Sliding and damming properties of granular debris with different geometric configurations and grain size distributions

Granular debris plays a significant role in determining damming deposit characteristics. An in-depth understanding of how variations in grain size distribution (GSD) and geometric configurations impact the behavior of granular debris during the occurrence of granular debris is essential for precise...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of mountain science 2024-03, Vol.21 (3), p.932-951
Hauptverfasser: He, Ligeng, Tan, Longmeng, Yang, Xingguo, Zhou, Jiawen, Liao, Haimei
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 951
container_issue 3
container_start_page 932
container_title Journal of mountain science
container_volume 21
creator He, Ligeng
Tan, Longmeng
Yang, Xingguo
Zhou, Jiawen
Liao, Haimei
description Granular debris plays a significant role in determining damming deposit characteristics. An in-depth understanding of how variations in grain size distribution (GSD) and geometric configurations impact the behavior of granular debris during the occurrence of granular debris is essential for precise assessment and effective mitigation of landslide hazards in mountainous terrains. This research aims to investigate the impact of GSD and geometric configurations on sliding and damming properties through laboratory experiments. The geometric configurations were categorized into three categories based on the spatial distribution of maximum volume: located at the front (Type I), middle (Type II), and rear (Type III) of the granular debris. Our experimental findings highlight that the sliding and damming processes primarily depend on the interaction among the geometric configuration, grain size, and GSD in granular debris. Different sliding and damming mechanisms across various geometric configurations induce variability in motion parameters and deposition patterns. For Type I configurations, the front debris functions as the critical and primary driving component, with energy dissipation primarily occurring through inter-grain interactions. In contrast, Type II configurations feature the middle debris as the dominant driving component, experiencing hindrance from the front debris and propulsion from the rear, leading to complex alterations in sliding motion. Here, energy dissipation arises from a combination of inter-grain and grain-substrate interactions. Lastly, in Type III configurations, both the middle and rear debris serve as the main driving components, with the rear sliding debris impeded by the front. In this case, energy dissipation predominantly results from grain-substrate interaction. Moreover, we have quantitatively demonstrated that the inverse grading in damming deposits, where coarse grain moves upward and fine grain moves downward, is primarily caused by grain sorting due to collisions among the grains and between the grain and the base. The impact of grain on the horizontal channel further aids grain sorting and contributes to inverse grading. The proposed classification of three geometric configurations in our study enhances the understanding of damming properties from the view of mechanism, which provides valuable insights for related study about damming granular debris.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11629-023-8373-2
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2973655825</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2973655825</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c268t-eb71b246a4a4f6f6df3aa4b2f2a31845e87aee7ad7262e756cb1ed117999b4943</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEtLxDAUhYMoOI7-AHcB19E82qRZyuALBBfqOqTtTc0wTcekVfTXm5kKrlzdA_d853IPQueMXjJK1VViTHJNKBekEkoQfoAWTGtBqODsMGupOJGCyWN0ktKaUql0xRbo43njWx86bEOLW9v3O72Nwxbi6CHhweEu2jBtbMQt1NEn_OnHN9x65yBCGHEHQw9j9A1uhuB8N0U7-iGkfWJmfcDJf0MmUnbV0355io6c3SQ4-51L9Hp787K6J49Pdw-r60fScFmNBGrFal5IW9jCSSdbJ6wtau64FawqSqiUBVC2VVxyUKVsagYtY0prXRe6EEt0Mefml94nSKNZD1MM-aThWglZlhUvs4vNriYOKUVwZht9b-OXYdTs6jVzvSbXa3b1Gp4ZPjMpe0MH8S_5f-gHt9CARg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2973655825</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Sliding and damming properties of granular debris with different geometric configurations and grain size distributions</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>He, Ligeng ; Tan, Longmeng ; Yang, Xingguo ; Zhou, Jiawen ; Liao, Haimei</creator><creatorcontrib>He, Ligeng ; Tan, Longmeng ; Yang, Xingguo ; Zhou, Jiawen ; Liao, Haimei</creatorcontrib><description>Granular debris plays a significant role in determining damming deposit characteristics. An in-depth understanding of how variations in grain size distribution (GSD) and geometric configurations impact the behavior of granular debris during the occurrence of granular debris is essential for precise assessment and effective mitigation of landslide hazards in mountainous terrains. This research aims to investigate the impact of GSD and geometric configurations on sliding and damming properties through laboratory experiments. The geometric configurations were categorized into three categories based on the spatial distribution of maximum volume: located at the front (Type I), middle (Type II), and rear (Type III) of the granular debris. Our experimental findings highlight that the sliding and damming processes primarily depend on the interaction among the geometric configuration, grain size, and GSD in granular debris. Different sliding and damming mechanisms across various geometric configurations induce variability in motion parameters and deposition patterns. For Type I configurations, the front debris functions as the critical and primary driving component, with energy dissipation primarily occurring through inter-grain interactions. In contrast, Type II configurations feature the middle debris as the dominant driving component, experiencing hindrance from the front debris and propulsion from the rear, leading to complex alterations in sliding motion. Here, energy dissipation arises from a combination of inter-grain and grain-substrate interactions. Lastly, in Type III configurations, both the middle and rear debris serve as the main driving components, with the rear sliding debris impeded by the front. In this case, energy dissipation predominantly results from grain-substrate interaction. Moreover, we have quantitatively demonstrated that the inverse grading in damming deposits, where coarse grain moves upward and fine grain moves downward, is primarily caused by grain sorting due to collisions among the grains and between the grain and the base. The impact of grain on the horizontal channel further aids grain sorting and contributes to inverse grading. The proposed classification of three geometric configurations in our study enhances the understanding of damming properties from the view of mechanism, which provides valuable insights for related study about damming granular debris.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1672-6316</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1993-0321</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1008-2786</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11629-023-8373-2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Heidelberg: Science Press</publisher><subject>Configurations ; Debris ; Detritus ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Earth Sciences ; Ecology ; Energy dissipation ; Energy exchange ; Environment ; Geography ; Geological hazards ; Grain size ; Grain size distribution ; Hazard assessment ; Hazard mitigation ; Laboratory experimentation ; Landslides ; Mitigation ; Original Article ; Particle size ; Size distribution ; Sliding ; Slumping ; Spatial distribution ; Substrates</subject><ispartof>Journal of mountain science, 2024-03, Vol.21 (3), p.932-951</ispartof><rights>Science Press, Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment, CAS and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2024</rights><rights>Science Press, Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment, CAS and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2024.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c268t-eb71b246a4a4f6f6df3aa4b2f2a31845e87aee7ad7262e756cb1ed117999b4943</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7346-9190 ; 0000-0002-6817-1071 ; 0009-0000-1075-2327 ; 0009-0003-9905-1106 ; 0009-0002-3037-513X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11629-023-8373-2$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11629-023-8373-2$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>He, Ligeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tan, Longmeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Xingguo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Jiawen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liao, Haimei</creatorcontrib><title>Sliding and damming properties of granular debris with different geometric configurations and grain size distributions</title><title>Journal of mountain science</title><addtitle>J. Mt. Sci</addtitle><description>Granular debris plays a significant role in determining damming deposit characteristics. An in-depth understanding of how variations in grain size distribution (GSD) and geometric configurations impact the behavior of granular debris during the occurrence of granular debris is essential for precise assessment and effective mitigation of landslide hazards in mountainous terrains. This research aims to investigate the impact of GSD and geometric configurations on sliding and damming properties through laboratory experiments. The geometric configurations were categorized into three categories based on the spatial distribution of maximum volume: located at the front (Type I), middle (Type II), and rear (Type III) of the granular debris. Our experimental findings highlight that the sliding and damming processes primarily depend on the interaction among the geometric configuration, grain size, and GSD in granular debris. Different sliding and damming mechanisms across various geometric configurations induce variability in motion parameters and deposition patterns. For Type I configurations, the front debris functions as the critical and primary driving component, with energy dissipation primarily occurring through inter-grain interactions. In contrast, Type II configurations feature the middle debris as the dominant driving component, experiencing hindrance from the front debris and propulsion from the rear, leading to complex alterations in sliding motion. Here, energy dissipation arises from a combination of inter-grain and grain-substrate interactions. Lastly, in Type III configurations, both the middle and rear debris serve as the main driving components, with the rear sliding debris impeded by the front. In this case, energy dissipation predominantly results from grain-substrate interaction. Moreover, we have quantitatively demonstrated that the inverse grading in damming deposits, where coarse grain moves upward and fine grain moves downward, is primarily caused by grain sorting due to collisions among the grains and between the grain and the base. The impact of grain on the horizontal channel further aids grain sorting and contributes to inverse grading. The proposed classification of three geometric configurations in our study enhances the understanding of damming properties from the view of mechanism, which provides valuable insights for related study about damming granular debris.</description><subject>Configurations</subject><subject>Debris</subject><subject>Detritus</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Energy dissipation</subject><subject>Energy exchange</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Geography</subject><subject>Geological hazards</subject><subject>Grain size</subject><subject>Grain size distribution</subject><subject>Hazard assessment</subject><subject>Hazard mitigation</subject><subject>Laboratory experimentation</subject><subject>Landslides</subject><subject>Mitigation</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Particle size</subject><subject>Size distribution</subject><subject>Sliding</subject><subject>Slumping</subject><subject>Spatial distribution</subject><subject>Substrates</subject><issn>1672-6316</issn><issn>1993-0321</issn><issn>1008-2786</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kEtLxDAUhYMoOI7-AHcB19E82qRZyuALBBfqOqTtTc0wTcekVfTXm5kKrlzdA_d853IPQueMXjJK1VViTHJNKBekEkoQfoAWTGtBqODsMGupOJGCyWN0ktKaUql0xRbo43njWx86bEOLW9v3O72Nwxbi6CHhweEu2jBtbMQt1NEn_OnHN9x65yBCGHEHQw9j9A1uhuB8N0U7-iGkfWJmfcDJf0MmUnbV0355io6c3SQ4-51L9Hp787K6J49Pdw-r60fScFmNBGrFal5IW9jCSSdbJ6wtau64FawqSqiUBVC2VVxyUKVsagYtY0prXRe6EEt0Mefml94nSKNZD1MM-aThWglZlhUvs4vNriYOKUVwZht9b-OXYdTs6jVzvSbXa3b1Gp4ZPjMpe0MH8S_5f-gHt9CARg</recordid><startdate>20240301</startdate><enddate>20240301</enddate><creator>He, Ligeng</creator><creator>Tan, Longmeng</creator><creator>Yang, Xingguo</creator><creator>Zhou, Jiawen</creator><creator>Liao, Haimei</creator><general>Science Press</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7346-9190</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6817-1071</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0000-1075-2327</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0003-9905-1106</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0002-3037-513X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240301</creationdate><title>Sliding and damming properties of granular debris with different geometric configurations and grain size distributions</title><author>He, Ligeng ; Tan, Longmeng ; Yang, Xingguo ; Zhou, Jiawen ; Liao, Haimei</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c268t-eb71b246a4a4f6f6df3aa4b2f2a31845e87aee7ad7262e756cb1ed117999b4943</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Configurations</topic><topic>Debris</topic><topic>Detritus</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Energy dissipation</topic><topic>Energy exchange</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Geography</topic><topic>Geological hazards</topic><topic>Grain size</topic><topic>Grain size distribution</topic><topic>Hazard assessment</topic><topic>Hazard mitigation</topic><topic>Laboratory experimentation</topic><topic>Landslides</topic><topic>Mitigation</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Particle size</topic><topic>Size distribution</topic><topic>Sliding</topic><topic>Slumping</topic><topic>Spatial distribution</topic><topic>Substrates</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>He, Ligeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tan, Longmeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Xingguo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Jiawen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liao, Haimei</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of mountain science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>He, Ligeng</au><au>Tan, Longmeng</au><au>Yang, Xingguo</au><au>Zhou, Jiawen</au><au>Liao, Haimei</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Sliding and damming properties of granular debris with different geometric configurations and grain size distributions</atitle><jtitle>Journal of mountain science</jtitle><stitle>J. Mt. Sci</stitle><date>2024-03-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>932</spage><epage>951</epage><pages>932-951</pages><issn>1672-6316</issn><eissn>1993-0321</eissn><eissn>1008-2786</eissn><abstract>Granular debris plays a significant role in determining damming deposit characteristics. An in-depth understanding of how variations in grain size distribution (GSD) and geometric configurations impact the behavior of granular debris during the occurrence of granular debris is essential for precise assessment and effective mitigation of landslide hazards in mountainous terrains. This research aims to investigate the impact of GSD and geometric configurations on sliding and damming properties through laboratory experiments. The geometric configurations were categorized into three categories based on the spatial distribution of maximum volume: located at the front (Type I), middle (Type II), and rear (Type III) of the granular debris. Our experimental findings highlight that the sliding and damming processes primarily depend on the interaction among the geometric configuration, grain size, and GSD in granular debris. Different sliding and damming mechanisms across various geometric configurations induce variability in motion parameters and deposition patterns. For Type I configurations, the front debris functions as the critical and primary driving component, with energy dissipation primarily occurring through inter-grain interactions. In contrast, Type II configurations feature the middle debris as the dominant driving component, experiencing hindrance from the front debris and propulsion from the rear, leading to complex alterations in sliding motion. Here, energy dissipation arises from a combination of inter-grain and grain-substrate interactions. Lastly, in Type III configurations, both the middle and rear debris serve as the main driving components, with the rear sliding debris impeded by the front. In this case, energy dissipation predominantly results from grain-substrate interaction. Moreover, we have quantitatively demonstrated that the inverse grading in damming deposits, where coarse grain moves upward and fine grain moves downward, is primarily caused by grain sorting due to collisions among the grains and between the grain and the base. The impact of grain on the horizontal channel further aids grain sorting and contributes to inverse grading. The proposed classification of three geometric configurations in our study enhances the understanding of damming properties from the view of mechanism, which provides valuable insights for related study about damming granular debris.</abstract><cop>Heidelberg</cop><pub>Science Press</pub><doi>10.1007/s11629-023-8373-2</doi><tpages>20</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7346-9190</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6817-1071</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0000-1075-2327</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0003-9905-1106</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0002-3037-513X</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1672-6316
ispartof Journal of mountain science, 2024-03, Vol.21 (3), p.932-951
issn 1672-6316
1993-0321
1008-2786
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2973655825
source Alma/SFX Local Collection; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Configurations
Debris
Detritus
Earth and Environmental Science
Earth Sciences
Ecology
Energy dissipation
Energy exchange
Environment
Geography
Geological hazards
Grain size
Grain size distribution
Hazard assessment
Hazard mitigation
Laboratory experimentation
Landslides
Mitigation
Original Article
Particle size
Size distribution
Sliding
Slumping
Spatial distribution
Substrates
title Sliding and damming properties of granular debris with different geometric configurations and grain size distributions
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T13%3A04%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sliding%20and%20damming%20properties%20of%20granular%20debris%20with%20different%20geometric%20configurations%20and%20grain%20size%20distributions&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20mountain%20science&rft.au=He,%20Ligeng&rft.date=2024-03-01&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=932&rft.epage=951&rft.pages=932-951&rft.issn=1672-6316&rft.eissn=1993-0321&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11629-023-8373-2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2973655825%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2973655825&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true