Influence of electromagnetic riveting process on microstructures and mechanical properties of 2A10 and 6082 Al riveted structures
Electromagnetic riveting (EMR) technology had unique connection advantages compared to traditional riveting methods. The influence of EMR process on microstructures and mechanical properties for 2A10 and 6082 aluminum riveted structures was investigated by comparison with regular pressure riveting (...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering 2019-08, Vol.19 (4), p.1284-1294 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1294 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 1284 |
container_title | Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering |
container_volume | 19 |
creator | Dong, Dongying Sun, Liqiang Wang, Qiong Li, Guangyao Cui, Junjia |
description | Electromagnetic riveting (EMR) technology had unique connection advantages compared to traditional riveting methods. The influence of EMR process on microstructures and mechanical properties for 2A10 and 6082 aluminum riveted structures was investigated by comparison with regular pressure riveting (RPR) process. The microstructures and mechanical properties of the two riveting processes were analyzed by optical microscopy and tensile testing machine, respectively. The micro-hardness and the interference amount were also investigated. The results showed that the main characteristic of the driven head was the shear zone. The grain deformation of the EMR in shear zone was more severe than that of the RPR. The width of the shear zone of the RPR was larger than that of the EMR. The trend of micro-hardness distribution was opposite along the direction of the shear zone. Meanwhile, the distribution of the interference amounts of EMR had a better uniformity. The failure mechanisms of shear tests of the EMR and RPR were same, but the pull-out tests were different. The dynamic loading had a great influence on the microstructures and mechanical properties of riveted structures, and the mechanical properties of EMR were significantly enhanced. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.acme.2019.07.006 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2932841513</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1644966519300792</els_id><sourcerecordid>2932841513</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-4eef5e0385f4ee5979a05a117166b2f4aada4ae58d6a93194353a80a21f4b48f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU9r3DAQxUVJoEuSL9CToGc7o7-2oZclpE0g0EtyFoo82mqx5Y1kB3LsN68cF3LLaQTzfm80bwj5xqBmwPT1sbZuxJoD62poagD9hew4tKISgrVnZMe0lFWntfpKrnI-AgCDhjOtduTvffTDgtEhnTzFAd2cptEeIs7B0RReS40HekqTw5zpFOkYXJrynBY3LwkztbGnI7o_NgZnh1V5wjSH0imGfM_gXaGh5XQ_bI7Y0w-DS3Lu7ZDx6n-9IE8_bx9v7qqH37_ub_YPlRMNnyuJ6BWCaJUvT9U1nQVlGWuY1s_cS2t7Ky2qtte2E6yTQgnbguXMy2fZenFBvm--5YcvC-bZHKclxTLS8E7wVjLFRFHxTbUumRN6c0phtOnNMDBr2uZo1rTNmraBxpS0CyQ2KBdxPGD6sP6U-rFRWLZ-DYXKLqyX6EMqZzD9FD7D_wGi-Zol</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2932841513</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Influence of electromagnetic riveting process on microstructures and mechanical properties of 2A10 and 6082 Al riveted structures</title><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><source>ProQuest Central</source><creator>Dong, Dongying ; Sun, Liqiang ; Wang, Qiong ; Li, Guangyao ; Cui, Junjia</creator><creatorcontrib>Dong, Dongying ; Sun, Liqiang ; Wang, Qiong ; Li, Guangyao ; Cui, Junjia</creatorcontrib><description>Electromagnetic riveting (EMR) technology had unique connection advantages compared to traditional riveting methods. The influence of EMR process on microstructures and mechanical properties for 2A10 and 6082 aluminum riveted structures was investigated by comparison with regular pressure riveting (RPR) process. The microstructures and mechanical properties of the two riveting processes were analyzed by optical microscopy and tensile testing machine, respectively. The micro-hardness and the interference amount were also investigated. The results showed that the main characteristic of the driven head was the shear zone. The grain deformation of the EMR in shear zone was more severe than that of the RPR. The width of the shear zone of the RPR was larger than that of the EMR. The trend of micro-hardness distribution was opposite along the direction of the shear zone. Meanwhile, the distribution of the interference amounts of EMR had a better uniformity. The failure mechanisms of shear tests of the EMR and RPR were same, but the pull-out tests were different. The dynamic loading had a great influence on the microstructures and mechanical properties of riveted structures, and the mechanical properties of EMR were significantly enhanced.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1644-9665</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2083-3318</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.acme.2019.07.006</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Civil Engineering ; Dynamic loads ; Electromagnetic riveting ; Engineering ; Failure mechanisms ; Interference ; Mechanical Engineering ; Mechanical properties ; Microhardness ; Microstructure ; Microstructures ; Optical microscopy ; Optical properties ; Original Research Article ; Pull out tests ; Regular pressure riveting ; Riveting ; Shear tests ; Shear zone ; Structural Materials ; Tensile tests</subject><ispartof>Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, 2019-08, Vol.19 (4), p.1284-1294</ispartof><rights>2019</rights><rights>Wroclaw University of Science and Technology 2019</rights><rights>Copyright Springer Nature B.V. Dec 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-4eef5e0385f4ee5979a05a117166b2f4aada4ae58d6a93194353a80a21f4b48f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-4eef5e0385f4ee5979a05a117166b2f4aada4ae58d6a93194353a80a21f4b48f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1016/j.acme.2019.07.006$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2932841513?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21367,27901,27902,33721,41464,42533,43781,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dong, Dongying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sun, Liqiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Qiong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Guangyao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cui, Junjia</creatorcontrib><title>Influence of electromagnetic riveting process on microstructures and mechanical properties of 2A10 and 6082 Al riveted structures</title><title>Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering</title><addtitle>Archiv.Civ.Mech.Eng</addtitle><description>Electromagnetic riveting (EMR) technology had unique connection advantages compared to traditional riveting methods. The influence of EMR process on microstructures and mechanical properties for 2A10 and 6082 aluminum riveted structures was investigated by comparison with regular pressure riveting (RPR) process. The microstructures and mechanical properties of the two riveting processes were analyzed by optical microscopy and tensile testing machine, respectively. The micro-hardness and the interference amount were also investigated. The results showed that the main characteristic of the driven head was the shear zone. The grain deformation of the EMR in shear zone was more severe than that of the RPR. The width of the shear zone of the RPR was larger than that of the EMR. The trend of micro-hardness distribution was opposite along the direction of the shear zone. Meanwhile, the distribution of the interference amounts of EMR had a better uniformity. The failure mechanisms of shear tests of the EMR and RPR were same, but the pull-out tests were different. The dynamic loading had a great influence on the microstructures and mechanical properties of riveted structures, and the mechanical properties of EMR were significantly enhanced.</description><subject>Civil Engineering</subject><subject>Dynamic loads</subject><subject>Electromagnetic riveting</subject><subject>Engineering</subject><subject>Failure mechanisms</subject><subject>Interference</subject><subject>Mechanical Engineering</subject><subject>Mechanical properties</subject><subject>Microhardness</subject><subject>Microstructure</subject><subject>Microstructures</subject><subject>Optical microscopy</subject><subject>Optical properties</subject><subject>Original Research Article</subject><subject>Pull out tests</subject><subject>Regular pressure riveting</subject><subject>Riveting</subject><subject>Shear tests</subject><subject>Shear zone</subject><subject>Structural Materials</subject><subject>Tensile tests</subject><issn>1644-9665</issn><issn>2083-3318</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU9r3DAQxUVJoEuSL9CToGc7o7-2oZclpE0g0EtyFoo82mqx5Y1kB3LsN68cF3LLaQTzfm80bwj5xqBmwPT1sbZuxJoD62poagD9hew4tKISgrVnZMe0lFWntfpKrnI-AgCDhjOtduTvffTDgtEhnTzFAd2cptEeIs7B0RReS40HekqTw5zpFOkYXJrynBY3LwkztbGnI7o_NgZnh1V5wjSH0imGfM_gXaGh5XQ_bI7Y0w-DS3Lu7ZDx6n-9IE8_bx9v7qqH37_ub_YPlRMNnyuJ6BWCaJUvT9U1nQVlGWuY1s_cS2t7Ky2qtte2E6yTQgnbguXMy2fZenFBvm--5YcvC-bZHKclxTLS8E7wVjLFRFHxTbUumRN6c0phtOnNMDBr2uZo1rTNmraBxpS0CyQ2KBdxPGD6sP6U-rFRWLZ-DYXKLqyX6EMqZzD9FD7D_wGi-Zol</recordid><startdate>20190801</startdate><enddate>20190801</enddate><creator>Dong, Dongying</creator><creator>Sun, Liqiang</creator><creator>Wang, Qiong</creator><creator>Li, Guangyao</creator><creator>Cui, Junjia</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Springer London</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190801</creationdate><title>Influence of electromagnetic riveting process on microstructures and mechanical properties of 2A10 and 6082 Al riveted structures</title><author>Dong, Dongying ; Sun, Liqiang ; Wang, Qiong ; Li, Guangyao ; Cui, Junjia</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-4eef5e0385f4ee5979a05a117166b2f4aada4ae58d6a93194353a80a21f4b48f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Civil Engineering</topic><topic>Dynamic loads</topic><topic>Electromagnetic riveting</topic><topic>Engineering</topic><topic>Failure mechanisms</topic><topic>Interference</topic><topic>Mechanical Engineering</topic><topic>Mechanical properties</topic><topic>Microhardness</topic><topic>Microstructure</topic><topic>Microstructures</topic><topic>Optical microscopy</topic><topic>Optical properties</topic><topic>Original Research Article</topic><topic>Pull out tests</topic><topic>Regular pressure riveting</topic><topic>Riveting</topic><topic>Shear tests</topic><topic>Shear zone</topic><topic>Structural Materials</topic><topic>Tensile tests</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dong, Dongying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sun, Liqiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Qiong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Guangyao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cui, Junjia</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><jtitle>Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dong, Dongying</au><au>Sun, Liqiang</au><au>Wang, Qiong</au><au>Li, Guangyao</au><au>Cui, Junjia</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Influence of electromagnetic riveting process on microstructures and mechanical properties of 2A10 and 6082 Al riveted structures</atitle><jtitle>Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering</jtitle><stitle>Archiv.Civ.Mech.Eng</stitle><date>2019-08-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1284</spage><epage>1294</epage><pages>1284-1294</pages><issn>1644-9665</issn><eissn>2083-3318</eissn><abstract>Electromagnetic riveting (EMR) technology had unique connection advantages compared to traditional riveting methods. The influence of EMR process on microstructures and mechanical properties for 2A10 and 6082 aluminum riveted structures was investigated by comparison with regular pressure riveting (RPR) process. The microstructures and mechanical properties of the two riveting processes were analyzed by optical microscopy and tensile testing machine, respectively. The micro-hardness and the interference amount were also investigated. The results showed that the main characteristic of the driven head was the shear zone. The grain deformation of the EMR in shear zone was more severe than that of the RPR. The width of the shear zone of the RPR was larger than that of the EMR. The trend of micro-hardness distribution was opposite along the direction of the shear zone. Meanwhile, the distribution of the interference amounts of EMR had a better uniformity. The failure mechanisms of shear tests of the EMR and RPR were same, but the pull-out tests were different. The dynamic loading had a great influence on the microstructures and mechanical properties of riveted structures, and the mechanical properties of EMR were significantly enhanced.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.acme.2019.07.006</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1644-9665 |
ispartof | Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, 2019-08, Vol.19 (4), p.1284-1294 |
issn | 1644-9665 2083-3318 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2932841513 |
source | SpringerLink Journals; ProQuest Central |
subjects | Civil Engineering Dynamic loads Electromagnetic riveting Engineering Failure mechanisms Interference Mechanical Engineering Mechanical properties Microhardness Microstructure Microstructures Optical microscopy Optical properties Original Research Article Pull out tests Regular pressure riveting Riveting Shear tests Shear zone Structural Materials Tensile tests |
title | Influence of electromagnetic riveting process on microstructures and mechanical properties of 2A10 and 6082 Al riveted structures |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T12%3A50%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Influence%20of%20electromagnetic%20riveting%20process%20on%20microstructures%20and%20mechanical%20properties%20of%202A10%20and%206082%20Al%20riveted%20structures&rft.jtitle=Archives%20of%20Civil%20and%20Mechanical%20Engineering&rft.au=Dong,%20Dongying&rft.date=2019-08-01&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1284&rft.epage=1294&rft.pages=1284-1294&rft.issn=1644-9665&rft.eissn=2083-3318&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.acme.2019.07.006&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2932841513%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2932841513&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S1644966519300792&rfr_iscdi=true |