Machine learning and non-machine learning methods in mathematical recognition systems: Two decades’ systematic literature review
Tools based on machine learning (ML) have seen widespread application in the prediction and categorization of mathematical symbols and phrases. The purpose of this work is to conduct a comprehensive analysis of the machine learning and non-machine learning strategies that are currently in use for th...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Multimedia tools and applications 2024-03, Vol.83 (9), p.27831-27900 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 27900 |
---|---|
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | 27831 |
container_title | Multimedia tools and applications |
container_volume | 83 |
creator | Sakshi Kukreja, Vinay |
description | Tools based on machine learning (ML) have seen widespread application in the prediction and categorization of mathematical symbols and phrases. The purpose of this work is to conduct a comprehensive analysis of the machine learning and non-machine learning strategies that are currently in use for the recognition of mathematical expressions. (MEs). The authors collected and analyzed research studies on the recognition of MEs (and closely related models and issues as well), which are published from January 2000 to December 2022 in the SLR. The review has nominated 98 primary studies out of the extracted 202 studies after heedful filtering using inclusion/exclusion criteria and quality assessment. The pertinent data is derived from IEEE explore, Science Direct, Wiley, Scopus, ACM Digital Library, etc. For assiduously reviewing and synthesizing the data, the authors used grounded theory and other qualitative and quantitative techniques. The analysis reveals that the support vector machine as an ML model with CROHME as the dataset and expression recognition rate as an accuracy metric is frequently used in the chosen studies. Recognition is typically fragmented down into three stages—segmenting symbols, recognizing symbols, and analyzing structures—in non-ML studies. In conclusion, this work aims to synthesize the results of existing research to provide a summary of the state-of-the-art in recognizing handwritten MEs. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11042-023-16356-z |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2933267926</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2933267926</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c270t-32485d6578b41898f6823b10ebe56cdaa669e04761cdbbb61cf1e5e06d09890c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1OwzAQhS0EEqVwAVaWWAf8k9gJO1TxJxWxgbXlOJPWVeMUO6VqV4hbcD1OgksqgViwmRnNvO-N9BA6peScEiIvAqUkZQlhPKGCZyLZ7KEBzSRPpGR0_9d8iI5CmBFCRcbSAXp_0GZqHeA5aO-sm2DtKuxalzR_Dw1007YK2Drc6G4KsVij59iDaSfOdrZ1OKxDB024xE-rFldgdAXh8-1jt98CeG478Lpbeojkq4XVMTqo9TzAya4P0fPN9dPoLhk_3t6PrsaJYZJ0CWdpnlUik3mZ0rzIa5EzXlICJWTCVFoLUQBJpaCmKssytppCBkRUpMgLYvgQnfW-C9--LCF0atYuvYsvFSs4Z0IWTEQV61XGtyF4qNXC20b7taJEbbNWfdYqZq2-s1abCPEeClHsJuB_rP-hvgCwCoYS</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2933267926</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Machine learning and non-machine learning methods in mathematical recognition systems: Two decades’ systematic literature review</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Sakshi ; Kukreja, Vinay</creator><creatorcontrib>Sakshi ; Kukreja, Vinay</creatorcontrib><description>Tools based on machine learning (ML) have seen widespread application in the prediction and categorization of mathematical symbols and phrases. The purpose of this work is to conduct a comprehensive analysis of the machine learning and non-machine learning strategies that are currently in use for the recognition of mathematical expressions. (MEs). The authors collected and analyzed research studies on the recognition of MEs (and closely related models and issues as well), which are published from January 2000 to December 2022 in the SLR. The review has nominated 98 primary studies out of the extracted 202 studies after heedful filtering using inclusion/exclusion criteria and quality assessment. The pertinent data is derived from IEEE explore, Science Direct, Wiley, Scopus, ACM Digital Library, etc. For assiduously reviewing and synthesizing the data, the authors used grounded theory and other qualitative and quantitative techniques. The analysis reveals that the support vector machine as an ML model with CROHME as the dataset and expression recognition rate as an accuracy metric is frequently used in the chosen studies. Recognition is typically fragmented down into three stages—segmenting symbols, recognizing symbols, and analyzing structures—in non-ML studies. In conclusion, this work aims to synthesize the results of existing research to provide a summary of the state-of-the-art in recognizing handwritten MEs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1573-7721</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1380-7501</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-7721</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11042-023-16356-z</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Computer Communication Networks ; Computer Science ; Data Structures and Information Theory ; Digital systems ; Handwriting recognition ; Literature reviews ; Machine learning ; Mathematical analysis ; Multimedia Information Systems ; Qualitative analysis ; Quality assessment ; Special Purpose and Application-Based Systems ; Support vector machines ; Symbols ; Synthesis ; Track 6: Computer Vision for Multimedia Applications</subject><ispartof>Multimedia tools and applications, 2024-03, Vol.83 (9), p.27831-27900</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c270t-32485d6578b41898f6823b10ebe56cdaa669e04761cdbbb61cf1e5e06d09890c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8757-4001 ; 0000-0002-9760-0824</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11042-023-16356-z$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11042-023-16356-z$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sakshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kukreja, Vinay</creatorcontrib><title>Machine learning and non-machine learning methods in mathematical recognition systems: Two decades’ systematic literature review</title><title>Multimedia tools and applications</title><addtitle>Multimed Tools Appl</addtitle><description>Tools based on machine learning (ML) have seen widespread application in the prediction and categorization of mathematical symbols and phrases. The purpose of this work is to conduct a comprehensive analysis of the machine learning and non-machine learning strategies that are currently in use for the recognition of mathematical expressions. (MEs). The authors collected and analyzed research studies on the recognition of MEs (and closely related models and issues as well), which are published from January 2000 to December 2022 in the SLR. The review has nominated 98 primary studies out of the extracted 202 studies after heedful filtering using inclusion/exclusion criteria and quality assessment. The pertinent data is derived from IEEE explore, Science Direct, Wiley, Scopus, ACM Digital Library, etc. For assiduously reviewing and synthesizing the data, the authors used grounded theory and other qualitative and quantitative techniques. The analysis reveals that the support vector machine as an ML model with CROHME as the dataset and expression recognition rate as an accuracy metric is frequently used in the chosen studies. Recognition is typically fragmented down into three stages—segmenting symbols, recognizing symbols, and analyzing structures—in non-ML studies. In conclusion, this work aims to synthesize the results of existing research to provide a summary of the state-of-the-art in recognizing handwritten MEs.</description><subject>Computer Communication Networks</subject><subject>Computer Science</subject><subject>Data Structures and Information Theory</subject><subject>Digital systems</subject><subject>Handwriting recognition</subject><subject>Literature reviews</subject><subject>Machine learning</subject><subject>Mathematical analysis</subject><subject>Multimedia Information Systems</subject><subject>Qualitative analysis</subject><subject>Quality assessment</subject><subject>Special Purpose and Application-Based Systems</subject><subject>Support vector machines</subject><subject>Symbols</subject><subject>Synthesis</subject><subject>Track 6: Computer Vision for Multimedia Applications</subject><issn>1573-7721</issn><issn>1380-7501</issn><issn>1573-7721</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1OwzAQhS0EEqVwAVaWWAf8k9gJO1TxJxWxgbXlOJPWVeMUO6VqV4hbcD1OgksqgViwmRnNvO-N9BA6peScEiIvAqUkZQlhPKGCZyLZ7KEBzSRPpGR0_9d8iI5CmBFCRcbSAXp_0GZqHeA5aO-sm2DtKuxalzR_Dw1007YK2Drc6G4KsVij59iDaSfOdrZ1OKxDB024xE-rFldgdAXh8-1jt98CeG478Lpbeojkq4XVMTqo9TzAya4P0fPN9dPoLhk_3t6PrsaJYZJ0CWdpnlUik3mZ0rzIa5EzXlICJWTCVFoLUQBJpaCmKssytppCBkRUpMgLYvgQnfW-C9--LCF0atYuvYsvFSs4Z0IWTEQV61XGtyF4qNXC20b7taJEbbNWfdYqZq2-s1abCPEeClHsJuB_rP-hvgCwCoYS</recordid><startdate>20240301</startdate><enddate>20240301</enddate><creator>Sakshi</creator><creator>Kukreja, Vinay</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8757-4001</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9760-0824</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240301</creationdate><title>Machine learning and non-machine learning methods in mathematical recognition systems: Two decades’ systematic literature review</title><author>Sakshi ; Kukreja, Vinay</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c270t-32485d6578b41898f6823b10ebe56cdaa669e04761cdbbb61cf1e5e06d09890c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Computer Communication Networks</topic><topic>Computer Science</topic><topic>Data Structures and Information Theory</topic><topic>Digital systems</topic><topic>Handwriting recognition</topic><topic>Literature reviews</topic><topic>Machine learning</topic><topic>Mathematical analysis</topic><topic>Multimedia Information Systems</topic><topic>Qualitative analysis</topic><topic>Quality assessment</topic><topic>Special Purpose and Application-Based Systems</topic><topic>Support vector machines</topic><topic>Symbols</topic><topic>Synthesis</topic><topic>Track 6: Computer Vision for Multimedia Applications</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sakshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kukreja, Vinay</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><jtitle>Multimedia tools and applications</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sakshi</au><au>Kukreja, Vinay</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Machine learning and non-machine learning methods in mathematical recognition systems: Two decades’ systematic literature review</atitle><jtitle>Multimedia tools and applications</jtitle><stitle>Multimed Tools Appl</stitle><date>2024-03-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>83</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>27831</spage><epage>27900</epage><pages>27831-27900</pages><issn>1573-7721</issn><issn>1380-7501</issn><eissn>1573-7721</eissn><abstract>Tools based on machine learning (ML) have seen widespread application in the prediction and categorization of mathematical symbols and phrases. The purpose of this work is to conduct a comprehensive analysis of the machine learning and non-machine learning strategies that are currently in use for the recognition of mathematical expressions. (MEs). The authors collected and analyzed research studies on the recognition of MEs (and closely related models and issues as well), which are published from January 2000 to December 2022 in the SLR. The review has nominated 98 primary studies out of the extracted 202 studies after heedful filtering using inclusion/exclusion criteria and quality assessment. The pertinent data is derived from IEEE explore, Science Direct, Wiley, Scopus, ACM Digital Library, etc. For assiduously reviewing and synthesizing the data, the authors used grounded theory and other qualitative and quantitative techniques. The analysis reveals that the support vector machine as an ML model with CROHME as the dataset and expression recognition rate as an accuracy metric is frequently used in the chosen studies. Recognition is typically fragmented down into three stages—segmenting symbols, recognizing symbols, and analyzing structures—in non-ML studies. In conclusion, this work aims to synthesize the results of existing research to provide a summary of the state-of-the-art in recognizing handwritten MEs.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><doi>10.1007/s11042-023-16356-z</doi><tpages>70</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8757-4001</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9760-0824</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1573-7721 |
ispartof | Multimedia tools and applications, 2024-03, Vol.83 (9), p.27831-27900 |
issn | 1573-7721 1380-7501 1573-7721 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2933267926 |
source | SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Computer Communication Networks Computer Science Data Structures and Information Theory Digital systems Handwriting recognition Literature reviews Machine learning Mathematical analysis Multimedia Information Systems Qualitative analysis Quality assessment Special Purpose and Application-Based Systems Support vector machines Symbols Synthesis Track 6: Computer Vision for Multimedia Applications |
title | Machine learning and non-machine learning methods in mathematical recognition systems: Two decades’ systematic literature review |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T20%3A36%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Machine%20learning%20and%20non-machine%20learning%20methods%20in%20mathematical%20recognition%20systems:%20Two%20decades%E2%80%99%20systematic%20literature%20review&rft.jtitle=Multimedia%20tools%20and%20applications&rft.au=Sakshi&rft.date=2024-03-01&rft.volume=83&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=27831&rft.epage=27900&rft.pages=27831-27900&rft.issn=1573-7721&rft.eissn=1573-7721&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11042-023-16356-z&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2933267926%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2933267926&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |