Repeat victimisation and the crime drop: evidence from Japan
It is well-established that some people and places are repeat victims of crime. It is equally well-established that crime in many countries has fallen considerably in recent decades—the so-called ‘international crime drop’. What is less clear is the relationship between repeat victimisation and the...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Crime prevention and community safety 2024-03, Vol.26 (1), p.1-15 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 15 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 1 |
container_title | Crime prevention and community safety |
container_volume | 26 |
creator | Suzuki, Ai Sidebottom, Aiden Wortley, Richard Shimada, Takahito |
description | It is well-established that some people and places are repeat victims of crime. It is equally well-established that crime in many countries has fallen considerably in recent decades—the so-called ‘international crime drop’. What is less clear is the relationship between repeat victimisation and the crime drop, and whether reductions in crime have produced a more or less equitable distribution of crime across people and places. This study uses data from four sweeps of a national victimisation survey (2007–2018) to explore the relationship between the trend and prevalence of (repeat) residential burglary and vandalism victimisation in Japan. Results indicate high levels of repeat victimisation: households burgled and/or vandalised twice or more made up less than 1% of all surveyed households but accounted for 17% of all burglaries and 24% of all vandalism incidents. Moreover, although the prevalence rate of residential burglary and vandalism was shown to fall over time (residential burglary = 2.9% in 2007–1.5% in 2018 and vandalism = 4.0% in 2007–1.7% in 2018%), both crime types were found to have become more concentrated. Our results are largely consistent with recent studies in Europe and reaffirm the value and fairness of crime prevention interventions being targeted at and tailored to previous victims of crime. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1057/s41300-023-00196-y |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2956513062</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2956513062</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-e9993e6cf3c32cb9539758d85d4165dd89348d085704505743e2a0dfca250b33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtLAzEUhYMoWKt_wFXAdfTmOYm4keKTgiDdhzTJ6BTnYTIt9N8bHcGdq3sX55x7z4fQOYVLCrK6yoJyAAKMEwBqFNkfoBmtBCdCMXNYdqGA8ErDMTrJeQOgQAPM0M1rHKIb8a7xY9M22Y1N32HXBTy-R-xT00YcUj9c47hrQux8xHXqW_zsBtedoqPafeR49jvnaHV_t1o8kuXLw9Pidkk8p2Yk0RjDo_I195z5tZHcVFIHLYOgSoagDRc6gJYVCFnaCB6Zg1B7xySsOZ-jiyl2SP3nNubRbvpt6spFy4xUslRXrKjYpPKpzznF2g7le5f2loL9hmQnSLZAsj-Q7L6Y-GTKRdy9xfQX_Y_rC9f8aLk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2956513062</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Repeat victimisation and the crime drop: evidence from Japan</title><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Suzuki, Ai ; Sidebottom, Aiden ; Wortley, Richard ; Shimada, Takahito</creator><creatorcontrib>Suzuki, Ai ; Sidebottom, Aiden ; Wortley, Richard ; Shimada, Takahito</creatorcontrib><description>It is well-established that some people and places are repeat victims of crime. It is equally well-established that crime in many countries has fallen considerably in recent decades—the so-called ‘international crime drop’. What is less clear is the relationship between repeat victimisation and the crime drop, and whether reductions in crime have produced a more or less equitable distribution of crime across people and places. This study uses data from four sweeps of a national victimisation survey (2007–2018) to explore the relationship between the trend and prevalence of (repeat) residential burglary and vandalism victimisation in Japan. Results indicate high levels of repeat victimisation: households burgled and/or vandalised twice or more made up less than 1% of all surveyed households but accounted for 17% of all burglaries and 24% of all vandalism incidents. Moreover, although the prevalence rate of residential burglary and vandalism was shown to fall over time (residential burglary = 2.9% in 2007–1.5% in 2018 and vandalism = 4.0% in 2007–1.7% in 2018%), both crime types were found to have become more concentrated. Our results are largely consistent with recent studies in Europe and reaffirm the value and fairness of crime prevention interventions being targeted at and tailored to previous victims of crime.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1460-3780</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1743-4629</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1057/s41300-023-00196-y</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Palgrave Macmillan UK</publisher><subject>Burglary ; Crime and Society ; Crime prevention ; Criminology and Criminal Justice ; Original Article ; Social Sciences ; Vandalism ; Victimization ; Victims of crime</subject><ispartof>Crime prevention and community safety, 2024-03, Vol.26 (1), p.1-15</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited 2024. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-e9993e6cf3c32cb9539758d85d4165dd89348d085704505743e2a0dfca250b33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-e9993e6cf3c32cb9539758d85d4165dd89348d085704505743e2a0dfca250b33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1057/s41300-023-00196-y$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41300-023-00196-y$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Suzuki, Ai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sidebottom, Aiden</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wortley, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shimada, Takahito</creatorcontrib><title>Repeat victimisation and the crime drop: evidence from Japan</title><title>Crime prevention and community safety</title><addtitle>Crime Prev Community Saf</addtitle><description>It is well-established that some people and places are repeat victims of crime. It is equally well-established that crime in many countries has fallen considerably in recent decades—the so-called ‘international crime drop’. What is less clear is the relationship between repeat victimisation and the crime drop, and whether reductions in crime have produced a more or less equitable distribution of crime across people and places. This study uses data from four sweeps of a national victimisation survey (2007–2018) to explore the relationship between the trend and prevalence of (repeat) residential burglary and vandalism victimisation in Japan. Results indicate high levels of repeat victimisation: households burgled and/or vandalised twice or more made up less than 1% of all surveyed households but accounted for 17% of all burglaries and 24% of all vandalism incidents. Moreover, although the prevalence rate of residential burglary and vandalism was shown to fall over time (residential burglary = 2.9% in 2007–1.5% in 2018 and vandalism = 4.0% in 2007–1.7% in 2018%), both crime types were found to have become more concentrated. Our results are largely consistent with recent studies in Europe and reaffirm the value and fairness of crime prevention interventions being targeted at and tailored to previous victims of crime.</description><subject>Burglary</subject><subject>Crime and Society</subject><subject>Crime prevention</subject><subject>Criminology and Criminal Justice</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Vandalism</subject><subject>Victimization</subject><subject>Victims of crime</subject><issn>1460-3780</issn><issn>1743-4629</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kEtLAzEUhYMoWKt_wFXAdfTmOYm4keKTgiDdhzTJ6BTnYTIt9N8bHcGdq3sX55x7z4fQOYVLCrK6yoJyAAKMEwBqFNkfoBmtBCdCMXNYdqGA8ErDMTrJeQOgQAPM0M1rHKIb8a7xY9M22Y1N32HXBTy-R-xT00YcUj9c47hrQux8xHXqW_zsBtedoqPafeR49jvnaHV_t1o8kuXLw9Pidkk8p2Yk0RjDo_I195z5tZHcVFIHLYOgSoagDRc6gJYVCFnaCB6Zg1B7xySsOZ-jiyl2SP3nNubRbvpt6spFy4xUslRXrKjYpPKpzznF2g7le5f2loL9hmQnSLZAsj-Q7L6Y-GTKRdy9xfQX_Y_rC9f8aLk</recordid><startdate>20240301</startdate><enddate>20240301</enddate><creator>Suzuki, Ai</creator><creator>Sidebottom, Aiden</creator><creator>Wortley, Richard</creator><creator>Shimada, Takahito</creator><general>Palgrave Macmillan UK</general><general>Palgrave Macmillan</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K7.</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240301</creationdate><title>Repeat victimisation and the crime drop: evidence from Japan</title><author>Suzuki, Ai ; Sidebottom, Aiden ; Wortley, Richard ; Shimada, Takahito</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-e9993e6cf3c32cb9539758d85d4165dd89348d085704505743e2a0dfca250b33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Burglary</topic><topic>Crime and Society</topic><topic>Crime prevention</topic><topic>Criminology and Criminal Justice</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Vandalism</topic><topic>Victimization</topic><topic>Victims of crime</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Suzuki, Ai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sidebottom, Aiden</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wortley, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shimada, Takahito</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><jtitle>Crime prevention and community safety</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Suzuki, Ai</au><au>Sidebottom, Aiden</au><au>Wortley, Richard</au><au>Shimada, Takahito</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Repeat victimisation and the crime drop: evidence from Japan</atitle><jtitle>Crime prevention and community safety</jtitle><stitle>Crime Prev Community Saf</stitle><date>2024-03-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>15</epage><pages>1-15</pages><issn>1460-3780</issn><eissn>1743-4629</eissn><abstract>It is well-established that some people and places are repeat victims of crime. It is equally well-established that crime in many countries has fallen considerably in recent decades—the so-called ‘international crime drop’. What is less clear is the relationship between repeat victimisation and the crime drop, and whether reductions in crime have produced a more or less equitable distribution of crime across people and places. This study uses data from four sweeps of a national victimisation survey (2007–2018) to explore the relationship between the trend and prevalence of (repeat) residential burglary and vandalism victimisation in Japan. Results indicate high levels of repeat victimisation: households burgled and/or vandalised twice or more made up less than 1% of all surveyed households but accounted for 17% of all burglaries and 24% of all vandalism incidents. Moreover, although the prevalence rate of residential burglary and vandalism was shown to fall over time (residential burglary = 2.9% in 2007–1.5% in 2018 and vandalism = 4.0% in 2007–1.7% in 2018%), both crime types were found to have become more concentrated. Our results are largely consistent with recent studies in Europe and reaffirm the value and fairness of crime prevention interventions being targeted at and tailored to previous victims of crime.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Palgrave Macmillan UK</pub><doi>10.1057/s41300-023-00196-y</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1460-3780 |
ispartof | Crime prevention and community safety, 2024-03, Vol.26 (1), p.1-15 |
issn | 1460-3780 1743-4629 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2956513062 |
source | SpringerNature Journals |
subjects | Burglary Crime and Society Crime prevention Criminology and Criminal Justice Original Article Social Sciences Vandalism Victimization Victims of crime |
title | Repeat victimisation and the crime drop: evidence from Japan |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T01%3A28%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Repeat%20victimisation%20and%20the%20crime%20drop:%20evidence%20from%20Japan&rft.jtitle=Crime%20prevention%20and%20community%20safety&rft.au=Suzuki,%20Ai&rft.date=2024-03-01&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=15&rft.pages=1-15&rft.issn=1460-3780&rft.eissn=1743-4629&rft_id=info:doi/10.1057/s41300-023-00196-y&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2956513062%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2956513062&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |