Exploratory Evaluation of Co-produced Groups in a Community Psychiatry Organisation in England
This study evaluated co-produced rehabilitative social groups in English community psychiatric services. It aimed to describe the experience and views of staff and service users involved in group planning and delivery. A convenience sample (four staff and three service users) took part in this quali...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of psychosocial rehabilitation and mental health 2015-06, Vol.2 (1), p.43-50 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 50 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 43 |
| container_title | Journal of psychosocial rehabilitation and mental health |
| container_volume | 2 |
| creator | Thorneycroft, Joy Dobel-Ober, David |
| description | This study evaluated co-produced rehabilitative social groups in English community psychiatric services. It aimed to describe the experience and views of staff and service users involved in group planning and delivery. A convenience sample (four staff and three service users) took part in this qualitative study. Service user co-producers were current/previous patients of secondary psychiatric services. The groups pre-existed this evaluation and included creative writing, walking, glass-crafting and reading activities. Interviews were semi-structured and transcribed verbatim. Thematic analysis was carried out by the first author using NVivo10 (©QSR) and reviewed and discussed with the second author. Co-production improved self-esteem, empowerment and purpose, and enabled recovery for service user co-producers. Staff provided necessary support for people with ongoing mental health problems. Risks were limited and well managed. Future research could examine the experiences of group participants who were not involved in co-production, and how organisational infrastructure can encourage these groups. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s40737-015-0032-7 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2933424767</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2933424767</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2747-453a17d3a354f7f21a9958cef6c03c417baf70e2885ea160cf0dfb32f9865b4d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM9LwzAUx4MoOOb-AG8Fz9H8atMcZdQpDOZBwZMhS5PZ0SU1acX-98uo4snTezw-n_ceXwCuMbrFCPG7yBCnHCKcQ4QogfwMzAgWJRQFfTv_7UvKLsEixj1CiaRc8HIG3qvvrvVB9T6MWfWl2kH1jXeZt9nSwy74etCmzlbBD13MGpepND8cBtf0Y_YcR_3RqD6pm7BTromTnLDK7Vrl6itwYVUbzeKnzsHrQ_WyfITrzeppeb-GmnDGIcupwrymiubMckuwEiIvtbGFRlQzzLfKcmRIWeZG4QJpi2q7pcSKssi3rKZzcDPtTR9_Dib2cu-H4NJJSQSljDBe8EThidLBxxiMlV1oDiqMEiN5SlJOScqUjzwlKU8OmZyYWLcz4W_z_9IR3QF2iw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2933424767</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Exploratory Evaluation of Co-produced Groups in a Community Psychiatry Organisation in England</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><source>ProQuest Central</source><creator>Thorneycroft, Joy ; Dobel-Ober, David</creator><creatorcontrib>Thorneycroft, Joy ; Dobel-Ober, David</creatorcontrib><description>This study evaluated co-produced rehabilitative social groups in English community psychiatric services. It aimed to describe the experience and views of staff and service users involved in group planning and delivery. A convenience sample (four staff and three service users) took part in this qualitative study. Service user co-producers were current/previous patients of secondary psychiatric services. The groups pre-existed this evaluation and included creative writing, walking, glass-crafting and reading activities. Interviews were semi-structured and transcribed verbatim. Thematic analysis was carried out by the first author using NVivo10 (©QSR) and reviewed and discussed with the second author. Co-production improved self-esteem, empowerment and purpose, and enabled recovery for service user co-producers. Staff provided necessary support for people with ongoing mental health problems. Risks were limited and well managed. Future research could examine the experiences of group participants who were not involved in co-production, and how organisational infrastructure can encourage these groups.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2198-9834</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2198-963X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s40737-015-0032-7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New Delhi: Springer India</publisher><subject>Behavioral Science and Psychology ; Clinical Psychology ; Community support ; Creative writing ; Empowerment ; Health problems ; Infrastructure ; Interviews ; Mental disorders ; Mental health ; Original Article ; Patient participation ; Peers ; Professionals ; Psychiatric services ; Psychiatry ; Psychology ; Psychotherapy and Counseling ; R&D ; Rehabilitation ; Research & development ; Self esteem ; Social Work ; Walking</subject><ispartof>Journal of psychosocial rehabilitation and mental health, 2015-06, Vol.2 (1), p.43-50</ispartof><rights>Springer India Pvt. Ltd. 2015</rights><rights>Springer India Pvt. Ltd. 2015.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2747-453a17d3a354f7f21a9958cef6c03c417baf70e2885ea160cf0dfb32f9865b4d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2747-453a17d3a354f7f21a9958cef6c03c417baf70e2885ea160cf0dfb32f9865b4d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s40737-015-0032-7$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2933424767?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,12825,21367,27901,27902,30976,33721,41464,42533,43781,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Thorneycroft, Joy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dobel-Ober, David</creatorcontrib><title>Exploratory Evaluation of Co-produced Groups in a Community Psychiatry Organisation in England</title><title>Journal of psychosocial rehabilitation and mental health</title><addtitle>J. Psychosoc. Rehabil. Ment. Health</addtitle><description>This study evaluated co-produced rehabilitative social groups in English community psychiatric services. It aimed to describe the experience and views of staff and service users involved in group planning and delivery. A convenience sample (four staff and three service users) took part in this qualitative study. Service user co-producers were current/previous patients of secondary psychiatric services. The groups pre-existed this evaluation and included creative writing, walking, glass-crafting and reading activities. Interviews were semi-structured and transcribed verbatim. Thematic analysis was carried out by the first author using NVivo10 (©QSR) and reviewed and discussed with the second author. Co-production improved self-esteem, empowerment and purpose, and enabled recovery for service user co-producers. Staff provided necessary support for people with ongoing mental health problems. Risks were limited and well managed. Future research could examine the experiences of group participants who were not involved in co-production, and how organisational infrastructure can encourage these groups.</description><subject>Behavioral Science and Psychology</subject><subject>Clinical Psychology</subject><subject>Community support</subject><subject>Creative writing</subject><subject>Empowerment</subject><subject>Health problems</subject><subject>Infrastructure</subject><subject>Interviews</subject><subject>Mental disorders</subject><subject>Mental health</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Patient participation</subject><subject>Peers</subject><subject>Professionals</subject><subject>Psychiatric services</subject><subject>Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Psychotherapy and Counseling</subject><subject>R&D</subject><subject>Rehabilitation</subject><subject>Research & development</subject><subject>Self esteem</subject><subject>Social Work</subject><subject>Walking</subject><issn>2198-9834</issn><issn>2198-963X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kM9LwzAUx4MoOOb-AG8Fz9H8atMcZdQpDOZBwZMhS5PZ0SU1acX-98uo4snTezw-n_ceXwCuMbrFCPG7yBCnHCKcQ4QogfwMzAgWJRQFfTv_7UvKLsEixj1CiaRc8HIG3qvvrvVB9T6MWfWl2kH1jXeZt9nSwy74etCmzlbBD13MGpepND8cBtf0Y_YcR_3RqD6pm7BTromTnLDK7Vrl6itwYVUbzeKnzsHrQ_WyfITrzeppeb-GmnDGIcupwrymiubMckuwEiIvtbGFRlQzzLfKcmRIWeZG4QJpi2q7pcSKssi3rKZzcDPtTR9_Dib2cu-H4NJJSQSljDBe8EThidLBxxiMlV1oDiqMEiN5SlJOScqUjzwlKU8OmZyYWLcz4W_z_9IR3QF2iw</recordid><startdate>20150601</startdate><enddate>20150601</enddate><creator>Thorneycroft, Joy</creator><creator>Dobel-Ober, David</creator><general>Springer India</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150601</creationdate><title>Exploratory Evaluation of Co-produced Groups in a Community Psychiatry Organisation in England</title><author>Thorneycroft, Joy ; Dobel-Ober, David</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2747-453a17d3a354f7f21a9958cef6c03c417baf70e2885ea160cf0dfb32f9865b4d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Behavioral Science and Psychology</topic><topic>Clinical Psychology</topic><topic>Community support</topic><topic>Creative writing</topic><topic>Empowerment</topic><topic>Health problems</topic><topic>Infrastructure</topic><topic>Interviews</topic><topic>Mental disorders</topic><topic>Mental health</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Patient participation</topic><topic>Peers</topic><topic>Professionals</topic><topic>Psychiatric services</topic><topic>Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Psychotherapy and Counseling</topic><topic>R&D</topic><topic>Rehabilitation</topic><topic>Research & development</topic><topic>Self esteem</topic><topic>Social Work</topic><topic>Walking</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Thorneycroft, Joy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dobel-Ober, David</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><jtitle>Journal of psychosocial rehabilitation and mental health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Thorneycroft, Joy</au><au>Dobel-Ober, David</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Exploratory Evaluation of Co-produced Groups in a Community Psychiatry Organisation in England</atitle><jtitle>Journal of psychosocial rehabilitation and mental health</jtitle><stitle>J. Psychosoc. Rehabil. Ment. Health</stitle><date>2015-06-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>2</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>43</spage><epage>50</epage><pages>43-50</pages><issn>2198-9834</issn><eissn>2198-963X</eissn><abstract>This study evaluated co-produced rehabilitative social groups in English community psychiatric services. It aimed to describe the experience and views of staff and service users involved in group planning and delivery. A convenience sample (four staff and three service users) took part in this qualitative study. Service user co-producers were current/previous patients of secondary psychiatric services. The groups pre-existed this evaluation and included creative writing, walking, glass-crafting and reading activities. Interviews were semi-structured and transcribed verbatim. Thematic analysis was carried out by the first author using NVivo10 (©QSR) and reviewed and discussed with the second author. Co-production improved self-esteem, empowerment and purpose, and enabled recovery for service user co-producers. Staff provided necessary support for people with ongoing mental health problems. Risks were limited and well managed. Future research could examine the experiences of group participants who were not involved in co-production, and how organisational infrastructure can encourage these groups.</abstract><cop>New Delhi</cop><pub>Springer India</pub><doi>10.1007/s40737-015-0032-7</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 2198-9834 |
| ispartof | Journal of psychosocial rehabilitation and mental health, 2015-06, Vol.2 (1), p.43-50 |
| issn | 2198-9834 2198-963X |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2933424767 |
| source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings; ProQuest Central |
| subjects | Behavioral Science and Psychology Clinical Psychology Community support Creative writing Empowerment Health problems Infrastructure Interviews Mental disorders Mental health Original Article Patient participation Peers Professionals Psychiatric services Psychiatry Psychology Psychotherapy and Counseling R&D Rehabilitation Research & development Self esteem Social Work Walking |
| title | Exploratory Evaluation of Co-produced Groups in a Community Psychiatry Organisation in England |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T16%3A54%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Exploratory%20Evaluation%20of%20Co-produced%20Groups%20in%20a%20Community%20Psychiatry%20Organisation%20in%20England&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20psychosocial%20rehabilitation%20and%20mental%20health&rft.au=Thorneycroft,%20Joy&rft.date=2015-06-01&rft.volume=2&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=43&rft.epage=50&rft.pages=43-50&rft.issn=2198-9834&rft.eissn=2198-963X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s40737-015-0032-7&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2933424767%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2933424767&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |