Televising Talent: Musicality, Meritocracy, and the Aesthetics of Exclusion
Throughout the history of television, American audiences have participated in a tradition of programs that follow a consistent structure: Amateur musicians and entertainers are offered an opportunity to display their talent on stage, competing for audience votes to win first prize and a chance at st...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of the Society for American Music 2024-02, Vol.18 (1), p.33-55 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 55 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 33 |
container_title | Journal of the Society for American Music |
container_volume | 18 |
creator | Wright, Lindsay J. |
description | Throughout the history of television, American audiences have participated in a tradition of programs that follow a consistent structure: Amateur musicians and entertainers are offered an opportunity to display their talent on stage, competing for audience votes to win first prize and a chance at stardom. This article contributes to a growing literature on the significance of televised talent shows, demonstrating how their remarkable longevity and representational power stems from their configuration as a “format,” the set of guidelines that structure and constrain the content of each broadcast—an aesthetic process grounded in exclusion. Through their formatting, I argue, these programs reify the notion of “talent” at the heart of talent shows, transforming a multidimensional and context-contingent assemblage of musical abilities into a seemingly stable object able to be recognized, rated, and ranked. Musical auditions offer a microcosm of formatting's role as a means of training audiences’ attention. They normalize the practice of eliminating whatever (or whomever) is deemed unworthy—on these programs and in the wider world. Through analyzing examples from Ted Mack and the Original Amateur Hour (1948), The Gong Show (1978), and The Voice (2017), the article demonstrates how beneath the widely discussed content of contestant demographics, judge commentary, or audience voting results, the talent show format serves to obscure the contradictions upon which meritocracy's cruel optimism rests. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S1752196323000421 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2931495346</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S1752196323000421</cupid><sourcerecordid>2931495346</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c269t-70dd9500788859b5aa484aa0a98d98967bcfc7fb8220aadf69a5c0746f4a1b63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwAewssSVgO36yq6ryEK1YkH00ceziKk2KnSL696QqggViNQ_dc2d0Ebqk5IYSqm5fqRKMGpmznBDCGT1Co_0qo0bR459e5qfoLKUVIYJrbUbouXCN-wgptEtcQOPa_g4vtilYaEK_u8YLF0Pf2Qh2GKCtcf_m8MSlofTBJtx5PPu0zUB07Tk68dAkd_Fdx6i4nxXTx2z-8vA0ncwzy6TpM0Xq2ghClNZamEoAcM0BCBhdG22kqqy3yleaMQJQe2lAWKK49BxoJfMxujrYbmL3vh1eKVfdNrbDxZKZnHIjcr5X0YPKxi6l6Hy5iWENcVdSUu4jK_9ENjD5NwPrKoZ66X6t_6e-AMLPbOQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2931495346</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Televising Talent: Musicality, Meritocracy, and the Aesthetics of Exclusion</title><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>Wright, Lindsay J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Wright, Lindsay J.</creatorcontrib><description>Throughout the history of television, American audiences have participated in a tradition of programs that follow a consistent structure: Amateur musicians and entertainers are offered an opportunity to display their talent on stage, competing for audience votes to win first prize and a chance at stardom. This article contributes to a growing literature on the significance of televised talent shows, demonstrating how their remarkable longevity and representational power stems from their configuration as a “format,” the set of guidelines that structure and constrain the content of each broadcast—an aesthetic process grounded in exclusion. Through their formatting, I argue, these programs reify the notion of “talent” at the heart of talent shows, transforming a multidimensional and context-contingent assemblage of musical abilities into a seemingly stable object able to be recognized, rated, and ranked. Musical auditions offer a microcosm of formatting's role as a means of training audiences’ attention. They normalize the practice of eliminating whatever (or whomever) is deemed unworthy—on these programs and in the wider world. Through analyzing examples from Ted Mack and the Original Amateur Hour (1948), The Gong Show (1978), and The Voice (2017), the article demonstrates how beneath the widely discussed content of contestant demographics, judge commentary, or audience voting results, the talent show format serves to obscure the contradictions upon which meritocracy's cruel optimism rests.