Influence of Investors’ Loss-cut Behavior to Artificial Market

The aim of this study is to discuss the influence of investors’ loss-cut behavior to the market stock price and the investors’ asset distribution by using the artificial market simulation. The loss-cut behavior is strongly related to the anchoring effect, which is one of the investors’ cognitive bia...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Evolutionary and institutional economics review 2010-09, Vol.7 (1), p.133-153
Hauptverfasser: Zhai, Fei, Takahashi, Kenji, Shinoki, Hiroto, Kita, Eisuke
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 153
container_issue 1
container_start_page 133
container_title Evolutionary and institutional economics review
container_volume 7
creator Zhai, Fei
Takahashi, Kenji
Shinoki, Hiroto
Kita, Eisuke
description The aim of this study is to discuss the influence of investors’ loss-cut behavior to the market stock price and the investors’ asset distribution by using the artificial market simulation. The loss-cut behavior is strongly related to the anchoring effect, which is one of the investors’ cognitive biases. The anchoring effect is a psychological heuristic that influences the way people intuitively assess probabilities. The investor in the actual market is modeled as the agent in the artificial market. The agent has the prediction rule of the stock price and the anchoring coefficient related to the strength of the anchoring effect. Once the agent predicts the stock price by the prediction rule, he determines the order price and the order amount from the predicted stock price according to the strength of the anchoring effect. Agents’ orders are gathered to the market and the stock price is determined according to the Itayose method. In the numerical examples, two kinds of agents with different anchoring effects are modeled; Type A and Type B agents. Type A agents have stronger anchoring effect than the Type B agents. The simulation results reveal that the Type-A agents’ order price tends to uctuate more violently than the Type B agents, and that the Type A agents tend to lose more asset than the Type B.
doi_str_mv 10.14441/eier.7.133
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2932278798</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2932278798</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-efd5f51839f06382dd5b1a77a746417f540427e3af5a92d0a111f95f5e4959723</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkMtOwzAQRS0EEqWw4gcssYQEjx9xvKNUPCoFsYG1ZRIbUkJc7KQSO36D3-NLMBSxYjXS6Mydq4PQIZAcOOdwalsbcpkDY1toQqEsM0pUsY0mwLjKuCpgF-3FuCSEgyDFBJ0teteNtq8t9g4v-rWNgw_x8_0DVz7GrB4HfG6fzLr1AQ8ez8LQurZuTYdvTHi2wz7acaaL9uB3TtH95cXd_Dqrbq8W81mV1UyoIbOuEU5AyZQjBStp04gHMFIayQsO0glOOJWWGSeMog0xAOBUOrFcCSUpm6KjTe4q-NcxtdRLP4Y-vdRUMUplKVWZqOMNVYfUPlinV6F9MeFNA9E_ivS3Ii11UpTokw0dE9U_pv1f5n_4F2SQaCY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2932278798</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Influence of Investors’ Loss-cut Behavior to Artificial Market</title><source>SpringerLink_现刊</source><creator>Zhai, Fei ; Takahashi, Kenji ; Shinoki, Hiroto ; Kita, Eisuke</creator><creatorcontrib>Zhai, Fei ; Takahashi, Kenji ; Shinoki, Hiroto ; Kita, Eisuke</creatorcontrib><description>The aim of this study is to discuss the influence of investors’ loss-cut behavior to the market stock price and the investors’ asset distribution by using the artificial market simulation. The loss-cut behavior is strongly related to the anchoring effect, which is one of the investors’ cognitive biases. The anchoring effect is a psychological heuristic that influences the way people intuitively assess probabilities. The investor in the actual market is modeled as the agent in the artificial market. The agent has the prediction rule of the stock price and the anchoring coefficient related to the strength of the anchoring effect. Once the agent predicts the stock price by the prediction rule, he determines the order price and the order amount from the predicted stock price according to the strength of the anchoring effect. Agents’ orders are gathered to the market and the stock price is determined according to the Itayose method. In the numerical examples, two kinds of agents with different anchoring effects are modeled; Type A and Type B agents. Type A agents have stronger anchoring effect than the Type B agents. The simulation results reveal that the Type-A agents’ order price tends to uctuate more violently than the Type B agents, and that the Type A agents tend to lose more asset than the Type B.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1349-4961</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2188-2096</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.14441/eier.7.133</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Tokyo: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Economic theory ; Economic Theory/Quantitative Economics/Mathematical Methods ; Economics ; Economics and Finance ; History of Economic Thought/Methodology ; Investments ; Investors ; Political Economy/Economic Systems ; Social Policy</subject><ispartof>Evolutionary and institutional economics review, 2010-09, Vol.7 (1), p.133-153</ispartof><rights>Japan Association for Evolutionary Economics 2010</rights><rights>Japan Association for Evolutionary Economics 2010.</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-efd5f51839f06382dd5b1a77a746417f540427e3af5a92d0a111f95f5e4959723</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.14441/eier.7.133$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.14441/eier.7.133$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zhai, Fei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takahashi, Kenji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shinoki, Hiroto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kita, Eisuke</creatorcontrib><title>Influence of Investors’ Loss-cut Behavior to Artificial Market</title><title>Evolutionary and institutional economics review</title><addtitle>Evolut Inst Econ Rev</addtitle><description>The aim of this study is to discuss the influence of investors’ loss-cut behavior to the market stock price and the investors’ asset distribution by using the artificial market simulation. The loss-cut behavior is strongly related to the anchoring effect, which is one of the investors’ cognitive biases. The anchoring effect is a psychological heuristic that influences the way people intuitively assess probabilities. The investor in the actual market is modeled as the agent in the artificial market. The agent has the prediction rule of the stock price and the anchoring coefficient related to the strength of the anchoring effect. Once the agent predicts the stock price by the prediction rule, he determines the order price and the order amount from the predicted stock price according to the strength of the anchoring effect. Agents’ orders are gathered to the market and the stock price is determined according to the Itayose method. In the numerical examples, two kinds of agents with different anchoring effects are modeled; Type A and Type B agents. Type A agents have stronger anchoring effect than the Type B agents. The simulation results reveal that the Type-A agents’ order price tends to uctuate more violently than the Type B agents, and that the Type A agents tend to lose more asset than the Type B.</description><subject>Economic theory</subject><subject>Economic Theory/Quantitative Economics/Mathematical Methods</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Economics and Finance</subject><subject>History of Economic Thought/Methodology</subject><subject>Investments</subject><subject>Investors</subject><subject>Political Economy/Economic Systems</subject><subject>Social Policy</subject><issn>1349-4961</issn><issn>2188-2096</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNptkMtOwzAQRS0EEqWw4gcssYQEjx9xvKNUPCoFsYG1ZRIbUkJc7KQSO36D3-NLMBSxYjXS6Mydq4PQIZAcOOdwalsbcpkDY1toQqEsM0pUsY0mwLjKuCpgF-3FuCSEgyDFBJ0teteNtq8t9g4v-rWNgw_x8_0DVz7GrB4HfG6fzLr1AQ8ez8LQurZuTYdvTHi2wz7acaaL9uB3TtH95cXd_Dqrbq8W81mV1UyoIbOuEU5AyZQjBStp04gHMFIayQsO0glOOJWWGSeMog0xAOBUOrFcCSUpm6KjTe4q-NcxtdRLP4Y-vdRUMUplKVWZqOMNVYfUPlinV6F9MeFNA9E_ivS3Ii11UpTokw0dE9U_pv1f5n_4F2SQaCY</recordid><startdate>20100901</startdate><enddate>20100901</enddate><creator>Zhai, Fei</creator><creator>Takahashi, Kenji</creator><creator>Shinoki, Hiroto</creator><creator>Kita, Eisuke</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100901</creationdate><title>Influence of Investors’ Loss-cut Behavior to Artificial Market</title><author>Zhai, Fei ; Takahashi, Kenji ; Shinoki, Hiroto ; Kita, Eisuke</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-efd5f51839f06382dd5b1a77a746417f540427e3af5a92d0a111f95f5e4959723</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Economic theory</topic><topic>Economic Theory/Quantitative Economics/Mathematical Methods</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Economics and Finance</topic><topic>History of Economic Thought/Methodology</topic><topic>Investments</topic><topic>Investors</topic><topic>Political Economy/Economic Systems</topic><topic>Social Policy</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zhai, Fei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takahashi, Kenji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shinoki, Hiroto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kita, Eisuke</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><jtitle>Evolutionary and institutional economics review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zhai, Fei</au><au>Takahashi, Kenji</au><au>Shinoki, Hiroto</au><au>Kita, Eisuke</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Influence of Investors’ Loss-cut Behavior to Artificial Market</atitle><jtitle>Evolutionary and institutional economics review</jtitle><stitle>Evolut Inst Econ Rev</stitle><date>2010-09-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>133</spage><epage>153</epage><pages>133-153</pages><issn>1349-4961</issn><eissn>2188-2096</eissn><abstract>The aim of this study is to discuss the influence of investors’ loss-cut behavior to the market stock price and the investors’ asset distribution by using the artificial market simulation. The loss-cut behavior is strongly related to the anchoring effect, which is one of the investors’ cognitive biases. The anchoring effect is a psychological heuristic that influences the way people intuitively assess probabilities. The investor in the actual market is modeled as the agent in the artificial market. The agent has the prediction rule of the stock price and the anchoring coefficient related to the strength of the anchoring effect. Once the agent predicts the stock price by the prediction rule, he determines the order price and the order amount from the predicted stock price according to the strength of the anchoring effect. Agents’ orders are gathered to the market and the stock price is determined according to the Itayose method. In the numerical examples, two kinds of agents with different anchoring effects are modeled; Type A and Type B agents. Type A agents have stronger anchoring effect than the Type B agents. The simulation results reveal that the Type-A agents’ order price tends to uctuate more violently than the Type B agents, and that the Type A agents tend to lose more asset than the Type B.</abstract><cop>Tokyo</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><doi>10.14441/eier.7.133</doi><tpages>21</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1349-4961
ispartof Evolutionary and institutional economics review, 2010-09, Vol.7 (1), p.133-153
issn 1349-4961
2188-2096
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2932278798
source SpringerLink_现刊
subjects Economic theory
Economic Theory/Quantitative Economics/Mathematical Methods
Economics
Economics and Finance
History of Economic Thought/Methodology
Investments
Investors
Political Economy/Economic Systems
Social Policy
title Influence of Investors’ Loss-cut Behavior to Artificial Market
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T10%3A16%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Influence%20of%20Investors%E2%80%99%20Loss-cut%20Behavior%20to%20Artificial%20Market&rft.jtitle=Evolutionary%20and%20institutional%20economics%20review&rft.au=Zhai,%20Fei&rft.date=2010-09-01&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=133&rft.epage=153&rft.pages=133-153&rft.issn=1349-4961&rft.eissn=2188-2096&rft_id=info:doi/10.14441/eier.7.133&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2932278798%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2932278798&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true