Socially responsible portfolios, environmental, social, corporate governance (ESG) efficient frontiers, and psychic dividends
The aim of this article is to evaluate the performance of investment portfolios built under environmental, social, and corporate governance (ESG) criteria or socially responsible portfolios, based on companies listed on three representative stock exchanges in Latin America (Chile, Colombia, and Peru...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Corporate social-responsibility and environmental management 2024-03, Vol.31 (2), p.1323-1339 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1339 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 1323 |
container_title | Corporate social-responsibility and environmental management |
container_volume | 31 |
creator | Useche, Alejandro J. Martínez‐Ferrero, Jennifer Alayón‐Gonzales, José Luis |
description | The aim of this article is to evaluate the performance of investment portfolios built under environmental, social, and corporate governance (ESG) criteria or socially responsible portfolios, based on companies listed on three representative stock exchanges in Latin America (Chile, Colombia, and Peru) for the period 2011–2019. The performance of portfolios comprising high‐ESG stocks was compared with that of low‐ESG performance portfolios and with portfolios of companies that did not report such information, as well as against the main index of each market. A novel utility function was defined that allows evaluating different degrees of propensity to responsible investment, based on which restricted optimization processes were conducted to build efficient frontiers that combine traditional mean–variance aspects with ESG elements. Based on these frontiers, a measure of the psychic dividend or ESG utility premium generated by investing in high‐ESG portfolios is proposed. Results obtained in risk and return rates and Jensen, Treynor, alpha, VaR, tracking error, information coefficient, efficient frontiers, and utility premium show the value of following responsible investment criteria and the clear disadvantages in investing in companies that do not report ESG information. This research contributes to the debate on the importance of socially responsible investment guided by ESG criteria, filling a gap in the literature regarding Latin America and confirming the better performance by calculating a wide range of portfolio evaluation indicators. We proposed a novel approach to optimization with sustainability constraints, incorporating the utility premium derived from investing in stocks with better ESG performance. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/csr.2635 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2934208857</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2934208857</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3845-f48d755ca65a27de4434d2f0be87da5e545ac23e537198c9b76b3e4faaa1e1af3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10EFLwzAch-EiCs4p-BECXiass22SJj3KmFMYCE7PJU3_0YwuqUmd9OB3N1tFT56Sw5OX8IuiyzSZpUmS3UjvZlmO6VE0SimmMS7y_Pj3TvlpdOb9JklSxlkxir7WVmrRND1y4FtrvK4aQK11nbKNtn6KwOy0s2YLphPNFPmDnyJpXVCiA_Rqd-CMMBLQZLFeXiNQSksdPFLhYafBhYwwNWp9L9-0RLXe6RpM7c-jEyUaDxc_5zh6uVs8z-_j1ePyYX67iiXmhMaK8JpRKkVORcZqIASTOlNJBZzVggIlVMgMA8UsLbgsKpZXGIgSQqSQCoXH0dXQbZ19_wDflRv7Ef7c-DIrMMkSzikLajIo6az3DlTZOr0Vri_TpNyPW4Zxy_24gaKBgrRG-z8YQhnhhJFA4oF86gb6f1PlfP10SH4Dw96H9w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2934208857</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Socially responsible portfolios, environmental, social, corporate governance (ESG) efficient frontiers, and psychic dividends</title><source>Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals</source><creator>Useche, Alejandro J. ; Martínez‐Ferrero, Jennifer ; Alayón‐Gonzales, José Luis</creator><creatorcontrib>Useche, Alejandro J. ; Martínez‐Ferrero, Jennifer ; Alayón‐Gonzales, José Luis</creatorcontrib><description>The aim of this article is to evaluate the performance of investment portfolios built under environmental, social, and corporate governance (ESG) criteria or socially responsible portfolios, based on companies listed on three representative stock exchanges in Latin America (Chile, Colombia, and Peru) for the period 2011–2019. The performance of portfolios comprising high‐ESG stocks was compared with that of low‐ESG performance portfolios and with portfolios of companies that did not report such information, as well as against the main index of each market. A novel utility function was defined that allows evaluating different degrees of propensity to responsible investment, based on which restricted optimization processes were conducted to build efficient frontiers that combine traditional mean–variance aspects with ESG elements. Based on these frontiers, a measure of the psychic dividend or ESG utility premium generated by investing in high‐ESG portfolios is proposed. Results obtained in risk and return rates and Jensen, Treynor, alpha, VaR, tracking error, information coefficient, efficient frontiers, and utility premium show the value of following responsible investment criteria and the clear disadvantages in investing in companies that do not report ESG information. This research contributes to the debate on the importance of socially responsible investment guided by ESG criteria, filling a gap in the literature regarding Latin America and confirming the better performance by calculating a wide range of portfolio evaluation indicators. We proposed a novel approach to optimization with sustainability constraints, incorporating the utility premium derived from investing in stocks with better ESG performance.