The use of multi-criteria decision-making methods in project portfolio selection: a literature review and future research directions
In most project portfolio selection (PPS) situations, the presence of multiple attributes and decision-maker preference is inevitable. As Multi-criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) methods provide a framework well-suited to deal with these challenges in PPS problems, the use of MCDA methods in real-lif...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Annals of operations research 2024, Vol.332 (1-3), p.807-830 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 830 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1-3 |
container_start_page | 807 |
container_title | Annals of operations research |
container_volume | 332 |
creator | Kandakoglu, M. Walther, G. Ben Amor, S. |
description | In most project portfolio selection (PPS) situations, the presence of multiple attributes and decision-maker preference is inevitable. As Multi-criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) methods provide a framework well-suited to deal with these challenges in PPS problems, the use of MCDA methods in real-life PPS problems has increased in recent years. This paper provides a comprehensive literature review of the use of different MCDA methods and their individual or combined utilization with other modeling techniques to support PPS problems. First, we summarize how MCDA methods are used in different modeling approaches. Second, we examine the mathematical models that are generally used to combine MCDA with mathematical programming techniques to solve PPS problems with resource constraints. Third, we present the drawbacks of combined utilization and discuss recent advances. Finally, we visualize the summary of the reviewed papers as a decision tree to assist researchers and practitioners in the use of MCDA methods in a specific PPS context and propose some future research directions. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10479-023-05564-3 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2932337940</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2932337940</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-3e7873edd77aab6e8aa87296b2625c016f804d68098ceced60f0c43a545fd9f93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1r3DAQhkVIoZu0f6AnQc9KRpJlWb2VJR-FhVy2Z6FIo6w2Xmsr2Sm994fXiRd6y2lgeJ93hoeQLxyuOIC-rhwabRgIyUCptmHyjKy40oIZKbtzsgKhGqakhI_kotY9AHDeqRX5u90hnSrSHOlh6sfEfEkjluRoQJ9qygM7uOc0PNEDjrscKk0DPZa8Rz_SYy5jzH3KtGI_L-b0N-po_9rgxqkgLfiS8Dd1Q6BxOm0quuJ3NKSyIPUT-RBdX_HzaV6Sn7c32_U92zzc_Vh_3zAvuRmZRN1piSFo7dxji51znRamfRStUB54GztoQtuB6Tx6DC1E8I10qlExmGjkJfm69M7__5qwjnafpzLMJ60wUkipTQNzSiwpX3KtBaM9lnRw5Y_lYF9t28W2nW3bN9tWzpBcoDqHhycs_6vfof4BosKFdg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2932337940</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The use of multi-criteria decision-making methods in project portfolio selection: a literature review and future research directions</title><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Kandakoglu, M. ; Walther, G. ; Ben Amor, S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kandakoglu, M. ; Walther, G. ; Ben Amor, S.</creatorcontrib><description>In most project portfolio selection (PPS) situations, the presence of multiple attributes and decision-maker preference is inevitable. As Multi-criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) methods provide a framework well-suited to deal with these challenges in PPS problems, the use of MCDA methods in real-life PPS problems has increased in recent years. This paper provides a comprehensive literature review of the use of different MCDA methods and their individual or combined utilization with other modeling techniques to support PPS problems. First, we summarize how MCDA methods are used in different modeling approaches. Second, we examine the mathematical models that are generally used to combine MCDA with mathematical programming techniques to solve PPS problems with resource constraints. Third, we present the drawbacks of combined utilization and discuss recent advances. Finally, we visualize the summary of the reviewed papers as a decision tree to assist researchers and practitioners in the use of MCDA methods in a specific PPS context and propose some future research directions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0254-5330</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1572-9338</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10479-023-05564-3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Business and Management ; Combinatorics ; Decision analysis ; Decision making ; Decision trees ; Literature reviews ; Mathematical analysis ; Mathematical models ; Mathematical programming ; Multiple criterion ; Operations Research/Decision Theory ; Original Research ; Theory of Computation</subject><ispartof>Annals of operations research, 2024, Vol.332 (1-3), p.807-830</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-3e7873edd77aab6e8aa87296b2625c016f804d68098ceced60f0c43a545fd9f93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-3e7873edd77aab6e8aa87296b2625c016f804d68098ceced60f0c43a545fd9f93</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4409-7521</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10479-023-05564-3$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10479-023-05564-3$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,27929,27930,41493,42562,51324</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kandakoglu, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walther, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ben Amor, S.</creatorcontrib><title>The use of multi-criteria decision-making methods in project portfolio selection: a literature review and future research directions</title><title>Annals of operations research</title><addtitle>Ann Oper Res</addtitle><description>In most project portfolio selection (PPS) situations, the presence of multiple attributes and decision-maker preference is inevitable. As Multi-criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) methods provide a framework well-suited to deal with these challenges in PPS problems, the use of MCDA methods in real-life PPS problems has increased in recent years. This paper provides a comprehensive literature review of the use of different MCDA methods and their individual or combined utilization with other modeling techniques to support PPS problems. First, we summarize how MCDA methods are used in different modeling approaches. Second, we examine the mathematical models that are generally used to combine MCDA with mathematical programming techniques to solve PPS problems with resource constraints. Third, we present the drawbacks of combined utilization and discuss recent advances. Finally, we visualize the summary of the reviewed papers as a decision tree to assist researchers and practitioners in the use of MCDA methods in a specific PPS context and propose some future research directions.</description><subject>Business and Management</subject><subject>Combinatorics</subject><subject>Decision analysis</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Decision trees</subject><subject>Literature reviews</subject><subject>Mathematical analysis</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Mathematical programming</subject><subject>Multiple criterion</subject><subject>Operations Research/Decision Theory</subject><subject>Original Research</subject><subject>Theory of Computation</subject><issn>0254-5330</issn><issn>1572-9338</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1r3DAQhkVIoZu0f6AnQc9KRpJlWb2VJR-FhVy2Z6FIo6w2Xmsr2Sm994fXiRd6y2lgeJ93hoeQLxyuOIC-rhwabRgIyUCptmHyjKy40oIZKbtzsgKhGqakhI_kotY9AHDeqRX5u90hnSrSHOlh6sfEfEkjluRoQJ9qygM7uOc0PNEDjrscKk0DPZa8Rz_SYy5jzH3KtGI_L-b0N-po_9rgxqkgLfiS8Dd1Q6BxOm0quuJ3NKSyIPUT-RBdX_HzaV6Sn7c32_U92zzc_Vh_3zAvuRmZRN1piSFo7dxji51znRamfRStUB54GztoQtuB6Tx6DC1E8I10qlExmGjkJfm69M7__5qwjnafpzLMJ60wUkipTQNzSiwpX3KtBaM9lnRw5Y_lYF9t28W2nW3bN9tWzpBcoDqHhycs_6vfof4BosKFdg</recordid><startdate>2024</startdate><enddate>2024</enddate><creator>Kandakoglu, M.</creator><creator>Walther, G.</creator><creator>Ben Amor, S.</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4409-7521</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>2024</creationdate><title>The use of multi-criteria decision-making methods in project portfolio selection: a literature review and future research directions</title><author>Kandakoglu, M. ; Walther, G. ; Ben Amor, S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-3e7873edd77aab6e8aa87296b2625c016f804d68098ceced60f0c43a545fd9f93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Business and Management</topic><topic>Combinatorics</topic><topic>Decision analysis</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Decision trees</topic><topic>Literature reviews</topic><topic>Mathematical analysis</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Mathematical programming</topic><topic>Multiple criterion</topic><topic>Operations Research/Decision Theory</topic><topic>Original Research</topic><topic>Theory of Computation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kandakoglu, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walther, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ben Amor, S.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Annals of operations research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kandakoglu, M.</au><au>Walther, G.</au><au>Ben Amor, S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The use of multi-criteria decision-making methods in project portfolio selection: a literature review and future research directions</atitle><jtitle>Annals of operations research</jtitle><stitle>Ann Oper Res</stitle><date>2024</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>332</volume><issue>1-3</issue><spage>807</spage><epage>830</epage><pages>807-830</pages><issn>0254-5330</issn><eissn>1572-9338</eissn><abstract>In most project portfolio selection (PPS) situations, the presence of multiple attributes and decision-maker preference is inevitable. As Multi-criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) methods provide a framework well-suited to deal with these challenges in PPS problems, the use of MCDA methods in real-life PPS problems has increased in recent years. This paper provides a comprehensive literature review of the use of different MCDA methods and their individual or combined utilization with other modeling techniques to support PPS problems. First, we summarize how MCDA methods are used in different modeling approaches. Second, we examine the mathematical models that are generally used to combine MCDA with mathematical programming techniques to solve PPS problems with resource constraints. Third, we present the drawbacks of combined utilization and discuss recent advances. Finally, we visualize the summary of the reviewed papers as a decision tree to assist researchers and practitioners in the use of MCDA methods in a specific PPS context and propose some future research directions.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><doi>10.1007/s10479-023-05564-3</doi><tpages>24</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4409-7521</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0254-5330 |
ispartof | Annals of operations research, 2024, Vol.332 (1-3), p.807-830 |
issn | 0254-5330 1572-9338 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2932337940 |
source | SpringerNature Journals |
subjects | Business and Management Combinatorics Decision analysis Decision making Decision trees Literature reviews Mathematical analysis Mathematical models Mathematical programming Multiple criterion Operations Research/Decision Theory Original Research Theory of Computation |
title | The use of multi-criteria decision-making methods in project portfolio selection: a literature review and future research directions |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-12T04%3A39%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20use%20of%20multi-criteria%20decision-making%20methods%20in%20project%20portfolio%20selection:%20a%20literature%20review%20and%20future%20research%20directions&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20operations%20research&rft.au=Kandakoglu,%20M.&rft.date=2024&rft.volume=332&rft.issue=1-3&rft.spage=807&rft.epage=830&rft.pages=807-830&rft.issn=0254-5330&rft.eissn=1572-9338&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10479-023-05564-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2932337940%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2932337940&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |