The Validity of Violence Risk Assessment in Young Adults: A Comparative Study of Juvenile and Adult Risk Assessment Tools
Few studies have addressed the application of violence risk assessment for individuals transitioning from youth to adulthood. For 202 young adults released from Dutch juvenile justice institutions this study investigated the predictive validity and potential disparities in impact of juvenile risk as...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Emerging adulthood (Thousand Oaks, CA) CA), 2023-12, Vol.11 (6), p.1409-1422 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 1422 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 6 |
| container_start_page | 1409 |
| container_title | Emerging adulthood (Thousand Oaks, CA) |
| container_volume | 11 |
| creator | Kleeven, Anneke T. H. de Vries Robbé, Michiel Mulder, Eva A. Popma, Arne |
| description | Few studies have addressed the application of violence risk assessment for individuals transitioning from youth to adulthood. For 202 young adults released from Dutch juvenile justice institutions this study investigated the predictive validity and potential disparities in impact of juvenile risk assessment tools (i.e., SAVRY [Structured Assessment of Violence Risk in Youth], and SAPROF-YV [Structured Assessment of Protective Factors for violence risk-Youth Version]), and comparable adult risk assessment tools (i.e., HCR-20V3 [Historical Clinical Risk management-20 Version 3], and SAPROF [Structured Assessment of Protective Factors for violence risk]). Assessments with juvenile and adult risk assessment tools yielded similar predictive validity for violent and non-violent recidivism. Risk and protective factors related to treatability, parents, community participation, resilience, and personality showed individual predictive validity. These findings offer flexibility when applying risk assessment in clinical practice. The choice between youth and adult assessment tools should be made considering the individual’s developmental stage. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1177/21676968231184278 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2930457466</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_21676968231184278</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2930457466</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-f065ba195142796d68f12c6744a9b418f4c27bc65cd56f48006c24ccf4f3c4b03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kF1LwzAUhoMoOHQ_wLuA151Jmq96V4afDASdA69KmiYzs2tm0g727-2s6MXw3JzD4X2fw3kBuMBogrEQVwRzwTMuSYqxpETIIzDa7xKeSXr8O3N5CsYxrlBfkmHJ6Ajs5u8GLlTtKtfuoLdw4XxtGm3gs4sfMI_RxLg2TQtdA9981yxhXnV1G69hDqd-vVFBtW5r4EvbVd-Ax25rGlcbqJpq0B6g5t7X8RycWFVHM_7pZ-D19mY-vU9mT3cP03yW6JSxNrGIs1LhjOH-sYxXXFpMNBeUqqykWFqqiSg1Z7pi3FKJENeEam2pTTUtUXoGLgfuJvjPzsS2WPkuNP3JgmQpokxQznsVHlQ6-BiDscUmuLUKuwKjYh9ycRBy75kMnqiW5o_6v-ELtHd7qA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2930457466</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Validity of Violence Risk Assessment in Young Adults: A Comparative Study of Juvenile and Adult Risk Assessment Tools</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><creator>Kleeven, Anneke T. H. ; de Vries Robbé, Michiel ; Mulder, Eva A. ; Popma, Arne</creator><creatorcontrib>Kleeven, Anneke T. H. ; de Vries Robbé, Michiel ; Mulder, Eva A. ; Popma, Arne</creatorcontrib><description>Few studies have addressed the application of violence risk assessment for individuals transitioning from youth to adulthood. For 202 young adults released from Dutch juvenile justice institutions this study investigated the predictive validity and potential disparities in impact of juvenile risk assessment tools (i.e., SAVRY [Structured Assessment of Violence Risk in Youth], and SAPROF-YV [Structured Assessment of Protective Factors for violence risk-Youth Version]), and comparable adult risk assessment tools (i.e., HCR-20V3 [Historical Clinical Risk management-20 Version 3], and SAPROF [Structured Assessment of Protective Factors for violence risk]). Assessments with juvenile and adult risk assessment tools yielded similar predictive validity for violent and non-violent recidivism. Risk and protective factors related to treatability, parents, community participation, resilience, and personality showed individual predictive validity. These findings offer flexibility when applying risk assessment in clinical practice. The choice between youth and adult assessment tools should be made considering the individual’s developmental stage.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2167-6968</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2167-6984</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/21676968231184278</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Clinical assessment ; Clinical medicine ; Clinical risk management ; Community involvement ; Comparative studies ; Evaluation ; Flexibility ; Juvenile justice ; Predictive validity ; Protective factors ; Recidivism ; Resilience ; Risk assessment ; Risk management ; Violence ; Young adults ; Youth</subject><ispartof>Emerging adulthood (Thousand Oaks, CA), 2023-12, Vol.11 (6), p.1409-1422</ispartof><rights>2023 Society for the Study of Emerging Adulthood and SAGE Publishing</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-f065ba195142796d68f12c6744a9b418f4c27bc65cd56f48006c24ccf4f3c4b03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-f065ba195142796d68f12c6744a9b418f4c27bc65cd56f48006c24ccf4f3c4b03</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6838-0802</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/21676968231184278$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21676968231184278$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21798,27901,27902,30976,43597,43598</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kleeven, Anneke T. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Vries Robbé, Michiel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mulder, Eva A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Popma, Arne</creatorcontrib><title>The Validity of Violence Risk Assessment in Young Adults: A Comparative Study of Juvenile and Adult Risk Assessment Tools</title><title>Emerging adulthood (Thousand Oaks, CA)</title><description>Few studies have addressed the application of violence risk assessment for individuals transitioning from youth to adulthood. For 202 young adults released from Dutch juvenile justice institutions this study investigated the predictive validity and potential disparities in impact of juvenile risk assessment tools (i.e., SAVRY [Structured Assessment of Violence Risk in Youth], and SAPROF-YV [Structured Assessment of Protective Factors for violence risk-Youth Version]), and comparable adult risk assessment tools (i.e., HCR-20V3 [Historical Clinical Risk management-20 Version 3], and SAPROF [Structured Assessment of Protective Factors for violence risk]). Assessments with juvenile and adult risk assessment tools yielded similar predictive validity for violent and non-violent recidivism. Risk and protective factors related to treatability, parents, community participation, resilience, and personality showed individual predictive validity. These findings offer flexibility when applying risk assessment in clinical practice. The choice between youth and adult assessment tools should be made considering the individual’s developmental stage.</description><subject>Clinical assessment</subject><subject>Clinical medicine</subject><subject>Clinical risk management</subject><subject>Community involvement</subject><subject>Comparative studies</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Flexibility</subject><subject>Juvenile justice</subject><subject>Predictive validity</subject><subject>Protective factors</subject><subject>Recidivism</subject><subject>Resilience</subject><subject>Risk assessment</subject><subject>Risk management</subject><subject>Violence</subject><subject>Young adults</subject><subject>Youth</subject><issn>2167-6968</issn><issn>2167-6984</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFRWT</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kF1LwzAUhoMoOHQ_wLuA151Jmq96V4afDASdA69KmiYzs2tm0g727-2s6MXw3JzD4X2fw3kBuMBogrEQVwRzwTMuSYqxpETIIzDa7xKeSXr8O3N5CsYxrlBfkmHJ6Ajs5u8GLlTtKtfuoLdw4XxtGm3gs4sfMI_RxLg2TQtdA9981yxhXnV1G69hDqd-vVFBtW5r4EvbVd-Ax25rGlcbqJpq0B6g5t7X8RycWFVHM_7pZ-D19mY-vU9mT3cP03yW6JSxNrGIs1LhjOH-sYxXXFpMNBeUqqykWFqqiSg1Z7pi3FKJENeEam2pTTUtUXoGLgfuJvjPzsS2WPkuNP3JgmQpokxQznsVHlQ6-BiDscUmuLUKuwKjYh9ycRBy75kMnqiW5o_6v-ELtHd7qA</recordid><startdate>202312</startdate><enddate>202312</enddate><creator>Kleeven, Anneke T. H.</creator><creator>de Vries Robbé, Michiel</creator><creator>Mulder, Eva A.</creator><creator>Popma, Arne</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>AFRWT</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6838-0802</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202312</creationdate><title>The Validity of Violence Risk Assessment in Young Adults: A Comparative Study of Juvenile and Adult Risk Assessment Tools</title><author>Kleeven, Anneke T. H. ; de Vries Robbé, Michiel ; Mulder, Eva A. ; Popma, Arne</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-f065ba195142796d68f12c6744a9b418f4c27bc65cd56f48006c24ccf4f3c4b03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Clinical assessment</topic><topic>Clinical medicine</topic><topic>Clinical risk management</topic><topic>Community involvement</topic><topic>Comparative studies</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Flexibility</topic><topic>Juvenile justice</topic><topic>Predictive validity</topic><topic>Protective factors</topic><topic>Recidivism</topic><topic>Resilience</topic><topic>Risk assessment</topic><topic>Risk management</topic><topic>Violence</topic><topic>Young adults</topic><topic>Youth</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kleeven, Anneke T. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Vries Robbé, Michiel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mulder, Eva A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Popma, Arne</creatorcontrib><collection>Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><jtitle>Emerging adulthood (Thousand Oaks, CA)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kleeven, Anneke T. H.</au><au>de Vries Robbé, Michiel</au><au>Mulder, Eva A.</au><au>Popma, Arne</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Validity of Violence Risk Assessment in Young Adults: A Comparative Study of Juvenile and Adult Risk Assessment Tools</atitle><jtitle>Emerging adulthood (Thousand Oaks, CA)</jtitle><date>2023-12</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1409</spage><epage>1422</epage><pages>1409-1422</pages><issn>2167-6968</issn><eissn>2167-6984</eissn><abstract>Few studies have addressed the application of violence risk assessment for individuals transitioning from youth to adulthood. For 202 young adults released from Dutch juvenile justice institutions this study investigated the predictive validity and potential disparities in impact of juvenile risk assessment tools (i.e., SAVRY [Structured Assessment of Violence Risk in Youth], and SAPROF-YV [Structured Assessment of Protective Factors for violence risk-Youth Version]), and comparable adult risk assessment tools (i.e., HCR-20V3 [Historical Clinical Risk management-20 Version 3], and SAPROF [Structured Assessment of Protective Factors for violence risk]). Assessments with juvenile and adult risk assessment tools yielded similar predictive validity for violent and non-violent recidivism. Risk and protective factors related to treatability, parents, community participation, resilience, and personality showed individual predictive validity. These findings offer flexibility when applying risk assessment in clinical practice. The choice between youth and adult assessment tools should be made considering the individual’s developmental stage.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/21676968231184278</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6838-0802</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 2167-6968 |
| ispartof | Emerging adulthood (Thousand Oaks, CA), 2023-12, Vol.11 (6), p.1409-1422 |
| issn | 2167-6968 2167-6984 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2930457466 |
| source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); SAGE Complete A-Z List |
| subjects | Clinical assessment Clinical medicine Clinical risk management Community involvement Comparative studies Evaluation Flexibility Juvenile justice Predictive validity Protective factors Recidivism Resilience Risk assessment Risk management Violence Young adults Youth |
| title | The Validity of Violence Risk Assessment in Young Adults: A Comparative Study of Juvenile and Adult Risk Assessment Tools |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-15T23%3A10%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Validity%20of%20Violence%20Risk%20Assessment%20in%20Young%20Adults:%20A%20Comparative%20Study%20of%20Juvenile%20and%20Adult%20Risk%20Assessment%20Tools&rft.jtitle=Emerging%20adulthood%20(Thousand%20Oaks,%20CA)&rft.au=Kleeven,%20Anneke%20T.%20H.&rft.date=2023-12&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1409&rft.epage=1422&rft.pages=1409-1422&rft.issn=2167-6968&rft.eissn=2167-6984&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/21676968231184278&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2930457466%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2930457466&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_21676968231184278&rfr_iscdi=true |