The role of connectivity in conservation planning for species with obligatory interactions: Prospects for future climate scenarios

Climate change may lead to range shifts, and barriers to such displacements may result in extirpations from previously suitable habitats. This may be particularly important in freshwater ecosystems that are highly fragmented by anthropogenic obstacles, such as dams and other smaller in‐stream barrie...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Global change biology 2024-02, Vol.30 (2), p.n/a
Hauptverfasser: Silva, Janine P., Hermoso, Virgilio, Lopes‐Lima, Manuel, Miranda, Rafael, Filipe, Ana Filipa, Sousa, Ronaldo
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page n/a
container_issue 2
container_start_page
container_title Global change biology
container_volume 30
creator Silva, Janine P.
Hermoso, Virgilio
Lopes‐Lima, Manuel
Miranda, Rafael
Filipe, Ana Filipa
Sousa, Ronaldo
description Climate change may lead to range shifts, and barriers to such displacements may result in extirpations from previously suitable habitats. This may be particularly important in freshwater ecosystems that are highly fragmented by anthropogenic obstacles, such as dams and other smaller in‐stream barriers. Conservation planning in freshwaters should consider the dynamic effects of climate change and the ability of species to cope with it. In this study, we developed a framework for incorporating climate‐driven dispersal barriers into conservation planning taking into account the medium and long‐term impacts of climate change and species with obligatory interactions. Given that freshwater mussels (Bivalvia: Unionida) are a group of highly threatened organisms dependent on fish hosts to complete their larval development and dispersal, we used Marxan to prioritize areas for their joint conservation in the Iberian Peninsula as a case study. We tested two connectivity scenarios between current and future habitats, (i) unlimited dispersal capacity and (ii) dispersal constrained by artificial barriers, and also identified priority translocation areas for species that were unable to disperse. Accounting for the effects of climate change on species distributions allowed the identification of long‐term conservation areas, but disregarding artificial barriers to dispersal may lead to unrealistic solutions. Integrating the location of barriers allowed the identification of priority areas that are more likely to be colonized in the future following climatic shifts, although this resulted in an additional loss of six to eight features (~5%–7%) compared to solutions without dispersal constraints. Between 173 and 357 artificial barriers (~1.6%–3.3%) will potentially block species dispersal to irreplaceable planning units. Where removal of artificial barriers is unfeasible, conservation translocations may additionally cover up to eight additional features that do not meet conservation targets due to dispersal constraints. This study highlights the challenge of identifying protected areas to safeguard biodiversity under climate change. This study emphasizes the significance of adaptive conservation planning in freshwater ecosystems under climate change. The research employs Marxan to prioritize conservation areas while accounting for climate change, interspecific obligatory interactions, and barriers to climate‐driven dispersal. By testing scenarios with and without artificial
doi_str_mv 10.1111/gcb.17169
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2931882806</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3040356014</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2909-940d8955af7ab8e499069332b91f64695eda8171e30f2ba693c5cb1d5504a5193</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kUtPxCAUhYnRxPGx8B-QuNFFRygFizud-EpMdDGuCWVuR0yFCtTJbP3l0hlXJrKBG75zc04OQieUTGk-F0vTTOklFXIHTSgTvCirWuyOb14VlFC2jw5ifCeEsJKICfqevwEOvgPsW2y8c2CS_bJpja0b5wjhSyfrHe477Zx1S9z6gGMPxkLEK5vesG86u9TJh1GUIGgzCuIVfgl-BFPcaNohDQGw6eyHToCjAaeD9fEI7bW6i3D8ex-i17vb-eyheHq-f5xdPxWmlEQWsiKLWnKu20vd1FBJSYRkrGwkbUUlJIeFrnN0YKQtG53_DDcNXXBOKs2pZIfobLu3D_5zgJjUh80mupwL_BAVIxVhXBBaZfT0D_ruh-CyO1VKRuu6rInI1PmWMjlnDNCqPuRsYa0oUWMbKrehNm1k9mLLrmwH6_9BdT-72Sp-ACqbjRY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2931882806</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The role of connectivity in conservation planning for species with obligatory interactions: Prospects for future climate scenarios</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Silva, Janine P. ; Hermoso, Virgilio ; Lopes‐Lima, Manuel ; Miranda, Rafael ; Filipe, Ana Filipa ; Sousa, Ronaldo</creator><creatorcontrib>Silva, Janine P. ; Hermoso, Virgilio ; Lopes‐Lima, Manuel ; Miranda, Rafael ; Filipe, Ana Filipa ; Sousa, Ronaldo</creatorcontrib><description>Climate change may lead to range shifts, and barriers to such displacements may result in extirpations from previously suitable habitats. This may be particularly important in freshwater ecosystems that are highly fragmented by anthropogenic obstacles, such as dams and other smaller in‐stream barriers. Conservation planning in freshwaters should consider the dynamic effects of climate change and the ability of species to cope with it. In this study, we developed a framework for incorporating climate‐driven dispersal barriers into conservation planning taking into account the medium and long‐term impacts of climate change and species with obligatory interactions. Given that freshwater mussels (Bivalvia: Unionida) are a group of highly threatened organisms dependent on fish hosts to complete their larval development and dispersal, we used Marxan to prioritize areas for their joint conservation in the Iberian Peninsula as a case study. We tested two connectivity scenarios between current and future habitats, (i) unlimited dispersal capacity and (ii) dispersal constrained by artificial barriers, and also identified priority translocation areas for species that were unable to disperse. Accounting for the effects of climate change on species distributions allowed the identification of long‐term conservation areas, but disregarding artificial barriers to dispersal may lead to unrealistic solutions. Integrating the location of barriers allowed the identification of priority areas that are more likely to be colonized in the future following climatic shifts, although this resulted in an additional loss of six to eight features (~5%–7%) compared to solutions without dispersal constraints. Between 173 and 357 artificial barriers (~1.6%–3.3%) will potentially block species dispersal to irreplaceable planning units. Where removal of artificial barriers is unfeasible, conservation translocations may additionally cover up to eight additional features that do not meet conservation targets due to dispersal constraints. This study highlights the challenge of identifying protected areas to safeguard biodiversity under climate change. This study emphasizes the significance of adaptive conservation planning in freshwater ecosystems under climate change. The research employs Marxan to prioritize conservation areas while accounting for climate change, interspecific obligatory interactions, and barriers to climate‐driven dispersal. By testing scenarios with and without artificial barriers to dispersal, the study highlights the necessity of integrating such obstacles into planning efforts to achieve the long‐term conservation of species and their interactions. Additionally, identifying translocation areas upstream of artificial barriers that block species dispersal may contribute to safeguarding biodiversity under global climate change.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1354-1013</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2486</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/gcb.17169</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Anthropogenic factors ; Aquatic ecosystems ; artificial barriers ; Barriers ; Biodiversity ; Biological Sciences ; biotic interactions ; case studies ; climate ; Climate change ; Climate effects ; Conservation ; Conservation areas ; Constraints ; dams ; Developmental stages ; Dispersal ; Dispersion ; Environmental impact ; Fish ; fish hosts ; Fresh water ; Freshwater ; Freshwater ecosystems ; Freshwater molluscs ; freshwater mussels ; Habitats ; Human influences ; Iberian Peninsula ; Inland water environment ; Larval development ; Larval stage ; Mussels ; Protected areas ; spatial prioritization ; Species ; species dispersal ; Translocation ; Unionida</subject><ispartof>Global change biology, 2024-02, Vol.30 (2), p.n/a</ispartof><rights>2024 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2024 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2909-940d8955af7ab8e499069332b91f64695eda8171e30f2ba693c5cb1d5504a5193</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3205-5033 ; 0000-0001-7862-2676 ; 0000-0002-2761-7962 ; 0000-0002-5961-5515 ; 0000-0003-4798-314X ; 0000-0002-1010-938X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fgcb.17169$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fgcb.17169$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,1412,27905,27906,45555,45556</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Silva, Janine P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hermoso, Virgilio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lopes‐Lima, Manuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miranda, Rafael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Filipe, Ana Filipa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sousa, Ronaldo</creatorcontrib><title>The role of connectivity in conservation planning for species with obligatory interactions: Prospects for future climate scenarios</title><title>Global change biology</title><description>Climate change may lead to range shifts, and barriers to such displacements may result in extirpations from previously suitable habitats. This may be particularly important in freshwater ecosystems that are highly fragmented by anthropogenic obstacles, such as dams and other smaller in‐stream barriers. Conservation planning in freshwaters should consider the dynamic effects of climate change and the ability of species to cope with it. In this study, we developed a framework for incorporating climate‐driven dispersal barriers into conservation planning taking into account the medium and long‐term impacts of climate change and species with obligatory interactions. Given that freshwater mussels (Bivalvia: Unionida) are a group of highly threatened organisms dependent on fish hosts to complete their larval development and dispersal, we used Marxan to prioritize areas for their joint conservation in the Iberian Peninsula as a case study. We tested two connectivity scenarios between current and future habitats, (i) unlimited dispersal capacity and (ii) dispersal constrained by artificial barriers, and also identified priority translocation areas for species that were unable to disperse. Accounting for the effects of climate change on species distributions allowed the identification of long‐term conservation areas, but disregarding artificial barriers to dispersal may lead to unrealistic solutions. Integrating the location of barriers allowed the identification of priority areas that are more likely to be colonized in the future following climatic shifts, although this resulted in an additional loss of six to eight features (~5%–7%) compared to solutions without dispersal constraints. Between 173 and 357 artificial barriers (~1.6%–3.3%) will potentially block species dispersal to irreplaceable planning units. Where removal of artificial barriers is unfeasible, conservation translocations may additionally cover up to eight additional features that do not meet conservation targets due to dispersal constraints. This study highlights the challenge of identifying protected areas to safeguard biodiversity under climate change. This study emphasizes the significance of adaptive conservation planning in freshwater ecosystems under climate change. The research employs Marxan to prioritize conservation areas while accounting for climate change, interspecific obligatory interactions, and barriers to climate‐driven dispersal. By testing scenarios with and without artificial barriers to dispersal, the study highlights the necessity of integrating such obstacles into planning efforts to achieve the long‐term conservation of species and their interactions. Additionally, identifying translocation areas upstream of artificial barriers that block species dispersal may contribute to safeguarding biodiversity under global climate change.</description><subject>Anthropogenic factors</subject><subject>Aquatic ecosystems</subject><subject>artificial barriers</subject><subject>Barriers</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Biological Sciences</subject><subject>biotic interactions</subject><subject>case studies</subject><subject>climate</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Climate effects</subject><subject>Conservation</subject><subject>Conservation areas</subject><subject>Constraints</subject><subject>dams</subject><subject>Developmental stages</subject><subject>Dispersal</subject><subject>Dispersion</subject><subject>Environmental impact</subject><subject>Fish</subject><subject>fish hosts</subject><subject>Fresh water</subject><subject>Freshwater</subject><subject>Freshwater ecosystems</subject><subject>Freshwater molluscs</subject><subject>freshwater mussels</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>Human influences</subject><subject>Iberian Peninsula</subject><subject>Inland water environment</subject><subject>Larval development</subject><subject>Larval stage</subject><subject>Mussels</subject><subject>Protected areas</subject><subject>spatial prioritization</subject><subject>Species</subject><subject>species dispersal</subject><subject>Translocation</subject><subject>Unionida</subject><issn>1354-1013</issn><issn>1365-2486</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kUtPxCAUhYnRxPGx8B-QuNFFRygFizud-EpMdDGuCWVuR0yFCtTJbP3l0hlXJrKBG75zc04OQieUTGk-F0vTTOklFXIHTSgTvCirWuyOb14VlFC2jw5ifCeEsJKICfqevwEOvgPsW2y8c2CS_bJpja0b5wjhSyfrHe477Zx1S9z6gGMPxkLEK5vesG86u9TJh1GUIGgzCuIVfgl-BFPcaNohDQGw6eyHToCjAaeD9fEI7bW6i3D8ex-i17vb-eyheHq-f5xdPxWmlEQWsiKLWnKu20vd1FBJSYRkrGwkbUUlJIeFrnN0YKQtG53_DDcNXXBOKs2pZIfobLu3D_5zgJjUh80mupwL_BAVIxVhXBBaZfT0D_ruh-CyO1VKRuu6rInI1PmWMjlnDNCqPuRsYa0oUWMbKrehNm1k9mLLrmwH6_9BdT-72Sp-ACqbjRY</recordid><startdate>202402</startdate><enddate>202402</enddate><creator>Silva, Janine P.</creator><creator>Hermoso, Virgilio</creator><creator>Lopes‐Lima, Manuel</creator><creator>Miranda, Rafael</creator><creator>Filipe, Ana Filipa</creator><creator>Sousa, Ronaldo</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>7S9</scope><scope>L.6</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3205-5033</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7862-2676</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2761-7962</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5961-5515</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4798-314X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1010-938X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202402</creationdate><title>The role of connectivity in conservation planning for species with obligatory interactions: Prospects for future climate scenarios</title><author>Silva, Janine P. ; Hermoso, Virgilio ; Lopes‐Lima, Manuel ; Miranda, Rafael ; Filipe, Ana Filipa ; Sousa, Ronaldo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2909-940d8955af7ab8e499069332b91f64695eda8171e30f2ba693c5cb1d5504a5193</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Anthropogenic factors</topic><topic>Aquatic ecosystems</topic><topic>artificial barriers</topic><topic>Barriers</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Biological Sciences</topic><topic>biotic interactions</topic><topic>case studies</topic><topic>climate</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Climate effects</topic><topic>Conservation</topic><topic>Conservation areas</topic><topic>Constraints</topic><topic>dams</topic><topic>Developmental stages</topic><topic>Dispersal</topic><topic>Dispersion</topic><topic>Environmental impact</topic><topic>Fish</topic><topic>fish hosts</topic><topic>Fresh water</topic><topic>Freshwater</topic><topic>Freshwater ecosystems</topic><topic>Freshwater molluscs</topic><topic>freshwater mussels</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>Human influences</topic><topic>Iberian Peninsula</topic><topic>Inland water environment</topic><topic>Larval development</topic><topic>Larval stage</topic><topic>Mussels</topic><topic>Protected areas</topic><topic>spatial prioritization</topic><topic>Species</topic><topic>species dispersal</topic><topic>Translocation</topic><topic>Unionida</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Silva, Janine P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hermoso, Virgilio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lopes‐Lima, Manuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miranda, Rafael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Filipe, Ana Filipa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sousa, Ronaldo</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>AGRICOLA</collection><collection>AGRICOLA - Academic</collection><jtitle>Global change biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Silva, Janine P.</au><au>Hermoso, Virgilio</au><au>Lopes‐Lima, Manuel</au><au>Miranda, Rafael</au><au>Filipe, Ana Filipa</au><au>Sousa, Ronaldo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The role of connectivity in conservation planning for species with obligatory interactions: Prospects for future climate scenarios</atitle><jtitle>Global change biology</jtitle><date>2024-02</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>2</issue><epage>n/a</epage><issn>1354-1013</issn><eissn>1365-2486</eissn><abstract>Climate change may lead to range shifts, and barriers to such displacements may result in extirpations from previously suitable habitats. This may be particularly important in freshwater ecosystems that are highly fragmented by anthropogenic obstacles, such as dams and other smaller in‐stream barriers. Conservation planning in freshwaters should consider the dynamic effects of climate change and the ability of species to cope with it. In this study, we developed a framework for incorporating climate‐driven dispersal barriers into conservation planning taking into account the medium and long‐term impacts of climate change and species with obligatory interactions. Given that freshwater mussels (Bivalvia: Unionida) are a group of highly threatened organisms dependent on fish hosts to complete their larval development and dispersal, we used Marxan to prioritize areas for their joint conservation in the Iberian Peninsula as a case study. We tested two connectivity scenarios between current and future habitats, (i) unlimited dispersal capacity and (ii) dispersal constrained by artificial barriers, and also identified priority translocation areas for species that were unable to disperse. Accounting for the effects of climate change on species distributions allowed the identification of long‐term conservation areas, but disregarding artificial barriers to dispersal may lead to unrealistic solutions. Integrating the location of barriers allowed the identification of priority areas that are more likely to be colonized in the future following climatic shifts, although this resulted in an additional loss of six to eight features (~5%–7%) compared to solutions without dispersal constraints. Between 173 and 357 artificial barriers (~1.6%–3.3%) will potentially block species dispersal to irreplaceable planning units. Where removal of artificial barriers is unfeasible, conservation translocations may additionally cover up to eight additional features that do not meet conservation targets due to dispersal constraints. This study highlights the challenge of identifying protected areas to safeguard biodiversity under climate change. This study emphasizes the significance of adaptive conservation planning in freshwater ecosystems under climate change. The research employs Marxan to prioritize conservation areas while accounting for climate change, interspecific obligatory interactions, and barriers to climate‐driven dispersal. By testing scenarios with and without artificial barriers to dispersal, the study highlights the necessity of integrating such obstacles into planning efforts to achieve the long‐term conservation of species and their interactions. Additionally, identifying translocation areas upstream of artificial barriers that block species dispersal may contribute to safeguarding biodiversity under global climate change.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/gcb.17169</doi><tpages>17</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3205-5033</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7862-2676</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2761-7962</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5961-5515</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4798-314X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1010-938X</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1354-1013
ispartof Global change biology, 2024-02, Vol.30 (2), p.n/a
issn 1354-1013
1365-2486
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2931882806
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Anthropogenic factors
Aquatic ecosystems
artificial barriers
Barriers
Biodiversity
Biological Sciences
biotic interactions
case studies
climate
Climate change
Climate effects
Conservation
Conservation areas
Constraints
dams
Developmental stages
Dispersal
Dispersion
Environmental impact
Fish
fish hosts
Fresh water
Freshwater
Freshwater ecosystems
Freshwater molluscs
freshwater mussels
Habitats
Human influences
Iberian Peninsula
Inland water environment
Larval development
Larval stage
Mussels
Protected areas
spatial prioritization
Species
species dispersal
Translocation
Unionida
title The role of connectivity in conservation planning for species with obligatory interactions: Prospects for future climate scenarios
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T12%3A34%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20role%20of%20connectivity%20in%20conservation%20planning%20for%20species%20with%20obligatory%20interactions:%20Prospects%20for%20future%20climate%20scenarios&rft.jtitle=Global%20change%20biology&rft.au=Silva,%20Janine%20P.&rft.date=2024-02&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=2&rft.epage=n/a&rft.issn=1354-1013&rft.eissn=1365-2486&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/gcb.17169&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3040356014%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2931882806&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true