Investigating the Relationship between Activities of Project Management Offices and Project Stakeholder Satisfaction
Organizations need to execute a number of projects simultaneously in order to react market changes. Besides that, technological advancements enable large scale, complex projects feasible. Keeping all these projects under control and executing projects effectively is a serious problem for every organ...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of information technology project management 2017-04, Vol.8 (2), p.34-49 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 49 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 34 |
| container_title | International journal of information technology project management |
| container_volume | 8 |
| creator | Güngör, Dilek Özdemir Gözlü, Sıtkı |
| description | Organizations need to execute a number of projects simultaneously in order to react market changes. Besides that, technological advancements enable large scale, complex projects feasible. Keeping all these projects under control and executing projects effectively is a serious problem for every organization. PMOs are appeared to be a solution for managing multi-project environments, but their contribution to organizations is tortuous. In this research, activity areas of PMOs are derived from existing works, and the relationships between PMO activity areas and stakeholder's satisfaction are investigated by applying PLS-SEM methodology. There are six activity areas defined, and named as “project procurement”, “knowledge management”, “project team management”, “communication”, “project planning & follow up”, and “development and maintenance of IT”. With the guidance of existing literature research model is developed. Results show that “project planning & follow up”, and “project procurement” activities have direct effect on “stakeholder satisfaction” at medium level. Besides that, “knowledge management” and “IT infrastructure” have indirect effect through “project planning & follow up”. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.4018/IJITPM.2017040103 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2931971288</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A760509716</galeid><sourcerecordid>A760509716</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-9f57a3290695e10d2dfa99cd50639668c2822185eaffa8e232c67439654d3f0d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU1LAzEQhhdRsGh_gLeAJ8HWfOxHciyitdJSsfUcYnayTa3Zukkr_ntTVqqg5pBMMs87k-FNkjOC-ykm_Gp0P5o_TPoUkwLHB8wOkg4RjPcwTfHhPmb0OOl6v8RxZWmR8qKThJHbgg-2UsG6CoUFoEdYxUvt_MKu0TOEdwCHBjrYrQ0WPKoNemjqJeiAJsqpCl7BBTQ1xuqYVa7cp2dBvcCiXpXQoFms6Y3Su8qnyZFRKw_dr_Mkebq9mV_f9cbT4eh6MO5pxnjoCZMVilGBc5EBwSUtjRJClxnOmchzrimnlPAMlDGKQ5xP50UaU1laMoNLdpKct3XXTf22iWPKZb1pXGwpqWBEFIRyHqnLlqrUCuTzxlsHPm7eVovgK7XxXg6KHGc4CvKIkxbXTe19A0auG_uqmg9JsNzZIVs75LcdUXPRamxlv__wi5Pr0kR2-Ae7t0hGi-QPi_5tytknDgejjg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2931971288</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Investigating the Relationship between Activities of Project Management Offices and Project Stakeholder Satisfaction</title><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><source>ProQuest Central</source><creator>Güngör, Dilek Özdemir ; Gözlü, Sıtkı</creator><creatorcontrib>Güngör, Dilek Özdemir ; Gözlü, Sıtkı</creatorcontrib><description>Organizations need to execute a number of projects simultaneously in order to react market changes. Besides that, technological advancements enable large scale, complex projects feasible. Keeping all these projects under control and executing projects effectively is a serious problem for every organization. PMOs are appeared to be a solution for managing multi-project environments, but their contribution to organizations is tortuous. In this research, activity areas of PMOs are derived from existing works, and the relationships between PMO activity areas and stakeholder's satisfaction are investigated by applying PLS-SEM methodology. There are six activity areas defined, and named as “project procurement”, “knowledge management”, “project team management”, “communication”, “project planning & follow up”, and “development and maintenance of IT”. With the guidance of existing literature research model is developed. Results show that “project planning & follow up”, and “project procurement” activities have direct effect on “stakeholder satisfaction” at medium level. Besides that, “knowledge management” and “IT infrastructure” have indirect effect through “project planning & follow up”.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1938-0232</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-0240</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4018/IJITPM.2017040103</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hershey: IGI Global</publisher><subject>Brand loyalty ; Information technology ; Knowledge management ; Organizations ; Portfolio management ; Procurement management ; Project feasibility ; Project management ; Project planning ; Responsibilities ; Stakeholders ; Teams</subject><ispartof>International journal of information technology project management, 2017-04, Vol.8 (2), p.34-49</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2017 IGI Global</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017, IGI Global. Copying or distributing in print or electronic forms without written permission of IGI Global is prohibited.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-9f57a3290695e10d2dfa99cd50639668c2822185eaffa8e232c67439654d3f0d3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2931971288?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21386,27922,27923,33742,43803,64383,64387,72239</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Güngör, Dilek Özdemir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gözlü, Sıtkı</creatorcontrib><title>Investigating the Relationship between Activities of Project Management Offices and Project Stakeholder Satisfaction</title><title>International journal of information technology project management</title><description>Organizations need to execute a number of projects simultaneously in order to react market changes. Besides that, technological advancements enable large scale, complex projects feasible. Keeping all these projects under control and executing projects effectively is a serious problem for every organization. PMOs are appeared to be a solution for managing multi-project environments, but their contribution to organizations is tortuous. In this research, activity areas of PMOs are derived from existing works, and the relationships between PMO activity areas and stakeholder's satisfaction are investigated by applying PLS-SEM methodology. There are six activity areas defined, and named as “project procurement”, “knowledge management”, “project team management”, “communication”, “project planning & follow up”, and “development and maintenance of IT”. With the guidance of existing literature research model is developed. Results show that “project planning & follow up”, and “project procurement” activities have direct effect on “stakeholder satisfaction” at medium level. Besides that, “knowledge management” and “IT infrastructure” have indirect effect through “project planning & follow up”.</description><subject>Brand loyalty</subject><subject>Information technology</subject><subject>Knowledge management</subject><subject>Organizations</subject><subject>Portfolio management</subject><subject>Procurement management</subject><subject>Project feasibility</subject><subject>Project management</subject><subject>Project planning</subject><subject>Responsibilities</subject><subject>Stakeholders</subject><subject>Teams</subject><issn>1938-0232</issn><issn>1938-0240</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>N95</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kU1LAzEQhhdRsGh_gLeAJ8HWfOxHciyitdJSsfUcYnayTa3Zukkr_ntTVqqg5pBMMs87k-FNkjOC-ykm_Gp0P5o_TPoUkwLHB8wOkg4RjPcwTfHhPmb0OOl6v8RxZWmR8qKThJHbgg-2UsG6CoUFoEdYxUvt_MKu0TOEdwCHBjrYrQ0WPKoNemjqJeiAJsqpCl7BBTQ1xuqYVa7cp2dBvcCiXpXQoFms6Y3Su8qnyZFRKw_dr_Mkebq9mV_f9cbT4eh6MO5pxnjoCZMVilGBc5EBwSUtjRJClxnOmchzrimnlPAMlDGKQ5xP50UaU1laMoNLdpKct3XXTf22iWPKZb1pXGwpqWBEFIRyHqnLlqrUCuTzxlsHPm7eVovgK7XxXg6KHGc4CvKIkxbXTe19A0auG_uqmg9JsNzZIVs75LcdUXPRamxlv__wi5Pr0kR2-Ae7t0hGi-QPi_5tytknDgejjg</recordid><startdate>20170401</startdate><enddate>20170401</enddate><creator>Güngör, Dilek Özdemir</creator><creator>Gözlü, Sıtkı</creator><general>IGI Global</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>N95</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170401</creationdate><title>Investigating the Relationship between Activities of Project Management Offices and Project Stakeholder Satisfaction</title><author>Güngör, Dilek Özdemir ; Gözlü, Sıtkı</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-9f57a3290695e10d2dfa99cd50639668c2822185eaffa8e232c67439654d3f0d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Brand loyalty</topic><topic>Information technology</topic><topic>Knowledge management</topic><topic>Organizations</topic><topic>Portfolio management</topic><topic>Procurement management</topic><topic>Project feasibility</topic><topic>Project management</topic><topic>Project planning</topic><topic>Responsibilities</topic><topic>Stakeholders</topic><topic>Teams</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Güngör, Dilek Özdemir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gözlü, Sıtkı</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale Business: Insights</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Computer Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><jtitle>International journal of information technology project management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Güngör, Dilek Özdemir</au><au>Gözlü, Sıtkı</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Investigating the Relationship between Activities of Project Management Offices and Project Stakeholder Satisfaction</atitle><jtitle>International journal of information technology project management</jtitle><date>2017-04-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>34</spage><epage>49</epage><pages>34-49</pages><issn>1938-0232</issn><eissn>1938-0240</eissn><abstract>Organizations need to execute a number of projects simultaneously in order to react market changes. Besides that, technological advancements enable large scale, complex projects feasible. Keeping all these projects under control and executing projects effectively is a serious problem for every organization. PMOs are appeared to be a solution for managing multi-project environments, but their contribution to organizations is tortuous. In this research, activity areas of PMOs are derived from existing works, and the relationships between PMO activity areas and stakeholder's satisfaction are investigated by applying PLS-SEM methodology. There are six activity areas defined, and named as “project procurement”, “knowledge management”, “project team management”, “communication”, “project planning & follow up”, and “development and maintenance of IT”. With the guidance of existing literature research model is developed. Results show that “project planning & follow up”, and “project procurement” activities have direct effect on “stakeholder satisfaction” at medium level. Besides that, “knowledge management” and “IT infrastructure” have indirect effect through “project planning & follow up”.</abstract><cop>Hershey</cop><pub>IGI Global</pub><doi>10.4018/IJITPM.2017040103</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1938-0232 |
| ispartof | International journal of information technology project management, 2017-04, Vol.8 (2), p.34-49 |
| issn | 1938-0232 1938-0240 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2931971288 |
| source | ProQuest Central UK/Ireland; ProQuest Central |
| subjects | Brand loyalty Information technology Knowledge management Organizations Portfolio management Procurement management Project feasibility Project management Project planning Responsibilities Stakeholders Teams |
| title | Investigating the Relationship between Activities of Project Management Offices and Project Stakeholder Satisfaction |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T15%3A33%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Investigating%20the%20Relationship%20between%20Activities%20of%20Project%20Management%20Offices%20and%20Project%20Stakeholder%20Satisfaction&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20information%20technology%20project%20management&rft.au=G%C3%BCng%C3%B6r,%20Dilek%20%C3%96zdemir&rft.date=2017-04-01&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=34&rft.epage=49&rft.pages=34-49&rft.issn=1938-0232&rft.eissn=1938-0240&rft_id=info:doi/10.4018/IJITPM.2017040103&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA760509716%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2931971288&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A760509716&rfr_iscdi=true |