Towards Designing Profitable Courses: Predicting Student Purchasing Behaviour in MOOCs

Since their ‘official’ emergence in 2012 (Gardner and Brooks 2018 ), massive open online courses (MOOCs) have been growing rapidly. They offer low-cost education for both students and content providers; however, currently there is a very low level of course purchasing (less than 1% of the total numb...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of artificial intelligence in education 2021-06, Vol.31 (2), p.215-233
Hauptverfasser: Alshehri, Mohammad, Alamri, Ahmed, Cristea, Alexandra I., Stewart, Craig D.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 233
container_issue 2
container_start_page 215
container_title International journal of artificial intelligence in education
container_volume 31
creator Alshehri, Mohammad
Alamri, Ahmed
Cristea, Alexandra I.
Stewart, Craig D.
description Since their ‘official’ emergence in 2012 (Gardner and Brooks 2018 ), massive open online courses (MOOCs) have been growing rapidly. They offer low-cost education for both students and content providers; however, currently there is a very low level of course purchasing (less than 1% of the total number of enrolled students on a given online course opt to purchase its certificate). The most recent literature on MOOCs focuses on identifying factors that contribute to student success, completion level and engagement. One of the MOOC platforms’ ultimate targets is to become self-sustaining, enabling partners to create revenues and offset operating costs. Nevertheless, analysing learners’ purchasing behaviour on MOOCs remains limited. Thus, this study aims to predict students purchasing behaviour and therefore a MOOCs revenue , based on the rich array of activity clickstream and demographic data from learners. Specifically, we compare how several machine learning algorithms, namely RandomForest , GradientBoosting , AdaBoost and XGBoost can predict course purchasability using a large-scale data collection of 23 runs spread over 5 courses delivered by The University of Warwick between 2013 and 2017 via FutureLearn. We further identify the common representative predictive attributes that influence a learner’s certificate purchasing decisions. Our proposed model achieved promising accuracies, between 0.82 and 0.91, using only the time spent on each step. We further reached higher accuracy of 0.83 to 0.95, adding learner demographics (e.g. gender , age group , level of education , and country ) which showed a considerable impact on the model’s performance. The outcomes of this study are expected to help design future courses and predict the profitability of future runs; it may also help determine what personalisation features could be provided to increase MOOC revenue.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s40593-021-00246-2
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2938257094</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1299854</ericid><sourcerecordid>2938257094</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-32369084ce361c5a3eb30f95ab2258d45c93899d615b60b10d5e9c60815f8a053</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UFtLwzAUDqLgnP4BQSj4XD25rvFN57wx2cDpa0jTdMuYrSat4r83tV7efDqH890OH0KHGE4wwOg0MOCSpkBwCkCYSMkWGmAuIGUUxPbPTiTZRXshrAHYCAQboKdF_a59EZJLG9yyctUymfu6dI3ONzYZ160PNpzFmy2caTr4oWkLWzXJvPVmpUN3urAr_eYiN3FVcj-bjcM-2in1JtiD7zlEj1eTxfgmnc6ub8fn09TQjDcpJVRIyJixVGDDNbU5hVJynRPCs4JxI2kmZSEwzwXkGApupRGQYV5mGjgdouPe98XXr60NjVrHN6oYqUiUEj4CySKL9Czj6xC8LdWLd8_afygMqutP9f2p2J_66k-RKDrqRdY78yuY3GEiZcY7U9rjIWLV0vq_6H9cPwES7Xsz</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2938257094</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Towards Designing Profitable Courses: Predicting Student Purchasing Behaviour in MOOCs</title><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><source>ProQuest Central</source><creator>Alshehri, Mohammad ; Alamri, Ahmed ; Cristea, Alexandra I. ; Stewart, Craig D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Alshehri, Mohammad ; Alamri, Ahmed ; Cristea, Alexandra I. ; Stewart, Craig D.</creatorcontrib><description>Since their ‘official’ emergence in 2012 (Gardner and Brooks 2018 ), massive open online courses (MOOCs) have been growing rapidly. They offer low-cost education for both students and content providers; however, currently there is a very low level of course purchasing (less than 1% of the total number of enrolled students on a given online course opt to purchase its certificate). The most recent literature on MOOCs focuses on identifying factors that contribute to student success, completion level and engagement. One of the MOOC platforms’ ultimate targets is to become self-sustaining, enabling partners to create revenues and offset operating costs. Nevertheless, analysing learners’ purchasing behaviour on MOOCs remains limited. Thus, this study aims to predict students purchasing behaviour and therefore a MOOCs revenue , based on the rich array of activity clickstream and demographic data from learners. Specifically, we compare how several machine learning algorithms, namely RandomForest , GradientBoosting , AdaBoost and XGBoost can predict course purchasability using a large-scale data collection of 23 runs spread over 5 courses delivered by The University of Warwick between 2013 and 2017 via FutureLearn. We further identify the common representative predictive attributes that influence a learner’s certificate purchasing decisions. Our proposed model achieved promising accuracies, between 0.82 and 0.91, using only the time spent on each step. We further reached higher accuracy of 0.83 to 0.95, adding learner demographics (e.g. gender , age group , level of education , and country ) which showed a considerable impact on the model’s performance. The outcomes of this study are expected to help design future courses and predict the profitability of future runs; it may also help determine what personalisation features could be provided to increase MOOC revenue.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1560-4292</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1560-4306</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s40593-021-00246-2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer New York</publisher><subject>AI4MOOCs: Artificial Intelligence ; Algorithms ; Artificial Intelligence ; Behavior ; Big Data ; Certification ; Colleges &amp; universities ; Computer Science ; Computers and Education ; Consumer Economics ; Cost analysis ; Course Content ; Data collection ; Demographics ; Education ; Educational Research ; Educational Technology ; Electronic commerce ; Instructional Design ; Learning ; Low level ; Machine learning ; Model accuracy ; modeling and assessment for MOOCs. A step beyond ; Online Courses ; Online instruction ; Predictor Variables ; Profitability ; Purchasing ; Research Methodology ; Revenue ; sensoring ; Student Behavior ; Student Characteristics ; Student Participation ; Students ; User Interfaces and Human Computer Interaction</subject><ispartof>International journal of artificial intelligence in education, 2021-06, Vol.31 (2), p.215-233</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2021</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2021. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-32369084ce361c5a3eb30f95ab2258d45c93899d615b60b10d5e9c60815f8a053</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-32369084ce361c5a3eb30f95ab2258d45c93899d615b60b10d5e9c60815f8a053</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5482-1926</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s40593-021-00246-2$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2938257094?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21367,27901,27902,33721,41464,42533,43781,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1299854$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Alshehri, Mohammad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alamri, Ahmed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cristea, Alexandra I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stewart, Craig D.</creatorcontrib><title>Towards Designing Profitable Courses: Predicting Student Purchasing Behaviour in MOOCs</title><title>International journal of artificial intelligence in education</title><addtitle>Int J Artif Intell Educ</addtitle><description>Since their ‘official’ emergence in 2012 (Gardner and Brooks 2018 ), massive open online courses (MOOCs) have been growing rapidly. They offer low-cost education for both students and content providers; however, currently there is a very low level of course purchasing (less than 1% of the total number of enrolled students on a given online course opt to purchase its certificate). The most recent literature on MOOCs focuses on identifying factors that contribute to student success, completion level and engagement. One of the MOOC platforms’ ultimate targets is to become self-sustaining, enabling partners to create revenues and offset operating costs. Nevertheless, analysing learners’ purchasing behaviour on MOOCs remains limited. Thus, this study aims to predict students purchasing behaviour and therefore a MOOCs revenue , based on the rich array of activity clickstream and demographic data from learners. Specifically, we compare how several machine learning algorithms, namely RandomForest , GradientBoosting , AdaBoost and XGBoost can predict course purchasability using a large-scale data collection of 23 runs spread over 5 courses delivered by The University of Warwick between 2013 and 2017 via FutureLearn. We further identify the common representative predictive attributes that influence a learner’s certificate purchasing decisions. Our proposed model achieved promising accuracies, between 0.82 and 0.91, using only the time spent on each step. We further reached higher accuracy of 0.83 to 0.95, adding learner demographics (e.g. gender , age group , level of education , and country ) which showed a considerable impact on the model’s performance. The outcomes of this study are expected to help design future courses and predict the profitability of future runs; it may also help determine what personalisation features could be provided to increase MOOC revenue.</description><subject>AI4MOOCs: Artificial Intelligence</subject><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Artificial Intelligence</subject><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Big Data</subject><subject>Certification</subject><subject>Colleges &amp; universities</subject><subject>Computer Science</subject><subject>Computers and Education</subject><subject>Consumer Economics</subject><subject>Cost analysis</subject><subject>Course Content</subject><subject>Data collection</subject><subject>Demographics</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Educational Research</subject><subject>Educational Technology</subject><subject>Electronic commerce</subject><subject>Instructional Design</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Low level</subject><subject>Machine learning</subject><subject>Model accuracy</subject><subject>modeling and assessment for MOOCs. A step beyond</subject><subject>Online Courses</subject><subject>Online instruction</subject><subject>Predictor Variables</subject><subject>Profitability</subject><subject>Purchasing</subject><subject>Research Methodology</subject><subject>Revenue</subject><subject>sensoring</subject><subject>Student Behavior</subject><subject>Student Characteristics</subject><subject>Student Participation</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>User Interfaces and Human Computer Interaction</subject><issn>1560-4292</issn><issn>1560-4306</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UFtLwzAUDqLgnP4BQSj4XD25rvFN57wx2cDpa0jTdMuYrSat4r83tV7efDqH890OH0KHGE4wwOg0MOCSpkBwCkCYSMkWGmAuIGUUxPbPTiTZRXshrAHYCAQboKdF_a59EZJLG9yyctUymfu6dI3ONzYZ160PNpzFmy2caTr4oWkLWzXJvPVmpUN3urAr_eYiN3FVcj-bjcM-2in1JtiD7zlEj1eTxfgmnc6ub8fn09TQjDcpJVRIyJixVGDDNbU5hVJynRPCs4JxI2kmZSEwzwXkGApupRGQYV5mGjgdouPe98XXr60NjVrHN6oYqUiUEj4CySKL9Czj6xC8LdWLd8_afygMqutP9f2p2J_66k-RKDrqRdY78yuY3GEiZcY7U9rjIWLV0vq_6H9cPwES7Xsz</recordid><startdate>20210601</startdate><enddate>20210601</enddate><creator>Alshehri, Mohammad</creator><creator>Alamri, Ahmed</creator><creator>Cristea, Alexandra I.</creator><creator>Stewart, Craig D.</creator><general>Springer New York</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5482-1926</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210601</creationdate><title>Towards Designing Profitable Courses: Predicting Student Purchasing Behaviour in MOOCs</title><author>Alshehri, Mohammad ; Alamri, Ahmed ; Cristea, Alexandra I. ; Stewart, Craig D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-32369084ce361c5a3eb30f95ab2258d45c93899d615b60b10d5e9c60815f8a053</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>AI4MOOCs: Artificial Intelligence</topic><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Artificial Intelligence</topic><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Big Data</topic><topic>Certification</topic><topic>Colleges &amp; universities</topic><topic>Computer Science</topic><topic>Computers and Education</topic><topic>Consumer Economics</topic><topic>Cost analysis</topic><topic>Course Content</topic><topic>Data collection</topic><topic>Demographics</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Educational Research</topic><topic>Educational Technology</topic><topic>Electronic commerce</topic><topic>Instructional Design</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Low level</topic><topic>Machine learning</topic><topic>Model accuracy</topic><topic>modeling and assessment for MOOCs. A step beyond</topic><topic>Online Courses</topic><topic>Online instruction</topic><topic>Predictor Variables</topic><topic>Profitability</topic><topic>Purchasing</topic><topic>Research Methodology</topic><topic>Revenue</topic><topic>sensoring</topic><topic>Student Behavior</topic><topic>Student Characteristics</topic><topic>Student Participation</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>User Interfaces and Human Computer Interaction</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Alshehri, Mohammad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alamri, Ahmed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cristea, Alexandra I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stewart, Craig D.</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA/Free Journals</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>International journal of artificial intelligence in education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Alshehri, Mohammad</au><au>Alamri, Ahmed</au><au>Cristea, Alexandra I.</au><au>Stewart, Craig D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1299854</ericid><atitle>Towards Designing Profitable Courses: Predicting Student Purchasing Behaviour in MOOCs</atitle><jtitle>International journal of artificial intelligence in education</jtitle><stitle>Int J Artif Intell Educ</stitle><date>2021-06-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>215</spage><epage>233</epage><pages>215-233</pages><issn>1560-4292</issn><eissn>1560-4306</eissn><abstract>Since their ‘official’ emergence in 2012 (Gardner and Brooks 2018 ), massive open online courses (MOOCs) have been growing rapidly. They offer low-cost education for both students and content providers; however, currently there is a very low level of course purchasing (less than 1% of the total number of enrolled students on a given online course opt to purchase its certificate). The most recent literature on MOOCs focuses on identifying factors that contribute to student success, completion level and engagement. One of the MOOC platforms’ ultimate targets is to become self-sustaining, enabling partners to create revenues and offset operating costs. Nevertheless, analysing learners’ purchasing behaviour on MOOCs remains limited. Thus, this study aims to predict students purchasing behaviour and therefore a MOOCs revenue , based on the rich array of activity clickstream and demographic data from learners. Specifically, we compare how several machine learning algorithms, namely RandomForest , GradientBoosting , AdaBoost and XGBoost can predict course purchasability using a large-scale data collection of 23 runs spread over 5 courses delivered by The University of Warwick between 2013 and 2017 via FutureLearn. We further identify the common representative predictive attributes that influence a learner’s certificate purchasing decisions. Our proposed model achieved promising accuracies, between 0.82 and 0.91, using only the time spent on each step. We further reached higher accuracy of 0.83 to 0.95, adding learner demographics (e.g. gender , age group , level of education , and country ) which showed a considerable impact on the model’s performance. The outcomes of this study are expected to help design future courses and predict the profitability of future runs; it may also help determine what personalisation features could be provided to increase MOOC revenue.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer New York</pub><doi>10.1007/s40593-021-00246-2</doi><tpages>19</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5482-1926</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1560-4292
ispartof International journal of artificial intelligence in education, 2021-06, Vol.31 (2), p.215-233
issn 1560-4292
1560-4306
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2938257094
source Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals; ProQuest Central
subjects AI4MOOCs: Artificial Intelligence
Algorithms
Artificial Intelligence
Behavior
Big Data
Certification
Colleges & universities
Computer Science
Computers and Education
Consumer Economics
Cost analysis
Course Content
Data collection
Demographics
Education
Educational Research
Educational Technology
Electronic commerce
Instructional Design
Learning
Low level
Machine learning
Model accuracy
modeling and assessment for MOOCs. A step beyond
Online Courses
Online instruction
Predictor Variables
Profitability
Purchasing
Research Methodology
Revenue
sensoring
Student Behavior
Student Characteristics
Student Participation
Students
User Interfaces and Human Computer Interaction
title Towards Designing Profitable Courses: Predicting Student Purchasing Behaviour in MOOCs
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T18%3A05%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Towards%20Designing%20Profitable%20Courses:%20Predicting%20Student%20Purchasing%20Behaviour%20in%20MOOCs&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20artificial%20intelligence%20in%20education&rft.au=Alshehri,%20Mohammad&rft.date=2021-06-01&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=215&rft.epage=233&rft.pages=215-233&rft.issn=1560-4292&rft.eissn=1560-4306&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s40593-021-00246-2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2938257094%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2938257094&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1299854&rfr_iscdi=true