Frequency Versus Quantity: Phenotypic Response of Two Wheat Varieties to Water and Nitrogen Variability
Due to climate change, water availability will become increasingly variable, affecting nitrogen (N) availability. Therefore, we hypothesised watering frequency would have a greater impact on plant growth than quantity, affecting N availability, uptake and carbon allocation. We used a gravimetric pla...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of soil science and plant nutrition 2021-06, Vol.21 (2), p.1631-1641 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1641 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 1631 |
container_title | Journal of soil science and plant nutrition |
container_volume | 21 |
creator | Cousins, Olivia H. Garnett, Trevor P. Rasmussen, Amanda Mooney, Sacha J. Smernik, Ronald J. Brien, Chris J. Cavagnaro, Timothy R. |
description | Due to climate change, water availability will become increasingly variable, affecting nitrogen (N) availability. Therefore, we hypothesised watering frequency would have a greater impact on plant growth than quantity, affecting N availability, uptake and carbon allocation. We used a gravimetric platform, which measures the unit of volume per unit of time, to control soil moisture and precisely compare the impact of quantity and frequency of water under variable N levels. Two wheat genotypes (Kukri and Gladius) were used in a factorial glasshouse pot experiment, each with three N application rates (25, 75 and 150 mg N kg
−1
soil) and five soil moisture regimes (changing water frequency or quantity). Previously documented drought tolerance, but high N use efficiency, of Gladius as compared to Kukri provides for potentially different responses to N and soil moisture content. Water use, biomass and soil N were measured. Both cultivars showed potential to adapt to variable watering, producing higher specific root lengths under low N coupled with reduced water and reduced watering frequency (48 h watering intervals), or wet/dry cycling. This affected mineral N uptake, with less soil N remaining under constant watering × high moisture, or 48 h watering intervals × high moisture. Soil N availability affected carbon allocation, demonstrated by both cultivars producing longer, deeper roots under low N. Reduced watering frequency decreased biomass more than reduced quantity for both cultivars. Less frequent watering had a more negative effect on plant growth compared to decreasing the quantity of water. Water variability resulted in differences in C allocation, with changes to root thickness even when root biomass remained the same across N treatments. The preferences identified in wheat for water consistency highlights an undeveloped opportunity for identifying root and shoot traits that may improve plant adaptability to moderate to extreme resource limitation, whilst potentially encouraging less water and nitrogen use. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s42729-021-00467-3 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2932290484</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2932290484</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-4a0d0ce517bf6fdb88fe873148d0cfddcb1e4285463290c2d383fdc3b58f920d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UMtOwzAQjBBIVNAf4GSJc2Bt5-FwQxUFpIqXSjlajrNuU5Uk2I5Q_h7TILixl13NzsxqJ4rOKFxQgPzSJSxnRQyMxgBJlsf8IJpATkVcpDQ7_J1BHEdT57YQSgCkkE-i9dziR4-NHsgKresdee5V42s_XJGnDTatH7pakxd0Xds4JK0hy8-WvG1QebJStkZfoyM-QMqjJaqpyEPtbbvGZr9XZb0LbqfRkVE7h9OffhK9zm-Ws7t48Xh7P7texJpn3MeJggo0pjQvTWaqUgiDIuc0EQE2VaVLigkTaZJxVoBmFRfcVJqXqTAFg4qfROejb2fb8Jfzctv2tgknJSs4C6JEJIHFRpa2rXMWjexs_a7sICnI70zlmKkMmcp9ppIHER9FLpCbNdo_639UXxvUerc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2932290484</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Frequency Versus Quantity: Phenotypic Response of Two Wheat Varieties to Water and Nitrogen Variability</title><source>ProQuest Central Essentials</source><source>ProQuest Central Student</source><source>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><source>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>ProQuest Central</source><creator>Cousins, Olivia H. ; Garnett, Trevor P. ; Rasmussen, Amanda ; Mooney, Sacha J. ; Smernik, Ronald J. ; Brien, Chris J. ; Cavagnaro, Timothy R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Cousins, Olivia H. ; Garnett, Trevor P. ; Rasmussen, Amanda ; Mooney, Sacha J. ; Smernik, Ronald J. ; Brien, Chris J. ; Cavagnaro, Timothy R.</creatorcontrib><description>Due to climate change, water availability will become increasingly variable, affecting nitrogen (N) availability. Therefore, we hypothesised watering frequency would have a greater impact on plant growth than quantity, affecting N availability, uptake and carbon allocation. We used a gravimetric platform, which measures the unit of volume per unit of time, to control soil moisture and precisely compare the impact of quantity and frequency of water under variable N levels. Two wheat genotypes (Kukri and Gladius) were used in a factorial glasshouse pot experiment, each with three N application rates (25, 75 and 150 mg N kg
−1
soil) and five soil moisture regimes (changing water frequency or quantity). Previously documented drought tolerance, but high N use efficiency, of Gladius as compared to Kukri provides for potentially different responses to N and soil moisture content. Water use, biomass and soil N were measured. Both cultivars showed potential to adapt to variable watering, producing higher specific root lengths under low N coupled with reduced water and reduced watering frequency (48 h watering intervals), or wet/dry cycling. This affected mineral N uptake, with less soil N remaining under constant watering × high moisture, or 48 h watering intervals × high moisture. Soil N availability affected carbon allocation, demonstrated by both cultivars producing longer, deeper roots under low N. Reduced watering frequency decreased biomass more than reduced quantity for both cultivars. Less frequent watering had a more negative effect on plant growth compared to decreasing the quantity of water. Water variability resulted in differences in C allocation, with changes to root thickness even when root biomass remained the same across N treatments. The preferences identified in wheat for water consistency highlights an undeveloped opportunity for identifying root and shoot traits that may improve plant adaptability to moderate to extreme resource limitation, whilst potentially encouraging less water and nitrogen use.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0718-9508</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 0718-9516</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s42729-021-00467-3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Adaptability ; Agricultural production ; Agriculture ; Biomass ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Carbon ; Climate change ; Cultivars ; Drought resistance ; Ecology ; Efficiency ; Environment ; Foraging behavior ; Genotypes ; Greenhouses ; Intervals ; Irrigation ; Life Sciences ; Moisture content ; Nitrogen ; Nutrients ; Original Paper ; Plant growth ; Plant Sciences ; Soil moisture ; Soil Science & Conservation ; Soil water ; Variability ; Water availability ; Water content ; Water shortages ; Water supply ; Water use ; Wheat</subject><ispartof>Journal of soil science and plant nutrition, 2021-06, Vol.21 (2), p.1631-1641</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2021</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2021. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-4a0d0ce517bf6fdb88fe873148d0cfddcb1e4285463290c2d383fdc3b58f920d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-4a0d0ce517bf6fdb88fe873148d0cfddcb1e4285463290c2d383fdc3b58f920d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5865-4478</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s42729-021-00467-3$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2932290484?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21368,21369,21370,21371,23236,27903,27904,33509,33682,33723,33984,34293,41467,42536,43638,43766,43784,43932,44046,51298,64362,64366,72216</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cousins, Olivia H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garnett, Trevor P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rasmussen, Amanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mooney, Sacha J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smernik, Ronald J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brien, Chris J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cavagnaro, Timothy R.</creatorcontrib><title>Frequency Versus Quantity: Phenotypic Response of Two Wheat Varieties to Water and Nitrogen Variability</title><title>Journal of soil science and plant nutrition</title><addtitle>J Soil Sci Plant Nutr</addtitle><description>Due to climate change, water availability will become increasingly variable, affecting nitrogen (N) availability. Therefore, we hypothesised watering frequency would have a greater impact on plant growth than quantity, affecting N availability, uptake and carbon allocation. We used a gravimetric platform, which measures the unit of volume per unit of time, to control soil moisture and precisely compare the impact of quantity and frequency of water under variable N levels. Two wheat genotypes (Kukri and Gladius) were used in a factorial glasshouse pot experiment, each with three N application rates (25, 75 and 150 mg N kg
−1
soil) and five soil moisture regimes (changing water frequency or quantity). Previously documented drought tolerance, but high N use efficiency, of Gladius as compared to Kukri provides for potentially different responses to N and soil moisture content. Water use, biomass and soil N were measured. Both cultivars showed potential to adapt to variable watering, producing higher specific root lengths under low N coupled with reduced water and reduced watering frequency (48 h watering intervals), or wet/dry cycling. This affected mineral N uptake, with less soil N remaining under constant watering × high moisture, or 48 h watering intervals × high moisture. Soil N availability affected carbon allocation, demonstrated by both cultivars producing longer, deeper roots under low N. Reduced watering frequency decreased biomass more than reduced quantity for both cultivars. Less frequent watering had a more negative effect on plant growth compared to decreasing the quantity of water. Water variability resulted in differences in C allocation, with changes to root thickness even when root biomass remained the same across N treatments. The preferences identified in wheat for water consistency highlights an undeveloped opportunity for identifying root and shoot traits that may improve plant adaptability to moderate to extreme resource limitation, whilst potentially encouraging less water and nitrogen use.</description><subject>Adaptability</subject><subject>Agricultural production</subject><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Biomass</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Carbon</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Cultivars</subject><subject>Drought resistance</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Efficiency</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Foraging behavior</subject><subject>Genotypes</subject><subject>Greenhouses</subject><subject>Intervals</subject><subject>Irrigation</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Moisture content</subject><subject>Nitrogen</subject><subject>Nutrients</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Plant growth</subject><subject>Plant Sciences</subject><subject>Soil moisture</subject><subject>Soil Science & Conservation</subject><subject>Soil water</subject><subject>Variability</subject><subject>Water availability</subject><subject>Water content</subject><subject>Water shortages</subject><subject>Water supply</subject><subject>Water use</subject><subject>Wheat</subject><issn>0718-9508</issn><issn>0718-9516</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UMtOwzAQjBBIVNAf4GSJc2Bt5-FwQxUFpIqXSjlajrNuU5Uk2I5Q_h7TILixl13NzsxqJ4rOKFxQgPzSJSxnRQyMxgBJlsf8IJpATkVcpDQ7_J1BHEdT57YQSgCkkE-i9dziR4-NHsgKresdee5V42s_XJGnDTatH7pakxd0Xds4JK0hy8-WvG1QebJStkZfoyM-QMqjJaqpyEPtbbvGZr9XZb0LbqfRkVE7h9OffhK9zm-Ws7t48Xh7P7texJpn3MeJggo0pjQvTWaqUgiDIuc0EQE2VaVLigkTaZJxVoBmFRfcVJqXqTAFg4qfROejb2fb8Jfzctv2tgknJSs4C6JEJIHFRpa2rXMWjexs_a7sICnI70zlmKkMmcp9ppIHER9FLpCbNdo_639UXxvUerc</recordid><startdate>20210601</startdate><enddate>20210601</enddate><creator>Cousins, Olivia H.</creator><creator>Garnett, Trevor P.</creator><creator>Rasmussen, Amanda</creator><creator>Mooney, Sacha J.</creator><creator>Smernik, Ronald J.</creator><creator>Brien, Chris J.</creator><creator>Cavagnaro, Timothy R.</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5865-4478</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210601</creationdate><title>Frequency Versus Quantity: Phenotypic Response of Two Wheat Varieties to Water and Nitrogen Variability</title><author>Cousins, Olivia H. ; Garnett, Trevor P. ; Rasmussen, Amanda ; Mooney, Sacha J. ; Smernik, Ronald J. ; Brien, Chris J. ; Cavagnaro, Timothy R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-4a0d0ce517bf6fdb88fe873148d0cfddcb1e4285463290c2d383fdc3b58f920d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Adaptability</topic><topic>Agricultural production</topic><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Biomass</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Carbon</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Cultivars</topic><topic>Drought resistance</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Efficiency</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Foraging behavior</topic><topic>Genotypes</topic><topic>Greenhouses</topic><topic>Intervals</topic><topic>Irrigation</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Moisture content</topic><topic>Nitrogen</topic><topic>Nutrients</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Plant growth</topic><topic>Plant Sciences</topic><topic>Soil moisture</topic><topic>Soil Science & Conservation</topic><topic>Soil water</topic><topic>Variability</topic><topic>Water availability</topic><topic>Water content</topic><topic>Water shortages</topic><topic>Water supply</topic><topic>Water use</topic><topic>Wheat</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cousins, Olivia H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garnett, Trevor P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rasmussen, Amanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mooney, Sacha J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smernik, Ronald J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brien, Chris J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cavagnaro, Timothy R.</creatorcontrib><collection>SpringerOpen</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Journal of soil science and plant nutrition</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cousins, Olivia H.</au><au>Garnett, Trevor P.</au><au>Rasmussen, Amanda</au><au>Mooney, Sacha J.</au><au>Smernik, Ronald J.</au><au>Brien, Chris J.</au><au>Cavagnaro, Timothy R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Frequency Versus Quantity: Phenotypic Response of Two Wheat Varieties to Water and Nitrogen Variability</atitle><jtitle>Journal of soil science and plant nutrition</jtitle><stitle>J Soil Sci Plant Nutr</stitle><date>2021-06-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>1631</spage><epage>1641</epage><pages>1631-1641</pages><issn>0718-9508</issn><eissn>0718-9516</eissn><abstract>Due to climate change, water availability will become increasingly variable, affecting nitrogen (N) availability. Therefore, we hypothesised watering frequency would have a greater impact on plant growth than quantity, affecting N availability, uptake and carbon allocation. We used a gravimetric platform, which measures the unit of volume per unit of time, to control soil moisture and precisely compare the impact of quantity and frequency of water under variable N levels. Two wheat genotypes (Kukri and Gladius) were used in a factorial glasshouse pot experiment, each with three N application rates (25, 75 and 150 mg N kg
−1
soil) and five soil moisture regimes (changing water frequency or quantity). Previously documented drought tolerance, but high N use efficiency, of Gladius as compared to Kukri provides for potentially different responses to N and soil moisture content. Water use, biomass and soil N were measured. Both cultivars showed potential to adapt to variable watering, producing higher specific root lengths under low N coupled with reduced water and reduced watering frequency (48 h watering intervals), or wet/dry cycling. This affected mineral N uptake, with less soil N remaining under constant watering × high moisture, or 48 h watering intervals × high moisture. Soil N availability affected carbon allocation, demonstrated by both cultivars producing longer, deeper roots under low N. Reduced watering frequency decreased biomass more than reduced quantity for both cultivars. Less frequent watering had a more negative effect on plant growth compared to decreasing the quantity of water. Water variability resulted in differences in C allocation, with changes to root thickness even when root biomass remained the same across N treatments. The preferences identified in wheat for water consistency highlights an undeveloped opportunity for identifying root and shoot traits that may improve plant adaptability to moderate to extreme resource limitation, whilst potentially encouraging less water and nitrogen use.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><doi>10.1007/s42729-021-00467-3</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5865-4478</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0718-9508 |
ispartof | Journal of soil science and plant nutrition, 2021-06, Vol.21 (2), p.1631-1641 |
issn | 0718-9508 0718-9516 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2932290484 |
source | ProQuest Central Essentials; ProQuest Central Student; AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals; ProQuest Central (Alumni); Alma/SFX Local Collection; ProQuest Central |
subjects | Adaptability Agricultural production Agriculture Biomass Biomedical and Life Sciences Carbon Climate change Cultivars Drought resistance Ecology Efficiency Environment Foraging behavior Genotypes Greenhouses Intervals Irrigation Life Sciences Moisture content Nitrogen Nutrients Original Paper Plant growth Plant Sciences Soil moisture Soil Science & Conservation Soil water Variability Water availability Water content Water shortages Water supply Water use Wheat |
title | Frequency Versus Quantity: Phenotypic Response of Two Wheat Varieties to Water and Nitrogen Variability |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T19%3A10%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Frequency%20Versus%20Quantity:%20Phenotypic%20Response%20of%20Two%20Wheat%20Varieties%20to%20Water%20and%20Nitrogen%20Variability&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20soil%20science%20and%20plant%20nutrition&rft.au=Cousins,%20Olivia%20H.&rft.date=2021-06-01&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=1631&rft.epage=1641&rft.pages=1631-1641&rft.issn=0718-9508&rft.eissn=0718-9516&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s42729-021-00467-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2932290484%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2932290484&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |