Shaping Ethnoracial Identities: State-Society Relations and Programmatic Differentiation in the Andes
Under what circumstances do ethnoracial groups become programmatically differentiated? This article argues that ethnoracial programmatic differentiation results from major transformations in groups’ access to state power. Access to state power conditions ethnoracial groups’ perceptions of the state...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Comparative politics 2024-04, Vol.56 (3), p.295-320 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 320 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 295 |
container_title | Comparative politics |
container_volume | 56 |
creator | Giusti-Rodríguez, Mariana |
description | Under what circumstances do ethnoracial groups become programmatically differentiated? This article argues that ethnoracial programmatic differentiation results from major transformations in groups’ access to state power. Access to state power conditions ethnoracial groups’ perceptions of the state and their support for state-centric programmatic policies. As historically-excluded groups gain access to power, and historically-advantaged ones lose theirs, programmatic differentiation increases, the product of shifting relationships with the state. I evaluate this argument using survey data from the Andean region and demonstrate that ethnoracial groups have become programmatically differentiated where the indigenous have recently gained political power, but not elsewhere despite widespread structural inequalities and extensive indigenous organizational capacity. The findings shed light on why ethnoracialized preferences vary across contexts in unexpected ways. |
doi_str_mv | 10.5129/001041523X17011215536598 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>pubtec_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2961726661</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ingid>cuny/cp/10.5129/001041523x17011215536598</ingid><sourcerecordid>cuny/cp/10.5129/001041523x17011215536598</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c289t-95e60c848a5b0f8be85c35d7e3c14a1b95c9bc14a880b2ac004b155b2f58a2b03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kF9LwzAUxYMoOKffIeBzNUmbNPHJMTcdDBSn4FtJ0nTL2NKaZOC-vakTBMWn-4ffOZd7AIAYXVFMxDVCGBWYkvwNlwhjginNGRX8CAxSjzNGSHkMBj2WJU6cgrMQ1mksWMEHwCxWsrNuCSdx5VovtZUbOKuNizZaE27gIsposkWrrYl7-Gw2MtrWBShdDZ98u_Ryu00rDe9s0xjfC78IaB2MKwNHrjbhHJw0chPMxXcdgtfp5GX8kM0f72fj0TzThIuYCWoY0rzgkirUcGU41TmtS5NrXEisBNVC9S3nSBGpESpU-leRhnJJFMqH4PLg2_n2fWdCrNbtzrt0siKC4ZIwxnCi-IHSvg3Bm6bqvN1Kv68wqvpQq_9CTdLbgzRFll6VP_565_aV7v5afPyy-ASHyn45</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2961726661</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Shaping Ethnoracial Identities: State-Society Relations and Programmatic Differentiation in the Andes</title><source>IngentaConnect</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><creator>Giusti-Rodríguez, Mariana</creator><creatorcontrib>Giusti-Rodríguez, Mariana</creatorcontrib><description>Under what circumstances do ethnoracial groups become programmatically differentiated? This article argues that ethnoracial programmatic differentiation results from major transformations in groups’ access to state power. Access to state power conditions ethnoracial groups’ perceptions of the state and their support for state-centric programmatic policies. As historically-excluded groups gain access to power, and historically-advantaged ones lose theirs, programmatic differentiation increases, the product of shifting relationships with the state. I evaluate this argument using survey data from the Andean region and demonstrate that ethnoracial groups have become programmatically differentiated where the indigenous have recently gained political power, but not elsewhere despite widespread structural inequalities and extensive indigenous organizational capacity. The findings shed light on why ethnoracialized preferences vary across contexts in unexpected ways.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0010-4159</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2151-6227</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5129/001041523X17011215536598</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New Brunswick: City University of New York</publisher><subject>Access ; Access To Power ; Andes ; Between-Group Inequalities ; Differentiation ; Ethnoracial Identities ; Groups ; Indigenous Politics ; Inequality ; Policy Preferences ; Political power ; Programmatic Differentiation ; State power ; State Trust ; State-society relations</subject><ispartof>Comparative politics, 2024-04, Vol.56 (3), p.295-320</ispartof><rights>Copyright Transaction Inc. 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c289t-95e60c848a5b0f8be85c35d7e3c14a1b95c9bc14a880b2ac004b155b2f58a2b03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>289,314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Giusti-Rodríguez, Mariana</creatorcontrib><title>Shaping Ethnoracial Identities: State-Society Relations and Programmatic Differentiation in the Andes</title><title>Comparative politics</title><description>Under what circumstances do ethnoracial groups become programmatically differentiated? This article argues that ethnoracial programmatic differentiation results from major transformations in groups’ access to state power. Access to state power conditions ethnoracial groups’ perceptions of the state and their support for state-centric programmatic policies. As historically-excluded groups gain access to power, and historically-advantaged ones lose theirs, programmatic differentiation increases, the product of shifting relationships with the state. I evaluate this argument using survey data from the Andean region and demonstrate that ethnoracial groups have become programmatically differentiated where the indigenous have recently gained political power, but not elsewhere despite widespread structural inequalities and extensive indigenous organizational capacity. The findings shed light on why ethnoracialized preferences vary across contexts in unexpected ways.</description><subject>Access</subject><subject>Access To Power</subject><subject>Andes</subject><subject>Between-Group Inequalities</subject><subject>Differentiation</subject><subject>Ethnoracial Identities</subject><subject>Groups</subject><subject>Indigenous Politics</subject><subject>Inequality</subject><subject>Policy Preferences</subject><subject>Political power</subject><subject>Programmatic Differentiation</subject><subject>State power</subject><subject>State Trust</subject><subject>State-society relations</subject><issn>0010-4159</issn><issn>2151-6227</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kF9LwzAUxYMoOKffIeBzNUmbNPHJMTcdDBSn4FtJ0nTL2NKaZOC-vakTBMWn-4ffOZd7AIAYXVFMxDVCGBWYkvwNlwhjginNGRX8CAxSjzNGSHkMBj2WJU6cgrMQ1mksWMEHwCxWsrNuCSdx5VovtZUbOKuNizZaE27gIsposkWrrYl7-Gw2MtrWBShdDZ98u_Ryu00rDe9s0xjfC78IaB2MKwNHrjbhHJw0chPMxXcdgtfp5GX8kM0f72fj0TzThIuYCWoY0rzgkirUcGU41TmtS5NrXEisBNVC9S3nSBGpESpU-leRhnJJFMqH4PLg2_n2fWdCrNbtzrt0siKC4ZIwxnCi-IHSvg3Bm6bqvN1Kv68wqvpQq_9CTdLbgzRFll6VP_565_aV7v5afPyy-ASHyn45</recordid><startdate>20240401</startdate><enddate>20240401</enddate><creator>Giusti-Rodríguez, Mariana</creator><general>City University of New York</general><general>Transaction Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240401</creationdate><title>Shaping Ethnoracial Identities: State-Society Relations and Programmatic Differentiation in the Andes</title><author>Giusti-Rodríguez, Mariana</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c289t-95e60c848a5b0f8be85c35d7e3c14a1b95c9bc14a880b2ac004b155b2f58a2b03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Access</topic><topic>Access To Power</topic><topic>Andes</topic><topic>Between-Group Inequalities</topic><topic>Differentiation</topic><topic>Ethnoracial Identities</topic><topic>Groups</topic><topic>Indigenous Politics</topic><topic>Inequality</topic><topic>Policy Preferences</topic><topic>Political power</topic><topic>Programmatic Differentiation</topic><topic>State power</topic><topic>State Trust</topic><topic>State-society relations</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Giusti-Rodríguez, Mariana</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Comparative politics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Giusti-Rodríguez, Mariana</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Shaping Ethnoracial Identities: State-Society Relations and Programmatic Differentiation in the Andes</atitle><jtitle>Comparative politics</jtitle><date>2024-04-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>56</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>295</spage><epage>320</epage><pages>295-320</pages><issn>0010-4159</issn><eissn>2151-6227</eissn><abstract>Under what circumstances do ethnoracial groups become programmatically differentiated? This article argues that ethnoracial programmatic differentiation results from major transformations in groups’ access to state power. Access to state power conditions ethnoracial groups’ perceptions of the state and their support for state-centric programmatic policies. As historically-excluded groups gain access to power, and historically-advantaged ones lose theirs, programmatic differentiation increases, the product of shifting relationships with the state. I evaluate this argument using survey data from the Andean region and demonstrate that ethnoracial groups have become programmatically differentiated where the indigenous have recently gained political power, but not elsewhere despite widespread structural inequalities and extensive indigenous organizational capacity. The findings shed light on why ethnoracialized preferences vary across contexts in unexpected ways.</abstract><cop>New Brunswick</cop><pub>City University of New York</pub><doi>10.5129/001041523X17011215536598</doi><tpages>26</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0010-4159 |
ispartof | Comparative politics, 2024-04, Vol.56 (3), p.295-320 |
issn | 0010-4159 2151-6227 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2961726661 |
source | IngentaConnect; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts |
subjects | Access Access To Power Andes Between-Group Inequalities Differentiation Ethnoracial Identities Groups Indigenous Politics Inequality Policy Preferences Political power Programmatic Differentiation State power State Trust State-society relations |
title | Shaping Ethnoracial Identities: State-Society Relations and Programmatic Differentiation in the Andes |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T14%3A55%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubtec_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Shaping%20Ethnoracial%20Identities:%20State-Society%20Relations%20and%20Programmatic%20Differentiation%20in%20the%20Andes&rft.jtitle=Comparative%20politics&rft.au=Giusti-Rodr%C3%ADguez,%20Mariana&rft.date=2024-04-01&rft.volume=56&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=295&rft.epage=320&rft.pages=295-320&rft.issn=0010-4159&rft.eissn=2151-6227&rft_id=info:doi/10.5129/001041523X17011215536598&rft_dat=%3Cpubtec_proqu%3Ecuny/cp/10.5129/001041523x17011215536598%3C/pubtec_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2961726661&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ingid=cuny/cp/10.5129/001041523x17011215536598&rfr_iscdi=true |