Asymptotic bounds for clustering problems in random graphs
Graph clustering is an important problem in network analysis. This problem can be approached by first finding a large cluster subgraph (i.e., a subgraph in which every connected component is a complete graph), perhaps in a relaxed form (connected components may have missing edges), and then assignin...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Networks 2024-04, Vol.83 (3), p.485-502 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 502 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 485 |
container_title | Networks |
container_volume | 83 |
creator | Lykhovyd, Eugene Butenko, Sergiy Krokhmal, Pavlo |
description | Graph clustering is an important problem in network analysis. This problem can be approached by first finding a large cluster subgraph (i.e., a subgraph in which every connected component is a complete graph), perhaps in a relaxed form (connected components may have missing edges), and then assigning each of the remaining vertices to one of the connected components of the cluster subgraph according to some optimization criteria. The more vertices can be included in the initial cluster subgraph (also referred to as independent union of clusters), the more “clusterable” the graph is. This paper proposes a framework for establishing asymptotic bounds on the cardinality of independent unions of clusters in Erdős‐Rényi random graphs G(n,p)$$ G\left(n,p\right) $$ with constant p$$ p $$, referred to as uniform random graphs. In particular, sufficient conditions ensuring O(logn)$$ O\left(\log n\right) $$ (where n$$ n $$ is the number of nodes) upper bounds with probability 1 are developed and shown to be applicable for the maximum independent union of cliques as well as some clique relaxations. In addition, it is shown that every graph must have an independent union of cliques of cardinality at least Ω(logn)$$ \Omega \left(\log n\right) $$. Since this bound is asymptotically tight on uniform random graphs, this suggests that these graphs can be viewed as a “least clusterable” class of graphs. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/net.22203 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2933516769</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2933516769</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3463-5d3937ea3ac1dcce8f1a83f12353b37f5dfc970a834f8fa43b6493fa6e29e9ca3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kD1PwzAQhi0EEqEw8A8sMTGktX1xErNVVfmQKljKbDmOXVIlcbATof57DGFlOunuubtXD0K3lCwpIWzVm3HJGCNwhhJKRJESAsU5SuKsTIFk_BJdhXAkhFJOywQ9rMOpG0Y3NhpXburrgK3zWLdTGI1v-gMevKta0wXc9NirvnYdPng1fIRrdGFVG8zNX12g98ftfvOc7t6eXjbrXaohyyHlNQgojAKlaa21KS1VJVjKgEMFheW11aIgsZfZ0qoMqjwTYFVumDBCK1igu_luTPI5mTDKo5t8H19KJgA4zYtcROp-prR3IXhj5eCbTvmTpET-qJFRjfxVE9nVzH41rTn9D8rX7X7e-AZ_dWVY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2933516769</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Asymptotic bounds for clustering problems in random graphs</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Lykhovyd, Eugene ; Butenko, Sergiy ; Krokhmal, Pavlo</creator><creatorcontrib>Lykhovyd, Eugene ; Butenko, Sergiy ; Krokhmal, Pavlo</creatorcontrib><description>Graph clustering is an important problem in network analysis. This problem can be approached by first finding a large cluster subgraph (i.e., a subgraph in which every connected component is a complete graph), perhaps in a relaxed form (connected components may have missing edges), and then assigning each of the remaining vertices to one of the connected components of the cluster subgraph according to some optimization criteria. The more vertices can be included in the initial cluster subgraph (also referred to as independent union of clusters), the more “clusterable” the graph is. This paper proposes a framework for establishing asymptotic bounds on the cardinality of independent unions of clusters in Erdős‐Rényi random graphs G(n,p)$$ G\left(n,p\right) $$ with constant p$$ p $$, referred to as uniform random graphs. In particular, sufficient conditions ensuring O(logn)$$ O\left(\log n\right) $$ (where n$$ n $$ is the number of nodes) upper bounds with probability 1 are developed and shown to be applicable for the maximum independent union of cliques as well as some clique relaxations. In addition, it is shown that every graph must have an independent union of cliques of cardinality at least Ω(logn)$$ \Omega \left(\log n\right) $$. Since this bound is asymptotically tight on uniform random graphs, this suggests that these graphs can be viewed as a “least clusterable” class of graphs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0028-3045</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-0037</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/net.22203</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Apexes ; asymptotic bounds ; Asymptotic properties ; Clustering ; Graph theory ; Graphs ; independent union of cliques ; Network analysis ; network clusterability ; uniform random graphs ; Upper bounds</subject><ispartof>Networks, 2024-04, Vol.83 (3), p.485-502</ispartof><rights>2023 The Authors. published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.</rights><rights>2023. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3463-5d3937ea3ac1dcce8f1a83f12353b37f5dfc970a834f8fa43b6493fa6e29e9ca3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6662-9552</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fnet.22203$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fnet.22203$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lykhovyd, Eugene</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Butenko, Sergiy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krokhmal, Pavlo</creatorcontrib><title>Asymptotic bounds for clustering problems in random graphs</title><title>Networks</title><description>Graph clustering is an important problem in network analysis. This problem can be approached by first finding a large cluster subgraph (i.e., a subgraph in which every connected component is a complete graph), perhaps in a relaxed form (connected components may have missing edges), and then assigning each of the remaining vertices to one of the connected components of the cluster subgraph according to some optimization criteria. The more vertices can be included in the initial cluster subgraph (also referred to as independent union of clusters), the more “clusterable” the graph is. This paper proposes a framework for establishing asymptotic bounds on the cardinality of independent unions of clusters in Erdős‐Rényi random graphs G(n,p)$$ G\left(n,p\right) $$ with constant p$$ p $$, referred to as uniform random graphs. In particular, sufficient conditions ensuring O(logn)$$ O\left(\log n\right) $$ (where n$$ n $$ is the number of nodes) upper bounds with probability 1 are developed and shown to be applicable for the maximum independent union of cliques as well as some clique relaxations. In addition, it is shown that every graph must have an independent union of cliques of cardinality at least Ω(logn)$$ \Omega \left(\log n\right) $$. Since this bound is asymptotically tight on uniform random graphs, this suggests that these graphs can be viewed as a “least clusterable” class of graphs.</description><subject>Apexes</subject><subject>asymptotic bounds</subject><subject>Asymptotic properties</subject><subject>Clustering</subject><subject>Graph theory</subject><subject>Graphs</subject><subject>independent union of cliques</subject><subject>Network analysis</subject><subject>network clusterability</subject><subject>uniform random graphs</subject><subject>Upper bounds</subject><issn>0028-3045</issn><issn>1097-0037</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kD1PwzAQhi0EEqEw8A8sMTGktX1xErNVVfmQKljKbDmOXVIlcbATof57DGFlOunuubtXD0K3lCwpIWzVm3HJGCNwhhJKRJESAsU5SuKsTIFk_BJdhXAkhFJOywQ9rMOpG0Y3NhpXburrgK3zWLdTGI1v-gMevKta0wXc9NirvnYdPng1fIRrdGFVG8zNX12g98ftfvOc7t6eXjbrXaohyyHlNQgojAKlaa21KS1VJVjKgEMFheW11aIgsZfZ0qoMqjwTYFVumDBCK1igu_luTPI5mTDKo5t8H19KJgA4zYtcROp-prR3IXhj5eCbTvmTpET-qJFRjfxVE9nVzH41rTn9D8rX7X7e-AZ_dWVY</recordid><startdate>202404</startdate><enddate>202404</enddate><creator>Lykhovyd, Eugene</creator><creator>Butenko, Sergiy</creator><creator>Krokhmal, Pavlo</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6662-9552</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202404</creationdate><title>Asymptotic bounds for clustering problems in random graphs</title><author>Lykhovyd, Eugene ; Butenko, Sergiy ; Krokhmal, Pavlo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3463-5d3937ea3ac1dcce8f1a83f12353b37f5dfc970a834f8fa43b6493fa6e29e9ca3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Apexes</topic><topic>asymptotic bounds</topic><topic>Asymptotic properties</topic><topic>Clustering</topic><topic>Graph theory</topic><topic>Graphs</topic><topic>independent union of cliques</topic><topic>Network analysis</topic><topic>network clusterability</topic><topic>uniform random graphs</topic><topic>Upper bounds</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lykhovyd, Eugene</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Butenko, Sergiy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krokhmal, Pavlo</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library Free Content</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><jtitle>Networks</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lykhovyd, Eugene</au><au>Butenko, Sergiy</au><au>Krokhmal, Pavlo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Asymptotic bounds for clustering problems in random graphs</atitle><jtitle>Networks</jtitle><date>2024-04</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>83</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>485</spage><epage>502</epage><pages>485-502</pages><issn>0028-3045</issn><eissn>1097-0037</eissn><abstract>Graph clustering is an important problem in network analysis. This problem can be approached by first finding a large cluster subgraph (i.e., a subgraph in which every connected component is a complete graph), perhaps in a relaxed form (connected components may have missing edges), and then assigning each of the remaining vertices to one of the connected components of the cluster subgraph according to some optimization criteria. The more vertices can be included in the initial cluster subgraph (also referred to as independent union of clusters), the more “clusterable” the graph is. This paper proposes a framework for establishing asymptotic bounds on the cardinality of independent unions of clusters in Erdős‐Rényi random graphs G(n,p)$$ G\left(n,p\right) $$ with constant p$$ p $$, referred to as uniform random graphs. In particular, sufficient conditions ensuring O(logn)$$ O\left(\log n\right) $$ (where n$$ n $$ is the number of nodes) upper bounds with probability 1 are developed and shown to be applicable for the maximum independent union of cliques as well as some clique relaxations. In addition, it is shown that every graph must have an independent union of cliques of cardinality at least Ω(logn)$$ \Omega \left(\log n\right) $$. Since this bound is asymptotically tight on uniform random graphs, this suggests that these graphs can be viewed as a “least clusterable” class of graphs.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/net.22203</doi><tpages>18</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6662-9552</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0028-3045 |
ispartof | Networks, 2024-04, Vol.83 (3), p.485-502 |
issn | 0028-3045 1097-0037 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2933516769 |
source | Access via Wiley Online Library |
subjects | Apexes asymptotic bounds Asymptotic properties Clustering Graph theory Graphs independent union of cliques Network analysis network clusterability uniform random graphs Upper bounds |
title | Asymptotic bounds for clustering problems in random graphs |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-30T23%3A54%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Asymptotic%20bounds%20for%20clustering%20problems%20in%20random%20graphs&rft.jtitle=Networks&rft.au=Lykhovyd,%20Eugene&rft.date=2024-04&rft.volume=83&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=485&rft.epage=502&rft.pages=485-502&rft.issn=0028-3045&rft.eissn=1097-0037&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/net.22203&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2933516769%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2933516769&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |