Positive and Negative Innovations in Software Engineering

The software engineering field has been a fountain of innovation. Ideas and inventions from the software domain have literally changed the world as we know it. For software development, we have a few proven innovations. The way software is built remains surprisingly primitive. Even in 2008 major sof...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of software science and computational intelligence 2009-04, Vol.1 (2), p.20-30
1. Verfasser: Jones, Capers
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 30
container_issue 2
container_start_page 20
container_title International journal of software science and computational intelligence
container_volume 1
creator Jones, Capers
description The software engineering field has been a fountain of innovation. Ideas and inventions from the software domain have literally changed the world as we know it. For software development, we have a few proven innovations. The way software is built remains surprisingly primitive. Even in 2008 major software applications are cancelled, overrun their budgets and schedules, and often have hazardously bad quality levels when released. There have been many attempts to improve software development, but progress has resembled a drunkard’s walk. Some attempts have been beneficial, but others have been either ineffective or harmful. This article puts forth the hypothesis that the main reason for the shortage of positive innovation in software development methods is due to a lack of understanding of the underlying problems of the software development domain. A corollary hypothesis is that lack of understanding of the problems is due to inadequate measurement of quality, productivity, costs, and the factors that affect project outcomes.
doi_str_mv 10.4018/jssci.2009040102
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2937274909</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2937274909</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2454-523aa05a09b05e5ed13ebf220f5a9687013f43c931f6c36ce36f7f0a95b61fe83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEtLAzEURoMoWKt7lwNu3Ey9ec00SymtFooK6jqkaTKktElN2or_3vShhaKr-1043MdB6BpDhwHu3k1T0q5DAATkHsgJamHBSCmA1qe_mfFzdJHSFKBiFOMWEi8huaVbm0L5SfFkGrVtht6HdY7Bp8L54jXY5aeKpuj7xnljovPNJTqzapbM1b620fug_9Z7LEfPD8Pe_ajUhHFWckKVAq5AjIEbbiaYmrElBCxXourWgKllVAuKbaVppQ2tbG1BCT6usDVd2ka3u7mLGD5WJi3l3CVtZjPlTVgliSnLv1FOWUZvjtBpWEWfr5NE0JrUTIDIFOwoHUNK0Vi5iG6u4pfEIDcu5dalPLg83OAad5h5jMnFxGZ08Ae6kSqzYfljWO4N_7cS028ObYwk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2937274909</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Positive and Negative Innovations in Software Engineering</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>ProQuest Central</source><creator>Jones, Capers</creator><creatorcontrib>Jones, Capers</creatorcontrib><description>The software engineering field has been a fountain of innovation. Ideas and inventions from the software domain have literally changed the world as we know it. For software development, we have a few proven innovations. The way software is built remains surprisingly primitive. Even in 2008 major software applications are cancelled, overrun their budgets and schedules, and often have hazardously bad quality levels when released. There have been many attempts to improve software development, but progress has resembled a drunkard’s walk. Some attempts have been beneficial, but others have been either ineffective or harmful. This article puts forth the hypothesis that the main reason for the shortage of positive innovation in software development methods is due to a lack of understanding of the underlying problems of the software development domain. A corollary hypothesis is that lack of understanding of the problems is due to inadequate measurement of quality, productivity, costs, and the factors that affect project outcomes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1942-9045</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1942-9037</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4018/jssci.2009040102</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hershey: IGI Global</publisher><subject>Applications programs ; Computer programs ; Hypotheses ; Innovations ; Intelligence ; Inventions ; Productivity ; Shortages ; Software ; Software development ; Software engineering</subject><ispartof>International journal of software science and computational intelligence, 2009-04, Vol.1 (2), p.20-30</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2009, IGI Global. Copying or distributing in print or electronic forms without written permission of IGI Global is prohibited.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2454-523aa05a09b05e5ed13ebf220f5a9687013f43c931f6c36ce36f7f0a95b61fe83</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2937274909?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21367,27901,27902,33721,33722,43781</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jones, Capers</creatorcontrib><title>Positive and Negative Innovations in Software Engineering</title><title>International journal of software science and computational intelligence</title><description>The software engineering field has been a fountain of innovation. Ideas and inventions from the software domain have literally changed the world as we know it. For software development, we have a few proven innovations. The way software is built remains surprisingly primitive. Even in 2008 major software applications are cancelled, overrun their budgets and schedules, and often have hazardously bad quality levels when released. There have been many attempts to improve software development, but progress has resembled a drunkard’s walk. Some attempts have been beneficial, but others have been either ineffective or harmful. This article puts forth the hypothesis that the main reason for the shortage of positive innovation in software development methods is due to a lack of understanding of the underlying problems of the software development domain. A corollary hypothesis is that lack of understanding of the problems is due to inadequate measurement of quality, productivity, costs, and the factors that affect project outcomes.</description><subject>Applications programs</subject><subject>Computer programs</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Innovations</subject><subject>Intelligence</subject><subject>Inventions</subject><subject>Productivity</subject><subject>Shortages</subject><subject>Software</subject><subject>Software development</subject><subject>Software engineering</subject><issn>1942-9045</issn><issn>1942-9037</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kEtLAzEURoMoWKt7lwNu3Ey9ec00SymtFooK6jqkaTKktElN2or_3vShhaKr-1043MdB6BpDhwHu3k1T0q5DAATkHsgJamHBSCmA1qe_mfFzdJHSFKBiFOMWEi8huaVbm0L5SfFkGrVtht6HdY7Bp8L54jXY5aeKpuj7xnljovPNJTqzapbM1b620fug_9Z7LEfPD8Pe_ajUhHFWckKVAq5AjIEbbiaYmrElBCxXourWgKllVAuKbaVppQ2tbG1BCT6usDVd2ka3u7mLGD5WJi3l3CVtZjPlTVgliSnLv1FOWUZvjtBpWEWfr5NE0JrUTIDIFOwoHUNK0Vi5iG6u4pfEIDcu5dalPLg83OAad5h5jMnFxGZ08Ae6kSqzYfljWO4N_7cS028ObYwk</recordid><startdate>20090401</startdate><enddate>20090401</enddate><creator>Jones, Capers</creator><general>IGI Global</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090401</creationdate><title>Positive and Negative Innovations in Software Engineering</title><author>Jones, Capers</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2454-523aa05a09b05e5ed13ebf220f5a9687013f43c931f6c36ce36f7f0a95b61fe83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Applications programs</topic><topic>Computer programs</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Innovations</topic><topic>Intelligence</topic><topic>Inventions</topic><topic>Productivity</topic><topic>Shortages</topic><topic>Software</topic><topic>Software development</topic><topic>Software engineering</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jones, Capers</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Computer Science Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>International journal of software science and computational intelligence</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jones, Capers</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Positive and Negative Innovations in Software Engineering</atitle><jtitle>International journal of software science and computational intelligence</jtitle><date>2009-04-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>1</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>20</spage><epage>30</epage><pages>20-30</pages><issn>1942-9045</issn><eissn>1942-9037</eissn><abstract>The software engineering field has been a fountain of innovation. Ideas and inventions from the software domain have literally changed the world as we know it. For software development, we have a few proven innovations. The way software is built remains surprisingly primitive. Even in 2008 major software applications are cancelled, overrun their budgets and schedules, and often have hazardously bad quality levels when released. There have been many attempts to improve software development, but progress has resembled a drunkard’s walk. Some attempts have been beneficial, but others have been either ineffective or harmful. This article puts forth the hypothesis that the main reason for the shortage of positive innovation in software development methods is due to a lack of understanding of the underlying problems of the software development domain. A corollary hypothesis is that lack of understanding of the problems is due to inadequate measurement of quality, productivity, costs, and the factors that affect project outcomes.</abstract><cop>Hershey</cop><pub>IGI Global</pub><doi>10.4018/jssci.2009040102</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1942-9045
ispartof International journal of software science and computational intelligence, 2009-04, Vol.1 (2), p.20-30
issn 1942-9045
1942-9037
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2937274909
source Alma/SFX Local Collection; ProQuest Central
subjects Applications programs
Computer programs
Hypotheses
Innovations
Intelligence
Inventions
Productivity
Shortages
Software
Software development
Software engineering
title Positive and Negative Innovations in Software Engineering
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T14%3A20%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Positive%20and%20Negative%20Innovations%20in%20Software%20Engineering&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20software%20science%20and%20computational%20intelligence&rft.au=Jones,%20Capers&rft.date=2009-04-01&rft.volume=1&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=20&rft.epage=30&rft.pages=20-30&rft.issn=1942-9045&rft.eissn=1942-9037&rft_id=info:doi/10.4018/jssci.2009040102&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2937274909%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2937274909&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true