Influence of electromagnetic riveting process on microstructures and mechanical properties of 2A10 and 6082 Al riveted structures

Electromagnetic riveting (EMR) technology had unique connection advantages compared to traditional riveting methods. The influence of EMR process on microstructures and mechanical properties for 2A10 and 6082 aluminum riveted structures was investigated by comparison with regular pressure riveting (...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering 2019-08, Vol.19 (4), p.1284-1294
Hauptverfasser: Dong, Dongying, Sun, Liqiang, Wang, Qiong, Li, Guangyao, Cui, Junjia
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1294
container_issue 4
container_start_page 1284
container_title Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering
container_volume 19
creator Dong, Dongying
Sun, Liqiang
Wang, Qiong
Li, Guangyao
Cui, Junjia
description Electromagnetic riveting (EMR) technology had unique connection advantages compared to traditional riveting methods. The influence of EMR process on microstructures and mechanical properties for 2A10 and 6082 aluminum riveted structures was investigated by comparison with regular pressure riveting (RPR) process. The microstructures and mechanical properties of the two riveting processes were analyzed by optical microscopy and tensile testing machine, respectively. The micro-hardness and the interference amount were also investigated. The results showed that the main characteristic of the driven head was the shear zone. The grain deformation of the EMR in shear zone was more severe than that of the RPR. The width of the shear zone of the RPR was larger than that of the EMR. The trend of micro-hardness distribution was opposite along the direction of the shear zone. Meanwhile, the distribution of the interference amounts of EMR had a better uniformity. The failure mechanisms of shear tests of the EMR and RPR were same, but the pull-out tests were different. The dynamic loading had a great influence on the microstructures and mechanical properties of riveted structures, and the mechanical properties of EMR were significantly enhanced.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.acme.2019.07.006
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2932841513</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1644966519300792</els_id><sourcerecordid>2932841513</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-4eef5e0385f4ee5979a05a117166b2f4aada4ae58d6a93194353a80a21f4b48f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU9r3DAQxUVJoEuSL9CToGc7o7-2oZclpE0g0EtyFoo82mqx5Y1kB3LsN68cF3LLaQTzfm80bwj5xqBmwPT1sbZuxJoD62poagD9hew4tKISgrVnZMe0lFWntfpKrnI-AgCDhjOtduTvffTDgtEhnTzFAd2cptEeIs7B0RReS40HekqTw5zpFOkYXJrynBY3LwkztbGnI7o_NgZnh1V5wjSH0imGfM_gXaGh5XQ_bI7Y0w-DS3Lu7ZDx6n-9IE8_bx9v7qqH37_ub_YPlRMNnyuJ6BWCaJUvT9U1nQVlGWuY1s_cS2t7Ky2qtte2E6yTQgnbguXMy2fZenFBvm--5YcvC-bZHKclxTLS8E7wVjLFRFHxTbUumRN6c0phtOnNMDBr2uZo1rTNmraBxpS0CyQ2KBdxPGD6sP6U-rFRWLZ-DYXKLqyX6EMqZzD9FD7D_wGi-Zol</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2932841513</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Influence of electromagnetic riveting process on microstructures and mechanical properties of 2A10 and 6082 Al riveted structures</title><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><source>ProQuest Central</source><creator>Dong, Dongying ; Sun, Liqiang ; Wang, Qiong ; Li, Guangyao ; Cui, Junjia</creator><creatorcontrib>Dong, Dongying ; Sun, Liqiang ; Wang, Qiong ; Li, Guangyao ; Cui, Junjia</creatorcontrib><description>Electromagnetic riveting (EMR) technology had unique connection advantages compared to traditional riveting methods. The influence of EMR process on microstructures and mechanical properties for 2A10 and 6082 aluminum riveted structures was investigated by comparison with regular pressure riveting (RPR) process. The microstructures and mechanical properties of the two riveting processes were analyzed by optical microscopy and tensile testing machine, respectively. The micro-hardness and the interference amount were also investigated. The results showed that the main characteristic of the driven head was the shear zone. The grain deformation of the EMR in shear zone was more severe than that of the RPR. The width of the shear zone of the RPR was larger than that of the EMR. The trend of micro-hardness distribution was opposite along the direction of the shear zone. Meanwhile, the distribution of the interference amounts of EMR had a better uniformity. The failure mechanisms of shear tests of the EMR and RPR were same, but the pull-out tests were different. The dynamic loading had a great influence on the microstructures and mechanical properties of riveted structures, and the mechanical properties of EMR were significantly enhanced.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1644-9665</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2083-3318</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.acme.2019.07.006</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Civil Engineering ; Dynamic loads ; Electromagnetic riveting ; Engineering ; Failure mechanisms ; Interference ; Mechanical Engineering ; Mechanical properties ; Microhardness ; Microstructure ; Microstructures ; Optical microscopy ; Optical properties ; Original Research Article ; Pull out tests ; Regular pressure riveting ; Riveting ; Shear tests ; Shear zone ; Structural Materials ; Tensile tests</subject><ispartof>Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, 2019-08, Vol.19 (4), p.1284-1294</ispartof><rights>2019</rights><rights>Wroclaw University of Science and Technology 2019</rights><rights>Copyright Springer Nature B.V. Dec 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-4eef5e0385f4ee5979a05a117166b2f4aada4ae58d6a93194353a80a21f4b48f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-4eef5e0385f4ee5979a05a117166b2f4aada4ae58d6a93194353a80a21f4b48f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1016/j.acme.2019.07.006$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2932841513?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21367,27901,27902,33721,41464,42533,43781,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dong, Dongying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sun, Liqiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Qiong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Guangyao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cui, Junjia</creatorcontrib><title>Influence of electromagnetic riveting process on microstructures and mechanical properties of 2A10 and 6082 Al riveted structures</title><title>Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering</title><addtitle>Archiv.Civ.Mech.Eng</addtitle><description>Electromagnetic riveting (EMR) technology had unique connection advantages compared to traditional riveting methods. The influence of EMR process on microstructures and mechanical properties for 2A10 and 6082 aluminum riveted structures was investigated by comparison with regular pressure riveting (RPR) process. The microstructures and mechanical properties of the two riveting processes were analyzed by optical microscopy and tensile testing machine, respectively. The micro-hardness and the interference amount were also investigated. The results showed that the main characteristic of the driven head was the shear zone. The grain deformation of the EMR in shear zone was more severe than that of the RPR. The width of the shear zone of the RPR was larger than that of the EMR. The trend of micro-hardness distribution was opposite along the direction of the shear zone. Meanwhile, the distribution of the interference amounts of EMR had a better uniformity. The failure mechanisms of shear tests of the EMR and RPR were same, but the pull-out tests were different. The dynamic loading had a great influence on the microstructures and mechanical properties of riveted structures, and the mechanical properties of EMR were significantly enhanced.</description><subject>Civil Engineering</subject><subject>Dynamic loads</subject><subject>Electromagnetic riveting</subject><subject>Engineering</subject><subject>Failure mechanisms</subject><subject>Interference</subject><subject>Mechanical Engineering</subject><subject>Mechanical properties</subject><subject>Microhardness</subject><subject>Microstructure</subject><subject>Microstructures</subject><subject>Optical microscopy</subject><subject>Optical properties</subject><subject>Original Research Article</subject><subject>Pull out tests</subject><subject>Regular pressure riveting</subject><subject>Riveting</subject><subject>Shear tests</subject><subject>Shear zone</subject><subject>Structural Materials</subject><subject>Tensile tests</subject><issn>1644-9665</issn><issn>2083-3318</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU9r3DAQxUVJoEuSL9CToGc7o7-2oZclpE0g0EtyFoo82mqx5Y1kB3LsN68cF3LLaQTzfm80bwj5xqBmwPT1sbZuxJoD62poagD9hew4tKISgrVnZMe0lFWntfpKrnI-AgCDhjOtduTvffTDgtEhnTzFAd2cptEeIs7B0RReS40HekqTw5zpFOkYXJrynBY3LwkztbGnI7o_NgZnh1V5wjSH0imGfM_gXaGh5XQ_bI7Y0w-DS3Lu7ZDx6n-9IE8_bx9v7qqH37_ub_YPlRMNnyuJ6BWCaJUvT9U1nQVlGWuY1s_cS2t7Ky2qtte2E6yTQgnbguXMy2fZenFBvm--5YcvC-bZHKclxTLS8E7wVjLFRFHxTbUumRN6c0phtOnNMDBr2uZo1rTNmraBxpS0CyQ2KBdxPGD6sP6U-rFRWLZ-DYXKLqyX6EMqZzD9FD7D_wGi-Zol</recordid><startdate>20190801</startdate><enddate>20190801</enddate><creator>Dong, Dongying</creator><creator>Sun, Liqiang</creator><creator>Wang, Qiong</creator><creator>Li, Guangyao</creator><creator>Cui, Junjia</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Springer London</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190801</creationdate><title>Influence of electromagnetic riveting process on microstructures and mechanical properties of 2A10 and 6082 Al riveted structures</title><author>Dong, Dongying ; Sun, Liqiang ; Wang, Qiong ; Li, Guangyao ; Cui, Junjia</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-4eef5e0385f4ee5979a05a117166b2f4aada4ae58d6a93194353a80a21f4b48f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Civil Engineering</topic><topic>Dynamic loads</topic><topic>Electromagnetic riveting</topic><topic>Engineering</topic><topic>Failure mechanisms</topic><topic>Interference</topic><topic>Mechanical Engineering</topic><topic>Mechanical properties</topic><topic>Microhardness</topic><topic>Microstructure</topic><topic>Microstructures</topic><topic>Optical microscopy</topic><topic>Optical properties</topic><topic>Original Research Article</topic><topic>Pull out tests</topic><topic>Regular pressure riveting</topic><topic>Riveting</topic><topic>Shear tests</topic><topic>Shear zone</topic><topic>Structural Materials</topic><topic>Tensile tests</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dong, Dongying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sun, Liqiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Qiong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Guangyao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cui, Junjia</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><jtitle>Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dong, Dongying</au><au>Sun, Liqiang</au><au>Wang, Qiong</au><au>Li, Guangyao</au><au>Cui, Junjia</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Influence of electromagnetic riveting process on microstructures and mechanical properties of 2A10 and 6082 Al riveted structures</atitle><jtitle>Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering</jtitle><stitle>Archiv.Civ.Mech.Eng</stitle><date>2019-08-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1284</spage><epage>1294</epage><pages>1284-1294</pages><issn>1644-9665</issn><eissn>2083-3318</eissn><abstract>Electromagnetic riveting (EMR) technology had unique connection advantages compared to traditional riveting methods. The influence of EMR process on microstructures and mechanical properties for 2A10 and 6082 aluminum riveted structures was investigated by comparison with regular pressure riveting (RPR) process. The microstructures and mechanical properties of the two riveting processes were analyzed by optical microscopy and tensile testing machine, respectively. The micro-hardness and the interference amount were also investigated. The results showed that the main characteristic of the driven head was the shear zone. The grain deformation of the EMR in shear zone was more severe than that of the RPR. The width of the shear zone of the RPR was larger than that of the EMR. The trend of micro-hardness distribution was opposite along the direction of the shear zone. Meanwhile, the distribution of the interference amounts of EMR had a better uniformity. The failure mechanisms of shear tests of the EMR and RPR were same, but the pull-out tests were different. The dynamic loading had a great influence on the microstructures and mechanical properties of riveted structures, and the mechanical properties of EMR were significantly enhanced.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.acme.2019.07.006</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1644-9665
ispartof Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, 2019-08, Vol.19 (4), p.1284-1294
issn 1644-9665
2083-3318
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2932841513
source SpringerLink Journals; ProQuest Central
subjects Civil Engineering
Dynamic loads
Electromagnetic riveting
Engineering
Failure mechanisms
Interference
Mechanical Engineering
Mechanical properties
Microhardness
Microstructure
Microstructures
Optical microscopy
Optical properties
Original Research Article
Pull out tests
Regular pressure riveting
Riveting
Shear tests
Shear zone
Structural Materials
Tensile tests
title Influence of electromagnetic riveting process on microstructures and mechanical properties of 2A10 and 6082 Al riveted structures
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T12%3A50%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Influence%20of%20electromagnetic%20riveting%20process%20on%20microstructures%20and%20mechanical%20properties%20of%202A10%20and%206082%20Al%20riveted%20structures&rft.jtitle=Archives%20of%20Civil%20and%20Mechanical%20Engineering&rft.au=Dong,%20Dongying&rft.date=2019-08-01&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1284&rft.epage=1294&rft.pages=1284-1294&rft.issn=1644-9665&rft.eissn=2083-3318&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.acme.2019.07.006&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2932841513%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2932841513&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S1644966519300792&rfr_iscdi=true