Self-supervised opinion summarization with multi-modal knowledge graph
Multi-modal opinion summarization aims at automatically generating summaries of products or businesses from multi-modal reviews containing text, image and table to present clear references for other customers. To create faithful summaries, multi-modal structural knowledge should be well utilized, wh...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of intelligent information systems 2024-02, Vol.62 (1), p.191-208 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Multi-modal opinion summarization aims at automatically generating summaries of products or businesses from multi-modal reviews containing text, image and table to present clear references for other customers. To create faithful summaries, multi-modal structural knowledge should be well utilized, which is neglected by most existing work on multi-modal opinion summarization. Thus, we propose an opinion summarization framework based on multi-modal knowledge graphs (MKGOpinSum) to utilize structural knowledge in multi-modal data for opinion summarization. To construct a multi-modal knowledge graph, we first build a textual knowledge graph from review text and then enrich it by linking detected image objects to its corresponding entities. Our method obtains each modality representation from their own encoders, and generates the summary from the text decoder. To address the issue of heterogeneity of multi-modal data, we adopt a multi-modal training pipeline. In the pipeline we first pretrain text encoder and decoder with only text modality data. Then we respectively pretrain table and MKG modality by taking text decoder as a pivot. Finally, we train the entire encoder-decoder architecture and fuse representations of all modalities to generate the summary text. Experiments on Amazon and Yelp dataset show the framework has satisfactory performances when compared to ten baselines. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0925-9902 1573-7675 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s10844-023-00812-1 |