High‐velocity ballistic response of AA 1100‐H14 based carbon‐fiber metal laminates: An experimental investigation

A detailed experimental investigation was carried out for the high‐velocity ballistic response of AA 1100‐H14 based carbon‐fiber metal laminates (FMLs). FMLs with different metal volume fractions and the same thickness of carbon‐epoxy fiber laminates were tested to examine the surface and internal d...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Polymer composites 2024-03, Vol.45 (4), p.2981-3009
Hauptverfasser: Jamsheed, Mohammed, Rashid, Faizan Mohammad, Velmurugan, R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 3009
container_issue 4
container_start_page 2981
container_title Polymer composites
container_volume 45
creator Jamsheed, Mohammed
Rashid, Faizan Mohammad
Velmurugan, R.
description A detailed experimental investigation was carried out for the high‐velocity ballistic response of AA 1100‐H14 based carbon‐fiber metal laminates (FMLs). FMLs with different metal volume fractions and the same thickness of carbon‐epoxy fiber laminates were tested to examine the surface and internal damage. The ballistic performance parameters, namely % escalation in absorbed energy, specific energy absorbed, ballistic limit, specific perforation energy, first cracking energy, and global deformation profile, were studied and a comparison was drawn with pure carbons fiber reinforced epoxy composite laminates. Despite having greater thickness, pure carbon fiber‐reinforced epoxy composite laminates absorbed less impact energy than FMLs and failed catastrophically. For FMLs, the % escalation in the absorbed energy and the specific energy absorption kept increasing with the increasing impact velocity until the onset of perforation. Once the perforation started, both these parameters showed a decreasing trend. Thick FMLs absorbed a good amount of energy, leading to projectile recoil suffering minimal damage. The ballistic velocity, specific perforation energy, and first cracking energy on the front and rear face of FMLs layers showed an increasing trend. The minimum for the thinner and maximum for the thicker FMLs attributed to the large thickness and more metal volume fraction. Contrary to the large deformation of the impacting points, pure carbon fiber‐reinforced epoxy composite laminates showed very minimal deformation as compared to FMLs. The brittle nature of the epoxy resin resisted the deformation to a large extent leading to less energy absorption. Highlights High‐velocity ballistic response of AA 1100‐H14 based carbon‐FMLs was investigated. Ballistic performance parameters of FMLs were studied and was compared with carbons fiber reinforced composite laminates. The ballistic limit of FMLs showed a direct dependence its thickness and metal volume fraction. In the absence of any metallic layer, pure carbons fiber reinforced composite laminates absorbed less impact energy. Ballistic study of AA 1100‐H14 based carbon‐fibre metal laminates.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/pc.27965
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2933382635</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2933382635</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2935-f2b375bfcdb4000990d1d98fe5cf820521052f9c3f134999ec0d46b11000c7373</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10E9LwzAYBvAgCs4p-BECXrx05k_TNt7KUCcM9KDnkKbJzOiSmnSbu_kR_Ix-EjPn1UMIJD-e5-UF4BKjCUaI3PRqQkpesCMwwiyvMsQKfgxGiJQkqygvT8FZjMskcVHQEdjO7OLt-_Nrozuv7LCDjew6GwerYNCx9y5q6A2sa4hTfIIznCcTdQuVDI136cnYRge40oPsYCdX1slBx1tYO6g_eh3sSrv9l3UbnYIXcrDenYMTI7uoL_7uMXi9v3uZzrL508PjtJ5ninDKMkMaWrLGqLbJEUKcoxa3vDKaKVMRxAhOx3BFDaY551wr1OZFs58VqZKWdAyuDrl98O_r1C-Wfh1cqhSpgNKKFJQldX1QKvgYgzaiT2PLsBMYif1aRa_E71oTzQ50azu9-9eJ5-nB_wCao3p5</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2933382635</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>High‐velocity ballistic response of AA 1100‐H14 based carbon‐fiber metal laminates: An experimental investigation</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Jamsheed, Mohammed ; Rashid, Faizan Mohammad ; Velmurugan, R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Jamsheed, Mohammed ; Rashid, Faizan Mohammad ; Velmurugan, R.</creatorcontrib><description>A detailed experimental investigation was carried out for the high‐velocity ballistic response of AA 1100‐H14 based carbon‐fiber metal laminates (FMLs). FMLs with different metal volume fractions and the same thickness of carbon‐epoxy fiber laminates were tested to examine the surface and internal damage. The ballistic performance parameters, namely % escalation in absorbed energy, specific energy absorbed, ballistic limit, specific perforation energy, first cracking energy, and global deformation profile, were studied and a comparison was drawn with pure carbons fiber reinforced epoxy composite laminates. Despite having greater thickness, pure carbon fiber‐reinforced epoxy composite laminates absorbed less impact energy than FMLs and failed catastrophically. For FMLs, the % escalation in the absorbed energy and the specific energy absorption kept increasing with the increasing impact velocity until the onset of perforation. Once the perforation started, both these parameters showed a decreasing trend. Thick FMLs absorbed a good amount of energy, leading to projectile recoil suffering minimal damage. The ballistic velocity, specific perforation energy, and first cracking energy on the front and rear face of FMLs layers showed an increasing trend. The minimum for the thinner and maximum for the thicker FMLs attributed to the large thickness and more metal volume fraction. Contrary to the large deformation of the impacting points, pure carbon fiber‐reinforced epoxy composite laminates showed very minimal deformation as compared to FMLs. The brittle nature of the epoxy resin resisted the deformation to a large extent leading to less energy absorption. Highlights High‐velocity ballistic response of AA 1100‐H14 based carbon‐FMLs was investigated. Ballistic performance parameters of FMLs were studied and was compared with carbons fiber reinforced composite laminates. The ballistic limit of FMLs showed a direct dependence its thickness and metal volume fraction. In the absence of any metallic layer, pure carbons fiber reinforced composite laminates absorbed less impact energy. Ballistic study of AA 1100‐H14 based carbon‐fibre metal laminates.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0272-8397</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1548-0569</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/pc.27965</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>AA 1100‐H14 aluminum alloy ; Antiballistic materials ; ballistic limit ; carbon fiber ; Carbon fiber reinforced plastics ; Carbon fibers ; Cracking (fracturing) ; Damage ; Energy ; Energy absorption ; Epoxy resins ; Fiber composites ; Fiber reinforced polymers ; Fiber-metal laminates ; high‐velocity impact ; Impact velocity ; Parameters ; Projectiles ; Specific energy ; Thickness ; Velocity</subject><ispartof>Polymer composites, 2024-03, Vol.45 (4), p.2981-3009</ispartof><rights>2023 Society of Plastics Engineers.</rights><rights>2024 Society of Plastics Engineers</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2935-f2b375bfcdb4000990d1d98fe5cf820521052f9c3f134999ec0d46b11000c7373</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2935-f2b375bfcdb4000990d1d98fe5cf820521052f9c3f134999ec0d46b11000c7373</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4047-5601</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fpc.27965$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fpc.27965$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jamsheed, Mohammed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rashid, Faizan Mohammad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Velmurugan, R.</creatorcontrib><title>High‐velocity ballistic response of AA 1100‐H14 based carbon‐fiber metal laminates: An experimental investigation</title><title>Polymer composites</title><description>A detailed experimental investigation was carried out for the high‐velocity ballistic response of AA 1100‐H14 based carbon‐fiber metal laminates (FMLs). FMLs with different metal volume fractions and the same thickness of carbon‐epoxy fiber laminates were tested to examine the surface and internal damage. The ballistic performance parameters, namely % escalation in absorbed energy, specific energy absorbed, ballistic limit, specific perforation energy, first cracking energy, and global deformation profile, were studied and a comparison was drawn with pure carbons fiber reinforced epoxy composite laminates. Despite having greater thickness, pure carbon fiber‐reinforced epoxy composite laminates absorbed less impact energy than FMLs and failed catastrophically. For FMLs, the % escalation in the absorbed energy and the specific energy absorption kept increasing with the increasing impact velocity until the onset of perforation. Once the perforation started, both these parameters showed a decreasing trend. Thick FMLs absorbed a good amount of energy, leading to projectile recoil suffering minimal damage. The ballistic velocity, specific perforation energy, and first cracking energy on the front and rear face of FMLs layers showed an increasing trend. The minimum for the thinner and maximum for the thicker FMLs attributed to the large thickness and more metal volume fraction. Contrary to the large deformation of the impacting points, pure carbon fiber‐reinforced epoxy composite laminates showed very minimal deformation as compared to FMLs. The brittle nature of the epoxy resin resisted the deformation to a large extent leading to less energy absorption. Highlights High‐velocity ballistic response of AA 1100‐H14 based carbon‐FMLs was investigated. Ballistic performance parameters of FMLs were studied and was compared with carbons fiber reinforced composite laminates. The ballistic limit of FMLs showed a direct dependence its thickness and metal volume fraction. In the absence of any metallic layer, pure carbons fiber reinforced composite laminates absorbed less impact energy. Ballistic study of AA 1100‐H14 based carbon‐fibre metal laminates.</description><subject>AA 1100‐H14 aluminum alloy</subject><subject>Antiballistic materials</subject><subject>ballistic limit</subject><subject>carbon fiber</subject><subject>Carbon fiber reinforced plastics</subject><subject>Carbon fibers</subject><subject>Cracking (fracturing)</subject><subject>Damage</subject><subject>Energy</subject><subject>Energy absorption</subject><subject>Epoxy resins</subject><subject>Fiber composites</subject><subject>Fiber reinforced polymers</subject><subject>Fiber-metal laminates</subject><subject>high‐velocity impact</subject><subject>Impact velocity</subject><subject>Parameters</subject><subject>Projectiles</subject><subject>Specific energy</subject><subject>Thickness</subject><subject>Velocity</subject><issn>0272-8397</issn><issn>1548-0569</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp10E9LwzAYBvAgCs4p-BECXrx05k_TNt7KUCcM9KDnkKbJzOiSmnSbu_kR_Ix-EjPn1UMIJD-e5-UF4BKjCUaI3PRqQkpesCMwwiyvMsQKfgxGiJQkqygvT8FZjMskcVHQEdjO7OLt-_Nrozuv7LCDjew6GwerYNCx9y5q6A2sa4hTfIIznCcTdQuVDI136cnYRge40oPsYCdX1slBx1tYO6g_eh3sSrv9l3UbnYIXcrDenYMTI7uoL_7uMXi9v3uZzrL508PjtJ5ninDKMkMaWrLGqLbJEUKcoxa3vDKaKVMRxAhOx3BFDaY551wr1OZFs58VqZKWdAyuDrl98O_r1C-Wfh1cqhSpgNKKFJQldX1QKvgYgzaiT2PLsBMYif1aRa_E71oTzQ50azu9-9eJ5-nB_wCao3p5</recordid><startdate>20240310</startdate><enddate>20240310</enddate><creator>Jamsheed, Mohammed</creator><creator>Rashid, Faizan Mohammad</creator><creator>Velmurugan, R.</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JG9</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4047-5601</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240310</creationdate><title>High‐velocity ballistic response of AA 1100‐H14 based carbon‐fiber metal laminates: An experimental investigation</title><author>Jamsheed, Mohammed ; Rashid, Faizan Mohammad ; Velmurugan, R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2935-f2b375bfcdb4000990d1d98fe5cf820521052f9c3f134999ec0d46b11000c7373</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>AA 1100‐H14 aluminum alloy</topic><topic>Antiballistic materials</topic><topic>ballistic limit</topic><topic>carbon fiber</topic><topic>Carbon fiber reinforced plastics</topic><topic>Carbon fibers</topic><topic>Cracking (fracturing)</topic><topic>Damage</topic><topic>Energy</topic><topic>Energy absorption</topic><topic>Epoxy resins</topic><topic>Fiber composites</topic><topic>Fiber reinforced polymers</topic><topic>Fiber-metal laminates</topic><topic>high‐velocity impact</topic><topic>Impact velocity</topic><topic>Parameters</topic><topic>Projectiles</topic><topic>Specific energy</topic><topic>Thickness</topic><topic>Velocity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jamsheed, Mohammed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rashid, Faizan Mohammad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Velmurugan, R.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><jtitle>Polymer composites</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jamsheed, Mohammed</au><au>Rashid, Faizan Mohammad</au><au>Velmurugan, R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>High‐velocity ballistic response of AA 1100‐H14 based carbon‐fiber metal laminates: An experimental investigation</atitle><jtitle>Polymer composites</jtitle><date>2024-03-10</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>2981</spage><epage>3009</epage><pages>2981-3009</pages><issn>0272-8397</issn><eissn>1548-0569</eissn><abstract>A detailed experimental investigation was carried out for the high‐velocity ballistic response of AA 1100‐H14 based carbon‐fiber metal laminates (FMLs). FMLs with different metal volume fractions and the same thickness of carbon‐epoxy fiber laminates were tested to examine the surface and internal damage. The ballistic performance parameters, namely % escalation in absorbed energy, specific energy absorbed, ballistic limit, specific perforation energy, first cracking energy, and global deformation profile, were studied and a comparison was drawn with pure carbons fiber reinforced epoxy composite laminates. Despite having greater thickness, pure carbon fiber‐reinforced epoxy composite laminates absorbed less impact energy than FMLs and failed catastrophically. For FMLs, the % escalation in the absorbed energy and the specific energy absorption kept increasing with the increasing impact velocity until the onset of perforation. Once the perforation started, both these parameters showed a decreasing trend. Thick FMLs absorbed a good amount of energy, leading to projectile recoil suffering minimal damage. The ballistic velocity, specific perforation energy, and first cracking energy on the front and rear face of FMLs layers showed an increasing trend. The minimum for the thinner and maximum for the thicker FMLs attributed to the large thickness and more metal volume fraction. Contrary to the large deformation of the impacting points, pure carbon fiber‐reinforced epoxy composite laminates showed very minimal deformation as compared to FMLs. The brittle nature of the epoxy resin resisted the deformation to a large extent leading to less energy absorption. Highlights High‐velocity ballistic response of AA 1100‐H14 based carbon‐FMLs was investigated. Ballistic performance parameters of FMLs were studied and was compared with carbons fiber reinforced composite laminates. The ballistic limit of FMLs showed a direct dependence its thickness and metal volume fraction. In the absence of any metallic layer, pure carbons fiber reinforced composite laminates absorbed less impact energy. Ballistic study of AA 1100‐H14 based carbon‐fibre metal laminates.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/pc.27965</doi><tpages>29</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4047-5601</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0272-8397
ispartof Polymer composites, 2024-03, Vol.45 (4), p.2981-3009
issn 0272-8397
1548-0569
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2933382635
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects AA 1100‐H14 aluminum alloy
Antiballistic materials
ballistic limit
carbon fiber
Carbon fiber reinforced plastics
Carbon fibers
Cracking (fracturing)
Damage
Energy
Energy absorption
Epoxy resins
Fiber composites
Fiber reinforced polymers
Fiber-metal laminates
high‐velocity impact
Impact velocity
Parameters
Projectiles
Specific energy
Thickness
Velocity
title High‐velocity ballistic response of AA 1100‐H14 based carbon‐fiber metal laminates: An experimental investigation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T00%3A38%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=High%E2%80%90velocity%20ballistic%20response%20of%20AA%201100%E2%80%90H14%20based%20carbon%E2%80%90fiber%20metal%20laminates:%20An%20experimental%20investigation&rft.jtitle=Polymer%20composites&rft.au=Jamsheed,%20Mohammed&rft.date=2024-03-10&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=2981&rft.epage=3009&rft.pages=2981-3009&rft.issn=0272-8397&rft.eissn=1548-0569&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/pc.27965&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2933382635%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2933382635&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true