Digital Participatory Platforms for Co-Production in Urban Development: A Systematic Review
A renewed interest has appeared in citizen co-production of public services due to financial pressure on governments. While social media are considered an important facilitator, many digital participatory platforms (DPPs) have been developed to facilitate co-production between citizens and governmen...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of e-planning research 2018-07, Vol.7 (3), p.52-79 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 79 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 52 |
| container_title | International journal of e-planning research |
| container_volume | 7 |
| creator | Falco, Enzo Kleinhans, Reinout |
| description | A renewed interest has appeared in citizen co-production of public services due to financial pressure on governments. While social media are considered an important facilitator, many digital participatory platforms (DPPs) have been developed to facilitate co-production between citizens and governments in the context of urban development. Previous studies have delivered a fragmented overview of DPPs in a few socio-spatial contexts and failed to take stock of the rise of DPPs. This article aims to provide a more comprehensive picture of the availability and functionalities of DPPs. Through a systematic review, 113 active DPPs have been identified, analysed, and classified within a citizen-government relationship typology. Almost a quarter of these DPPs demonstrate a realistic potential for online and offline co-production between governments and citizens. The article critically analyses the characteristics of these DPPs and explores their real-world applications in urban development. The article concludes with directions for further research. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.4018/IJEPR.2018070105 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2931916491</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A760210356</galeid><sourcerecordid>A760210356</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c491t-d95abfc7d1b2cebdbd5bb452b3a864a02ed67a0f4392b6053fd1e384755981f23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kUtLAzEUhQdRsGj3LgNuXDg1yTzjrtQ3BUu1KxchmSQ1MjMZk4zSf2-0YlU0gZtL-M49F04UHSA4SiEqT65vzmfzEQ4tLCCC2VY0wCiHMSE43_7qUbkbDZ17guHkMEtIOogezvRSe1aDGbNeV7pj3tgVmNXMK2MbB0IFExPPrBF95bVpgW7BwnLWgjP5ImvTNbL1p2AM7lbOy4aFKWAuX7R83Y92FKudHH6-e9Hi4vx-chVPby-vJ-NpXKUE-ViQjHFVFQJxXEkuuMg4TzPME1bmKYNYirxgUKUJwfx9byWQTMq0yDJSIoWTvehwPbez5rmXztMn09s2WFJMEkRQHnwCNVpTS1ZLqltlvGVVuEI2ujKtVDr8j4scYgSTLA-C428C3jvdSheK08tH75asd-4nDtd4ZY1zViraWd0wu6II0veU6EdKdJNSkBytJSGDzc6_MdoJFdCLP9AQHP0RHP0M7j_LInkD8Z6pEw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2931916491</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Digital Participatory Platforms for Co-Production in Urban Development: A Systematic Review</title><source>ProQuest Central Essentials</source><source>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</source><source>ProQuest Central Student</source><source>ProQuest Central Korea</source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><source>ProQuest Central</source><creator>Falco, Enzo ; Kleinhans, Reinout</creator><creatorcontrib>Falco, Enzo ; Kleinhans, Reinout</creatorcontrib><description>A renewed interest has appeared in citizen co-production of public services due to financial pressure on governments. While social media are considered an important facilitator, many digital participatory platforms (DPPs) have been developed to facilitate co-production between citizens and governments in the context of urban development. Previous studies have delivered a fragmented overview of DPPs in a few socio-spatial contexts and failed to take stock of the rise of DPPs. This article aims to provide a more comprehensive picture of the availability and functionalities of DPPs. Through a systematic review, 113 active DPPs have been identified, analysed, and classified within a citizen-government relationship typology. Almost a quarter of these DPPs demonstrate a realistic potential for online and offline co-production between governments and citizens. The article critically analyses the characteristics of these DPPs and explores their real-world applications in urban development. The article concludes with directions for further research.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2160-9918</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2160-9926</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4018/IJEPR.2018070105</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hershey: IGI Global</publisher><subject>Built environment ; China ; Citizens ; Collaboration ; Economic development ; France ; Geospatial data ; Government ; Netherlands ; Participation ; Public sector ; Public services ; Social media ; Social networks ; Social service ; Sweden ; Systematic review ; United Kingdom ; Urban development ; Urban planning</subject><ispartof>International journal of e-planning research, 2018-07, Vol.7 (3), p.52-79</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2018 IGI Global</rights><rights>2018. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c491t-d95abfc7d1b2cebdbd5bb452b3a864a02ed67a0f4392b6053fd1e384755981f23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c491t-d95abfc7d1b2cebdbd5bb452b3a864a02ed67a0f4392b6053fd1e384755981f23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2931916491?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,21371,21372,21373,21374,23239,27907,27908,33513,33686,33727,33988,34297,43642,43770,43788,43936,44050,64366,64370,72220</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Falco, Enzo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kleinhans, Reinout</creatorcontrib><title>Digital Participatory Platforms for Co-Production in Urban Development: A Systematic Review</title><title>International journal of e-planning research</title><description>A renewed interest has appeared in citizen co-production of public services due to financial pressure on governments. While social media are considered an important facilitator, many digital participatory platforms (DPPs) have been developed to facilitate co-production between citizens and governments in the context of urban development. Previous studies have delivered a fragmented overview of DPPs in a few socio-spatial contexts and failed to take stock of the rise of DPPs. This article aims to provide a more comprehensive picture of the availability and functionalities of DPPs. Through a systematic review, 113 active DPPs have been identified, analysed, and classified within a citizen-government relationship typology. Almost a quarter of these DPPs demonstrate a realistic potential for online and offline co-production between governments and citizens. The article critically analyses the characteristics of these DPPs and explores their real-world applications in urban development. The article concludes with directions for further research.</description><subject>Built environment</subject><subject>China</subject><subject>Citizens</subject><subject>Collaboration</subject><subject>Economic development</subject><subject>France</subject><subject>Geospatial data</subject><subject>Government</subject><subject>Netherlands</subject><subject>Participation</subject><subject>Public sector</subject><subject>Public services</subject><subject>Social media</subject><subject>Social networks</subject><subject>Social service</subject><subject>Sweden</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>United Kingdom</subject><subject>Urban development</subject><subject>Urban planning</subject><issn>2160-9918</issn><issn>2160-9926</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>N95</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kUtLAzEUhQdRsGj3LgNuXDg1yTzjrtQ3BUu1KxchmSQ1MjMZk4zSf2-0YlU0gZtL-M49F04UHSA4SiEqT65vzmfzEQ4tLCCC2VY0wCiHMSE43_7qUbkbDZ17guHkMEtIOogezvRSe1aDGbNeV7pj3tgVmNXMK2MbB0IFExPPrBF95bVpgW7BwnLWgjP5ImvTNbL1p2AM7lbOy4aFKWAuX7R83Y92FKudHH6-e9Hi4vx-chVPby-vJ-NpXKUE-ViQjHFVFQJxXEkuuMg4TzPME1bmKYNYirxgUKUJwfx9byWQTMq0yDJSIoWTvehwPbez5rmXztMn09s2WFJMEkRQHnwCNVpTS1ZLqltlvGVVuEI2ujKtVDr8j4scYgSTLA-C428C3jvdSheK08tH75asd-4nDtd4ZY1zViraWd0wu6II0veU6EdKdJNSkBytJSGDzc6_MdoJFdCLP9AQHP0RHP0M7j_LInkD8Z6pEw</recordid><startdate>20180701</startdate><enddate>20180701</enddate><creator>Falco, Enzo</creator><creator>Kleinhans, Reinout</creator><general>IGI Global</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>N95</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8AL</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>M0N</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180701</creationdate><title>Digital Participatory Platforms for Co-Production in Urban Development: A Systematic Review</title><author>Falco, Enzo ; Kleinhans, Reinout</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c491t-d95abfc7d1b2cebdbd5bb452b3a864a02ed67a0f4392b6053fd1e384755981f23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Built environment</topic><topic>China</topic><topic>Citizens</topic><topic>Collaboration</topic><topic>Economic development</topic><topic>France</topic><topic>Geospatial data</topic><topic>Government</topic><topic>Netherlands</topic><topic>Participation</topic><topic>Public sector</topic><topic>Public services</topic><topic>Social media</topic><topic>Social networks</topic><topic>Social service</topic><topic>Sweden</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>United Kingdom</topic><topic>Urban development</topic><topic>Urban planning</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Falco, Enzo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kleinhans, Reinout</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale Business: Insights</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Computing Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Computer Science Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Computing Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>International journal of e-planning research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Falco, Enzo</au><au>Kleinhans, Reinout</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Digital Participatory Platforms for Co-Production in Urban Development: A Systematic Review</atitle><jtitle>International journal of e-planning research</jtitle><date>2018-07-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>52</spage><epage>79</epage><pages>52-79</pages><issn>2160-9918</issn><eissn>2160-9926</eissn><abstract>A renewed interest has appeared in citizen co-production of public services due to financial pressure on governments. While social media are considered an important facilitator, many digital participatory platforms (DPPs) have been developed to facilitate co-production between citizens and governments in the context of urban development. Previous studies have delivered a fragmented overview of DPPs in a few socio-spatial contexts and failed to take stock of the rise of DPPs. This article aims to provide a more comprehensive picture of the availability and functionalities of DPPs. Through a systematic review, 113 active DPPs have been identified, analysed, and classified within a citizen-government relationship typology. Almost a quarter of these DPPs demonstrate a realistic potential for online and offline co-production between governments and citizens. The article critically analyses the characteristics of these DPPs and explores their real-world applications in urban development. The article concludes with directions for further research.</abstract><cop>Hershey</cop><pub>IGI Global</pub><doi>10.4018/IJEPR.2018070105</doi><tpages>28</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 2160-9918 |
| ispartof | International journal of e-planning research, 2018-07, Vol.7 (3), p.52-79 |
| issn | 2160-9918 2160-9926 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2931916491 |
| source | ProQuest Central Essentials; ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition); ProQuest Central Student; ProQuest Central Korea; ProQuest Central UK/Ireland; ProQuest Central |
| subjects | Built environment China Citizens Collaboration Economic development France Geospatial data Government Netherlands Participation Public sector Public services Social media Social networks Social service Sweden Systematic review United Kingdom Urban development Urban planning |
| title | Digital Participatory Platforms for Co-Production in Urban Development: A Systematic Review |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T04%3A43%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Digital%20Participatory%20Platforms%20for%20Co-Production%20in%20Urban%20Development:%20A%20Systematic%20Review&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20e-planning%20research&rft.au=Falco,%20Enzo&rft.date=2018-07-01&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=52&rft.epage=79&rft.pages=52-79&rft.issn=2160-9918&rft.eissn=2160-9926&rft_id=info:doi/10.4018/IJEPR.2018070105&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA760210356%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2931916491&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A760210356&rfr_iscdi=true |