Feed maximization of combined culture of Nile tilapia Oreochromis niloticus and African catfish Clarias gariepinus

This study focused on determining the growth of Nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus (Linnaeus, 1758), combined with African catfish, Clarias gariepinus (Burchell, 1822), under two different feeding schemes: feeding based on biomass (Tl) and feeding-to-satiation (T2). Data on the growth of the fish w...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Aquaculture, Aquarium, Conservation & Legislation Aquarium, Conservation & Legislation, 2024-02, Vol.17 (1), p.352-359
Hauptverfasser: Gagelonia, Jefferson D, Marfil, Ma Leslie M, Velasco, Ravelina R, Suyom, Jhon C P
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 359
container_issue 1
container_start_page 352
container_title Aquaculture, Aquarium, Conservation & Legislation
container_volume 17
creator Gagelonia, Jefferson D
Marfil, Ma Leslie M
Velasco, Ravelina R
Suyom, Jhon C P
description This study focused on determining the growth of Nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus (Linnaeus, 1758), combined with African catfish, Clarias gariepinus (Burchell, 1822), under two different feeding schemes: feeding based on biomass (Tl) and feeding-to-satiation (T2). Data on the growth of the fish was observed before and after the study. Specifically, the study determined the specific growth rate (SGR), survival rate (SR), feed conversion ratio (FCR), gain-in-weight, and condition factor. SGR in T2 was higher (1.2%) compared to Tl (1.1%). SR was significantly higher in Tl (66.7%) than in T2 (60%) at p
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2937268748</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2937268748</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_29372687483</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNisEKwjAQRIMoKOo_LHguWFvbepSieNKLd1nTVFfSpGYTEL_eFvoBzhxmmDcjMYuLNI12cZaNh17EaTIVS-bXulfeeTsT7qhUBQ1-qKEverIGbA3SNncyHZBB--BUv51JK_CksSWEi1NWPp1tiMGQtp5kYEBTwb52JNGARF8TP6HU6AgZHl2olkzghZjUqFkth5yL1fFwLU9R6-w7KPa3lw3OdOi22SX5JivytEj-e_0AiMBOEQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2937268748</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Feed maximization of combined culture of Nile tilapia Oreochromis niloticus and African catfish Clarias gariepinus</title><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Gagelonia, Jefferson D ; Marfil, Ma Leslie M ; Velasco, Ravelina R ; Suyom, Jhon C P</creator><creatorcontrib>Gagelonia, Jefferson D ; Marfil, Ma Leslie M ; Velasco, Ravelina R ; Suyom, Jhon C P</creatorcontrib><description>This study focused on determining the growth of Nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus (Linnaeus, 1758), combined with African catfish, Clarias gariepinus (Burchell, 1822), under two different feeding schemes: feeding based on biomass (Tl) and feeding-to-satiation (T2). Data on the growth of the fish was observed before and after the study. Specifically, the study determined the specific growth rate (SGR), survival rate (SR), feed conversion ratio (FCR), gain-in-weight, and condition factor. SGR in T2 was higher (1.2%) compared to Tl (1.1%). SR was significantly higher in Tl (66.7%) than in T2 (60%) at p&lt;0.05. Gain-in-weight (GIW) was higher in T2 (194.38 g) compared to Tl (149.09 g). Tl (1.42) has lower FCR compared to T2 (1.62), which indicates a better conversion of feed into flesh. Condition factors of O. niloticus in Tl are lower than those in T2 and are significantly different (p&lt;0.05). Tl's condition factors range from 2.37 to 3.14, while they were between 4.19-4.75 in T2. The condition of fish fed to satiation (T2) was more suitable than that of fish fed based on biomass (Tl). The study concluded that Tl (feeding based on biomass) was more acceptable than T2 (feeding-to-satiation). It is advantageous to utilize the feeding based on the biomass scheme (Tl) to lessen feed wastage, decrease operational cost, minimize the deterioration of water quality as well as attain better growth performance and survival of O. niloticus combined with C. gariepinus.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1844-8143</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1844-9166</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cluj-Napoca: Bioflux SRL</publisher><subject>Aquaculture ; Biomass ; Catfish ; Clarias gariepinus ; Condition factor ; Conversion ratio ; Farmers ; Feed conversion ; Feeding ; Feeds ; Fish ; Food conversion ; Freshwater fishes ; Growth rate ; Marine fishes ; Operating costs ; Oreochromis niloticus ; Ponds ; Satiety ; Survival ; Tilapia ; Water quality ; Weight ; Whitefish</subject><ispartof>Aquaculture, Aquarium, Conservation &amp; Legislation, 2024-02, Vol.17 (1), p.352-359</ispartof><rights>Copyright Bioflux SRL Feb 2024</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gagelonia, Jefferson D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marfil, Ma Leslie M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Velasco, Ravelina R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suyom, Jhon C P</creatorcontrib><title>Feed maximization of combined culture of Nile tilapia Oreochromis niloticus and African catfish Clarias gariepinus</title><title>Aquaculture, Aquarium, Conservation &amp; Legislation</title><description>This study focused on determining the growth of Nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus (Linnaeus, 1758), combined with African catfish, Clarias gariepinus (Burchell, 1822), under two different feeding schemes: feeding based on biomass (Tl) and feeding-to-satiation (T2). Data on the growth of the fish was observed before and after the study. Specifically, the study determined the specific growth rate (SGR), survival rate (SR), feed conversion ratio (FCR), gain-in-weight, and condition factor. SGR in T2 was higher (1.2%) compared to Tl (1.1%). SR was significantly higher in Tl (66.7%) than in T2 (60%) at p&lt;0.05. Gain-in-weight (GIW) was higher in T2 (194.38 g) compared to Tl (149.09 g). Tl (1.42) has lower FCR compared to T2 (1.62), which indicates a better conversion of feed into flesh. Condition factors of O. niloticus in Tl are lower than those in T2 and are significantly different (p&lt;0.05). Tl's condition factors range from 2.37 to 3.14, while they were between 4.19-4.75 in T2. The condition of fish fed to satiation (T2) was more suitable than that of fish fed based on biomass (Tl). The study concluded that Tl (feeding based on biomass) was more acceptable than T2 (feeding-to-satiation). It is advantageous to utilize the feeding based on the biomass scheme (Tl) to lessen feed wastage, decrease operational cost, minimize the deterioration of water quality as well as attain better growth performance and survival of O. niloticus combined with C. gariepinus.</description><subject>Aquaculture</subject><subject>Biomass</subject><subject>Catfish</subject><subject>Clarias gariepinus</subject><subject>Condition factor</subject><subject>Conversion ratio</subject><subject>Farmers</subject><subject>Feed conversion</subject><subject>Feeding</subject><subject>Feeds</subject><subject>Fish</subject><subject>Food conversion</subject><subject>Freshwater fishes</subject><subject>Growth rate</subject><subject>Marine fishes</subject><subject>Operating costs</subject><subject>Oreochromis niloticus</subject><subject>Ponds</subject><subject>Satiety</subject><subject>Survival</subject><subject>Tilapia</subject><subject>Water quality</subject><subject>Weight</subject><subject>Whitefish</subject><issn>1844-8143</issn><issn>1844-9166</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNisEKwjAQRIMoKOo_LHguWFvbepSieNKLd1nTVFfSpGYTEL_eFvoBzhxmmDcjMYuLNI12cZaNh17EaTIVS-bXulfeeTsT7qhUBQ1-qKEverIGbA3SNncyHZBB--BUv51JK_CksSWEi1NWPp1tiMGQtp5kYEBTwb52JNGARF8TP6HU6AgZHl2olkzghZjUqFkth5yL1fFwLU9R6-w7KPa3lw3OdOi22SX5JivytEj-e_0AiMBOEQ</recordid><startdate>20240201</startdate><enddate>20240201</enddate><creator>Gagelonia, Jefferson D</creator><creator>Marfil, Ma Leslie M</creator><creator>Velasco, Ravelina R</creator><creator>Suyom, Jhon C P</creator><general>Bioflux SRL</general><scope>7TN</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>H98</scope><scope>H99</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L.F</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240201</creationdate><title>Feed maximization of combined culture of Nile tilapia Oreochromis niloticus and African catfish Clarias gariepinus</title><author>Gagelonia, Jefferson D ; Marfil, Ma Leslie M ; Velasco, Ravelina R ; Suyom, Jhon C P</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_29372687483</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Aquaculture</topic><topic>Biomass</topic><topic>Catfish</topic><topic>Clarias gariepinus</topic><topic>Condition factor</topic><topic>Conversion ratio</topic><topic>Farmers</topic><topic>Feed conversion</topic><topic>Feeding</topic><topic>Feeds</topic><topic>Fish</topic><topic>Food