Isolated But Not Necessarily Lonely: An Exploratory Analysis of Subjective Isolation and Conspiracist Ideation
Previous research points to social/affiliative needs as playing an important role in orienting people towards conspiratorial thinking. Yet no research to date has compared the relative contribution of different forms of subjective interpersonal isolation to general conspiracist ideation (CI). Four s...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of individual differences 2024, Vol.45 (3), p.185-200 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 200 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 185 |
container_title | Journal of individual differences |
container_volume | 45 |
creator | Galgali, Madhwa S. Helm, Peter J. Arndt, Jamie |
description | Previous research points to social/affiliative needs as
playing an important role in orienting people towards conspiratorial thinking.
Yet no research to date has compared the relative contribution of different
forms of subjective interpersonal isolation to general conspiracist ideation
(CI). Four studies (N = 2,452) compare the
associations between three forms of subjective isolation (loneliness,
existential isolation, alienation/anomie) and CI. Results from Studies
1-3 indicate that existential isolation and alienation, but not
loneliness, independently predict higher CI over and above other relevant
predictors. Study 4 found that after controlling for relevant covariates, only
anomie predicted CI. Exploratory analyses revealed that unique effects of
existential isolation on CI emerged when the breakdown of the leadership
subdimension of anomie was excluded from the model. Implications of the four
studies are discussed. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1027/1614-0001/a000420 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3008369502</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3008369502</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a261t-92ed6124f165511fb79a55917fe8d7bad8f47550c9861874d0538cd1b3b2c463</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9UMtOwzAQtBBIlMIHcKvUIwrd9Sv2ESoelSK49G45tiOlCkmwk0P-nkStOOzuYWZ2NEPII8IzAs13KJFnAIA7O29O4YqsKArMKNX6mqz-8Vtyl9IJgCmu6IpsD6lr7BD85nUcNl_dPMGFlGysm2lTdG1opntyU9kmhYfLXZPj-9tx_5kV3x-H_UuRWSpxyDQNXiLlFUohEKsy11YIjXkVlM9L61XFcyHAaSVR5dyDYMp5LFlJHZdsTbbnt33sfseQBnPqxtjOjoYBKCa1ADqz8MxysUsphsr0sf6xcTIIZqnCLFHNEtVcqpg1T2eN7a3p0-RsHGrXhOTGGEM7G9XecGGYQSXYH8TBXaQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3008369502</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Isolated But Not Necessarily Lonely: An Exploratory Analysis of Subjective Isolation and Conspiracist Ideation</title><source>EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES</source><creator>Galgali, Madhwa S. ; Helm, Peter J. ; Arndt, Jamie</creator><creatorcontrib>Galgali, Madhwa S. ; Helm, Peter J. ; Arndt, Jamie</creatorcontrib><description>Previous research points to social/affiliative needs as
playing an important role in orienting people towards conspiratorial thinking.
Yet no research to date has compared the relative contribution of different
forms of subjective interpersonal isolation to general conspiracist ideation
(CI). Four studies (N = 2,452) compare the
associations between three forms of subjective isolation (loneliness,
existential isolation, alienation/anomie) and CI. Results from Studies
1-3 indicate that existential isolation and alienation, but not
loneliness, independently predict higher CI over and above other relevant
predictors. Study 4 found that after controlling for relevant covariates, only
anomie predicted CI. Exploratory analyses revealed that unique effects of
existential isolation on CI emerged when the breakdown of the leadership
subdimension of anomie was excluded from the model. Implications of the four
studies are discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1614-0001</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2151-2299</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1027/1614-0001/a000420</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hogrefe Publishing</publisher><subject>Alienation ; Anomie ; Conspiracy Beliefs ; Existentialism ; Female ; Human ; Ideation ; Individual Differences ; Loneliness ; Male ; Thinking</subject><ispartof>Journal of individual differences, 2024, Vol.45 (3), p.185-200</ispartof><rights>2024 Hogrefe Publishing</rights><rights>2024, Hogrefe Publishing</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a261t-92ed6124f165511fb79a55917fe8d7bad8f47550c9861874d0538cd1b3b2c463</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0323-1202 ; 0000-0002-3316-4699</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,4010,27900,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Galgali, Madhwa S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Helm, Peter J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arndt, Jamie</creatorcontrib><title>Isolated But Not Necessarily Lonely: An Exploratory Analysis of Subjective Isolation and Conspiracist Ideation</title><title>Journal of individual differences</title><description>Previous research points to social/affiliative needs as
playing an important role in orienting people towards conspiratorial thinking.
Yet no research to date has compared the relative contribution of different
forms of subjective interpersonal isolation to general conspiracist ideation
(CI). Four studies (N = 2,452) compare the
associations between three forms of subjective isolation (loneliness,
existential isolation, alienation/anomie) and CI. Results from Studies
1-3 indicate that existential isolation and alienation, but not
loneliness, independently predict higher CI over and above other relevant
predictors. Study 4 found that after controlling for relevant covariates, only
anomie predicted CI. Exploratory analyses revealed that unique effects of
existential isolation on CI emerged when the breakdown of the leadership
subdimension of anomie was excluded from the model. Implications of the four
studies are discussed.</description><subject>Alienation</subject><subject>Anomie</subject><subject>Conspiracy Beliefs</subject><subject>Existentialism</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Ideation</subject><subject>Individual Differences</subject><subject>Loneliness</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Thinking</subject><issn>1614-0001</issn><issn>2151-2299</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9UMtOwzAQtBBIlMIHcKvUIwrd9Sv2ESoelSK49G45tiOlCkmwk0P-nkStOOzuYWZ2NEPII8IzAs13KJFnAIA7O29O4YqsKArMKNX6mqz-8Vtyl9IJgCmu6IpsD6lr7BD85nUcNl_dPMGFlGysm2lTdG1opntyU9kmhYfLXZPj-9tx_5kV3x-H_UuRWSpxyDQNXiLlFUohEKsy11YIjXkVlM9L61XFcyHAaSVR5dyDYMp5LFlJHZdsTbbnt33sfseQBnPqxtjOjoYBKCa1ADqz8MxysUsphsr0sf6xcTIIZqnCLFHNEtVcqpg1T2eN7a3p0-RsHGrXhOTGGEM7G9XecGGYQSXYH8TBXaQ</recordid><startdate>2024</startdate><enddate>2024</enddate><creator>Galgali, Madhwa S.</creator><creator>Helm, Peter J.</creator><creator>Arndt, Jamie</creator><general>Hogrefe Publishing</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0323-1202</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3316-4699</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>2024</creationdate><title>Isolated But Not Necessarily Lonely</title><author>Galgali, Madhwa S. ; Helm, Peter J. ; Arndt, Jamie</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a261t-92ed6124f165511fb79a55917fe8d7bad8f47550c9861874d0538cd1b3b2c463</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Alienation</topic><topic>Anomie</topic><topic>Conspiracy Beliefs</topic><topic>Existentialism</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Ideation</topic><topic>Individual Differences</topic><topic>Loneliness</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Thinking</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Galgali, Madhwa S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Helm, Peter J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arndt, Jamie</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>APA PsycArticles®</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><jtitle>Journal of individual differences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Galgali, Madhwa S.</au><au>Helm, Peter J.</au><au>Arndt, Jamie</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Isolated But Not Necessarily Lonely: An Exploratory Analysis of Subjective Isolation and Conspiracist Ideation</atitle><jtitle>Journal of individual differences</jtitle><date>2024</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>185</spage><epage>200</epage><pages>185-200</pages><issn>1614-0001</issn><eissn>2151-2299</eissn><abstract>Previous research points to social/affiliative needs as
playing an important role in orienting people towards conspiratorial thinking.
Yet no research to date has compared the relative contribution of different
forms of subjective interpersonal isolation to general conspiracist ideation
(CI). Four studies (N = 2,452) compare the
associations between three forms of subjective isolation (loneliness,
existential isolation, alienation/anomie) and CI. Results from Studies
1-3 indicate that existential isolation and alienation, but not
loneliness, independently predict higher CI over and above other relevant
predictors. Study 4 found that after controlling for relevant covariates, only
anomie predicted CI. Exploratory analyses revealed that unique effects of
existential isolation on CI emerged when the breakdown of the leadership
subdimension of anomie was excluded from the model. Implications of the four
studies are discussed.</abstract><pub>Hogrefe Publishing</pub><doi>10.1027/1614-0001/a000420</doi><tpages>16</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0323-1202</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3316-4699</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1614-0001 |
ispartof | Journal of individual differences, 2024, Vol.45 (3), p.185-200 |
issn | 1614-0001 2151-2299 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_3008369502 |
source | EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES |
subjects | Alienation Anomie Conspiracy Beliefs Existentialism Female Human Ideation Individual Differences Loneliness Male Thinking |
title | Isolated But Not Necessarily Lonely: An Exploratory Analysis of Subjective Isolation and Conspiracist Ideation |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T23%3A43%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Isolated%20But%20Not%20Necessarily%20Lonely:%20An%20Exploratory%20Analysis%20of%20Subjective%20Isolation%20and%20Conspiracist%20Ideation&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20individual%20differences&rft.au=Galgali,%20Madhwa%20S.&rft.date=2024&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=185&rft.epage=200&rft.pages=185-200&rft.issn=1614-0001&rft.eissn=2151-2299&rft_id=info:doi/10.1027/1614-0001/a000420&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3008369502%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3008369502&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |