Putting occupational balance on the radar: Content validity of the 11-item Danish Occupational Balance Questionnaire
Background: Assessment of occupational balance is of clinical relevance for occupational therapists working with patients with reduced occupational performance. Clinical practice lacks validated assessment tools to measure occupational balance. Aim: To establish the content validity of the 11-item D...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | The British journal of occupational therapy 2024-03, Vol.87 (3), p.169-180 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 180 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 169 |
| container_title | The British journal of occupational therapy |
| container_volume | 87 |
| creator | Honoré, Helene Boll, Mette Lundkvist Hansen, Alice Ørts Kristensen, Hanne Kaae |
| description | Background:
Assessment of occupational balance is of clinical relevance for occupational therapists working with patients with reduced occupational performance. Clinical practice lacks validated assessment tools to measure occupational balance.
Aim:
To establish the content validity of the 11-item Danish version of the Occupational Balance Questionnaire (OBQ-DK) with a radar chart add-on for use in occupational therapy practice.
Materials and methods:
A convergent mixed-methods study was performed investigating content validity. Three group interviews were conducted in 3 settings with 12 occupational therapists. A deductive content analysis covered face validity, relevance, comprehensiveness and comprehensibility. The relevance of the 11 items was further assessed using a content validity index.
Results:
All items were found to be relevant to the construct of occupational balance. Even so, concerns were raised regarding content validity. The comprehensiveness was questioned regarding the coverage of the balance of meaningful occupations. Comprehensibility was questioned for 6 of the 11 items, and the response scale.
Conclusion:
Content validity was investigated. The doubts raised in relation to comprehensiveness call for new wordings or elaborate instructions to enhance constructional clarity. The response scale levels should be adapted. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1177/03080226231207277 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2933394684</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_03080226231207277</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2933394684</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c264t-7827b976fdbf62262d6c9be097c9526521638d6603e52f68740246c632d49ad03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kN1LwzAUxYMoOKd_gG8Bn6v52k3rm85PGExBn0uapltGl8wkFfbf27qBgvh04d7fOZx7EDqn5JJSKa8IJzlhDBinjEgm5QEaUSFlBoTAIRoN92wAjtFJjCtCeipnI5ReupSsW2CvdbdRyXqnWlypVjltsHc4LQ0OqlbhGk-9S8Yl_KlaW9u0xb75PlOa2WTW-E45G5d4_tvpdu_02pk4rJyywZyio0a10Zzt5xi9P9y_TZ-y2fzxeXozyzQDkbI-oKwKCU1dNTD8VoMuKkMKqYsJgwmjwPMagHAzYQ3kUhAmQANntShUTfgYXex8N8F_DAHKle9CHyuWrOCcFwJy0VN0R-ngYwymKTfBrlXYlpSUQ7nln3J7zeVOE9XC_Lj-L_gCtuV4fg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2933394684</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Putting occupational balance on the radar: Content validity of the 11-item Danish Occupational Balance Questionnaire</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><creator>Honoré, Helene ; Boll, Mette Lundkvist ; Hansen, Alice Ørts ; Kristensen, Hanne Kaae</creator><creatorcontrib>Honoré, Helene ; Boll, Mette Lundkvist ; Hansen, Alice Ørts ; Kristensen, Hanne Kaae</creatorcontrib><description>Background:
Assessment of occupational balance is of clinical relevance for occupational therapists working with patients with reduced occupational performance. Clinical practice lacks validated assessment tools to measure occupational balance.
Aim:
To establish the content validity of the 11-item Danish version of the Occupational Balance Questionnaire (OBQ-DK) with a radar chart add-on for use in occupational therapy practice.
Materials and methods:
A convergent mixed-methods study was performed investigating content validity. Three group interviews were conducted in 3 settings with 12 occupational therapists. A deductive content analysis covered face validity, relevance, comprehensiveness and comprehensibility. The relevance of the 11 items was further assessed using a content validity index.
Results:
All items were found to be relevant to the construct of occupational balance. Even so, concerns were raised regarding content validity. The comprehensiveness was questioned regarding the coverage of the balance of meaningful occupations. Comprehensibility was questioned for 6 of the 11 items, and the response scale.
Conclusion:
Content validity was investigated. The doubts raised in relation to comprehensiveness call for new wordings or elaborate instructions to enhance constructional clarity. The response scale levels should be adapted.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0308-0226</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1477-6006</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/03080226231207277</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Clinical assessment ; Clinical medicine ; Content analysis ; Occupational balance ; Occupational therapists ; Occupational therapy ; Occupations ; Professional practice ; Questionnaires ; Validity</subject><ispartof>The British journal of occupational therapy, 2024-03, Vol.87 (3), p.169-180</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2023</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c264t-7827b976fdbf62262d6c9be097c9526521638d6603e52f68740246c632d49ad03</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9596-5571 ; 0000-0002-0181-7464 ; 0000-0002-8245-6890</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/03080226231207277$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/03080226231207277$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21819,27924,27925,30999,43621,43622</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Honoré, Helene</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boll, Mette Lundkvist</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hansen, Alice Ørts</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kristensen, Hanne Kaae</creatorcontrib><title>Putting occupational balance on the radar: Content validity of the 11-item Danish Occupational Balance Questionnaire</title><title>The British journal of occupational therapy</title><description>Background:
Assessment of occupational balance is of clinical relevance for occupational therapists working with patients with reduced occupational performance. Clinical practice lacks validated assessment tools to measure occupational balance.
Aim:
To establish the content validity of the 11-item Danish version of the Occupational Balance Questionnaire (OBQ-DK) with a radar chart add-on for use in occupational therapy practice.
Materials and methods:
A convergent mixed-methods study was performed investigating content validity. Three group interviews were conducted in 3 settings with 12 occupational therapists. A deductive content analysis covered face validity, relevance, comprehensiveness and comprehensibility. The relevance of the 11 items was further assessed using a content validity index.
Results:
All items were found to be relevant to the construct of occupational balance. Even so, concerns were raised regarding content validity. The comprehensiveness was questioned regarding the coverage of the balance of meaningful occupations. Comprehensibility was questioned for 6 of the 11 items, and the response scale.
Conclusion:
Content validity was investigated. The doubts raised in relation to comprehensiveness call for new wordings or elaborate instructions to enhance constructional clarity. The response scale levels should be adapted.</description><subject>Clinical assessment</subject><subject>Clinical medicine</subject><subject>Content analysis</subject><subject>Occupational balance</subject><subject>Occupational therapists</subject><subject>Occupational therapy</subject><subject>Occupations</subject><subject>Professional practice</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Validity</subject><issn>0308-0226</issn><issn>1477-6006</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kN1LwzAUxYMoOKd_gG8Bn6v52k3rm85PGExBn0uapltGl8wkFfbf27qBgvh04d7fOZx7EDqn5JJSKa8IJzlhDBinjEgm5QEaUSFlBoTAIRoN92wAjtFJjCtCeipnI5ReupSsW2CvdbdRyXqnWlypVjltsHc4LQ0OqlbhGk-9S8Yl_KlaW9u0xb75PlOa2WTW-E45G5d4_tvpdu_02pk4rJyywZyio0a10Zzt5xi9P9y_TZ-y2fzxeXozyzQDkbI-oKwKCU1dNTD8VoMuKkMKqYsJgwmjwPMagHAzYQ3kUhAmQANntShUTfgYXex8N8F_DAHKle9CHyuWrOCcFwJy0VN0R-ngYwymKTfBrlXYlpSUQ7nln3J7zeVOE9XC_Lj-L_gCtuV4fg</recordid><startdate>20240301</startdate><enddate>20240301</enddate><creator>Honoré, Helene</creator><creator>Boll, Mette Lundkvist</creator><creator>Hansen, Alice Ørts</creator><creator>Kristensen, Hanne Kaae</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9596-5571</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0181-7464</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8245-6890</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240301</creationdate><title>Putting occupational balance on the radar: Content validity of the 11-item Danish Occupational Balance Questionnaire</title><author>Honoré, Helene ; Boll, Mette Lundkvist ; Hansen, Alice Ørts ; Kristensen, Hanne Kaae</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c264t-7827b976fdbf62262d6c9be097c9526521638d6603e52f68740246c632d49ad03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Clinical assessment</topic><topic>Clinical medicine</topic><topic>Content analysis</topic><topic>Occupational balance</topic><topic>Occupational therapists</topic><topic>Occupational therapy</topic><topic>Occupations</topic><topic>Professional practice</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Validity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Honoré, Helene</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boll, Mette Lundkvist</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hansen, Alice Ørts</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kristensen, Hanne Kaae</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><jtitle>The British journal of occupational therapy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Honoré, Helene</au><au>Boll, Mette Lundkvist</au><au>Hansen, Alice Ørts</au><au>Kristensen, Hanne Kaae</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Putting occupational balance on the radar: Content validity of the 11-item Danish Occupational Balance Questionnaire</atitle><jtitle>The British journal of occupational therapy</jtitle><date>2024-03-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>87</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>169</spage><epage>180</epage><pages>169-180</pages><issn>0308-0226</issn><eissn>1477-6006</eissn><abstract>Background:
Assessment of occupational balance is of clinical relevance for occupational therapists working with patients with reduced occupational performance. Clinical practice lacks validated assessment tools to measure occupational balance.
Aim:
To establish the content validity of the 11-item Danish version of the Occupational Balance Questionnaire (OBQ-DK) with a radar chart add-on for use in occupational therapy practice.
Materials and methods:
A convergent mixed-methods study was performed investigating content validity. Three group interviews were conducted in 3 settings with 12 occupational therapists. A deductive content analysis covered face validity, relevance, comprehensiveness and comprehensibility. The relevance of the 11 items was further assessed using a content validity index.
Results:
All items were found to be relevant to the construct of occupational balance. Even so, concerns were raised regarding content validity. The comprehensiveness was questioned regarding the coverage of the balance of meaningful occupations. Comprehensibility was questioned for 6 of the 11 items, and the response scale.
Conclusion:
Content validity was investigated. The doubts raised in relation to comprehensiveness call for new wordings or elaborate instructions to enhance constructional clarity. The response scale levels should be adapted.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/03080226231207277</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9596-5571</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0181-7464</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8245-6890</orcidid></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0308-0226 |
| ispartof | The British journal of occupational therapy, 2024-03, Vol.87 (3), p.169-180 |
| issn | 0308-0226 1477-6006 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2933394684 |
| source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); SAGE Complete A-Z List |
| subjects | Clinical assessment Clinical medicine Content analysis Occupational balance Occupational therapists Occupational therapy Occupations Professional practice Questionnaires Validity |
| title | Putting occupational balance on the radar: Content validity of the 11-item Danish Occupational Balance Questionnaire |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T16%3A42%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Putting%20occupational%20balance%20on%20the%20radar:%20Content%20validity%20of%20the%2011-item%20Danish%20Occupational%20Balance%20Questionnaire&rft.jtitle=The%20British%20journal%20of%20occupational%20therapy&rft.au=Honor%C3%A9,%20Helene&rft.date=2024-03-01&rft.volume=87&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=169&rft.epage=180&rft.pages=169-180&rft.issn=0308-0226&rft.eissn=1477-6006&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/03080226231207277&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2933394684%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2933394684&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_03080226231207277&rfr_iscdi=true |