UNDERSTANDING THE MISUNDERSTOOD KESSLER SYNDROME

Kelvey takes the measure of Kessler Syndrome, the theory that cascading collisions of debris could ruin humanity's future in space. All experts he spoke with agreed that Kessler Syndrome cascade is something that, whether it has begun or not, would play out over the course of decades if not cen...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Aerospace America 2024-03, Vol.62 (3), p.40
1. Verfasser: Kelvey, Jon
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 3
container_start_page 40
container_title Aerospace America
container_volume 62
creator Kelvey, Jon
description Kelvey takes the measure of Kessler Syndrome, the theory that cascading collisions of debris could ruin humanity's future in space. All experts he spoke with agreed that Kessler Syndrome cascade is something that, whether it has begun or not, would play out over the course of decades if not centuries, rather than fitting into the runtime of a Hollywood drama. Matney says that Kessler Syndrome won't cause orbital altitudes to be unusable. It's more like a gradual degradation that's going to cost everybody more money. The prospect of losing money leads naturally to the question of just what should be done about orbital debris, and there are two generally agreed-upon major actions to take. The first step is to make sure that new junk doesn't get added. The second step is to remove large pieces of junk that have the potential to be the sources of cascading debris events in a Kessler Syndrome scenario. Not creating new debris is largely a matter of adhering to the rule in the US and Europe that satellites must not stay in orbit longer than five years after their mission is completed.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2957490218</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2957490218</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_29574902183</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYeA0MDcx0DU3MorgYOAqLs4yMDAwNTa25GQwCPVzcQ0KDnH0c_H0c1cI8XBV8PUMhgr6-7soeLsGB_u4BikER_q5BPn7uvIwsKYl5hSn8kJpbgZlN9cQZw_dgqL8wtLU4pL4rPzSojygVLyRpam5iaWBkaGFMXGqACALLk4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2957490218</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>UNDERSTANDING THE MISUNDERSTOOD KESSLER SYNDROME</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Kelvey, Jon</creator><creatorcontrib>Kelvey, Jon</creatorcontrib><description>Kelvey takes the measure of Kessler Syndrome, the theory that cascading collisions of debris could ruin humanity's future in space. All experts he spoke with agreed that Kessler Syndrome cascade is something that, whether it has begun or not, would play out over the course of decades if not centuries, rather than fitting into the runtime of a Hollywood drama. Matney says that Kessler Syndrome won't cause orbital altitudes to be unusable. It's more like a gradual degradation that's going to cost everybody more money. The prospect of losing money leads naturally to the question of just what should be done about orbital debris, and there are two generally agreed-upon major actions to take. The first step is to make sure that new junk doesn't get added. The second step is to remove large pieces of junk that have the potential to be the sources of cascading debris events in a Kessler Syndrome scenario. Not creating new debris is largely a matter of adhering to the rule in the US and Europe that satellites must not stay in orbit longer than five years after their mission is completed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0740-722X</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics</publisher><subject>Collisions ; Satellites ; Space debris</subject><ispartof>Aerospace America, 2024-03, Vol.62 (3), p.40</ispartof><rights>Copyright American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Mar 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kelvey, Jon</creatorcontrib><title>UNDERSTANDING THE MISUNDERSTOOD KESSLER SYNDROME</title><title>Aerospace America</title><description>Kelvey takes the measure of Kessler Syndrome, the theory that cascading collisions of debris could ruin humanity's future in space. All experts he spoke with agreed that Kessler Syndrome cascade is something that, whether it has begun or not, would play out over the course of decades if not centuries, rather than fitting into the runtime of a Hollywood drama. Matney says that Kessler Syndrome won't cause orbital altitudes to be unusable. It's more like a gradual degradation that's going to cost everybody more money. The prospect of losing money leads naturally to the question of just what should be done about orbital debris, and there are two generally agreed-upon major actions to take. The first step is to make sure that new junk doesn't get added. The second step is to remove large pieces of junk that have the potential to be the sources of cascading debris events in a Kessler Syndrome scenario. Not creating new debris is largely a matter of adhering to the rule in the US and Europe that satellites must not stay in orbit longer than five years after their mission is completed.</description><subject>Collisions</subject><subject>Satellites</subject><subject>Space debris</subject><issn>0740-722X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNpjYeA0MDcx0DU3MorgYOAqLs4yMDAwNTa25GQwCPVzcQ0KDnH0c_H0c1cI8XBV8PUMhgr6-7soeLsGB_u4BikER_q5BPn7uvIwsKYl5hSn8kJpbgZlN9cQZw_dgqL8wtLU4pL4rPzSojygVLyRpam5iaWBkaGFMXGqACALLk4</recordid><startdate>20240301</startdate><enddate>20240301</enddate><creator>Kelvey, Jon</creator><general>American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics</general><scope/></search><sort><creationdate>20240301</creationdate><title>UNDERSTANDING THE MISUNDERSTOOD KESSLER SYNDROME</title><author>Kelvey, Jon</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_29574902183</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Collisions</topic><topic>Satellites</topic><topic>Space debris</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kelvey, Jon</creatorcontrib><jtitle>Aerospace America</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kelvey, Jon</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>UNDERSTANDING THE MISUNDERSTOOD KESSLER SYNDROME</atitle><jtitle>Aerospace America</jtitle><date>2024-03-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>62</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>40</spage><pages>40-</pages><issn>0740-722X</issn><abstract>Kelvey takes the measure of Kessler Syndrome, the theory that cascading collisions of debris could ruin humanity's future in space. All experts he spoke with agreed that Kessler Syndrome cascade is something that, whether it has begun or not, would play out over the course of decades if not centuries, rather than fitting into the runtime of a Hollywood drama. Matney says that Kessler Syndrome won't cause orbital altitudes to be unusable. It's more like a gradual degradation that's going to cost everybody more money. The prospect of losing money leads naturally to the question of just what should be done about orbital debris, and there are two generally agreed-upon major actions to take. The first step is to make sure that new junk doesn't get added. The second step is to remove large pieces of junk that have the potential to be the sources of cascading debris events in a Kessler Syndrome scenario. Not creating new debris is largely a matter of adhering to the rule in the US and Europe that satellites must not stay in orbit longer than five years after their mission is completed.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics</pub></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0740-722X
ispartof Aerospace America, 2024-03, Vol.62 (3), p.40
issn 0740-722X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2957490218
source EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Collisions
Satellites
Space debris
title UNDERSTANDING THE MISUNDERSTOOD KESSLER SYNDROME
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T10%3A41%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=UNDERSTANDING%20THE%20MISUNDERSTOOD%20KESSLER%20SYNDROME&rft.jtitle=Aerospace%20America&rft.au=Kelvey,%20Jon&rft.date=2024-03-01&rft.volume=62&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=40&rft.pages=40-&rft.issn=0740-722X&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2957490218%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2957490218&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true