Cost estimation for alternative aviation plans against potential radiation exposure associated with solar proton events for the airline industry

In this paper, we present a systematic approach to effectively evaluate potential risk cost caused by exposure to solar proton events (SPEs) from solar flares for the airline industry. We also evaluate associated health risks from radiation using ExoKyoto, to provide relevant alternative ways to min...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Evolutionary and institutional economics review 2020-07, Vol.17 (2), p.487-499
Hauptverfasser: Yamashiki, Yosuke A., Fujita, Moe, Sato, Tatsuhiko, Maehara, Hiroyuki, Notsu, Yuta, Shibata, Kazunari
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 499
container_issue 2
container_start_page 487
container_title Evolutionary and institutional economics review
container_volume 17
creator Yamashiki, Yosuke A.
Fujita, Moe
Sato, Tatsuhiko
Maehara, Hiroyuki
Notsu, Yuta
Shibata, Kazunari
description In this paper, we present a systematic approach to effectively evaluate potential risk cost caused by exposure to solar proton events (SPEs) from solar flares for the airline industry. We also evaluate associated health risks from radiation using ExoKyoto, to provide relevant alternative ways to minimize economic loss and opportunity. The estimated radiation dose induced by each solar proton events (SPE) for the passengers of each flight is calculated using ExoKyoto and PHITS. We determine a few scenarios for the estimated dose limit at 1 mSv, and 20 mSv, corresponding to the effective dose limit for the general public and occupational exposure, respectively, as well as a higher dose induced an extreme superflare. We set a hypothetical airline shutdown scenario at 1 mSv for a single flight per passenger, due to legal restrictions under the potential radiation dose. In such a scenario, we calculate the potential loss in direct and opportunity cost under the cancelation of the flight. At the same time, we considered that, even under such a scenario, if the airplane flies at a slightly lower altitude (from 12 to 9.5 km, corresponding to the slight increase of atmospheric depth from 234 to 365 g/cm 2 ), the total loss becomes much smaller than flight cancelation, and the estimated total dose now goes down from 1.2 to 0.45 mSv, which is below the effective dose limit for the general public. In the case of flying at an even lower altitude (7 km corresponding atmospheric depth with 484 g/cm 2 ), the estimated total dose becomes much smaller, to 0.12 m Sv. If we assume the increase of fuel cost is proportional to the increase in atmospheric depth, the increase in cost becomes 1.56 and 2.07 for the case of flying at 9.5 km and at 7 km, respectively. Lower altitude flights provide more safety for the potential risk of radiation doses induced by severe SPEs. At the same time, since there is total loss caused by flight cancelation, we propose that considering lower flight altitude is the best protection against solar flares.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s40844-020-00163-4
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2933555851</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2933555851</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c314t-5720f0651b79aa37c7d606d86ea6126f41c74eb991a92529931f81df41f2db063</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwA6wssQ6MH3HiJap4SZXYwNpyEwdchTh43AJ_wSfjNkjsWFmeOXfsOYScM7hkANUVSqilLIBDAcCUKOQBmXFW1wUHrQ7JjAmpC6kVOyYniGsAyUpQM_K9CJiow-TfbPJhoF2I1PbJxSHft47arZ8aY28HpPbF-iEnxpDckLztabTtL-E-x4CbmDOIoclF19IPn14pht5GOsaQdtQ2B3H_TnrNrI-9Hxz1Q7vBFL9OyVFne3Rnv-ecPN_ePC3ui-Xj3cPielk0gslUlBWHDlTJVpW2VlRN1SpQba2cVYyrTrKmkm6lNbOal1xrwbqatbne8XYFSszJxTQ3f-t9kwWYddjkpXs0XAtRlmVdskzxiWpiQIyuM2PMpuKXYWB25s1k3mTzZm_eyBwSUwgzPLy4-Df6n9QPwH2J5g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2933555851</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cost estimation for alternative aviation plans against potential radiation exposure associated with solar proton events for the airline industry</title><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Yamashiki, Yosuke A. ; Fujita, Moe ; Sato, Tatsuhiko ; Maehara, Hiroyuki ; Notsu, Yuta ; Shibata, Kazunari</creator><creatorcontrib>Yamashiki, Yosuke A. ; Fujita, Moe ; Sato, Tatsuhiko ; Maehara, Hiroyuki ; Notsu, Yuta ; Shibata, Kazunari</creatorcontrib><description>In this paper, we present a systematic approach to effectively evaluate potential risk cost caused by exposure to solar proton events (SPEs) from solar flares for the airline industry. We also evaluate associated health risks from radiation using ExoKyoto, to provide relevant alternative ways to minimize economic loss and opportunity. The estimated radiation dose induced by each solar proton events (SPE) for the passengers of each flight is calculated using ExoKyoto and PHITS. We determine a few scenarios for the estimated dose limit at 1 mSv, and 20 mSv, corresponding to the effective dose limit for the general public and occupational exposure, respectively, as well as a higher dose induced an extreme superflare. We set a hypothetical airline shutdown scenario at 1 mSv for a single flight per passenger, due to legal restrictions under the potential radiation dose. In such a scenario, we calculate the potential loss in direct and opportunity cost under the cancelation of the flight. At the same time, we considered that, even under such a scenario, if the airplane flies at a slightly lower altitude (from 12 to 9.5 km, corresponding to the slight increase of atmospheric depth from 234 to 365 g/cm 2 ), the total loss becomes much smaller than flight cancelation, and the estimated total dose now goes down from 1.2 to 0.45 mSv, which is below the effective dose limit for the general public. In the case of flying at an even lower altitude (7 km corresponding atmospheric depth with 484 g/cm 2 ), the estimated total dose becomes much smaller, to 0.12 m Sv. If we assume the increase of fuel cost is proportional to the increase in atmospheric depth, the increase in cost becomes 1.56 and 2.07 for the case of flying at 9.5 km and at 7 km, respectively. Lower altitude flights provide more safety for the potential risk of radiation doses induced by severe SPEs. At the same time, since there is total loss caused by flight cancelation, we propose that considering lower flight altitude is the best protection against solar flares.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1349-4961</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2188-2096</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s40844-020-00163-4</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Tokyo: Springer Japan</publisher><subject>Accidental deaths ; Aircraft ; Airline industry ; Aviation ; Cancer ; Charged particles ; Cosmic rays ; Economic theory ; Economic Theory/Quantitative Economics/Mathematical Methods ; Economics ; Economics and Finance ; History of Economic Thought/Methodology ; Nuclear accidents &amp; safety ; Occupational accidents ; Political Economy/Economic Systems ; Radiation ; Social Policy</subject><ispartof>Evolutionary and institutional economics review, 2020-07, Vol.17 (2), p.487-499</ispartof><rights>Japan Association for Evolutionary Economics 2020</rights><rights>Japan Association for Evolutionary Economics 2020.</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c314t-5720f0651b79aa37c7d606d86ea6126f41c74eb991a92529931f81df41f2db063</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c314t-5720f0651b79aa37c7d606d86ea6126f41c74eb991a92529931f81df41f2db063</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6241-4741</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s40844-020-00163-4$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40844-020-00163-4$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906,41469,42538,51300</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yamashiki, Yosuke A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fujita, Moe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sato, Tatsuhiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maehara, Hiroyuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Notsu, Yuta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shibata, Kazunari</creatorcontrib><title>Cost estimation for alternative aviation plans against potential radiation exposure associated with solar proton events for the airline industry</title><title>Evolutionary and institutional economics review</title><addtitle>Evolut Inst Econ Rev</addtitle><description>In this paper, we present a systematic approach to effectively evaluate potential risk cost caused by exposure to solar proton events (SPEs) from solar flares for the airline industry. We also evaluate associated health risks from radiation using ExoKyoto, to provide relevant alternative ways to minimize economic loss and opportunity. The estimated radiation dose induced by each solar proton events (SPE) for the passengers of each flight is calculated using ExoKyoto and PHITS. We determine a few scenarios for the estimated dose limit at 1 mSv, and 20 mSv, corresponding to the effective dose limit for the general public and occupational exposure, respectively, as well as a higher dose induced an extreme superflare. We set a hypothetical airline shutdown scenario at 1 mSv for a single flight per passenger, due to legal restrictions under the potential radiation dose. In such a scenario, we calculate the potential loss in direct and opportunity cost under the cancelation of the flight. At the same time, we considered that, even under such a scenario, if the airplane flies at a slightly lower altitude (from 12 to 9.5 km, corresponding to the slight increase of atmospheric depth from 234 to 365 g/cm 2 ), the total loss becomes much smaller than flight cancelation, and the estimated total dose now goes down from 1.2 to 0.45 mSv, which is below the effective dose limit for the general public. In the case of flying at an even lower altitude (7 km corresponding atmospheric depth with 484 g/cm 2 ), the estimated total dose becomes much smaller, to 0.12 m Sv. If we assume the increase of fuel cost is proportional to the increase in atmospheric depth, the increase in cost becomes 1.56 and 2.07 for the case of flying at 9.5 km and at 7 km, respectively. Lower altitude flights provide more safety for the potential risk of radiation doses induced by severe SPEs. At the same time, since there is total loss caused by flight cancelation, we propose that considering lower flight altitude is the best protection against solar flares.</description><subject>Accidental deaths</subject><subject>Aircraft</subject><subject>Airline industry</subject><subject>Aviation</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Charged particles</subject><subject>Cosmic rays</subject><subject>Economic theory</subject><subject>Economic Theory/Quantitative Economics/Mathematical Methods</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Economics and Finance</subject><subject>History of Economic Thought/Methodology</subject><subject>Nuclear accidents &amp; safety</subject><subject>Occupational accidents</subject><subject>Political Economy/Economic Systems</subject><subject>Radiation</subject><subject>Social Policy</subject><issn>1349-4961</issn><issn>2188-2096</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwA6wssQ6MH3HiJap4SZXYwNpyEwdchTh43AJ_wSfjNkjsWFmeOXfsOYScM7hkANUVSqilLIBDAcCUKOQBmXFW1wUHrQ7JjAmpC6kVOyYniGsAyUpQM_K9CJiow-TfbPJhoF2I1PbJxSHft47arZ8aY28HpPbF-iEnxpDckLztabTtL-E-x4CbmDOIoclF19IPn14pht5GOsaQdtQ2B3H_TnrNrI-9Hxz1Q7vBFL9OyVFne3Rnv-ecPN_ePC3ui-Xj3cPielk0gslUlBWHDlTJVpW2VlRN1SpQba2cVYyrTrKmkm6lNbOal1xrwbqatbne8XYFSszJxTQ3f-t9kwWYddjkpXs0XAtRlmVdskzxiWpiQIyuM2PMpuKXYWB25s1k3mTzZm_eyBwSUwgzPLy4-Df6n9QPwH2J5g</recordid><startdate>20200701</startdate><enddate>20200701</enddate><creator>Yamashiki, Yosuke A.</creator><creator>Fujita, Moe</creator><creator>Sato, Tatsuhiko</creator><creator>Maehara, Hiroyuki</creator><creator>Notsu, Yuta</creator><creator>Shibata, Kazunari</creator><general>Springer Japan</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6241-4741</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200701</creationdate><title>Cost estimation for alternative aviation plans against potential radiation exposure associated with solar proton events for the airline industry</title><author>Yamashiki, Yosuke A. ; Fujita, Moe ; Sato, Tatsuhiko ; Maehara, Hiroyuki ; Notsu, Yuta ; Shibata, Kazunari</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c314t-5720f0651b79aa37c7d606d86ea6126f41c74eb991a92529931f81df41f2db063</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Accidental deaths</topic><topic>Aircraft</topic><topic>Airline industry</topic><topic>Aviation</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Charged particles</topic><topic>Cosmic rays</topic><topic>Economic theory</topic><topic>Economic Theory/Quantitative Economics/Mathematical Methods</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Economics and Finance</topic><topic>History of Economic Thought/Methodology</topic><topic>Nuclear accidents &amp; safety</topic><topic>Occupational accidents</topic><topic>Political Economy/Economic Systems</topic><topic>Radiation</topic><topic>Social Policy</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yamashiki, Yosuke A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fujita, Moe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sato, Tatsuhiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maehara, Hiroyuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Notsu, Yuta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shibata, Kazunari</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><jtitle>Evolutionary and institutional economics review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yamashiki, Yosuke A.</au><au>Fujita, Moe</au><au>Sato, Tatsuhiko</au><au>Maehara, Hiroyuki</au><au>Notsu, Yuta</au><au>Shibata, Kazunari</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cost estimation for alternative aviation plans against potential radiation exposure associated with solar proton events for the airline industry</atitle><jtitle>Evolutionary and institutional economics review</jtitle><stitle>Evolut Inst Econ Rev</stitle><date>2020-07-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>487</spage><epage>499</epage><pages>487-499</pages><issn>1349-4961</issn><eissn>2188-2096</eissn><abstract>In this paper, we present a systematic approach to effectively evaluate potential risk cost caused by exposure to solar proton events (SPEs) from solar flares for the airline industry. We also evaluate associated health risks from radiation using ExoKyoto, to provide relevant alternative ways to minimize economic loss and opportunity. The estimated radiation dose induced by each solar proton events (SPE) for the passengers of each flight is calculated using ExoKyoto and PHITS. We determine a few scenarios for the estimated dose limit at 1 mSv, and 20 mSv, corresponding to the effective dose limit for the general public and occupational exposure, respectively, as well as a higher dose induced an extreme superflare. We set a hypothetical airline shutdown scenario at 1 mSv for a single flight per passenger, due to legal restrictions under the potential radiation dose. In such a scenario, we calculate the potential loss in direct and opportunity cost under the cancelation of the flight. At the same time, we considered that, even under such a scenario, if the airplane flies at a slightly lower altitude (from 12 to 9.5 km, corresponding to the slight increase of atmospheric depth from 234 to 365 g/cm 2 ), the total loss becomes much smaller than flight cancelation, and the estimated total dose now goes down from 1.2 to 0.45 mSv, which is below the effective dose limit for the general public. In the case of flying at an even lower altitude (7 km corresponding atmospheric depth with 484 g/cm 2 ), the estimated total dose becomes much smaller, to 0.12 m Sv. If we assume the increase of fuel cost is proportional to the increase in atmospheric depth, the increase in cost becomes 1.56 and 2.07 for the case of flying at 9.5 km and at 7 km, respectively. Lower altitude flights provide more safety for the potential risk of radiation doses induced by severe SPEs. At the same time, since there is total loss caused by flight cancelation, we propose that considering lower flight altitude is the best protection against solar flares.</abstract><cop>Tokyo</cop><pub>Springer Japan</pub><doi>10.1007/s40844-020-00163-4</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6241-4741</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1349-4961
ispartof Evolutionary and institutional economics review, 2020-07, Vol.17 (2), p.487-499
issn 1349-4961
2188-2096
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2933555851
source Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals
subjects Accidental deaths
Aircraft
Airline industry
Aviation
Cancer
Charged particles
Cosmic rays
Economic theory
Economic Theory/Quantitative Economics/Mathematical Methods
Economics
Economics and Finance
History of Economic Thought/Methodology
Nuclear accidents & safety
Occupational accidents
Political Economy/Economic Systems
Radiation
Social Policy
title Cost estimation for alternative aviation plans against potential radiation exposure associated with solar proton events for the airline industry
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T15%3A48%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cost%20estimation%20for%20alternative%20aviation%20plans%20against%20potential%20radiation%20exposure%20associated%20with%20solar%20proton%20events%20for%20the%20airline%20industry&rft.jtitle=Evolutionary%20and%20institutional%20economics%20review&rft.au=Yamashiki,%20Yosuke%20A.&rft.date=2020-07-01&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=487&rft.epage=499&rft.pages=487-499&rft.issn=1349-4961&rft.eissn=2188-2096&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s40844-020-00163-4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2933555851%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2933555851&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true