Accountability in densely institutionalized governance spaces
The concept of organizational accountability is central to good governance both domestically and internationally. However, assessing accountability in densely institutionalized global governance spaces requires new conceptual and analytical tools. Rather than concentrating on the accountability of s...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Global policy 2024-02, Vol.15 (1), p.103-113 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 113 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 103 |
container_title | Global policy |
container_volume | 15 |
creator | Eilstrup‐Sangiovanni, Mette Hofmann, Stephanie C. |
description | The concept of organizational accountability is central to good governance both domestically and internationally. However, assessing accountability in densely institutionalized global governance spaces requires new conceptual and analytical tools. Rather than concentrating on the accountability of states, intergovernmental organizations (IGOs), non‐governmental organizations (NGOs), and transnational corporations as distinct sets of global actors to whom different accountability criteria and mechanisms may apply, we want to focus on how growing overlap and interplay among diverse global policy actors affects organizational accountability. And rather than focusing exclusively on accountability in terms of retrospective sanctioning based on fixed standards or legal obligations, we suggest that, in a densely institutionalized world, accountability also needs to be thought of as a prospective process. We therefore suggest a stronger focus on pluralistic, participatory, and deliberative forms of accountability that emphasize standard‐setting and responsiveness through collective deliberation, learning, and competition. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/1758-5899.13345 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2929894163</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2929894163</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3115-2626ea55b25ef351345824cecb6d50c649e4019df03e2fb5b871ed8e2df30b013</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMFLwzAUxoMoOObOXgueu-UlTZccPIyhm1CYBz2HNH2VjNjWplXmX29rZVff5X08vu_x8SPkFugShlnBWshYSKWWwHkiLsjsfLk8a0mvySKEIx2GS0UZzMj9xtq6rzqTO--6U-SqqMAqoB9l6FzXd66ujHffWERv9Se2laksRqExFsMNuSqND7j423Py-vjwst3H2WH3tN1kseUAImYpS9EIkTOBJRcwNJQssWjztBDUponChIIqSsqRlbnI5RqwkMiKktOcAp-Tu-lv09YfPYZOH-t-aOKDZoopqRJI-eBaTS7b1iG0WOqmde-mPWmgesSkRxB6hKJ_MQ2JdEp8OY-n_-x693zIpuAP-X1pog</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2929894163</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Accountability in densely institutionalized governance spaces</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>PAIS Index</source><creator>Eilstrup‐Sangiovanni, Mette ; Hofmann, Stephanie C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Eilstrup‐Sangiovanni, Mette ; Hofmann, Stephanie C.</creatorcontrib><description>The concept of organizational accountability is central to good governance both domestically and internationally. However, assessing accountability in densely institutionalized global governance spaces requires new conceptual and analytical tools. Rather than concentrating on the accountability of states, intergovernmental organizations (IGOs), non‐governmental organizations (NGOs), and transnational corporations as distinct sets of global actors to whom different accountability criteria and mechanisms may apply, we want to focus on how growing overlap and interplay among diverse global policy actors affects organizational accountability. And rather than focusing exclusively on accountability in terms of retrospective sanctioning based on fixed standards or legal obligations, we suggest that, in a densely institutionalized world, accountability also needs to be thought of as a prospective process. We therefore suggest a stronger focus on pluralistic, participatory, and deliberative forms of accountability that emphasize standard‐setting and responsiveness through collective deliberation, learning, and competition.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1758-5880</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1758-5899</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/1758-5899.13345</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Accountability ; Governance ; Institutionalization ; NGOs ; Nongovernmental organizations</subject><ispartof>Global policy, 2024-02, Vol.15 (1), p.103-113</ispartof><rights>2024 The Authors. published by Durham University and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2024. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3115-2626ea55b25ef351345824cecb6d50c649e4019df03e2fb5b871ed8e2df30b013</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0045-8356</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2F1758-5899.13345$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2F1758-5899.13345$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,1412,27847,27905,27906,45555,45556</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Eilstrup‐Sangiovanni, Mette</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hofmann, Stephanie C.</creatorcontrib><title>Accountability in densely institutionalized governance spaces</title><title>Global policy</title><description>The concept of organizational accountability is central to good governance both domestically and internationally. However, assessing accountability in densely institutionalized global governance spaces requires new conceptual and analytical tools. Rather than concentrating on the accountability of states, intergovernmental organizations (IGOs), non‐governmental organizations (NGOs), and transnational corporations as distinct sets of global actors to whom different accountability criteria and mechanisms may apply, we want to focus on how growing overlap and interplay among diverse global policy actors affects organizational accountability. And rather than focusing exclusively on accountability in terms of retrospective sanctioning based on fixed standards or legal obligations, we suggest that, in a densely institutionalized world, accountability also needs to be thought of as a prospective process. We therefore suggest a stronger focus on pluralistic, participatory, and deliberative forms of accountability that emphasize standard‐setting and responsiveness through collective deliberation, learning, and competition.</description><subject>Accountability</subject><subject>Governance</subject><subject>Institutionalization</subject><subject>NGOs</subject><subject>Nongovernmental organizations</subject><issn>1758-5880</issn><issn>1758-5899</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkMFLwzAUxoMoOObOXgueu-UlTZccPIyhm1CYBz2HNH2VjNjWplXmX29rZVff5X08vu_x8SPkFugShlnBWshYSKWWwHkiLsjsfLk8a0mvySKEIx2GS0UZzMj9xtq6rzqTO--6U-SqqMAqoB9l6FzXd66ujHffWERv9Se2laksRqExFsMNuSqND7j423Py-vjwst3H2WH3tN1kseUAImYpS9EIkTOBJRcwNJQssWjztBDUponChIIqSsqRlbnI5RqwkMiKktOcAp-Tu-lv09YfPYZOH-t-aOKDZoopqRJI-eBaTS7b1iG0WOqmde-mPWmgesSkRxB6hKJ_MQ2JdEp8OY-n_-x693zIpuAP-X1pog</recordid><startdate>202402</startdate><enddate>202402</enddate><creator>Eilstrup‐Sangiovanni, Mette</creator><creator>Hofmann, Stephanie C.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0045-8356</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202402</creationdate><title>Accountability in densely institutionalized governance spaces</title><author>Eilstrup‐Sangiovanni, Mette ; Hofmann, Stephanie C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3115-2626ea55b25ef351345824cecb6d50c649e4019df03e2fb5b871ed8e2df30b013</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Accountability</topic><topic>Governance</topic><topic>Institutionalization</topic><topic>NGOs</topic><topic>Nongovernmental organizations</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Eilstrup‐Sangiovanni, Mette</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hofmann, Stephanie C.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>Wiley Free Content</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Global policy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Eilstrup‐Sangiovanni, Mette</au><au>Hofmann, Stephanie C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Accountability in densely institutionalized governance spaces</atitle><jtitle>Global policy</jtitle><date>2024-02</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>103</spage><epage>113</epage><pages>103-113</pages><issn>1758-5880</issn><eissn>1758-5899</eissn><abstract>The concept of organizational accountability is central to good governance both domestically and internationally. However, assessing accountability in densely institutionalized global governance spaces requires new conceptual and analytical tools. Rather than concentrating on the accountability of states, intergovernmental organizations (IGOs), non‐governmental organizations (NGOs), and transnational corporations as distinct sets of global actors to whom different accountability criteria and mechanisms may apply, we want to focus on how growing overlap and interplay among diverse global policy actors affects organizational accountability. And rather than focusing exclusively on accountability in terms of retrospective sanctioning based on fixed standards or legal obligations, we suggest that, in a densely institutionalized world, accountability also needs to be thought of as a prospective process. We therefore suggest a stronger focus on pluralistic, participatory, and deliberative forms of accountability that emphasize standard‐setting and responsiveness through collective deliberation, learning, and competition.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/1758-5899.13345</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0045-8356</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1758-5880 |
ispartof | Global policy, 2024-02, Vol.15 (1), p.103-113 |
issn | 1758-5880 1758-5899 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2929894163 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; PAIS Index |
subjects | Accountability Governance Institutionalization NGOs Nongovernmental organizations |
title | Accountability in densely institutionalized governance spaces |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T10%3A42%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Accountability%20in%20densely%20institutionalized%20governance%20spaces&rft.jtitle=Global%20policy&rft.au=Eilstrup%E2%80%90Sangiovanni,%20Mette&rft.date=2024-02&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=103&rft.epage=113&rft.pages=103-113&rft.issn=1758-5880&rft.eissn=1758-5899&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/1758-5899.13345&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2929894163%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2929894163&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |