Effect of Agricultural Technology Elements on the Crop Structure and Productivity of Spring Wheat Variety Beiskaya
The research was performed to study the effect of agricultural technology elements on the crop structure and productivity of spring wheat of the variety Beiskaya under the conditions of Krasnoyarsk forest-steppe in 2020–2022. The experimental scheme included the study of the variants of forecrop (fa...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Russian agricultural sciences 2023, Vol.49 (Suppl 3), p.S471-S477 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | S477 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | Suppl 3 |
| container_start_page | S471 |
| container_title | Russian agricultural sciences |
| container_volume | 49 |
| creator | Bobrovskiy, A. V. Kozulina, N. S. Vasilenko, A. V. Kryuchkov, A. A. |
| description | The research was performed to study the effect of agricultural technology elements on the crop structure and productivity of spring wheat of the variety Beiskaya under the conditions of Krasnoyarsk forest-steppe in 2020–2022. The experimental scheme included the study of the variants of forecrop (factor A): black fallow and cereals (spring wheat); of fertilizer (factor B): without fertilizers (control), N
60
(ammonium nitrate), and N
60
P
60
K
60
(azophoska); and the plant protection system (factor C): without protection (control), presowing treatment of seeds with Vial Trast, WSC (0.4 L/t) + treatment at the tillering phase with a tank mixture of herbicides Balerina Super, SE (0.5 L/ha) and Lastik Top, OCE (0.5 l/ha) + treatment at the booting phase–heading with fungicide Kolosal’ PRO, CME (0.4 l/ha) and insecticide Borei Neo, SC (0.2 L/ha). The survival of wheat after black fallow increased relative to the control by 8.7–13.6% after fertilization; by 12.2–18.7% after fertilizers in combination with plant protection products, and by 12.5–17.9% and 17.7–19.7% for grain forecrop, respectively. The presowing application of azophoska improved the biometric parameters of plants: the number of leaves at the tillering phase was by 0.4–0.6 pcs greater after the black fallow than in the control, and the sheaf mass was greater by 24.3–45.0 g. At the heading phase, the values of these parameters increased by 0.2–0.9 pcs and 103.9–148.3 g, respectively. The values of the elements of the crop structure were the largest in the variant with presowing fertilization in combination with the use of plant protection products for both forecrops. The wheat yield for the two studied forecrops was maximal in the variant with the application of azophoska and the use of plant protection products: 4.23 t/ha for black fallow (the increase relative to the control was 1.15 t/ha or 36.4%) and 2.96 t/ha for grain forecrop (an increase by 1.26 t/ha or by 42.6%). |
| doi_str_mv | 10.3103/S1068367423090033 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2933509528</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2933509528</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1133-3c7344c555e2a4888ef3546937c1b2c6032544f1ad993615c66c2d8199c5a2273</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UFtLwzAUDqLgnP4A3wI-V5OcJG0e55gXGChs6mOJabp11mYmqdB_b-YEH8Snc_ku54LQOSWXQAlcLSiRBcicMyCKEIADNKIKeFYQyA9TnuBshx-jkxA2hAjJOIyQn9W1NRG7Gk9WvjF9G3uvW7y0Zt251q0GPGvtu-1iwK7DcW3x1LstXkTfm0S1WHcVfvSuSmXz2cRhZ7XY-qZb4Ze11RE_a9_Y1L-2TXjTgz5FR7Vugz37iWP0dDNbTu-y-cPt_XQyzwylABmYHDg3QgjLNC-KwtYguFSQG_rKjCTABOc11ZVSIKkwUhpWFVQpIzRjOYzRxd53691Hb0MsN673XRpZMgUgiBKsSCy6ZxnvQvC2LtPu79oPJSXl7rXln9cmDdtrwved1v86_y_6AhsVeg8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2933509528</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effect of Agricultural Technology Elements on the Crop Structure and Productivity of Spring Wheat Variety Beiskaya</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Bobrovskiy, A. V. ; Kozulina, N. S. ; Vasilenko, A. V. ; Kryuchkov, A. A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Bobrovskiy, A. V. ; Kozulina, N. S. ; Vasilenko, A. V. ; Kryuchkov, A. A.</creatorcontrib><description>The research was performed to study the effect of agricultural technology elements on the crop structure and productivity of spring wheat of the variety Beiskaya under the conditions of Krasnoyarsk forest-steppe in 2020–2022. The experimental scheme included the study of the variants of forecrop (factor A): black fallow and cereals (spring wheat); of fertilizer (factor B): without fertilizers (control), N
60
(ammonium nitrate), and N
60
P
60
K
60
(azophoska); and the plant protection system (factor C): without protection (control), presowing treatment of seeds with Vial Trast, WSC (0.4 L/t) + treatment at the tillering phase with a tank mixture of herbicides Balerina Super, SE (0.5 L/ha) and Lastik Top, OCE (0.5 l/ha) + treatment at the booting phase–heading with fungicide Kolosal’ PRO, CME (0.4 l/ha) and insecticide Borei Neo, SC (0.2 L/ha). The survival of wheat after black fallow increased relative to the control by 8.7–13.6% after fertilization; by 12.2–18.7% after fertilizers in combination with plant protection products, and by 12.5–17.9% and 17.7–19.7% for grain forecrop, respectively. The presowing application of azophoska improved the biometric parameters of plants: the number of leaves at the tillering phase was by 0.4–0.6 pcs greater after the black fallow than in the control, and the sheaf mass was greater by 24.3–45.0 g. At the heading phase, the values of these parameters increased by 0.2–0.9 pcs and 103.9–148.3 g, respectively. The values of the elements of the crop structure were the largest in the variant with presowing fertilization in combination with the use of plant protection products for both forecrops. The wheat yield for the two studied forecrops was maximal in the variant with the application of azophoska and the use of plant protection products: 4.23 t/ha for black fallow (the increase relative to the control was 1.15 t/ha or 36.4%) and 2.96 t/ha for grain forecrop (an increase by 1.26 t/ha or by 42.6%).</description><identifier>ISSN: 1068-3674</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1934-8037</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3103/S1068367423090033</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Moscow: Pleiades Publishing</publisher><subject>Agricultural equipment ; Agricultural technology ; Agriculture ; Ammonium ; Ammonium nitrate ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Cereals ; Crop yield ; Crops ; Fertilization ; Fertilizers ; Field and Meadow Farming ; Fungicides ; Grain ; Herbicides ; Insecticides ; Life Sciences ; Parameters ; Plant Biochemistry ; Plant protection ; Productivity ; Seeds ; Spring wheat ; Steppes ; Wheat</subject><ispartof>Russian agricultural sciences, 2023, Vol.49 (Suppl 3), p.S471-S477</ispartof><rights>Allerton Press, Inc. 2023. ISSN 1068-3674, Russian Agricultural Sciences, 2023, Vol. 49, Suppl. 3, pp. S471–S477. © Allerton Press, Inc., 2023. Russian Text © The Author(s), 2023, published in Zemledelie, 2023, No. 3, pp. 32–35.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1133-3c7344c555e2a4888ef3546937c1b2c6032544f1ad993615c66c2d8199c5a2273</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.3103/S1068367423090033$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.3103/S1068367423090033$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bobrovskiy, A. V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kozulina, N. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vasilenko, A. V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kryuchkov, A. A.</creatorcontrib><title>Effect of Agricultural Technology Elements on the Crop Structure and Productivity of Spring Wheat Variety Beiskaya</title><title>Russian agricultural sciences</title><addtitle>Russ. Agricult. Sci</addtitle><description>The research was performed to study the effect of agricultural technology elements on the crop structure and productivity of spring wheat of the variety Beiskaya under the conditions of Krasnoyarsk forest-steppe in 2020–2022. The experimental scheme included the study of the variants of forecrop (factor A): black fallow and cereals (spring wheat); of fertilizer (factor B): without fertilizers (control), N
60
(ammonium nitrate), and N
60
P
60
K
60
(azophoska); and the plant protection system (factor C): without protection (control), presowing treatment of seeds with Vial Trast, WSC (0.4 L/t) + treatment at the tillering phase with a tank mixture of herbicides Balerina Super, SE (0.5 L/ha) and Lastik Top, OCE (0.5 l/ha) + treatment at the booting phase–heading with fungicide Kolosal’ PRO, CME (0.4 l/ha) and insecticide Borei Neo, SC (0.2 L/ha). The survival of wheat after black fallow increased relative to the control by 8.7–13.6% after fertilization; by 12.2–18.7% after fertilizers in combination with plant protection products, and by 12.5–17.9% and 17.7–19.7% for grain forecrop, respectively. The presowing application of azophoska improved the biometric parameters of plants: the number of leaves at the tillering phase was by 0.4–0.6 pcs greater after the black fallow than in the control, and the sheaf mass was greater by 24.3–45.0 g. At the heading phase, the values of these parameters increased by 0.2–0.9 pcs and 103.9–148.3 g, respectively. The values of the elements of the crop structure were the largest in the variant with presowing fertilization in combination with the use of plant protection products for both forecrops. The wheat yield for the two studied forecrops was maximal in the variant with the application of azophoska and the use of plant protection products: 4.23 t/ha for black fallow (the increase relative to the control was 1.15 t/ha or 36.4%) and 2.96 t/ha for grain forecrop (an increase by 1.26 t/ha or by 42.6%).</description><subject>Agricultural equipment</subject><subject>Agricultural technology</subject><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Ammonium</subject><subject>Ammonium nitrate</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Cereals</subject><subject>Crop yield</subject><subject>Crops</subject><subject>Fertilization</subject><subject>Fertilizers</subject><subject>Field and Meadow Farming</subject><subject>Fungicides</subject><subject>Grain</subject><subject>Herbicides</subject><subject>Insecticides</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Parameters</subject><subject>Plant Biochemistry</subject><subject>Plant protection</subject><subject>Productivity</subject><subject>Seeds</subject><subject>Spring wheat</subject><subject>Steppes</subject><subject>Wheat</subject><issn>1068-3674</issn><issn>1934-8037</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1UFtLwzAUDqLgnP4A3wI-V5OcJG0e55gXGChs6mOJabp11mYmqdB_b-YEH8Snc_ku54LQOSWXQAlcLSiRBcicMyCKEIADNKIKeFYQyA9TnuBshx-jkxA2hAjJOIyQn9W1NRG7Gk9WvjF9G3uvW7y0Zt251q0GPGvtu-1iwK7DcW3x1LstXkTfm0S1WHcVfvSuSmXz2cRhZ7XY-qZb4Ze11RE_a9_Y1L-2TXjTgz5FR7Vugz37iWP0dDNbTu-y-cPt_XQyzwylABmYHDg3QgjLNC-KwtYguFSQG_rKjCTABOc11ZVSIKkwUhpWFVQpIzRjOYzRxd53691Hb0MsN673XRpZMgUgiBKsSCy6ZxnvQvC2LtPu79oPJSXl7rXln9cmDdtrwved1v86_y_6AhsVeg8</recordid><startdate>2023</startdate><enddate>2023</enddate><creator>Bobrovskiy, A. V.</creator><creator>Kozulina, N. S.</creator><creator>Vasilenko, A. V.</creator><creator>Kryuchkov, A. A.</creator><general>Pleiades Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2023</creationdate><title>Effect of Agricultural Technology Elements on the Crop Structure and Productivity of Spring Wheat Variety Beiskaya</title><author>Bobrovskiy, A. V. ; Kozulina, N. S. ; Vasilenko, A. V. ; Kryuchkov, A. A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1133-3c7344c555e2a4888ef3546937c1b2c6032544f1ad993615c66c2d8199c5a2273</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Agricultural equipment</topic><topic>Agricultural technology</topic><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Ammonium</topic><topic>Ammonium nitrate</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Cereals</topic><topic>Crop yield</topic><topic>Crops</topic><topic>Fertilization</topic><topic>Fertilizers</topic><topic>Field and Meadow Farming</topic><topic>Fungicides</topic><topic>Grain</topic><topic>Herbicides</topic><topic>Insecticides</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Parameters</topic><topic>Plant Biochemistry</topic><topic>Plant protection</topic><topic>Productivity</topic><topic>Seeds</topic><topic>Spring wheat</topic><topic>Steppes</topic><topic>Wheat</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bobrovskiy, A. V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kozulina, N. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vasilenko, A. V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kryuchkov, A. A.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Russian agricultural sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bobrovskiy, A. V.</au><au>Kozulina, N. S.</au><au>Vasilenko, A. V.</au><au>Kryuchkov, A. A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effect of Agricultural Technology Elements on the Crop Structure and Productivity of Spring Wheat Variety Beiskaya</atitle><jtitle>Russian agricultural sciences</jtitle><stitle>Russ. Agricult. Sci</stitle><date>2023</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>49</volume><issue>Suppl 3</issue><spage>S471</spage><epage>S477</epage><pages>S471-S477</pages><issn>1068-3674</issn><eissn>1934-8037</eissn><abstract>The research was performed to study the effect of agricultural technology elements on the crop structure and productivity of spring wheat of the variety Beiskaya under the conditions of Krasnoyarsk forest-steppe in 2020–2022. The experimental scheme included the study of the variants of forecrop (factor A): black fallow and cereals (spring wheat); of fertilizer (factor B): without fertilizers (control), N
60
(ammonium nitrate), and N
60
P
60
K
60
(azophoska); and the plant protection system (factor C): without protection (control), presowing treatment of seeds with Vial Trast, WSC (0.4 L/t) + treatment at the tillering phase with a tank mixture of herbicides Balerina Super, SE (0.5 L/ha) and Lastik Top, OCE (0.5 l/ha) + treatment at the booting phase–heading with fungicide Kolosal’ PRO, CME (0.4 l/ha) and insecticide Borei Neo, SC (0.2 L/ha). The survival of wheat after black fallow increased relative to the control by 8.7–13.6% after fertilization; by 12.2–18.7% after fertilizers in combination with plant protection products, and by 12.5–17.9% and 17.7–19.7% for grain forecrop, respectively. The presowing application of azophoska improved the biometric parameters of plants: the number of leaves at the tillering phase was by 0.4–0.6 pcs greater after the black fallow than in the control, and the sheaf mass was greater by 24.3–45.0 g. At the heading phase, the values of these parameters increased by 0.2–0.9 pcs and 103.9–148.3 g, respectively. The values of the elements of the crop structure were the largest in the variant with presowing fertilization in combination with the use of plant protection products for both forecrops. The wheat yield for the two studied forecrops was maximal in the variant with the application of azophoska and the use of plant protection products: 4.23 t/ha for black fallow (the increase relative to the control was 1.15 t/ha or 36.4%) and 2.96 t/ha for grain forecrop (an increase by 1.26 t/ha or by 42.6%).</abstract><cop>Moscow</cop><pub>Pleiades Publishing</pub><doi>10.3103/S1068367423090033</doi></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1068-3674 |
| ispartof | Russian agricultural sciences, 2023, Vol.49 (Suppl 3), p.S471-S477 |
| issn | 1068-3674 1934-8037 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2933509528 |
| source | SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
| subjects | Agricultural equipment Agricultural technology Agriculture Ammonium Ammonium nitrate Biomedical and Life Sciences Cereals Crop yield Crops Fertilization Fertilizers Field and Meadow Farming Fungicides Grain Herbicides Insecticides Life Sciences Parameters Plant Biochemistry Plant protection Productivity Seeds Spring wheat Steppes Wheat |
| title | Effect of Agricultural Technology Elements on the Crop Structure and Productivity of Spring Wheat Variety Beiskaya |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T11%3A17%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effect%20of%20Agricultural%20Technology%20Elements%20on%20the%20Crop%20Structure%20and%20Productivity%20of%20Spring%20Wheat%20Variety%20Beiskaya&rft.jtitle=Russian%20agricultural%20sciences&rft.au=Bobrovskiy,%20A.%20V.&rft.date=2023&rft.volume=49&rft.issue=Suppl%203&rft.spage=S471&rft.epage=S477&rft.pages=S471-S477&rft.issn=1068-3674&rft.eissn=1934-8037&rft_id=info:doi/10.3103/S1068367423090033&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2933509528%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2933509528&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |