Socially responsible portfolios, environmental, social, corporate governance (ESG) efficient frontiers, and psychic dividends

The aim of this article is to evaluate the performance of investment portfolios built under environmental, social, and corporate governance (ESG) criteria or socially responsible portfolios, based on companies listed on three representative stock exchanges in Latin America (Chile, Colombia, and Peru...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Corporate social-responsibility and environmental management 2024-03, Vol.31 (2), p.1323-1339
Hauptverfasser: Useche, Alejandro J., Martínez‐Ferrero, Jennifer, Alayón‐Gonzales, José Luis
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1339
container_issue 2
container_start_page 1323
container_title Corporate social-responsibility and environmental management
container_volume 31
creator Useche, Alejandro J.
Martínez‐Ferrero, Jennifer
Alayón‐Gonzales, José Luis
description The aim of this article is to evaluate the performance of investment portfolios built under environmental, social, and corporate governance (ESG) criteria or socially responsible portfolios, based on companies listed on three representative stock exchanges in Latin America (Chile, Colombia, and Peru) for the period 2011–2019. The performance of portfolios comprising high‐ESG stocks was compared with that of low‐ESG performance portfolios and with portfolios of companies that did not report such information, as well as against the main index of each market. A novel utility function was defined that allows evaluating different degrees of propensity to responsible investment, based on which restricted optimization processes were conducted to build efficient frontiers that combine traditional mean–variance aspects with ESG elements. Based on these frontiers, a measure of the psychic dividend or ESG utility premium generated by investing in high‐ESG portfolios is proposed. Results obtained in risk and return rates and Jensen, Treynor, alpha, VaR, tracking error, information coefficient, efficient frontiers, and utility premium show the value of following responsible investment criteria and the clear disadvantages in investing in companies that do not report ESG information. This research contributes to the debate on the importance of socially responsible investment guided by ESG criteria, filling a gap in the literature regarding Latin America and confirming the better performance by calculating a wide range of portfolio evaluation indicators. We proposed a novel approach to optimization with sustainability constraints, incorporating the utility premium derived from investing in stocks with better ESG performance.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/csr.2635
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2934208857</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2934208857</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3845-f48d755ca65a27de4434d2f0be87da5e545ac23e537198c9b76b3e4faaa1e1af3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10EFLwzAch-EiCs4p-BECXiass22SJj3KmFMYCE7PJU3_0YwuqUmd9OB3N1tFT56Sw5OX8IuiyzSZpUmS3UjvZlmO6VE0SimmMS7y_Pj3TvlpdOb9JklSxlkxir7WVmrRND1y4FtrvK4aQK11nbKNtn6KwOy0s2YLphPNFPmDnyJpXVCiA_Rqd-CMMBLQZLFeXiNQSksdPFLhYafBhYwwNWp9L9-0RLXe6RpM7c-jEyUaDxc_5zh6uVs8z-_j1ePyYX67iiXmhMaK8JpRKkVORcZqIASTOlNJBZzVggIlVMgMA8UsLbgsKpZXGIgSQqSQCoXH0dXQbZ19_wDflRv7Ef7c-DIrMMkSzikLajIo6az3DlTZOr0Vri_TpNyPW4Zxy_24gaKBgrRG-z8YQhnhhJFA4oF86gb6f1PlfP10SH4Dw96H9w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2934208857</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Socially responsible portfolios, environmental, social, corporate governance (ESG) efficient frontiers, and psychic dividends</title><source>Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals</source><creator>Useche, Alejandro J. ; Martínez‐Ferrero, Jennifer ; Alayón‐Gonzales, José Luis</creator><creatorcontrib>Useche, Alejandro J. ; Martínez‐Ferrero, Jennifer ; Alayón‐Gonzales, José Luis</creatorcontrib><description>The aim of this article is to evaluate the performance of investment portfolios built under environmental, social, and corporate governance (ESG) criteria or socially responsible portfolios, based on companies listed on three representative stock exchanges in Latin America (Chile, Colombia, and Peru) for the period 2011–2019. The performance of portfolios comprising high‐ESG stocks was compared with that of low‐ESG performance portfolios and with portfolios of companies that did not report such information, as well as against the main index of each market. A novel utility function was defined that allows evaluating different degrees of propensity to responsible investment, based on which restricted optimization processes were conducted to build efficient frontiers that combine traditional mean–variance aspects with ESG elements. Based on these frontiers, a measure of the psychic dividend or ESG utility premium generated by investing in high‐ESG portfolios is proposed. Results obtained in risk and return rates and Jensen, Treynor, alpha, VaR, tracking error, information coefficient, efficient frontiers, and utility premium show the value of following responsible investment criteria and the clear disadvantages in investing in companies that do not report ESG information. This research contributes to the debate on the importance of socially responsible investment guided by ESG criteria, filling a gap in the literature regarding Latin America and confirming the better performance by calculating a wide range of portfolio evaluation indicators. We proposed a novel approach to optimization with sustainability constraints, incorporating the utility premium derived from investing in stocks with better ESG performance.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1535-3958</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1535-3966</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/csr.2635</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester, UK: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Corporate governance ; Criteria ; developing markets ; Dividends ; Environmental governance ; Environmental performance ; ESG ; investment decisions ; Investments ; Optimization ; optimization techniques ; Performance evaluation ; portfolio choice ; Portfolio investments ; psychic dividend ; Tracking errors</subject><ispartof>Corporate social-responsibility and environmental management, 2024-03, Vol.31 (2), p.1323-1339</ispartof><rights>2023 ERP Environment and John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2024 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3845-f48d755ca65a27de4434d2f0be87da5e545ac23e537198c9b76b3e4faaa1e1af3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3845-f48d755ca65a27de4434d2f0be87da5e545ac23e537198c9b76b3e4faaa1e1af3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4462-6721 ; 0000-0001-8387-1466</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fcsr.2635$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fcsr.2635$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Useche, Alejandro J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martínez‐Ferrero, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alayón‐Gonzales, José Luis</creatorcontrib><title>Socially responsible portfolios, environmental, social, corporate governance (ESG) efficient frontiers, and psychic dividends</title><title>Corporate social-responsibility and environmental management</title><description>The aim of this article is to evaluate the performance of investment portfolios built under environmental, social, and corporate governance (ESG) criteria or socially responsible portfolios, based on companies listed on three representative stock exchanges in Latin America (Chile, Colombia, and Peru) for the period 2011–2019. The performance of portfolios comprising high‐ESG stocks was compared with that of low‐ESG performance portfolios and with portfolios of companies that did not report such information, as well as against the main index of each market. A novel utility function was defined that allows evaluating different degrees of propensity to responsible investment, based on which restricted optimization processes were conducted to build efficient frontiers that combine traditional mean–variance aspects with ESG elements. Based on these frontiers, a measure of the psychic dividend or ESG utility premium generated by investing in high‐ESG portfolios is proposed. Results obtained in risk and return rates and Jensen, Treynor, alpha, VaR, tracking error, information coefficient, efficient frontiers, and utility premium show the value of following responsible investment criteria and the clear disadvantages in investing in companies that do not report ESG information. This research contributes to the debate on the importance of socially responsible investment guided by ESG criteria, filling a gap in the literature regarding Latin America and confirming the better performance by calculating a wide range of portfolio evaluation indicators. We proposed a novel approach to optimization with sustainability constraints, incorporating the utility premium derived from investing in stocks with better ESG performance.</description><subject>Corporate governance</subject><subject>Criteria</subject><subject>developing markets</subject><subject>Dividends</subject><subject>Environmental governance</subject><subject>Environmental performance</subject><subject>ESG</subject><subject>investment decisions</subject><subject>Investments</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>optimization techniques</subject><subject>Performance evaluation</subject><subject>portfolio choice</subject><subject>Portfolio investments</subject><subject>psychic dividend</subject><subject>Tracking errors</subject><issn>1535-3958</issn><issn>1535-3966</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp10EFLwzAch-EiCs4p-BECXiass22SJj3KmFMYCE7PJU3_0YwuqUmd9OB3N1tFT56Sw5OX8IuiyzSZpUmS3UjvZlmO6VE0SimmMS7y_Pj3TvlpdOb9JklSxlkxir7WVmrRND1y4FtrvK4aQK11nbKNtn6KwOy0s2YLphPNFPmDnyJpXVCiA_Rqd-CMMBLQZLFeXiNQSksdPFLhYafBhYwwNWp9L9-0RLXe6RpM7c-jEyUaDxc_5zh6uVs8z-_j1ePyYX67iiXmhMaK8JpRKkVORcZqIASTOlNJBZzVggIlVMgMA8UsLbgsKpZXGIgSQqSQCoXH0dXQbZ19_wDflRv7Ef7c-DIrMMkSzikLajIo6az3DlTZOr0Vri_TpNyPW4Zxy_24gaKBgrRG-z8YQhnhhJFA4oF86gb6f1PlfP10SH4Dw96H9w</recordid><startdate>202403</startdate><enddate>202403</enddate><creator>Useche, Alejandro J.</creator><creator>Martínez‐Ferrero, Jennifer</creator><creator>Alayón‐Gonzales, José Luis</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><general>Wiley Periodicals Inc</general><scope>OQ6</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4462-6721</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8387-1466</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202403</creationdate><title>Socially responsible portfolios, environmental, social, corporate governance (ESG) efficient frontiers, and psychic dividends</title><author>Useche, Alejandro J. ; Martínez‐Ferrero, Jennifer ; Alayón‐Gonzales, José Luis</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3845-f48d755ca65a27de4434d2f0be87da5e545ac23e537198c9b76b3e4faaa1e1af3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Corporate governance</topic><topic>Criteria</topic><topic>developing markets</topic><topic>Dividends</topic><topic>Environmental governance</topic><topic>Environmental performance</topic><topic>ESG</topic><topic>investment decisions</topic><topic>Investments</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>optimization techniques</topic><topic>Performance evaluation</topic><topic>portfolio choice</topic><topic>Portfolio investments</topic><topic>psychic dividend</topic><topic>Tracking errors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Useche, Alejandro J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martínez‐Ferrero, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alayón‐Gonzales, José Luis</creatorcontrib><collection>ECONIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Corporate social-responsibility and environmental management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Useche, Alejandro J.</au><au>Martínez‐Ferrero, Jennifer</au><au>Alayón‐Gonzales, José Luis</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Socially responsible portfolios, environmental, social, corporate governance (ESG) efficient frontiers, and psychic dividends</atitle><jtitle>Corporate social-responsibility and environmental management</jtitle><date>2024-03</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>1323</spage><epage>1339</epage><pages>1323-1339</pages><issn>1535-3958</issn><eissn>1535-3966</eissn><abstract>The aim of this article is to evaluate the performance of investment portfolios built under environmental, social, and corporate governance (ESG) criteria or socially responsible portfolios, based on companies listed on three representative stock exchanges in Latin America (Chile, Colombia, and Peru) for the period 2011–2019. The performance of portfolios comprising high‐ESG stocks was compared with that of low‐ESG performance portfolios and with portfolios of companies that did not report such information, as well as against the main index of each market. A novel utility function was defined that allows evaluating different degrees of propensity to responsible investment, based on which restricted optimization processes were conducted to build efficient frontiers that combine traditional mean–variance aspects with ESG elements. Based on these frontiers, a measure of the psychic dividend or ESG utility premium generated by investing in high‐ESG portfolios is proposed. Results obtained in risk and return rates and Jensen, Treynor, alpha, VaR, tracking error, information coefficient, efficient frontiers, and utility premium show the value of following responsible investment criteria and the clear disadvantages in investing in companies that do not report ESG information. This research contributes to the debate on the importance of socially responsible investment guided by ESG criteria, filling a gap in the literature regarding Latin America and confirming the better performance by calculating a wide range of portfolio evaluation indicators. We proposed a novel approach to optimization with sustainability constraints, incorporating the utility premium derived from investing in stocks with better ESG performance.</abstract><cop>Chichester, UK</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/csr.2635</doi><tpages>17</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4462-6721</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8387-1466</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1535-3958
ispartof Corporate social-responsibility and environmental management, 2024-03, Vol.31 (2), p.1323-1339
issn 1535-3958
1535-3966
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2934208857
source Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals
subjects Corporate governance
Criteria
developing markets
Dividends
Environmental governance
Environmental performance
ESG
investment decisions
Investments
Optimization
optimization techniques
Performance evaluation
portfolio choice
Portfolio investments
psychic dividend
Tracking errors
title Socially responsible portfolios, environmental, social, corporate governance (ESG) efficient frontiers, and psychic dividends
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T18%3A37%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Socially%20responsible%20portfolios,%20environmental,%20social,%20corporate%20governance%20(ESG)%20efficient%20frontiers,%20and%20psychic%20dividends&rft.jtitle=Corporate%20social-responsibility%20and%20environmental%20management&rft.au=Useche,%20Alejandro%20J.&rft.date=2024-03&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=1323&rft.epage=1339&rft.pages=1323-1339&rft.issn=1535-3958&rft.eissn=1535-3966&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/csr.2635&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2934208857%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2934208857&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true