conversion</topic><topic>Freshwater fishes</topic><topic>Growth rate</topic><topic>Marine fishes</topic><topic>Operating costs</topic><topic>Oreochromis niloticus</topic><topic>Ponds</topic><topic>Satiety</topic><topic>Survival</topic><topic>Tilapia</topic><topic>Water quality</topic><topic>Weight</topic><topic>Whitefish</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gagelonia, Jefferson D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marfil, Ma Leslie M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Velasco, Ravelina R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suyom, Jhon C P</creatorcontrib><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Aquaculture Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Marine Biotechnology Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Marine Biotechnology Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><jtitle>Aquaculture, Aquarium, Conservation &amp; Legislation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gagelonia, Jefferson D</au><au>Marfil, Ma Leslie M</au><au>Velasco, Ravelina R</au><au>Suyom, Jhon C P</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Feed maximization of combined culture of Nile tilapia Oreochromis niloticus and African catfish Clarias gariepinus</atitle><jtitle>Aquaculture, Aquarium, Conservation &amp; Legislation</jtitle><date>2024-02-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>352</spage><epage>359</epage><pages>352-359</pages><issn>1844-8143</issn><eissn>1844-9166</eissn><abstract>This study focused on determining the growth of Nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus (Linnaeus, 1758), combined with African catfish, Clarias gariepinus (Burchell, 1822), under two different feeding schemes: feeding based on biomass (Tl) and feeding-to-satiation (T2). Data on the growth of the fish was observed before and after the study. Specifically, the study determined the specific growth rate (SGR), survival rate (SR), feed conversion ratio (FCR), gain-in-weight, and condition factor. SGR in T2 was higher (1.2%) compared to Tl (1.1%). SR was significantly higher in Tl (66.7%) than in T2 (60%) at p&lt;0.05. Gain-in-weight (GIW) was higher in T2 (194.38 g) compared to Tl (149.09 g). Tl (1.42) has lower FCR compared to T2 (1.62), which indicates a better conversion of feed into flesh. Condition factors of O. niloticus in Tl are lower than those in T2 and are significantly different (p&lt;0.05). Tl's condition factors range from 2.37 to 3.14, while they were between 4.19-4.75 in T2. The condition of fish fed to satiation (T2) was more suitable than that of fish fed based on biomass (Tl). The study concluded that Tl (feeding based on biomass) was more acceptable than T2 (feeding-to-satiation). It is advantageous to utilize the feeding based on the biomass scheme (Tl) to lessen feed wastage, decrease operational cost, minimize the deterioration of water quality as well as attain better growth performance and survival of O. niloticus combined with C. gariepinus.</abstract><cop>Cluj-Napoca</cop><pub>Bioflux SRL</pub></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1844-8143
ispartof Aquaculture, Aquarium, Conservation & Legislation, 2024-02, Vol.17 (1), p.352-359
issn 1844-8143
1844-9166
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2937268748
source EZB Electronic Journals Library
subjects Aquaculture
Biomass
Catfish
Clarias gariepinus
Condition factor
Conversion ratio
Farmers
Feed conversion
Feeding
Feeds
Fish
Food conversion
Freshwater fishes
Growth rate
Marine fishes
Operating costs
Oreochromis niloticus
Ponds
Satiety
Survival
Tilapia
Water quality
Weight
Whitefish
title Feed maximization of combined culture of Nile tilapia Oreochromis niloticus and African catfish Clarias gariepinus
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T16%3A49%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Feed%20maximization%20of%20combined%20culture%20of%20Nile%20tilapia%20Oreochromis%20niloticus%20and%20African%20catfish%20Clarias%20gariepinus&rft.jtitle=Aquaculture,%20Aquarium,%20Conservation%20&%20Legislation&rft.au=Gagelonia,%20Jefferson%20D&rft.date=2024-02-01&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=352&rft.epage=359&rft.pages=352-359&rft.issn=1844-8143&rft.eissn=1844-9166&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2937268748%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2937268748&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true