Renewable Energy Stocks’ Performance and Climate Risk: An Empirical Analysis
This article studies the relationship between renewable energy stocks’ performance and climate risk. It shows that publicly held renewable energy stocks underperform as a reaction to climate policy information releases, modeled by feed-in tariff (FIT) legislation announcements. The study examined st...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of risk and financial management 2024-03, Vol.17 (3), p.121 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 121 |
container_title | Journal of risk and financial management |
container_volume | 17 |
creator | Li, Lingyu Zheng, Xianrong Wang, Shuxi |
description | This article studies the relationship between renewable energy stocks’ performance and climate risk. It shows that publicly held renewable energy stocks underperform as a reaction to climate policy information releases, modeled by feed-in tariff (FIT) legislation announcements. The study examined stock price behaviors 2 days before and 30 days after FIT policy announcements. The stock sample used in the study has 3702 firm-day combinations, which included 180 cleantech firms and 32 events from 2007 to 2017. Based on the residual analysis of the sample’s abnormal return, it indicated that the FIT announcements are associated with significant declines in returns. The cumulative abnormal return until Day 18 was a significant −0.83%, while the average abnormal return on the day was −0.16% at normal levels. The study partially excluded the likelihood of a transitory result by varying the measurement horizon. It also adopted both the market model and the Fama–French three-factor models to rule out model misspecification when estimating abnormal returns and thus increased the robustness. In fact, the results were stable to changes in estimating the model’s specifications. In addition, the study compared the portfolio’s performance with mimicking portfolios in terms of size, book-to-market equity (BE/ME), and the firms’ geographic location. It demonstrated that the documented anomaly of the portfolio of renewable energy companies is robust. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/jrfm17030121 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3003303978</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A788249645</galeid><sourcerecordid>A788249645</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2121-3681ef42706bcdb47ecfd9bc299a76d3d01a3cba57dab220593f3c31033d3eec3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNUMtKAzEUDaJg0e78gIBbp95MppOJu1LqA4pK1fWQSW5K2nnUZIp052_4e36JKXVR7uI-OOdw7iHkisGIcwm3K28bJoADS9kJGTDJWFKAyE6P5nMyDGEFAAwihxcD8rzAFr9UVSOdteiXO_rWd3odfr9_6Ct62_lGtRqpag2d1q5RPdKFC-s7OmnprNk477Sq46LqXXDhkpxZVQcc_vcL8nE_e58-JvOXh6fpZJ7oNNpLeF4wtFkqIK-0qTKB2hpZ6VRKJXLDDTDFdaXGwqgqTWEsueWa710bjqj5Bbk-6G5897nF0JerbuujiVByiCjgUhQRNTqglqrG0rW2673SsQw2TnctWhfvE1EUaSbzbBwJNweC9l0IHm258fFnvysZlPuUy-OU-R8He2-J</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3003303978</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Renewable Energy Stocks’ Performance and Climate Risk: An Empirical Analysis</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><creator>Li, Lingyu ; Zheng, Xianrong ; Wang, Shuxi</creator><creatorcontrib>Li, Lingyu ; Zheng, Xianrong ; Wang, Shuxi</creatorcontrib><description>This article studies the relationship between renewable energy stocks’ performance and climate risk. It shows that publicly held renewable energy stocks underperform as a reaction to climate policy information releases, modeled by feed-in tariff (FIT) legislation announcements. The study examined stock price behaviors 2 days before and 30 days after FIT policy announcements. The stock sample used in the study has 3702 firm-day combinations, which included 180 cleantech firms and 32 events from 2007 to 2017. Based on the residual analysis of the sample’s abnormal return, it indicated that the FIT announcements are associated with significant declines in returns. The cumulative abnormal return until Day 18 was a significant −0.83%, while the average abnormal return on the day was −0.16% at normal levels. The study partially excluded the likelihood of a transitory result by varying the measurement horizon. It also adopted both the market model and the Fama–French three-factor models to rule out model misspecification when estimating abnormal returns and thus increased the robustness. In fact, the results were stable to changes in estimating the model’s specifications. In addition, the study compared the portfolio’s performance with mimicking portfolios in terms of size, book-to-market equity (BE/ME), and the firms’ geographic location. It demonstrated that the documented anomaly of the portfolio of renewable energy companies is robust.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1911-8074</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1911-8066</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1911-8074</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/jrfm17030121</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Alternative energy sources ; Clean technology ; Climate change ; Climate policy ; Costs (Law) ; Energy industry ; Natural resources ; Stocks</subject><ispartof>Journal of risk and financial management, 2024-03, Vol.17 (3), p.121</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2024 MDPI AG</rights><rights>2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2121-3681ef42706bcdb47ecfd9bc299a76d3d01a3cba57dab220593f3c31033d3eec3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,27931,27932</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Li, Lingyu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zheng, Xianrong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Shuxi</creatorcontrib><title>Renewable Energy Stocks’ Performance and Climate Risk: An Empirical Analysis</title><title>Journal of risk and financial management</title><description>This article studies the relationship between renewable energy stocks’ performance and climate risk. It shows that publicly held renewable energy stocks underperform as a reaction to climate policy information releases, modeled by feed-in tariff (FIT) legislation announcements. The study examined stock price behaviors 2 days before and 30 days after FIT policy announcements. The stock sample used in the study has 3702 firm-day combinations, which included 180 cleantech firms and 32 events from 2007 to 2017. Based on the residual analysis of the sample’s abnormal return, it indicated that the FIT announcements are associated with significant declines in returns. The cumulative abnormal return until Day 18 was a significant −0.83%, while the average abnormal return on the day was −0.16% at normal levels. The study partially excluded the likelihood of a transitory result by varying the measurement horizon. It also adopted both the market model and the Fama–French three-factor models to rule out model misspecification when estimating abnormal returns and thus increased the robustness. In fact, the results were stable to changes in estimating the model’s specifications. In addition, the study compared the portfolio’s performance with mimicking portfolios in terms of size, book-to-market equity (BE/ME), and the firms’ geographic location. It demonstrated that the documented anomaly of the portfolio of renewable energy companies is robust.</description><subject>Alternative energy sources</subject><subject>Clean technology</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Climate policy</subject><subject>Costs (Law)</subject><subject>Energy industry</subject><subject>Natural resources</subject><subject>Stocks</subject><issn>1911-8074</issn><issn>1911-8066</issn><issn>1911-8074</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpNUMtKAzEUDaJg0e78gIBbp95MppOJu1LqA4pK1fWQSW5K2nnUZIp052_4e36JKXVR7uI-OOdw7iHkisGIcwm3K28bJoADS9kJGTDJWFKAyE6P5nMyDGEFAAwihxcD8rzAFr9UVSOdteiXO_rWd3odfr9_6Ct62_lGtRqpag2d1q5RPdKFC-s7OmnprNk477Sq46LqXXDhkpxZVQcc_vcL8nE_e58-JvOXh6fpZJ7oNNpLeF4wtFkqIK-0qTKB2hpZ6VRKJXLDDTDFdaXGwqgqTWEsueWa710bjqj5Bbk-6G5897nF0JerbuujiVByiCjgUhQRNTqglqrG0rW2673SsQw2TnctWhfvE1EUaSbzbBwJNweC9l0IHm258fFnvysZlPuUy-OU-R8He2-J</recordid><startdate>20240301</startdate><enddate>20240301</enddate><creator>Li, Lingyu</creator><creator>Zheng, Xianrong</creator><creator>Wang, Shuxi</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240301</creationdate><title>Renewable Energy Stocks’ Performance and Climate Risk: An Empirical Analysis</title><author>Li, Lingyu ; Zheng, Xianrong ; Wang, Shuxi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2121-3681ef42706bcdb47ecfd9bc299a76d3d01a3cba57dab220593f3c31033d3eec3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Alternative energy sources</topic><topic>Clean technology</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Climate policy</topic><topic>Costs (Law)</topic><topic>Energy industry</topic><topic>Natural resources</topic><topic>Stocks</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Li, Lingyu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zheng, Xianrong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Shuxi</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Access via ABI/INFORM (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Journal of risk and financial management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Li, Lingyu</au><au>Zheng, Xianrong</au><au>Wang, Shuxi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Renewable Energy Stocks’ Performance and Climate Risk: An Empirical Analysis</atitle><jtitle>Journal of risk and financial management</jtitle><date>2024-03-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>121</spage><pages>121-</pages><issn>1911-8074</issn><issn>1911-8066</issn><eissn>1911-8074</eissn><abstract>This article studies the relationship between renewable energy stocks’ performance and climate risk. It shows that publicly held renewable energy stocks underperform as a reaction to climate policy information releases, modeled by feed-in tariff (FIT) legislation announcements. The study examined stock price behaviors 2 days before and 30 days after FIT policy announcements. The stock sample used in the study has 3702 firm-day combinations, which included 180 cleantech firms and 32 events from 2007 to 2017. Based on the residual analysis of the sample’s abnormal return, it indicated that the FIT announcements are associated with significant declines in returns. The cumulative abnormal return until Day 18 was a significant −0.83%, while the average abnormal return on the day was −0.16% at normal levels. The study partially excluded the likelihood of a transitory result by varying the measurement horizon. It also adopted both the market model and the Fama–French three-factor models to rule out model misspecification when estimating abnormal returns and thus increased the robustness. In fact, the results were stable to changes in estimating the model’s specifications. In addition, the study compared the portfolio’s performance with mimicking portfolios in terms of size, book-to-market equity (BE/ME), and the firms’ geographic location. It demonstrated that the documented anomaly of the portfolio of renewable energy companies is robust.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/jrfm17030121</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1911-8074 |
ispartof | Journal of risk and financial management, 2024-03, Vol.17 (3), p.121 |
issn | 1911-8074 1911-8066 1911-8074 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_3003303978 |
source | Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute |
subjects | Alternative energy sources Clean technology Climate change Climate policy Costs (Law) Energy industry Natural resources Stocks |
title | Renewable Energy Stocks’ Performance and Climate Risk: An Empirical Analysis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-05T16%3A20%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Renewable%20Energy%20Stocks%E2%80%99%20Performance%20and%20Climate%20Risk:%20An%20Empirical%20Analysis&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20risk%20and%20financial%20management&rft.au=Li,%20Lingyu&rft.date=2024-03-01&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=121&rft.pages=121-&rft.issn=1911-8074&rft.eissn=1911-8074&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/jrfm17030121&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA788249645%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3003303978&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A788249645&rfr_iscdi=true |