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1535-3958</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1535-3966</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/csr.2635</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Corporate governance ; Criteria ; developing markets ; Dividends ; Environmental governance ; Environmental performance ; ESG ; investment decisions ; Investments ; Optimization ; optimization techniques ; Performance evaluation ; portfolio choice ; Portfolio investments ; psychic dividend ; Tracking errors</subject><ispartof>Corporate social-responsibility and environmental management, 2024-03, Vol.31 (2), p.1323-1339</ispartof><rights>2023 ERP Environment and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2024 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3845-f48d755ca65a27de4434d2f0be87da5e545ac23e537198c9b76b3e4faaa1e1af3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3845-f48d755ca65a27de4434d2f0be87da5e545ac23e537198c9b76b3e4faaa1e1af3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4462-6721 ; 0000-0001-8387-1466</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fcsr.2635$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fcsr.2635$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Useche, Alejandro J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martínez‐Ferrero, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alayón‐Gonzales, José Luis</creatorcontrib><title>Socially responsible portfolios, environmental, social, corporate governance (ESG) efficient frontiers, and psychic dividends</title><title>Corporate social-responsibility and environmental management</title><description>The aim of this article is to evaluate the performance of investment portfolios built under environmental, social, and corporate governance (ESG) criteria or socially responsible portfolios, based on companies listed on three representative stock exchanges in Latin America (Chile, Colombia, and Peru) for the period 2011–2019. The performance of portfolios comprising high‐ESG stocks was compared with that of low‐ESG performance portfolios and with portfolios of companies that did not report such information, as well as against the main index of each market. A novel utility function was defined that allows evaluating different degrees of propensity to responsible investment, based on which restricted optimization processes were conducted to build efficient frontiers that combine traditional mean–variance aspects with ESG elements. Based on these frontiers, a measure of the psychic dividend or ESG utility premium generated by investing in high‐ESG portfolios is proposed. Results obtained in risk and return rates and Jensen, Treynor, alpha, VaR, tracking error, information coefficient, efficient frontiers, and utility premium show the value of following responsible investment criteria and the clear disadvantages in investing in companies that do not report ESG information. This research contributes to the debate on the importance of socially responsible investment guided by ESG criteria, filling a gap in the literature regarding Latin America and confirming the better performance by calculating a wide range of portfolio evaluation indicators. We proposed a novel approach to optimization with sustainability constraints, incorporating the utility premium derived from investing in stocks with better ESG performance.</description><subject>Corporate governance</subject><subject>Criteria</subject><subject>developing markets</subject><subject>Dividends</subject><subject>Environmental governance</subject><subject>Environmental performance</subject><subject>ESG</subject><subject>investment decisions</subject><subject>Investments</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>optimization techniques</subject><subject>Performance evaluation</subject><subject>portfolio choice</subject><subject>Portfolio investments</subject><subject>psychic dividend</subject><subject>Tracking errors</subject><issn>1535-3958</issn><issn>1535-3966</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp10EFLwzAch-EiCs4p-BECXiass22SJj3KmFMYCE7PJU3_0YwuqUmd9OB3N1tFT56Sw5OX8IuiyzSZpUmS3UjvZlmO6VE0SimmMS7y_Pj3TvlpdOb9JklSxlkxir7WVmrRND1y4FtrvK4aQK11nbKNtn6KwOy0s2YLphPNFPmDnyJpXVCiA_Rqd-CMMBLQZLFeXiNQSksdPFLhYafBhYwwNWp9L9-0RLXe6RpM7c-jEyUaDxc_5zh6uVs8z-_j1ePyYX67iiXmhMaK8JpRKkVORcZqIASTOlNJBZzVggIlVMgMA8UsLbgsKpZXGIgSQqSQCoXH0dXQbZ19_wDflRv7Ef7c-DIrMMkSzikLajIo6az3DlTZOr0Vri_TpNyPW4Zxy_24gaKBgrRG-z8YQhnhhJFA4oF86gb6f1PlfP10SH4Dw96H9w</recordid><startdate>202403</startdate><enddate>202403</enddate><creator>Useche, Alejandro J.</creator><creator>Martínez‐Ferrero, Jennifer</creator><creator>Alayón‐Gonzales, José Luis</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><general>Wiley Periodicals Inc</general><scope>OQ6</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4462-6721</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8387-1466</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202403</creationdate><title>Socially responsible portfolios, environmental, social, corporate governance (ESG) efficient frontiers, and psychic dividends</title><author>Useche, Alejandro J. ; Martínez‐Ferrero, Jennifer ; Alayón‐Gonzales, José Luis</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3845-f48d755ca65a27de4434d2f0be87da5e545ac23e537198c9b76b3e4faaa1e1af3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Corporate governance</topic><topic>Criteria</topic><topic>developing markets</topic><topic>Dividends</topic><topic>Environmental governance</topic><topic>Environmental performance</topic><topic>ESG</topic><topic>investment decisions</topic><topic>Investments</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>optimization techniques</topic><topic>Performance evaluation</topic><topic>portfolio choice</topic><topic>Portfolio investments</topic><topic>psychic dividend</topic><topic>Tracking errors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Useche, Alejandro J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martínez‐Ferrero, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alayón‐Gonzales, José Luis</creatorcontrib><collection>ECONIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Corporate social-responsibility and environmental management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Useche, Alejandro J.</au><au>Martínez‐Ferrero, Jennifer</au><au>Alayón‐Gonzales, José Luis</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Socially responsible portfolios, environmental, social, corporate governance (ESG) efficient frontiers, and psychic dividends</atitle><jtitle>Corporate social-responsibility and environmental management</jtitle><date>2024-03</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>1323</spage><epage>1339</epage><pages>1323-1339</pages><issn>1535-3958</issn><eissn>1535-3966</eissn><abstract>The aim of this article is to evaluate the performance of investment portfolios built under environmental, social, and corporate governance (ESG) criteria or socially responsible portfolios, based on companies listed on three representative stock exchanges in Latin America (Chile, Colombia, and Peru) for the period 2011–2019. The performance of portfolios comprising high‐ESG stocks was compared with that of low‐ESG performance portfolios and with portfolios of companies that did not report such information, as well as against the main index of each market. A novel utility function was defined that allows evaluating different degrees of propensity to responsible investment, based on which restricted optimization processes were conducted to build efficient frontiers that combine traditional mean–variance aspects with ESG elements. Based on these frontiers, a measure of the psychic dividend or ESG utility premium generated by investing in high‐ESG portfolios is proposed. Results obtained in risk and return rates and Jensen, Treynor, alpha, VaR, tracking error, information coefficient, efficient frontiers, and utility premium show the value of following responsible investment criteria and the clear disadvantages in investing in companies that do not report ESG information. This research contributes to the debate on the importance of socially responsible investment guided by ESG criteria, filling a gap in the literature regarding Latin America and confirming the better performance by calculating a wide range of portfolio evaluation indicators. We proposed a novel approach to optimization with sustainability constraints, incorporating the utility premium derived from investing in stocks with better ESG performance.</abstract><cop>Chichester, UK</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/csr.2635</doi><tpages>17</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4462-6721</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8387-1466</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1535-3958 |
ispartof | Corporate social-responsibility and environmental management, 2024-03, Vol.31 (2), p.1323-1339 |
issn | 1535-3958 1535-3966 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2934208857 |
source | Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals |
subjects | Corporate governance Criteria developing markets Dividends Environmental governance Environmental performance ESG investment decisions Investments Optimization optimization techniques Performance evaluation portfolio choice Portfolio investments psychic dividend Tracking errors |
title | Socially responsible portfolios, environmental, social, corporate governance (ESG) efficient frontiers, and psychic dividends |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T18%3A37%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Socially%20responsible%20portfolios,%20environmental,%20social,%20corporate%20governance%20(ESG)%20efficient%20frontiers,%20and%20psychic%20dividends&rft.jtitle=Corporate%20social-responsibility%20and%20environmental%20management&rft.au=Useche,%20Alejandro%20J.&rft.date=2024-03&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=1323&rft.epage=1339&rft.pages=1323-1339&rft.issn=1535-3958&rft.eissn=1535-3966&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/csr.2635&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2934208857%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2934208857&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |