Can intensive trapping to reduce the abundance of an invasive crayfish benefit an imperiled congener?
Management aimed at reducing the population sizes of established invasive species can be beneficial for the conservation of native species. Crayfish are some of the most widespread and impactful invasive species in freshwater ecosystems. This study evaluated the efficacy of intensive baited trapping...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Aquatic conservation 2024-03, Vol.34 (3), p.n/a |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | n/a |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | |
container_title | Aquatic conservation |
container_volume | 34 |
creator | Reisinger, Lindsey Tripp, Nicole Atchia, Alison Bolds, Sara Cook, David Fralick, Kasey Ganas, Danielle Hayman, Blair |
description | Management aimed at reducing the population sizes of established invasive species can be beneficial for the conservation of native species. Crayfish are some of the most widespread and impactful invasive species in freshwater ecosystems.
This study evaluated the efficacy of intensive baited trapping as a tool to reduce the abundance of an invasive crayfish (Procambarus spiculifer) in small streams and benefit an imperiled congener (Procambarus pictus). The invasive crayfish was captured and removed from a 1‐km stream reach through three rounds of intensive trapping conducted over a 16‐month period.
The abundance of the invasive species declined significantly in the trapping reach after the initial round of trapping. Throughout the year following the onset of trapping, its abundance within the trapping reach was less than half of that at control sites. The sex ratio of invasive crayfish collected in traps was approximately 1:1, and 31% of captured individuals were likely to be immature based on size class. The abundance of the imperiled species did not change significantly over the study period, but 1 year may not be long enough to detect a response.
Overall, the data suggest that periodic intensive trapping can effectively reduce the abundance of this invasive crayfish in small streams, and the extent to which this benefits the imperiled species remains an open question. Future research examining how trapping can best be applied to achieve lasting effects (including trap type, season and barriers to immigration) would be valuable for understanding the conservation potential of this management technique. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/aqc.4123 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2982874954</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2982874954</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2933-5fa99a7e320844489d505af703447ddf06e4885baef529b7f88216f91eff13643</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1rwzAMhs3YYN0H7CcYdtklnT8T-zRK2BcUxmA7GyeR25TWSe2ko_9-SbrrTpJePZLQi9AdJXNKCHu0-3IuKONnaEaJ1gnJpDwfc8mSLKX8El3FuCGE6JSmMwS59bj2HfhYHwB3wbZt7Ve4a3CAqi8HaQ3YFr2vrB-qxuFp4GAnvgz26Oq4xgV4cHU3NXcthHoLFS4bvxr08HSDLpzdRrj9i9fo--X5K39Llh-v7_limZRMc55IZ7W2GXBGlBBC6UoSaV1GuBBZVTmSglBKFhacZLrInFKMpk5TcI7yVPBrdH_a24Zm30PszKbpgx9OGqYVU5nQcqQeTlQZmhgDONOGemfD0VBiRhPNYKIZTRzQ5IT-DA8d_-XM4jOf-F8HnnKf</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2982874954</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Can intensive trapping to reduce the abundance of an invasive crayfish benefit an imperiled congener?</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Reisinger, Lindsey ; Tripp, Nicole ; Atchia, Alison ; Bolds, Sara ; Cook, David ; Fralick, Kasey ; Ganas, Danielle ; Hayman, Blair</creator><creatorcontrib>Reisinger, Lindsey ; Tripp, Nicole ; Atchia, Alison ; Bolds, Sara ; Cook, David ; Fralick, Kasey ; Ganas, Danielle ; Hayman, Blair</creatorcontrib><description>Management aimed at reducing the population sizes of established invasive species can be beneficial for the conservation of native species. Crayfish are some of the most widespread and impactful invasive species in freshwater ecosystems.
This study evaluated the efficacy of intensive baited trapping as a tool to reduce the abundance of an invasive crayfish (Procambarus spiculifer) in small streams and benefit an imperiled congener (Procambarus pictus). The invasive crayfish was captured and removed from a 1‐km stream reach through three rounds of intensive trapping conducted over a 16‐month period.
The abundance of the invasive species declined significantly in the trapping reach after the initial round of trapping. Throughout the year following the onset of trapping, its abundance within the trapping reach was less than half of that at control sites. The sex ratio of invasive crayfish collected in traps was approximately 1:1, and 31% of captured individuals were likely to be immature based on size class. The abundance of the imperiled species did not change significantly over the study period, but 1 year may not be long enough to detect a response.
Overall, the data suggest that periodic intensive trapping can effectively reduce the abundance of this invasive crayfish in small streams, and the extent to which this benefits the imperiled species remains an open question. Future research examining how trapping can best be applied to achieve lasting effects (including trap type, season and barriers to immigration) would be valuable for understanding the conservation potential of this management technique.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1052-7613</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-0755</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/aqc.4123</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Abundance ; Aquatic ecosystems ; Congeners ; Conservation ; Crayfish ; Freshwater ; Freshwater crustaceans ; Freshwater ecosystems ; Immigration ; Indigenous species ; Inland water environment ; Introduced species ; invasive ; Invasive species ; management ; mechanical removal ; native ; Native organisms ; Nonnative species ; Population decline ; Rivers ; sex ; Sex ratio ; size ; Streams ; threatened ; trap ; Trapping</subject><ispartof>Aquatic conservation, 2024-03, Vol.34 (3), p.n/a</ispartof><rights>2024 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2933-5fa99a7e320844489d505af703447ddf06e4885baef529b7f88216f91eff13643</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2933-5fa99a7e320844489d505af703447ddf06e4885baef529b7f88216f91eff13643</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6685-5958</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Faqc.4123$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Faqc.4123$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Reisinger, Lindsey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tripp, Nicole</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Atchia, Alison</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bolds, Sara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cook, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fralick, Kasey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ganas, Danielle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hayman, Blair</creatorcontrib><title>Can intensive trapping to reduce the abundance of an invasive crayfish benefit an imperiled congener?</title><title>Aquatic conservation</title><description>Management aimed at reducing the population sizes of established invasive species can be beneficial for the conservation of native species. Crayfish are some of the most widespread and impactful invasive species in freshwater ecosystems.
This study evaluated the efficacy of intensive baited trapping as a tool to reduce the abundance of an invasive crayfish (Procambarus spiculifer) in small streams and benefit an imperiled congener (Procambarus pictus). The invasive crayfish was captured and removed from a 1‐km stream reach through three rounds of intensive trapping conducted over a 16‐month period.
The abundance of the invasive species declined significantly in the trapping reach after the initial round of trapping. Throughout the year following the onset of trapping, its abundance within the trapping reach was less than half of that at control sites. The sex ratio of invasive crayfish collected in traps was approximately 1:1, and 31% of captured individuals were likely to be immature based on size class. The abundance of the imperiled species did not change significantly over the study period, but 1 year may not be long enough to detect a response.
Overall, the data suggest that periodic intensive trapping can effectively reduce the abundance of this invasive crayfish in small streams, and the extent to which this benefits the imperiled species remains an open question. Future research examining how trapping can best be applied to achieve lasting effects (including trap type, season and barriers to immigration) would be valuable for understanding the conservation potential of this management technique.</description><subject>Abundance</subject><subject>Aquatic ecosystems</subject><subject>Congeners</subject><subject>Conservation</subject><subject>Crayfish</subject><subject>Freshwater</subject><subject>Freshwater crustaceans</subject><subject>Freshwater ecosystems</subject><subject>Immigration</subject><subject>Indigenous species</subject><subject>Inland water environment</subject><subject>Introduced species</subject><subject>invasive</subject><subject>Invasive species</subject><subject>management</subject><subject>mechanical removal</subject><subject>native</subject><subject>Native organisms</subject><subject>Nonnative species</subject><subject>Population decline</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>sex</subject><subject>Sex ratio</subject><subject>size</subject><subject>Streams</subject><subject>threatened</subject><subject>trap</subject><subject>Trapping</subject><issn>1052-7613</issn><issn>1099-0755</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kE1rwzAMhs3YYN0H7CcYdtklnT8T-zRK2BcUxmA7GyeR25TWSe2ko_9-SbrrTpJePZLQi9AdJXNKCHu0-3IuKONnaEaJ1gnJpDwfc8mSLKX8El3FuCGE6JSmMwS59bj2HfhYHwB3wbZt7Ve4a3CAqi8HaQ3YFr2vrB-qxuFp4GAnvgz26Oq4xgV4cHU3NXcthHoLFS4bvxr08HSDLpzdRrj9i9fo--X5K39Llh-v7_limZRMc55IZ7W2GXBGlBBC6UoSaV1GuBBZVTmSglBKFhacZLrInFKMpk5TcI7yVPBrdH_a24Zm30PszKbpgx9OGqYVU5nQcqQeTlQZmhgDONOGemfD0VBiRhPNYKIZTRzQ5IT-DA8d_-XM4jOf-F8HnnKf</recordid><startdate>202403</startdate><enddate>202403</enddate><creator>Reisinger, Lindsey</creator><creator>Tripp, Nicole</creator><creator>Atchia, Alison</creator><creator>Bolds, Sara</creator><creator>Cook, David</creator><creator>Fralick, Kasey</creator><creator>Ganas, Danielle</creator><creator>Hayman, Blair</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>H99</scope><scope>L.F</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6685-5958</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202403</creationdate><title>Can intensive trapping to reduce the abundance of an invasive crayfish benefit an imperiled congener?</title><author>Reisinger, Lindsey ; Tripp, Nicole ; Atchia, Alison ; Bolds, Sara ; Cook, David ; Fralick, Kasey ; Ganas, Danielle ; Hayman, Blair</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2933-5fa99a7e320844489d505af703447ddf06e4885baef529b7f88216f91eff13643</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Abundance</topic><topic>Aquatic ecosystems</topic><topic>Congeners</topic><topic>Conservation</topic><topic>Crayfish</topic><topic>Freshwater</topic><topic>Freshwater crustaceans</topic><topic>Freshwater ecosystems</topic><topic>Immigration</topic><topic>Indigenous species</topic><topic>Inland water environment</topic><topic>Introduced species</topic><topic>invasive</topic><topic>Invasive species</topic><topic>management</topic><topic>mechanical removal</topic><topic>native</topic><topic>Native organisms</topic><topic>Nonnative species</topic><topic>Population decline</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>sex</topic><topic>Sex ratio</topic><topic>size</topic><topic>Streams</topic><topic>threatened</topic><topic>trap</topic><topic>Trapping</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Reisinger, Lindsey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tripp, Nicole</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Atchia, Alison</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bolds, Sara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cook, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fralick, Kasey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ganas, Danielle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hayman, Blair</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>ASFA: Marine Biotechnology Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Marine Biotechnology Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Aquatic conservation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Reisinger, Lindsey</au><au>Tripp, Nicole</au><au>Atchia, Alison</au><au>Bolds, Sara</au><au>Cook, David</au><au>Fralick, Kasey</au><au>Ganas, Danielle</au><au>Hayman, Blair</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Can intensive trapping to reduce the abundance of an invasive crayfish benefit an imperiled congener?</atitle><jtitle>Aquatic conservation</jtitle><date>2024-03</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>3</issue><epage>n/a</epage><issn>1052-7613</issn><eissn>1099-0755</eissn><abstract>Management aimed at reducing the population sizes of established invasive species can be beneficial for the conservation of native species. Crayfish are some of the most widespread and impactful invasive species in freshwater ecosystems.
This study evaluated the efficacy of intensive baited trapping as a tool to reduce the abundance of an invasive crayfish (Procambarus spiculifer) in small streams and benefit an imperiled congener (Procambarus pictus). The invasive crayfish was captured and removed from a 1‐km stream reach through three rounds of intensive trapping conducted over a 16‐month period.
The abundance of the invasive species declined significantly in the trapping reach after the initial round of trapping. Throughout the year following the onset of trapping, its abundance within the trapping reach was less than half of that at control sites. The sex ratio of invasive crayfish collected in traps was approximately 1:1, and 31% of captured individuals were likely to be immature based on size class. The abundance of the imperiled species did not change significantly over the study period, but 1 year may not be long enough to detect a response.
Overall, the data suggest that periodic intensive trapping can effectively reduce the abundance of this invasive crayfish in small streams, and the extent to which this benefits the imperiled species remains an open question. Future research examining how trapping can best be applied to achieve lasting effects (including trap type, season and barriers to immigration) would be valuable for understanding the conservation potential of this management technique.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/aqc.4123</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6685-5958</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1052-7613 |
ispartof | Aquatic conservation, 2024-03, Vol.34 (3), p.n/a |
issn | 1052-7613 1099-0755 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2982874954 |
source | Access via Wiley Online Library |
subjects | Abundance Aquatic ecosystems Congeners Conservation Crayfish Freshwater Freshwater crustaceans Freshwater ecosystems Immigration Indigenous species Inland water environment Introduced species invasive Invasive species management mechanical removal native Native organisms Nonnative species Population decline Rivers sex Sex ratio size Streams threatened trap Trapping |
title | Can intensive trapping to reduce the abundance of an invasive crayfish benefit an imperiled congener? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T03%3A33%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Can%20intensive%20trapping%20to%20reduce%20the%20abundance%20of%20an%20invasive%20crayfish%20benefit%20an%20imperiled%20congener?&rft.jtitle=Aquatic%20conservation&rft.au=Reisinger,%20Lindsey&rft.date=2024-03&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=3&rft.epage=n/a&rft.issn=1052-7613&rft.eissn=1099-0755&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/aqc.4123&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2982874954%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2982874954&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |