Eye movements and reading comprehension performance: examining the relationships among test format, working memory capacity and reading comprehension

The ability to form a mental model of a text is an essential component of successful reading comprehension (RC), and purpose for reading can influence mental model construction. Participants were assigned to one of two conditions during an RC test to alter their purpose for reading: concurrent (text...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Reading & writing 2024-03, Vol.37 (3), p.703-729
Hauptverfasser: Moss, Corrin, Kwabi, Sharon, Ardoin, Scott P., Binder, Katherine S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 729
container_issue 3
container_start_page 703
container_title Reading & writing
container_volume 37
creator Moss, Corrin
Kwabi, Sharon
Ardoin, Scott P.
Binder, Katherine S.
description The ability to form a mental model of a text is an essential component of successful reading comprehension (RC), and purpose for reading can influence mental model construction. Participants were assigned to one of two conditions during an RC test to alter their purpose for reading: concurrent (texts and questions were presented simultaneously) and sequential (texts were presented first, then questions were shown without text access). Their eye movements were recorded during testing. Working memory capacity (WMC) and centrality of textual information were measured. Participants in the sequential condition had longer first-pass reading times compared to participants in the concurrent condition, while participants in the concurrent condition had longer total processing times per word. In addition, participants with higher WMC had longer total reading times per word. Finally, participants in the sequential condition with higher WMC had longer processing times in central regions. Even among skilled college readers, participants with lower WMC had difficulty adjusting their reading behaviors to meet the task demands such as distinguishing central and peripheral ideas. However, participants with higher WMC increased attention to important text areas. One potential explanation is that participants with higher WMC are better able to construct a coherent mental model of the text, and attending to central text areas is an essential component of mental model formation. Therefore, these results help clarify the relationship between the purpose for reading and mental model development.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11145-023-10428-0
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2956965614</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2956965614</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-34d2470662ae059d038d09dbc951c9d2d9d6038a291706669083b2e37d867a043</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtKAzEUhoMoWC8v4Crg1tGTZG5xJ6VeoOBG1yFOTtupTTImU7UP4vuaaQVXujpw-L7_HH5CzhhcMoDqKjLG8iIDLjIGOa8z2CMjVlQiAwnFPhmB5DzLq6o6JEcxLgGA17kYka_JBqn172jR9ZFqZ2hAbVo3p423XcAFuth6RzsMMx-sdg1eU_zUtnUD1C8wCSvdJyYu2i5FWD_sMfZ0K_QX9MOH1wG2aH3Y0EZ3umn7zd_XTsjBTK8inv7MY_J8O3ka32fTx7uH8c00awSTfSZyw_MKypJrhEIaELUBaV4aWbBGGm6kKdNOc8kGqpRQixeOojJ1WWnIxTE53-V2wb-t08tq6dfBpZOKy6KUZVGygeI7qgk-xoAz1YXW6rBRDNRQv9rVr1L9alu_giSJnRQT7OYYfqP_sb4B8L2Kww</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2956965614</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Eye movements and reading comprehension performance: examining the relationships among test format, working memory capacity and reading comprehension</title><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Moss, Corrin ; Kwabi, Sharon ; Ardoin, Scott P. ; Binder, Katherine S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Moss, Corrin ; Kwabi, Sharon ; Ardoin, Scott P. ; Binder, Katherine S.</creatorcontrib><description>The ability to form a mental model of a text is an essential component of successful reading comprehension (RC), and purpose for reading can influence mental model construction. Participants were assigned to one of two conditions during an RC test to alter their purpose for reading: concurrent (texts and questions were presented simultaneously) and sequential (texts were presented first, then questions were shown without text access). Their eye movements were recorded during testing. Working memory capacity (WMC) and centrality of textual information were measured. Participants in the sequential condition had longer first-pass reading times compared to participants in the concurrent condition, while participants in the concurrent condition had longer total processing times per word. In addition, participants with higher WMC had longer total reading times per word. Finally, participants in the sequential condition with higher WMC had longer processing times in central regions. Even among skilled college readers, participants with lower WMC had difficulty adjusting their reading behaviors to meet the task demands such as distinguishing central and peripheral ideas. However, participants with higher WMC increased attention to important text areas. One potential explanation is that participants with higher WMC are better able to construct a coherent mental model of the text, and attending to central text areas is an essential component of mental model formation. Therefore, these results help clarify the relationship between the purpose for reading and mental model development.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0922-4777</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-0905</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11145-023-10428-0</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Education ; Eye movements ; Language and Literature ; Linguistics ; Literacy ; Neurology ; Psycholinguistics ; Reading comprehension ; Reading processes ; Short term memory ; Social Sciences</subject><ispartof>Reading &amp; writing, 2024-03, Vol.37 (3), p.703-729</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-34d2470662ae059d038d09dbc951c9d2d9d6038a291706669083b2e37d867a043</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-34d2470662ae059d038d09dbc951c9d2d9d6038a291706669083b2e37d867a043</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0711-5751</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11145-023-10428-0$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11145-023-10428-0$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Moss, Corrin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kwabi, Sharon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ardoin, Scott P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Binder, Katherine S.</creatorcontrib><title>Eye movements and reading comprehension performance: examining the relationships among test format, working memory capacity and reading comprehension</title><title>Reading &amp; writing</title><addtitle>Read Writ</addtitle><description>The ability to form a mental model of a text is an essential component of successful reading comprehension (RC), and purpose for reading can influence mental model construction. Participants were assigned to one of two conditions during an RC test to alter their purpose for reading: concurrent (texts and questions were presented simultaneously) and sequential (texts were presented first, then questions were shown without text access). Their eye movements were recorded during testing. Working memory capacity (WMC) and centrality of textual information were measured. Participants in the sequential condition had longer first-pass reading times compared to participants in the concurrent condition, while participants in the concurrent condition had longer total processing times per word. In addition, participants with higher WMC had longer total reading times per word. Finally, participants in the sequential condition with higher WMC had longer processing times in central regions. Even among skilled college readers, participants with lower WMC had difficulty adjusting their reading behaviors to meet the task demands such as distinguishing central and peripheral ideas. However, participants with higher WMC increased attention to important text areas. One potential explanation is that participants with higher WMC are better able to construct a coherent mental model of the text, and attending to central text areas is an essential component of mental model formation. Therefore, these results help clarify the relationship between the purpose for reading and mental model development.</description><subject>Education</subject><subject>Eye movements</subject><subject>Language and Literature</subject><subject>Linguistics</subject><subject>Literacy</subject><subject>Neurology</subject><subject>Psycholinguistics</subject><subject>Reading comprehension</subject><subject>Reading processes</subject><subject>Short term memory</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><issn>0922-4777</issn><issn>1573-0905</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMtKAzEUhoMoWC8v4Crg1tGTZG5xJ6VeoOBG1yFOTtupTTImU7UP4vuaaQVXujpw-L7_HH5CzhhcMoDqKjLG8iIDLjIGOa8z2CMjVlQiAwnFPhmB5DzLq6o6JEcxLgGA17kYka_JBqn172jR9ZFqZ2hAbVo3p423XcAFuth6RzsMMx-sdg1eU_zUtnUD1C8wCSvdJyYu2i5FWD_sMfZ0K_QX9MOH1wG2aH3Y0EZ3umn7zd_XTsjBTK8inv7MY_J8O3ka32fTx7uH8c00awSTfSZyw_MKypJrhEIaELUBaV4aWbBGGm6kKdNOc8kGqpRQixeOojJ1WWnIxTE53-V2wb-t08tq6dfBpZOKy6KUZVGygeI7qgk-xoAz1YXW6rBRDNRQv9rVr1L9alu_giSJnRQT7OYYfqP_sb4B8L2Kww</recordid><startdate>20240301</startdate><enddate>20240301</enddate><creator>Moss, Corrin</creator><creator>Kwabi, Sharon</creator><creator>Ardoin, Scott P.</creator><creator>Binder, Katherine S.</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T9</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0711-5751</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240301</creationdate><title>Eye movements and reading comprehension performance: examining the relationships among test format, working memory capacity and reading comprehension</title><author>Moss, Corrin ; Kwabi, Sharon ; Ardoin, Scott P. ; Binder, Katherine S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-34d2470662ae059d038d09dbc951c9d2d9d6038a291706669083b2e37d867a043</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Education</topic><topic>Eye movements</topic><topic>Language and Literature</topic><topic>Linguistics</topic><topic>Literacy</topic><topic>Neurology</topic><topic>Psycholinguistics</topic><topic>Reading comprehension</topic><topic>Reading processes</topic><topic>Short term memory</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Moss, Corrin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kwabi, Sharon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ardoin, Scott P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Binder, Katherine S.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><jtitle>Reading &amp; writing</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Moss, Corrin</au><au>Kwabi, Sharon</au><au>Ardoin, Scott P.</au><au>Binder, Katherine S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Eye movements and reading comprehension performance: examining the relationships among test format, working memory capacity and reading comprehension</atitle><jtitle>Reading &amp; writing</jtitle><stitle>Read Writ</stitle><date>2024-03-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>703</spage><epage>729</epage><pages>703-729</pages><issn>0922-4777</issn><eissn>1573-0905</eissn><abstract>The ability to form a mental model of a text is an essential component of successful reading comprehension (RC), and purpose for reading can influence mental model construction. Participants were assigned to one of two conditions during an RC test to alter their purpose for reading: concurrent (texts and questions were presented simultaneously) and sequential (texts were presented first, then questions were shown without text access). Their eye movements were recorded during testing. Working memory capacity (WMC) and centrality of textual information were measured. Participants in the sequential condition had longer first-pass reading times compared to participants in the concurrent condition, while participants in the concurrent condition had longer total processing times per word. In addition, participants with higher WMC had longer total reading times per word. Finally, participants in the sequential condition with higher WMC had longer processing times in central regions. Even among skilled college readers, participants with lower WMC had difficulty adjusting their reading behaviors to meet the task demands such as distinguishing central and peripheral ideas. However, participants with higher WMC increased attention to important text areas. One potential explanation is that participants with higher WMC are better able to construct a coherent mental model of the text, and attending to central text areas is an essential component of mental model formation. Therefore, these results help clarify the relationship between the purpose for reading and mental model development.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s11145-023-10428-0</doi><tpages>27</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0711-5751</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0922-4777
ispartof Reading & writing, 2024-03, Vol.37 (3), p.703-729
issn 0922-4777
1573-0905
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2956965614
source SpringerLink Journals
subjects Education
Eye movements
Language and Literature
Linguistics
Literacy
Neurology
Psycholinguistics
Reading comprehension
Reading processes
Short term memory
Social Sciences
title Eye movements and reading comprehension performance: examining the relationships among test format, working memory capacity and reading comprehension
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-15T03%3A17%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Eye%20movements%20and%20reading%20comprehension%20performance:%20examining%20the%20relationships%20among%20test%20format,%20working%20memory%20capacity%20and%20reading%20comprehension&rft.jtitle=Reading%20&%20writing&rft.au=Moss,%20Corrin&rft.date=2024-03-01&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=703&rft.epage=729&rft.pages=703-729&rft.issn=0922-4777&rft.eissn=1573-0905&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11145-023-10428-0&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2956965614%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2956965614&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true