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1752-1963</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1752-1971</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S1752196323000421</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, USA: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Aesthetics ; Amateurs ; Audiences ; Auditions ; Demography ; Harmon, Trent ; Ideology ; Lopez, Jennifer ; Meritocracy ; Morrison, Toni (1931-2019) ; Music ; Musicians & conductors ; Power ; Reality programming ; Singers ; Social networks ; Television programs ; Urban, Keith</subject><ispartof>Journal of the Society for American Music, 2024-02, Vol.18 (1), p.33-55</ispartof><rights>Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Society for American Music</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c269t-70dd9500788859b5aa484aa0a98d98967bcfc7fb8220aadf69a5c0746f4a1b63</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7229-3362</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1752196323000421/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,776,780,27901,27902,55603</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wright, Lindsay J.</creatorcontrib><title>Televising Talent: Musicality, Meritocracy, and the Aesthetics of Exclusion</title><title>Journal of the Society for American Music</title><addtitle>J Soc American Mus</addtitle><description>Throughout the history of television, American audiences have participated in a tradition of programs that follow a consistent structure: Amateur musicians and entertainers are offered an opportunity to display their talent on stage, competing for audience votes to win first prize and a chance at stardom. This article contributes to a growing literature on the significance of televised talent shows, demonstrating how their remarkable longevity and representational power stems from their configuration as a “format,” the set of guidelines that structure and constrain the content of each broadcast—an aesthetic process grounded in exclusion. Through their formatting, I argue, these programs reify the notion of “talent” at the heart of talent shows, transforming a multidimensional and context-contingent assemblage of musical abilities into a seemingly stable object able to be recognized, rated, and ranked. Musical auditions offer a microcosm of formatting's role as a means of training audiences’ attention. They normalize the practice of eliminating whatever (or whomever) is deemed unworthy—on these programs and in the wider world. Through analyzing examples from Ted Mack and the Original Amateur Hour (1948), The Gong Show (1978), and The Voice (2017), the article demonstrates how beneath the widely discussed content of contestant demographics, judge commentary, or audience voting results, the talent show format serves to obscure the contradictions upon which meritocracy's cruel optimism rests.</description><subject>Aesthetics</subject><subject>Amateurs</subject><subject>Audiences</subject><subject>Auditions</subject><subject>Demography</subject><subject>Harmon, Trent</subject><subject>Ideology</subject><subject>Lopez, Jennifer</subject><subject>Meritocracy</subject><subject>Morrison, Toni (1931-2019)</subject><subject>Music</subject><subject>Musicians & conductors</subject><subject>Power</subject><subject>Reality programming</subject><subject>Singers</subject><subject>Social networks</subject><subject>Television programs</subject><subject>Urban, Keith</subject><issn>1752-1963</issn><issn>1752-1971</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>A3D</sourceid><sourceid>AVQMV</sourceid><sourceid>DJMCT</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwAewssSVgO36yq6ryEK1YkH00ceziKk2KnSL696QqggViNQ_dc2d0Ebqk5IYSqm5fqRKMGpmznBDCGT1Co_0qo0bR459e5qfoLKUVIYJrbUbouXCN-wgptEtcQOPa_g4vtilYaEK_u8YLF0Pf2Qh2GKCtcf_m8MSlofTBJtx5PPu0zUB07Tk68dAkd_Fdx6i4nxXTx2z-8vA0ncwzy6TpM0Xq2ghClNZamEoAcM0BCBhdG22kqqy3yleaMQJQe2lAWKK49BxoJfMxujrYbmL3vh1eKVfdNrbDxZKZnHIjcr5X0YPKxi6l6Hy5iWENcVdSUu4jK_9ENjD5NwPrKoZ66X6t_6e-AMLPbOQ</recordid><startdate>20240201</startdate><enddate>20240201</enddate><creator>Wright, Lindsay J.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>A3D</scope><scope>AIMQZ</scope><scope>AVQMV</scope><scope>DJMCT</scope><scope>GB0</scope><scope>LIQON</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7229-3362</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240201</creationdate><title>Televising Talent: Musicality, Meritocracy, and the Aesthetics of Exclusion</title><author>Wright, Lindsay J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c269t-70dd9500788859b5aa484aa0a98d98967bcfc7fb8220aadf69a5c0746f4a1b63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Aesthetics</topic><topic>Amateurs</topic><topic>Audiences</topic><topic>Auditions</topic><topic>Demography</topic><topic>Harmon, Trent</topic><topic>Ideology</topic><topic>Lopez, Jennifer</topic><topic>Meritocracy</topic><topic>Morrison, Toni (1931-2019)</topic><topic>Music</topic><topic>Musicians & conductors</topic><topic>Power</topic><topic>Reality programming</topic><topic>Singers</topic><topic>Social networks</topic><topic>Television programs</topic><topic>Urban, Keith</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wright, Lindsay J.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Music Periodicals Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>Arts Premium Collection</collection><collection>Music & Performing Arts Collection</collection><collection>DELNET Social Sciences & Humanities Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature - U.S. Customers Only</collection><jtitle>Journal of the Society for American Music</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wright, Lindsay J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Televising Talent: Musicality, Meritocracy, and the Aesthetics of Exclusion</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the Society for American Music</jtitle><addtitle>J Soc American Mus</addtitle><date>2024-02-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>33</spage><epage>55</epage><pages>33-55</pages><issn>1752-1963</issn><eissn>1752-1971</eissn><abstract>Throughout the history of television, American audiences have participated in a tradition of programs that follow a consistent structure: Amateur musicians and entertainers are offered an opportunity to display their talent on stage, competing for audience votes to win first prize and a chance at stardom. This article contributes to a growing literature on the significance of televised talent shows, demonstrating how their remarkable longevity and representational power stems from their configuration as a “format,” the set of guidelines that structure and constrain the content of each broadcast—an aesthetic process grounded in exclusion. Through their formatting, I argue, these programs reify the notion of “talent” at the heart of talent shows, transforming a multidimensional and context-contingent assemblage of musical abilities into a seemingly stable object able to be recognized, rated, and ranked. Musical auditions offer a microcosm of formatting's role as a means of training audiences’ attention. They normalize the practice of eliminating whatever (or whomever) is deemed unworthy—on these programs and in the wider world. Through analyzing examples from Ted Mack and the Original Amateur Hour (1948), The Gong Show (1978), and The Voice (2017), the article demonstrates how beneath the widely discussed content of contestant demographics, judge commentary, or audience voting results, the talent show format serves to obscure the contradictions upon which meritocracy's cruel optimism rests.</abstract><cop>New York, USA</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S1752196323000421</doi><tpages>23</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7229-3362</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1752-1963 |
ispartof | Journal of the Society for American Music, 2024-02, Vol.18 (1), p.33-55 |
issn | 1752-1963 1752-1971 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2931495346 |
source | Cambridge University Press Journals Complete |
subjects | Aesthetics Amateurs Audiences Auditions Demography Harmon, Trent Ideology Lopez, Jennifer Meritocracy Morrison, Toni (1931-2019) Music Musicians & conductors Power Reality programming Singers Social networks Television programs Urban, Keith |
title | Televising Talent: Musicality, Meritocracy, and the Aesthetics of Exclusion |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T23%3A31%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Televising%20Talent:%20Musicality,%20Meritocracy,%20and%20the%20Aesthetics%20of%20Exclusion&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20Society%20for%20American%20Music&rft.au=Wright,%20Lindsay%20J.&rft.date=2024-02-01&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=33&rft.epage=55&rft.pages=33-55&rft.issn=1752-1963&rft.eissn=1752-1971&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S1752196323000421&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2931495346%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2931495346&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S1752196323000421&rfr_iscdi=true |