Carry‐over effects of nestling physical condition predict first‐year survival of a critically endangered migratory parrot
Conservation breeding programs are an increasingly important tool to help supplement declining wild populations, but captive‐bred animals generally do not survive well post‐release. Early life in captivity has the potential to influence growth and development, with impacts carrying over to affect su...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Animal conservation 2024-02, Vol.27 (1), p.78-85 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Conservation breeding programs are an increasingly important tool to help supplement declining wild populations, but captive‐bred animals generally do not survive well post‐release. Early life in captivity has the potential to influence growth and development, with impacts carrying over to affect survival. Understanding carry‐over effects of captivity and consequences on survival is critically important for conservation efforts globally but remains poorly understood. We examined the relationship between early‐life environment, physical condition, and juvenile survival of wild and captive‐bred critically endangered orange‐bellied parrots (Neophema chrysogaster). Using nestling growth models, we calculated a body condition index for 1,039 wild and captive‐bred orange‐bellied parrots hatched over six breeding seasons. Nestling body condition varied with year, provenance, and brood position. Wild nestlings had consistently higher body condition than captive‐bred nestlings, and first‐hatched nestlings were typically heavier than later hatched siblings. We then investigated first‐year survival for 298 wild‐born and captive‐bred released parrots in the wild. Overall, first‐year survival was 27.5%, and individual body condition was more influential than provenance in predicting survival. Our findings could be used to aid the selection of individuals for release that have the best prospects of surviving in the wild. This study addresses important questions about the post‐release fitness of captive‐bred animals, and our metric of assessing physical condition provides a straightforward tool for other conservation breeding programs to adapt management techniques to improve survival outcomes.
Conservation breeding programs are an increasingly important tool to help supplement declining wild populations, but captive‐bred animals generally do not survive well post‐release. We investigated both the impacts of captivity on physical condition and carry over effects on post‐release fitness for the critically endangered orange‐bellied parrot (Neophema chrysogaster). We demonstrate that while captivity can impact physical condition, captive‐bred juveniles are not inherently disadvantaged compared to wild‐hatched conspecifics. As more species continue to decline around the world and captive‐breeding programs continue to be a widespread conservation tool, understanding how to improve the post‐release survival of translocated individuals is a conservation priority. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1367-9430 1469-1795 |
DOI: | 10.1111/acv.12878 |