics</topic><topic>Intelligence</topic><topic>Intelligent manufacturing systems</topic><topic>negative attitudes toward cobots</topic><topic>perceived intelligence</topic><topic>perceived threat</topic><topic>robot use self‐efficacy</topic><topic>Robots</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Liao, Shilong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Long</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Qin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pei, Hairun</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Human factors and ergonomics in manufacturing & service industries</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Liao, Shilong</au><au>Lin, Long</au><au>Chen, Qin</au><au>Pei, Hairun</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Why not work with anthropomorphic collaborative robots? The mediation effect of perceived intelligence and the moderation effect of self‐efficacy</atitle><jtitle>Human factors and ergonomics in manufacturing & service industries</jtitle><date>2024-05</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>241</spage><epage>260</epage><pages>241-260</pages><issn>1090-8471</issn><eissn>1520-6564</eissn><abstract>Collaborative robots (cobots) are an essential component of intelligent manufacturing. However, employees working alongside them have negative attitudes toward cobots that assist humans' work. To address this industrial human–robot interaction problem, this study adopted the idea of cognitive ergonomics research, invited 323 participants, and conducted an empirical study using an experimental vignette methodology. This study found that (1) perceived intelligence plays a mediating role in the relationship between cobots anthropomorphism and negative attitudes toward cobots; (2) perceived intelligence and perceived threat play a serial mediating role in the relationship between cobots anthropomorphism and negative attitudes toward cobots; (3) robot use self‐efficacy plays a moderating role in the relationship between perceived threat and negative attitudes toward cobots. The results provide a mechanistic explanation and related measures to eliminate the negative attitudes toward cobots.</abstract><cop>Hoboken</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/hfm.21024</doi><tpages>20</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4405-9322</orcidid></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1090-8471 |
| ispartof | Human factors and ergonomics in manufacturing & service industries, 2024-05, Vol.34 (3), p.241-260 |
| issn | 1090-8471 1520-6564 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_3020759337 |
| source | Wiley-Blackwell Journals |
| subjects | Attitudes Cognitive ability collaborative robots Effectiveness Ergonomics Intelligence Intelligent manufacturing systems negative attitudes toward cobots perceived intelligence perceived threat robot use self‐efficacy Robots |
| title | Why not work with anthropomorphic collaborative robots? The mediation effect of perceived intelligence and the moderation effect of self‐efficacy |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T16%3A09%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Why%20not%20work%20with%20anthropomorphic%20collaborative%20robots?%20The%20mediation%20effect%20of%20perceived%20intelligence%20and%20the%20moderation%20effect%20of%20self%E2%80%90efficacy&rft.jtitle=Human%20factors%20and%20ergonomics%20in%20manufacturing%20&%20service%20industries&rft.au=Liao,%20Shilong&rft.date=2024-05&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=241&rft.epage=260&rft.pages=241-260&rft.issn=1090-8471&rft.eissn=1520-6564&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/hfm.21024&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3020759337%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3020759337&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |