Efficacy of Multiseason Sentinel-2 Imagery for Classifying and Mapping Grassland Condition

Assessing the condition of ecosystems is imperative for understanding their degree of degradation and managing their conservation. The increasing availability of remote sensing products offers unprecedented opportunities for mapping vegetation with high detail and accuracy. However, mapping complex...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of sensors 2024-03, Vol.2024, p.1-12
Hauptverfasser: Guevara-Torres, Diego R., Facelli, José M., Ostendorf, Bertram
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 12
container_issue
container_start_page 1
container_title Journal of sensors
container_volume 2024
creator Guevara-Torres, Diego R.
Facelli, José M.
Ostendorf, Bertram
description Assessing the condition of ecosystems is imperative for understanding their degree of degradation and managing their conservation. The increasing availability of remote sensing products offers unprecedented opportunities for mapping vegetation with high detail and accuracy. However, mapping complex ecosystems, like grasslands, remains challenging due to their heterogeneity in vegetation composition and structure. Furthermore, degraded ecosystems affected by invasive vegetation present different condition levels within vegetation classes, limiting the accuracy of classifications and condition assessment. Here, we evaluated the capacity of Sentinel-2 multispectral time series imagery as an input for classifying different levels of cover within a vegetation class to detect the subtle differences needed to assess the condition of degraded ecosystems. Our study was conducted in the iron-grasslands of South Australia, a perennial tussock grassland dominated by iron-grasses (Lomandra spp.) and severely affected by invasive annual grasses. We developed random forest models to discriminate classes defined by the cover of iron-grasses, wild oats (Avena barbata), and woodland (training points = 250). We tested the importance of data seasonality, spatial resolution, spectral bands, and vegetation indices. The combination of spatial, temporal, and spectral detail produced the best classification results. Random forest classifications performed best at 10 m resolution, suggesting that detailed resolution outweighs spectral detail for discriminating vegetation patterns in systems with high spatial heterogeneity. The model at 10 m resolution combining all periods and all variables (spectral bands and vegetation indices) produced a mean kappa coefficient of 56% and a mean overall accuracy of 67%. The dry season imagery and vegetation indices emerged as the most informative, suggesting that vegetation classes presented different phenological properties critical for their discrimination. Our study contributes to mapping complex ecosystems, facilitating the discrimination of different levels of condition in grasslands degraded by invasive species, and thus benefits the conservation of native grasslands and other ecosystems.
doi_str_mv 10.1155/2024/6668228
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2958097130</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2958097130</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-beb3b4291c4aa2cd7ce72985597a5bf3accc6014877d6b5eadda1ad5217f35ed3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kF1LwzAYhYMoOKd3_oCAl1qXjyZpL6XMOXB4oYJ4U9J8zIwumUmH9N_bsuGlV-_h8HBeeAC4xugeY8ZmBJF8xjkvCClOwATzQmSC8OL0L7OPc3CR0gYhTgWlE_A5t9YpqXoYLFzt284lI1Pw8NX4znnTZgQut3JtYg9tiLBqZUrO9s6vofQaruRuN-ZFHPp2bKrgtetc8JfgzMo2mavjnYL3x_lb9ZQ9vyyW1cNzpijHXdaYhjY5KbHKpSRKC2UEKQvGSiFZY6lUSnGE80IIzRtmpNYSS80IFpYyo-kU3Bx2dzF8703q6k3YRz-8rEnJClQKTNFA3R0oFUNK0dh6F91Wxr7GqB7t1aO9-mhvwG8P-JfzWv64_-lfeLJvsw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2958097130</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Efficacy of Multiseason Sentinel-2 Imagery for Classifying and Mapping Grassland Condition</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Guevara-Torres, Diego R. ; Facelli, José M. ; Ostendorf, Bertram</creator><contributor>Lim, Sangsoon ; Sangsoon Lim</contributor><creatorcontrib>Guevara-Torres, Diego R. ; Facelli, José M. ; Ostendorf, Bertram ; Lim, Sangsoon ; Sangsoon Lim</creatorcontrib><description>Assessing the condition of ecosystems is imperative for understanding their degree of degradation and managing their conservation. The increasing availability of remote sensing products offers unprecedented opportunities for mapping vegetation with high detail and accuracy. However, mapping complex ecosystems, like grasslands, remains challenging due to their heterogeneity in vegetation composition and structure. Furthermore, degraded ecosystems affected by invasive vegetation present different condition levels within vegetation classes, limiting the accuracy of classifications and condition assessment. Here, we evaluated the capacity of Sentinel-2 multispectral time series imagery as an input for classifying different levels of cover within a vegetation class to detect the subtle differences needed to assess the condition of degraded ecosystems. Our study was conducted in the iron-grasslands of South Australia, a perennial tussock grassland dominated by iron-grasses (Lomandra spp.) and severely affected by invasive annual grasses. We developed random forest models to discriminate classes defined by the cover of iron-grasses, wild oats (Avena barbata), and woodland (training points = 250). We tested the importance of data seasonality, spatial resolution, spectral bands, and vegetation indices. The combination of spatial, temporal, and spectral detail produced the best classification results. Random forest classifications performed best at 10 m resolution, suggesting that detailed resolution outweighs spectral detail for discriminating vegetation patterns in systems with high spatial heterogeneity. The model at 10 m resolution combining all periods and all variables (spectral bands and vegetation indices) produced a mean kappa coefficient of 56% and a mean overall accuracy of 67%. The dry season imagery and vegetation indices emerged as the most informative, suggesting that vegetation classes presented different phenological properties critical for their discrimination. Our study contributes to mapping complex ecosystems, facilitating the discrimination of different levels of condition in grasslands degraded by invasive species, and thus benefits the conservation of native grasslands and other ecosystems.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1687-725X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1687-7268</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1155/2024/6668228</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Hindawi</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Algorithms ; Band spectra ; Classification ; Degradation ; Dry season ; Ecosystems ; Grasses ; Grasslands ; Heterogeneity ; Image classification ; Iron ; Loam soils ; Machine learning ; Mapping ; Native species ; Nonnative species ; Remote sensing ; Satellites ; Seasonal variations ; Spatial resolution ; Spectral bands ; Time series ; Vegetation index ; Vegetation mapping ; Wildlife conservation ; Woodlands</subject><ispartof>Journal of sensors, 2024-03, Vol.2024, p.1-12</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2024 Diego R. Guevara-Torres et al.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2024 Diego R. Guevara-Torres et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-beb3b4291c4aa2cd7ce72985597a5bf3accc6014877d6b5eadda1ad5217f35ed3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9554-6409 ; 0000-0002-5868-3567 ; 0000-0002-0408-0082</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Lim, Sangsoon</contributor><contributor>Sangsoon Lim</contributor><creatorcontrib>Guevara-Torres, Diego R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Facelli, José M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ostendorf, Bertram</creatorcontrib><title>Efficacy of Multiseason Sentinel-2 Imagery for Classifying and Mapping Grassland Condition</title><title>Journal of sensors</title><description>Assessing the condition of ecosystems is imperative for understanding their degree of degradation and managing their conservation. The increasing availability of remote sensing products offers unprecedented opportunities for mapping vegetation with high detail and accuracy. However, mapping complex ecosystems, like grasslands, remains challenging due to their heterogeneity in vegetation composition and structure. Furthermore, degraded ecosystems affected by invasive vegetation present different condition levels within vegetation classes, limiting the accuracy of classifications and condition assessment. Here, we evaluated the capacity of Sentinel-2 multispectral time series imagery as an input for classifying different levels of cover within a vegetation class to detect the subtle differences needed to assess the condition of degraded ecosystems. Our study was conducted in the iron-grasslands of South Australia, a perennial tussock grassland dominated by iron-grasses (Lomandra spp.) and severely affected by invasive annual grasses. We developed random forest models to discriminate classes defined by the cover of iron-grasses, wild oats (Avena barbata), and woodland (training points = 250). We tested the importance of data seasonality, spatial resolution, spectral bands, and vegetation indices. The combination of spatial, temporal, and spectral detail produced the best classification results. Random forest classifications performed best at 10 m resolution, suggesting that detailed resolution outweighs spectral detail for discriminating vegetation patterns in systems with high spatial heterogeneity. The model at 10 m resolution combining all periods and all variables (spectral bands and vegetation indices) produced a mean kappa coefficient of 56% and a mean overall accuracy of 67%. The dry season imagery and vegetation indices emerged as the most informative, suggesting that vegetation classes presented different phenological properties critical for their discrimination. Our study contributes to mapping complex ecosystems, facilitating the discrimination of different levels of condition in grasslands degraded by invasive species, and thus benefits the conservation of native grasslands and other ecosystems.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Band spectra</subject><subject>Classification</subject><subject>Degradation</subject><subject>Dry season</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Grasses</subject><subject>Grasslands</subject><subject>Heterogeneity</subject><subject>Image classification</subject><subject>Iron</subject><subject>Loam soils</subject><subject>Machine learning</subject><subject>Mapping</subject><subject>Native species</subject><subject>Nonnative species</subject><subject>Remote sensing</subject><subject>Satellites</subject><subject>Seasonal variations</subject><subject>Spatial resolution</subject><subject>Spectral bands</subject><subject>Time series</subject><subject>Vegetation index</subject><subject>Vegetation mapping</subject><subject>Wildlife conservation</subject><subject>Woodlands</subject><issn>1687-725X</issn><issn>1687-7268</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>RHX</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kF1LwzAYhYMoOKd3_oCAl1qXjyZpL6XMOXB4oYJ4U9J8zIwumUmH9N_bsuGlV-_h8HBeeAC4xugeY8ZmBJF8xjkvCClOwATzQmSC8OL0L7OPc3CR0gYhTgWlE_A5t9YpqXoYLFzt284lI1Pw8NX4znnTZgQut3JtYg9tiLBqZUrO9s6vofQaruRuN-ZFHPp2bKrgtetc8JfgzMo2mavjnYL3x_lb9ZQ9vyyW1cNzpijHXdaYhjY5KbHKpSRKC2UEKQvGSiFZY6lUSnGE80IIzRtmpNYSS80IFpYyo-kU3Bx2dzF8703q6k3YRz-8rEnJClQKTNFA3R0oFUNK0dh6F91Wxr7GqB7t1aO9-mhvwG8P-JfzWv64_-lfeLJvsw</recordid><startdate>20240308</startdate><enddate>20240308</enddate><creator>Guevara-Torres, Diego R.</creator><creator>Facelli, José M.</creator><creator>Ostendorf, Bertram</creator><general>Hindawi</general><general>Hindawi Limited</general><scope>RHU</scope><scope>RHW</scope><scope>RHX</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8AL</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CWDGH</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>M0N</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9554-6409</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5868-3567</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0408-0082</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240308</creationdate><title>Efficacy of Multiseason Sentinel-2 Imagery for Classifying and Mapping Grassland Condition</title><author>Guevara-Torres, Diego R. ; Facelli, José M. ; Ostendorf, Bertram</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-beb3b4291c4aa2cd7ce72985597a5bf3accc6014877d6b5eadda1ad5217f35ed3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Band spectra</topic><topic>Classification</topic><topic>Degradation</topic><topic>Dry season</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Grasses</topic><topic>Grasslands</topic><topic>Heterogeneity</topic><topic>Image classification</topic><topic>Iron</topic><topic>Loam soils</topic><topic>Machine learning</topic><topic>Mapping</topic><topic>Native species</topic><topic>Nonnative species</topic><topic>Remote sensing</topic><topic>Satellites</topic><topic>Seasonal variations</topic><topic>Spatial resolution</topic><topic>Spectral bands</topic><topic>Time series</topic><topic>Vegetation index</topic><topic>Vegetation mapping</topic><topic>Wildlife conservation</topic><topic>Woodlands</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Guevara-Torres, Diego R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Facelli, José M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ostendorf, Bertram</creatorcontrib><collection>Hindawi Publishing Complete</collection><collection>Hindawi Publishing Subscription Journals</collection><collection>Hindawi Publishing Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Computing Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Middle East &amp; Africa Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Computer Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computing Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Journal of sensors</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Guevara-Torres, Diego R.</au><au>Facelli, José M.</au><au>Ostendorf, Bertram</au><au>Lim, Sangsoon</au><au>Sangsoon Lim</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Efficacy of Multiseason Sentinel-2 Imagery for Classifying and Mapping Grassland Condition</atitle><jtitle>Journal of sensors</jtitle><date>2024-03-08</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>2024</volume><spage>1</spage><epage>12</epage><pages>1-12</pages><issn>1687-725X</issn><eissn>1687-7268</eissn><abstract>Assessing the condition of ecosystems is imperative for understanding their degree of degradation and managing their conservation. The increasing availability of remote sensing products offers unprecedented opportunities for mapping vegetation with high detail and accuracy. However, mapping complex ecosystems, like grasslands, remains challenging due to their heterogeneity in vegetation composition and structure. Furthermore, degraded ecosystems affected by invasive vegetation present different condition levels within vegetation classes, limiting the accuracy of classifications and condition assessment. Here, we evaluated the capacity of Sentinel-2 multispectral time series imagery as an input for classifying different levels of cover within a vegetation class to detect the subtle differences needed to assess the condition of degraded ecosystems. Our study was conducted in the iron-grasslands of South Australia, a perennial tussock grassland dominated by iron-grasses (Lomandra spp.) and severely affected by invasive annual grasses. We developed random forest models to discriminate classes defined by the cover of iron-grasses, wild oats (Avena barbata), and woodland (training points = 250). We tested the importance of data seasonality, spatial resolution, spectral bands, and vegetation indices. The combination of spatial, temporal, and spectral detail produced the best classification results. Random forest classifications performed best at 10 m resolution, suggesting that detailed resolution outweighs spectral detail for discriminating vegetation patterns in systems with high spatial heterogeneity. The model at 10 m resolution combining all periods and all variables (spectral bands and vegetation indices) produced a mean kappa coefficient of 56% and a mean overall accuracy of 67%. The dry season imagery and vegetation indices emerged as the most informative, suggesting that vegetation classes presented different phenological properties critical for their discrimination. Our study contributes to mapping complex ecosystems, facilitating the discrimination of different levels of condition in grasslands degraded by invasive species, and thus benefits the conservation of native grasslands and other ecosystems.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Hindawi</pub><doi>10.1155/2024/6668228</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9554-6409</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5868-3567</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0408-0082</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1687-725X
ispartof Journal of sensors, 2024-03, Vol.2024, p.1-12
issn 1687-725X
1687-7268
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2958097130
source Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Accuracy
Algorithms
Band spectra
Classification
Degradation
Dry season
Ecosystems
Grasses
Grasslands
Heterogeneity
Image classification
Iron
Loam soils
Machine learning
Mapping
Native species
Nonnative species
Remote sensing
Satellites
Seasonal variations
Spatial resolution
Spectral bands
Time series
Vegetation index
Vegetation mapping
Wildlife conservation
Woodlands
title Efficacy of Multiseason Sentinel-2 Imagery for Classifying and Mapping Grassland Condition
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T19%3A27%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Efficacy%20of%20Multiseason%20Sentinel-2%20Imagery%20for%20Classifying%20and%20Mapping%20Grassland%20Condition&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20sensors&rft.au=Guevara-Torres,%20Diego%20R.&rft.date=2024-03-08&rft.volume=2024&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=12&rft.pages=1-12&rft.issn=1687-725X&rft.eissn=1687-7268&rft_id=info:doi/10.1155/2024/6668228&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2958097130%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2958097130&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true