Accountability in densely institutionalized governance spaces

The concept of organizational accountability is central to good governance both domestically and internationally. However, assessing accountability in densely institutionalized global governance spaces requires new conceptual and analytical tools. Rather than concentrating on the accountability of s...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Global policy 2024-02, Vol.15 (1), p.103-113
Hauptverfasser: Eilstrup‐Sangiovanni, Mette, Hofmann, Stephanie C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 113
container_issue 1
container_start_page 103
container_title Global policy
container_volume 15
creator Eilstrup‐Sangiovanni, Mette
Hofmann, Stephanie C.
description The concept of organizational accountability is central to good governance both domestically and internationally. However, assessing accountability in densely institutionalized global governance spaces requires new conceptual and analytical tools. Rather than concentrating on the accountability of states, intergovernmental organizations (IGOs), non‐governmental organizations (NGOs), and transnational corporations as distinct sets of global actors to whom different accountability criteria and mechanisms may apply, we want to focus on how growing overlap and interplay among diverse global policy actors affects organizational accountability. And rather than focusing exclusively on accountability in terms of retrospective sanctioning based on fixed standards or legal obligations, we suggest that, in a densely institutionalized world, accountability also needs to be thought of as a prospective process. We therefore suggest a stronger focus on pluralistic, participatory, and deliberative forms of accountability that emphasize standard‐setting and responsiveness through collective deliberation, learning, and competition.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/1758-5899.13345
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2929894163</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2929894163</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3115-2626ea55b25ef351345824cecb6d50c649e4019df03e2fb5b871ed8e2df30b013</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMFLwzAUxoMoOObOXgueu-UlTZccPIyhm1CYBz2HNH2VjNjWplXmX29rZVff5X08vu_x8SPkFugShlnBWshYSKWWwHkiLsjsfLk8a0mvySKEIx2GS0UZzMj9xtq6rzqTO--6U-SqqMAqoB9l6FzXd66ujHffWERv9Se2laksRqExFsMNuSqND7j423Py-vjwst3H2WH3tN1kseUAImYpS9EIkTOBJRcwNJQssWjztBDUponChIIqSsqRlbnI5RqwkMiKktOcAp-Tu-lv09YfPYZOH-t-aOKDZoopqRJI-eBaTS7b1iG0WOqmde-mPWmgesSkRxB6hKJ_MQ2JdEp8OY-n_-x693zIpuAP-X1pog</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2929894163</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Accountability in densely institutionalized governance spaces</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>PAIS Index</source><creator>Eilstrup‐Sangiovanni, Mette ; Hofmann, Stephanie C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Eilstrup‐Sangiovanni, Mette ; Hofmann, Stephanie C.</creatorcontrib><description>The concept of organizational accountability is central to good governance both domestically and internationally. However, assessing accountability in densely institutionalized global governance spaces requires new conceptual and analytical tools. Rather than concentrating on the accountability of states, intergovernmental organizations (IGOs), non‐governmental organizations (NGOs), and transnational corporations as distinct sets of global actors to whom different accountability criteria and mechanisms may apply, we want to focus on how growing overlap and interplay among diverse global policy actors affects organizational accountability. And rather than focusing exclusively on accountability in terms of retrospective sanctioning based on fixed standards or legal obligations, we suggest that, in a densely institutionalized world, accountability also needs to be thought of as a prospective process. We therefore suggest a stronger focus on pluralistic, participatory, and deliberative forms of accountability that emphasize standard‐setting and responsiveness through collective deliberation, learning, and competition.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1758-5880</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1758-5899</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/1758-5899.13345</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Accountability ; Governance ; Institutionalization ; NGOs ; Nongovernmental organizations</subject><ispartof>Global policy, 2024-02, Vol.15 (1), p.103-113</ispartof><rights>2024 The Authors. published by Durham University and John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2024. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3115-2626ea55b25ef351345824cecb6d50c649e4019df03e2fb5b871ed8e2df30b013</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0045-8356</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2F1758-5899.13345$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2F1758-5899.13345$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,1412,27847,27905,27906,45555,45556</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Eilstrup‐Sangiovanni, Mette</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hofmann, Stephanie C.</creatorcontrib><title>Accountability in densely institutionalized governance spaces</title><title>Global policy</title><description>The concept of organizational accountability is central to good governance both domestically and internationally. However, assessing accountability in densely institutionalized global governance spaces requires new conceptual and analytical tools. Rather than concentrating on the accountability of states, intergovernmental organizations (IGOs), non‐governmental organizations (NGOs), and transnational corporations as distinct sets of global actors to whom different accountability criteria and mechanisms may apply, we want to focus on how growing overlap and interplay among diverse global policy actors affects organizational accountability. And rather than focusing exclusively on accountability in terms of retrospective sanctioning based on fixed standards or legal obligations, we suggest that, in a densely institutionalized world, accountability also needs to be thought of as a prospective process. We therefore suggest a stronger focus on pluralistic, participatory, and deliberative forms of accountability that emphasize standard‐setting and responsiveness through collective deliberation, learning, and competition.</description><subject>Accountability</subject><subject>Governance</subject><subject>Institutionalization</subject><subject>NGOs</subject><subject>Nongovernmental organizations</subject><issn>1758-5880</issn><issn>1758-5899</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkMFLwzAUxoMoOObOXgueu-UlTZccPIyhm1CYBz2HNH2VjNjWplXmX29rZVff5X08vu_x8SPkFugShlnBWshYSKWWwHkiLsjsfLk8a0mvySKEIx2GS0UZzMj9xtq6rzqTO--6U-SqqMAqoB9l6FzXd66ujHffWERv9Se2laksRqExFsMNuSqND7j423Py-vjwst3H2WH3tN1kseUAImYpS9EIkTOBJRcwNJQssWjztBDUponChIIqSsqRlbnI5RqwkMiKktOcAp-Tu-lv09YfPYZOH-t-aOKDZoopqRJI-eBaTS7b1iG0WOqmde-mPWmgesSkRxB6hKJ_MQ2JdEp8OY-n_-x693zIpuAP-X1pog</recordid><startdate>202402</startdate><enddate>202402</enddate><creator>Eilstrup‐Sangiovanni, Mette</creator><creator>Hofmann, Stephanie C.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0045-8356</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202402</creationdate><title>Accountability in densely institutionalized governance spaces</title><author>Eilstrup‐Sangiovanni, Mette ; Hofmann, Stephanie C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3115-2626ea55b25ef351345824cecb6d50c649e4019df03e2fb5b871ed8e2df30b013</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Accountability</topic><topic>Governance</topic><topic>Institutionalization</topic><topic>NGOs</topic><topic>Nongovernmental organizations</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Eilstrup‐Sangiovanni, Mette</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hofmann, Stephanie C.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>Wiley Free Content</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Global policy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Eilstrup‐Sangiovanni, Mette</au><au>Hofmann, Stephanie C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Accountability in densely institutionalized governance spaces</atitle><jtitle>Global policy</jtitle><date>2024-02</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>103</spage><epage>113</epage><pages>103-113</pages><issn>1758-5880</issn><eissn>1758-5899</eissn><abstract>The concept of organizational accountability is central to good governance both domestically and internationally. However, assessing accountability in densely institutionalized global governance spaces requires new conceptual and analytical tools. Rather than concentrating on the accountability of states, intergovernmental organizations (IGOs), non‐governmental organizations (NGOs), and transnational corporations as distinct sets of global actors to whom different accountability criteria and mechanisms may apply, we want to focus on how growing overlap and interplay among diverse global policy actors affects organizational accountability. And rather than focusing exclusively on accountability in terms of retrospective sanctioning based on fixed standards or legal obligations, we suggest that, in a densely institutionalized world, accountability also needs to be thought of as a prospective process. We therefore suggest a stronger focus on pluralistic, participatory, and deliberative forms of accountability that emphasize standard‐setting and responsiveness through collective deliberation, learning, and competition.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/1758-5899.13345</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0045-8356</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1758-5880
ispartof Global policy, 2024-02, Vol.15 (1), p.103-113
issn 1758-5880
1758-5899
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2929894163
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; PAIS Index
subjects Accountability
Governance
Institutionalization
NGOs
Nongovernmental organizations
title Accountability in densely institutionalized governance spaces
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T10%3A42%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Accountability%20in%20densely%20institutionalized%20governance%20spaces&rft.jtitle=Global%20policy&rft.au=Eilstrup%E2%80%90Sangiovanni,%20Mette&rft.date=2024-02&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=103&rft.epage=113&rft.pages=103-113&rft.issn=1758-5880&rft.eissn=1758-5899&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/1758-5899.13345&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2929894163%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2929894163&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true