System Performance of Wing and Propellers in a Periodic Distributed Propulsion Experiment
The design task for distributed propulsion (DP) aircraft is more complex than conventional twin-engine designs due to the pronounced propeller wing interaction. DP concepts rely on a beneficial and robust interaction of propulsion and lifting surface. Additionally, a good DP design is optimised as a...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of physics. Conference series 2024-03, Vol.2716 (1), p.12003 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 12003 |
container_title | Journal of physics. Conference series |
container_volume | 2716 |
creator | Lindner, T.K. Oldeweme, J. Scholz, P. Friedrichs, J. |
description | The design task for distributed propulsion (DP) aircraft is more complex than conventional twin-engine designs due to the pronounced propeller wing interaction. DP concepts rely on a beneficial and robust interaction of propulsion and lifting surface. Additionally, a good DP design is optimised as a system such that each element is not optimised by itself (i.e.
η
prop
and
C
L
/C
D
)
, but with consideration of the close coupled interaction. The evaluation of such an interaction driven setup is scope of this work. Thrust and torque of a periodic co-rotating DP wing are measured simultaneously with airfoil coefficients. Thereby the influence of propeller on the wing and vice versa are identified.
Two different sets of propeller geometries with a diameter of
D =
0.6
m
are studied. One propeller set is designed for minimum induced propeller loss (MIL). The second propeller set is designed to have a constant induced axial velocity over the radius (CIV). We shall compare how the different strategies perform in the DP system.
The two element wing has a span of
B =
2.4 m and a reference chord of
c =
0.8 m, operating at
Re =
2.1 × 10
6
. For this study, the propellers are pitched to meet a constant
c
T
, J
and
Ma
tip
. The results focus on the system performance for the combined setup in take-off configuration. While the isolated propeller efficiency benefits from the integration in front of the wing by > Δ
η
prop
=
12%, the system efficiency suffers from increased drag on the trailing wing that is roughly tripled over the clean wing. Depending on the propeller position relative to the wing, interaction losses can be minimised so that a system efficiency gain over the isolated wing and propeller of > Δ
η
sys
=
4% is achieved. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1088/1742-6596/2716/1/012003 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2956825073</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2956825073</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2743-ed6646cd0f870cf8e3c8bfc750f096d5af464ddf21f15d2dcee4850bd9f8f5813</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkFtLwzAUgIMoOKe_wYBvQm3SNpc-ypw3Bg6miE-hy0UyuqYmLbh_b0plIgiel3PgfOfCB8A5RlcYcZ5iVmQJJSVNM4ZpilOEM4TyAzDZdw73NefH4CSETQRisAl4W-1Cp7dwqb1xfls1UkNn4Ktt3mHVKLj0rtV1rX2AtoHVwFmnrIQ3NnTervtOj1BfB-saOP9sI7HVTXcKjkxVB332nafg5Xb-PLtPFk93D7PrRSIzVuSJVpQWVCpkOEPScJ1LvjaSEWRQSRWpTEELpUyGDSYqU1LrghO0VqXhhnCcT8HFuLf17qPXoRMb1_smnhRZSSjPCGJ5pNhISe9C8NqINr5Z-Z3ASAwexWBIDLbE4FFgMXqMk5fjpHXtz-rH5Wz1GxStMhHO_4D_O_EFHCaDWw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2956825073</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>System Performance of Wing and Propellers in a Periodic Distributed Propulsion Experiment</title><source>IOP Publishing Free Content</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>IOPscience extra</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Lindner, T.K. ; Oldeweme, J. ; Scholz, P. ; Friedrichs, J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Lindner, T.K. ; Oldeweme, J. ; Scholz, P. ; Friedrichs, J.</creatorcontrib><description>The design task for distributed propulsion (DP) aircraft is more complex than conventional twin-engine designs due to the pronounced propeller wing interaction. DP concepts rely on a beneficial and robust interaction of propulsion and lifting surface. Additionally, a good DP design is optimised as a system such that each element is not optimised by itself (i.e.
η
prop
and
C
L
/C
D
)
, but with consideration of the close coupled interaction. The evaluation of such an interaction driven setup is scope of this work. Thrust and torque of a periodic co-rotating DP wing are measured simultaneously with airfoil coefficients. Thereby the influence of propeller on the wing and vice versa are identified.
