Shaping Ethnoracial Identities: State-Society Relations and Programmatic Differentiation in the Andes

Under what circumstances do ethnoracial groups become programmatically differentiated? This article argues that ethnoracial programmatic differentiation results from major transformations in groups’ access to state power. Access to state power conditions ethnoracial groups’ perceptions of the state...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Comparative politics 2024-04, Vol.56 (3), p.295-320
1. Verfasser: Giusti-Rodríguez, Mariana
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 320
container_issue 3
container_start_page 295
container_title Comparative politics
container_volume 56
creator Giusti-Rodríguez, Mariana
description Under what circumstances do ethnoracial groups become programmatically differentiated? This article argues that ethnoracial programmatic differentiation results from major transformations in groups’ access to state power. Access to state power conditions ethnoracial groups’ perceptions of the state and their support for state-centric programmatic policies. As historically-excluded groups gain access to power, and historically-advantaged ones lose theirs, programmatic differentiation increases, the product of shifting relationships with the state. I evaluate this argument using survey data from the Andean region and demonstrate that ethnoracial groups have become programmatically differentiated where the indigenous have recently gained political power, but not elsewhere despite widespread structural inequalities and extensive indigenous organizational capacity. The findings shed light on why ethnoracialized preferences vary across contexts in unexpected ways.
doi_str_mv 10.5129/001041523X17011215536598
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>pubtec_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2961726661</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ingid>cuny/cp/10.5129/001041523x17011215536598</ingid><sourcerecordid>cuny/cp/10.5129/001041523x17011215536598</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c289t-95e60c848a5b0f8be85c35d7e3c14a1b95c9bc14a880b2ac004b155b2f58a2b03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kF9LwzAUxYMoOKffIeBzNUmbNPHJMTcdDBSn4FtJ0nTL2NKaZOC-vakTBMWn-4ffOZd7AIAYXVFMxDVCGBWYkvwNlwhjginNGRX8CAxSjzNGSHkMBj2WJU6cgrMQ1mksWMEHwCxWsrNuCSdx5VovtZUbOKuNizZaE27gIsposkWrrYl7-Gw2MtrWBShdDZ98u_Ryu00rDe9s0xjfC78IaB2MKwNHrjbhHJw0chPMxXcdgtfp5GX8kM0f72fj0TzThIuYCWoY0rzgkirUcGU41TmtS5NrXEisBNVC9S3nSBGpESpU-leRhnJJFMqH4PLg2_n2fWdCrNbtzrt0siKC4ZIwxnCi-IHSvg3Bm6bqvN1Kv68wqvpQq_9CTdLbgzRFll6VP_565_aV7v5afPyy-ASHyn45</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2961726661</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Shaping Ethnoracial Identities: State-Society Relations and Programmatic Differentiation in the Andes</title><source>IngentaConnect</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><creator>Giusti-Rodríguez, Mariana</creator><creatorcontrib>Giusti-Rodríguez, Mariana</creatorcontrib><description>Under what circumstances do ethnoracial groups become programmatically differentiated? This article argues that ethnoracial programmatic differentiation results from major transformations in groups’ access to state power. Access to state power conditions ethnoracial groups’ perceptions of the state and their support for state-centric programmatic policies. As historically-excluded groups gain access to power, and historically-advantaged ones lose theirs, programmatic differentiation increases, the product of shifting relationships with the state. I evaluate this argument using survey data from the Andean region and demonstrate that ethnoracial groups have become programmatically differentiated where the indigenous have recently gained political power, but not elsewhere despite widespread structural inequalities and extensive indigenous organizational capacity. The findings shed light on why ethnoracialized preferences vary across contexts in unexpected ways.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0010-4159</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2151-6227</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5129/001041523X17011215536598</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New Brunswick: City University of New York</publisher><subject>Access ; Access To Power ; Andes ; Between-Group Inequalities ; Differentiation ; Ethnoracial Identities ; Groups ; Indigenous Politics ; Inequality ; Policy Preferences ; Political power ; Programmatic Differentiation ; State power ; State Trust ; State-society relations</subject><ispartof>Comparative politics, 2024-04, Vol.56 (3), p.295-320</ispartof><rights>Copyright Transaction Inc. 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c289t-95e60c848a5b0f8be85c35d7e3c14a1b95c9bc14a880b2ac004b155b2f58a2b03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>289,314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Giusti-Rodríguez, Mariana</creatorcontrib><title>Shaping Ethnoracial Identities: State-Society Relations and Programmatic Differentiation in the Andes</title><title>Comparative politics</title><description>Under what circumstances do ethnoracial groups become programmatically differentiated? This article argues that ethnoracial programmatic differentiation results from major transformations in groups’ access to state power. Access to state power conditions ethnoracial groups’ perceptions of the state and their support for state-centric programmatic policies. As historically-excluded groups gain access to power, and historically-advantaged ones lose theirs, programmatic differentiation increases, the product of shifting relationships with the state. I evaluate this argument using survey data from the Andean region and demonstrate that ethnoracial groups have become programmatically differentiated where the indigenous have recently gained political power, but not elsewhere despite widespread structural inequalities and extensive indigenous organizational capacity. The findings shed light on why ethnoracialized preferences vary across contexts in unexpected ways.</description><subject>Access</subject><subject>Access To Power</subject><subject>Andes</subject><subject>Between-Group Inequalities</subject><subject>Differentiation</subject><subject>Ethnoracial Identities</subject><subject>Groups</subject><subject>Indigenous Politics</subject><subject>Inequality</subject><subject>Policy Preferences</subject><subject>Political power</subject><subject>Programmatic Differentiation</subject><subject>State power</subject><subject>State Trust</subject><subject>State-society relations</subject><issn>0010-4159</issn><issn>2151-6227</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kF9LwzAUxYMoOKffIeBzNUmbNPHJMTcdDBSn4FtJ0nTL2NKaZOC-vakTBMWn-4ffOZd7AIAYXVFMxDVCGBWYkvwNlwhjginNGRX8CAxSjzNGSHkMBj2WJU6cgrMQ1mksWMEHwCxWsrNuCSdx5VovtZUbOKuNizZaE27gIsposkWrrYl7-Gw2MtrWBShdDZ98u_Ryu00rDe9s0xjfC78IaB2MKwNHrjbhHJw0chPMxXcdgtfp5GX8kM0f72fj0TzThIuYCWoY0rzgkirUcGU41TmtS5NrXEisBNVC9S3nSBGpESpU-leRhnJJFMqH4PLg2_n2fWdCrNbtzrt0siKC4ZIwxnCi-IHSvg3Bm6bqvN1Kv68wqvpQq_9CTdLbgzRFll6VP_565_aV7v5afPyy-ASHyn45</recordid><startdate>20240401</startdate><enddate>20240401</enddate><creator>Giusti-Rodríguez, Mariana</creator><general>City University of New York</general><general>Transaction Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240401</creationdate><title>Shaping Ethnoracial Identities: State-Society Relations and Programmatic Differentiation in the Andes</title><author>Giusti-Rodríguez, Mariana</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c289t-95e60c848a5b0f8be85c35d7e3c14a1b95c9bc14a880b2ac004b155b2f58a2b03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Access</topic><topic>Access To Power</topic><topic>Andes</topic><topic>Between-Group Inequalities</topic><topic>Differentiation</topic><topic>Ethnoracial Identities</topic><topic>Groups</topic><topic>Indigenous Politics</topic><topic>Inequality</topic><topic>Policy Preferences</topic><topic>Political power</topic><topic>Programmatic Differentiation</topic><topic>State power</topic><topic>State Trust</topic><topic>State-society relations</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Giusti-Rodríguez, Mariana</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Comparative politics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Giusti-Rodríguez, Mariana</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Shaping Ethnoracial Identities: State-Society Relations and Programmatic Differentiation in the Andes</atitle><jtitle>Comparative politics</jtitle><date>2024-04-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>56</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>295</spage><epage>320</epage><pages>295-320</pages><issn>0010-4159</issn><eissn>2151-6227</eissn><abstract>Under what circumstances do ethnoracial groups become programmatically differentiated? This article argues that ethnoracial programmatic differentiation results from major transformations in groups’ access to state power. Access to state power conditions ethnoracial groups’ perceptions of the state and their support for state-centric programmatic policies. As historically-excluded groups gain access to power, and historically-advantaged ones lose theirs, programmatic differentiation increases, the product of shifting relationships with the state. I evaluate this argument using survey data from the Andean region and demonstrate that ethnoracial groups have become programmatically differentiated where the indigenous have recently gained political power, but not elsewhere despite widespread structural inequalities and extensive indigenous organizational capacity. The findings shed light on why ethnoracialized preferences vary across contexts in unexpected ways.</abstract><cop>New Brunswick</cop><pub>City University of New York</pub><doi>10.5129/001041523X17011215536598</doi><tpages>26</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0010-4159
ispartof Comparative politics, 2024-04, Vol.56 (3), p.295-320
issn 0010-4159
2151-6227
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2961726661
source IngentaConnect; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts
subjects Access
Access To Power
Andes
Between-Group Inequalities
Differentiation
Ethnoracial Identities
Groups
Indigenous Politics
Inequality
Policy Preferences
Political power
Programmatic Differentiation
State power
State Trust
State-society relations
title Shaping Ethnoracial Identities: State-Society Relations and Programmatic Differentiation in the Andes
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T14%3A55%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubtec_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Shaping%20Ethnoracial%20Identities:%20State-Society%20Relations%20and%20Programmatic%20Differentiation%20in%20the%20Andes&rft.jtitle=Comparative%20politics&rft.au=Giusti-Rodr%C3%ADguez,%20Mariana&rft.date=2024-04-01&rft.volume=56&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=295&rft.epage=320&rft.pages=295-320&rft.issn=0010-4159&rft.eissn=2151-6227&rft_id=info:doi/10.5129/001041523X17011215536598&rft_dat=%3Cpubtec_proqu%3Ecuny/cp/10.5129/001041523x17011215536598%3C/pubtec_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2961726661&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ingid=cuny/cp/10.5129/001041523x17011215536598&rfr_iscdi=true