Two different sets of propeller geometries with a diameter of
D =
0.6
m
are studied. One propeller set is designed for minimum induced propeller loss (MIL). The second propeller set is designed to have a constant induced axial velocity over the radius (CIV). We shall compare how the different strategies perform in the DP system.
The two element wing has a span of
B =
2.4 m and a reference chord of
c =
0.8 m, operating at
Re =
2.1 × 10
6
. For this study, the propellers are pitched to meet a constant
c
T
, J
and
Ma
tip
. The results focus on the system performance for the combined setup in take-off configuration. While the isolated propeller efficiency benefits from the integration in front of the wing by > Δ
η
prop
=
12%, the system efficiency suffers from increased drag on the trailing wing that is roughly tripled over the clean wing. Depending on the propeller position relative to the wing, interaction losses can be minimised so that a system efficiency gain over the isolated wing and propeller of > Δ
η
sys
=
4% is achieved.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1742-6588</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1742-6596</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/2716/1/012003</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bristol: IOP Publishing</publisher><subject>Design ; Design optimization ; Diameters ; Efficiency ; Lift devices ; Propeller efficiency ; Propulsion</subject><ispartof>Journal of physics. Conference series, 2024-03, Vol.2716 (1), p.12003</ispartof><rights>Published under licence by IOP Publishing Ltd</rights><rights>Published under licence by IOP Publishing Ltd. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1742-6596/2716/1/012003/pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Giop$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,38847,38869,53818,53845</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lindner, T.K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oldeweme, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scholz, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Friedrichs, J.</creatorcontrib><title>System Performance of Wing and Propellers in a Periodic Distributed Propulsion Experiment</title><title>Journal of physics. Conference series</title><addtitle>J. Phys.: Conf. Ser</addtitle><description>The design task for distributed propulsion (DP) aircraft is more complex than conventional twin-engine designs due to the pronounced propeller wing interaction. DP concepts rely on a beneficial and robust interaction of propulsion and lifting surface. Additionally, a good DP design is optimised as a system such that each element is not optimised by itself (i.e.
η
prop
and
C
L
/C
D
)
, but with consideration of the close coupled interaction. The evaluation of such an interaction driven setup is scope of this work. Thrust and torque of a periodic co-rotating DP wing are measured simultaneously with airfoil coefficients. Thereby the influence of propeller on the wing and vice versa are identified.
Two different sets of propeller geometries with a diameter of
D =
0.6
m
are studied. One propeller set is designed for minimum induced propeller loss (MIL). The second propeller set is designed to have a constant induced axial velocity over the radius (CIV). We shall compare how the different strategies perform in the DP system.
The two element wing has a span of
B =
2.4 m and a reference chord of
c =
0.8 m, operating at
Re =
2.1 × 10
6
. For this study, the propellers are pitched to meet a constant
c
T
, J
and
Ma
tip
. The results focus on the system performance for the combined setup in take-off configuration. While the isolated propeller efficiency benefits from the integration in front of the wing by > Δ
η
prop
=
12%, the system efficiency suffers from increased drag on the trailing wing that is roughly tripled over the clean wing. Depending on the propeller position relative to the wing, interaction losses can be minimised so that a system efficiency gain over the isolated wing and propeller of > Δ
η
sys
=
4% is achieved.</description><subject>Design</subject><subject>Design optimization</subject><subject>Diameters</subject><subject>Efficiency</subject><subject>Lift devices</subject><subject>Propeller efficiency</subject><subject>Propulsion</subject><issn>1742-6588</issn><issn>1742-6596</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>O3W</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkFtLwzAUgIMoOKe_wYBvQm3SNpc-ypw3Bg6miE-hy0UyuqYmLbh_b0plIgiel3PgfOfCB8A5RlcYcZ5iVmQJJSVNM4ZpilOEM4TyAzDZdw73NefH4CSETQRisAl4W-1Cp7dwqb1xfls1UkNn4Ktt3mHVKLj0rtV1rX2AtoHVwFmnrIQ3NnTervtOj1BfB-saOP9sI7HVTXcKjkxVB332nafg5Xb-PLtPFk93D7PrRSIzVuSJVpQWVCpkOEPScJ1LvjaSEWRQSRWpTEELpUyGDSYqU1LrghO0VqXhhnCcT8HFuLf17qPXoRMb1_smnhRZSSjPCGJ5pNhISe9C8NqINr5Z-Z3ASAwexWBIDLbE4FFgMXqMk5fjpHXtz-rH5Wz1GxStMhHO_4D_O_EFHCaDWw</recordid><startdate>20240301</startdate><enddate>20240301</enddate><creator>Lindner, T.K.</creator><creator>Oldeweme, J.</creator><creator>Scholz, P.</creator><creator>Friedrichs, J.</creator><general>IOP Publishing</general><scope>O3W</scope><scope>TSCCA</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240301</creationdate><title>System Performance of Wing and Propellers in a Periodic Distributed Propulsion Experiment</title><author>Lindner, T.K. ; Oldeweme, J. ; Scholz, P. ; Friedrichs, J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2743-ed6646cd0f870cf8e3c8bfc750f096d5af464ddf21f15d2dcee4850bd9f8f5813</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Design</topic><topic>Design optimization</topic><topic>Diameters</topic><topic>Efficiency</topic><topic>Lift devices</topic><topic>Propeller efficiency</topic><topic>Propulsion</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lindner, T.K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oldeweme, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scholz, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Friedrichs, J.</creatorcontrib><collection>IOP Publishing Free Content</collection><collection>IOPscience (Open Access)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Journal of physics. Conference series</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lindner, T.K.</au><au>Oldeweme, J.</au><au>Scholz, P.</au><au>Friedrichs, J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>System Performance of Wing and Propellers in a Periodic Distributed Propulsion Experiment</atitle><jtitle>Journal of physics. Conference series</jtitle><addtitle>J. Phys.: Conf. Ser</addtitle><date>2024-03-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>2716</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>12003</spage><pages>12003-</pages><issn>1742-6588</issn><eissn>1742-6596</eissn><abstract>The design task for distributed propulsion (DP) aircraft is more complex than conventional twin-engine designs due to the pronounced propeller wing interaction. DP concepts rely on a beneficial and robust interaction of propulsion and lifting surface. Additionally, a good DP design is optimised as a system such that each element is not optimised by itself (i.e.
η
prop
and
C
L
/C
D
)
, but with consideration of the close coupled interaction. The evaluation of such an interaction driven setup is scope of this work. Thrust and torque of a periodic co-rotating DP wing are measured simultaneously with airfoil coefficients. Thereby the influence of propeller on the wing and vice versa are identified.
Two different sets of propeller geometries with a diameter of
D =
0.6
m
are studied. One propeller set is designed for minimum induced propeller loss (MIL). The second propeller set is designed to have a constant induced axial velocity over the radius (CIV). We shall compare how the different strategies perform in the DP system.
The two element wing has a span of
B =
2.4 m and a reference chord of
c =
0.8 m, operating at
Re =
2.1 × 10
6
. For this study, the propellers are pitched to meet a constant
c
T
, J
and
Ma
tip
. The results focus on the system performance for the combined setup in take-off configuration. While the isolated propeller efficiency benefits from the integration in front of the wing by > Δ
η
prop
=
12%, the system efficiency suffers from increased drag on the trailing wing that is roughly tripled over the clean wing. Depending on the propeller position relative to the wing, interaction losses can be minimised so that a system efficiency gain over the isolated wing and propeller of > Δ
η
sys
=
4% is achieved.</abstract><cop>Bristol</cop><pub>IOP Publishing</pub><doi>10.1088/1742-6596/2716/1/012003</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1742-6588 |
ispartof | Journal of physics. Conference series, 2024-03, Vol.2716 (1), p.12003 |
issn | 1742-6588 1742-6596 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2956825073 |
source | IOP Publishing Free Content; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; IOPscience extra; Alma/SFX Local Collection; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
subjects | Design Design optimization Diameters Efficiency Lift devices Propeller efficiency Propulsion |
title | System Performance of Wing and Propellers in a Periodic Distributed Propulsion Experiment |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T07%3A38%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=System%20Performance%20of%20Wing%20and%20Propellers%20in%20a%20Periodic%20Distributed%20Propulsion%20Experiment&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20physics.%20Conference%20series&rft.au=Lindner,%20T.K.&rft.date=2024-03-01&rft.volume=2716&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=12003&rft.pages=12003-&rft.issn=1742-6588&rft.eissn=1742-6596&rft_id=info:doi/10.1088/1742-6596/2716/1/012003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2956825073%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2956825073&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |