Bans, sanctions, and dog-whistles: a review of anti-critical race theory initiatives adopted in the United States since 2020
Labelled as racist, criticized for promoting racial divisions, and accused of indoctrinating vulnerable young people, Critical Race Theory (CRT) has, in recent years, become, a cause célèbre in the conservative movement, across both the Trumpist contingent and the Republican mainstream. We argue tha...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Policy studies 2024-03, Vol.45 (2), p.183-204 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 204 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 183 |
container_title | Policy studies |
container_volume | 45 |
creator | Filimon, Luiza-Maria Ivănescu, Mihaela |
description | Labelled as racist, criticized for promoting racial divisions, and accused of indoctrinating vulnerable young people, Critical Race Theory (CRT) has, in recent years, become, a cause célèbre in the conservative movement, across both the Trumpist contingent and the Republican mainstream. We argue that, inscribing itself in a long tradition of dog-whistles, the anti-CRT panic is predicated on the idea that the contemporary American society is one devoid of systemic forms of racial discrimination and that by deviating from this premise, a form of reverse discrimination targeting Whites is becoming, in effect, systemic. Using document analysis, this article examines how the anti-CRT rhetoric has translated into institutionalized forms that prohibit the use of alleged CRT practices in educational contexts (K-12 level and colleges) and public service. In this sense, we review a swath of anti-CRT initiatives that were passed between 2021 and 2022 in 15 state legislatures across the US. These bills sought to determine how issues pertaining to race, racism, and discrimination are addressed. We find that this was achieved through a multi-pronged approach that focused on: (1) defining sets of prohibited concepts; (2) creating mechanisms to detect perceived CRT-offenses; and (3) dispensing penalties and sanctions against potential transgressors. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/01442872.2023.2214088 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_infor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2928741332</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2928741332</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c286t-fbb7eb63fdd5a38a3236038e7e4c58b7cea06174941891d2c83cada245af4c023</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWKs_QQh4dWu-upt6UotfUPCgPYfZJGtTtpuaxJaCP94srVdPmcz7vjPDg9AlJSNKJLkhVAgmKzZihPERY1QQKY_QgIqKFJSQ8hgNek_Rm07RWYxLQghlnA7QzwN08RpH6HRyvi-hM9j4z2K7cDG1Nt5iwMFunN1i32Q1uUIHl5yGFgfQFqeF9WGHXZebkNzGRgzGr5M1udereJ6l_HtPkLIYXZdT-VZyjk4aaKO9OLxDNH96_Ji-FLO359fp_azQTJapaOq6snXJG2PGwCVwxkvCpa2s0GNZV9oCKWklJoLKCTVMS67BABNjaITOTIboaj93HfzXt41JLf136PJKxSYZiqCc967x3qWDjzHYRq2DW0HYKUpUD1r9gVY9aHUAnXN3-5zrGh9WsPWhNSrBrvWhCRmsi4r_P-IXy2-EpA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2928741332</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Bans, sanctions, and dog-whistles: a review of anti-critical race theory initiatives adopted in the United States since 2020</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Access via Taylor & Francis</source><creator>Filimon, Luiza-Maria ; Ivănescu, Mihaela</creator><creatorcontrib>Filimon, Luiza-Maria ; Ivănescu, Mihaela</creatorcontrib><description>Labelled as racist, criticized for promoting racial divisions, and accused of indoctrinating vulnerable young people, Critical Race Theory (CRT) has, in recent years, become, a cause célèbre in the conservative movement, across both the Trumpist contingent and the Republican mainstream. We argue that, inscribing itself in a long tradition of dog-whistles, the anti-CRT panic is predicated on the idea that the contemporary American society is one devoid of systemic forms of racial discrimination and that by deviating from this premise, a form of reverse discrimination targeting Whites is becoming, in effect, systemic. Using document analysis, this article examines how the anti-CRT rhetoric has translated into institutionalized forms that prohibit the use of alleged CRT practices in educational contexts (K-12 level and colleges) and public service. In this sense, we review a swath of anti-CRT initiatives that were passed between 2021 and 2022 in 15 state legislatures across the US. These bills sought to determine how issues pertaining to race, racism, and discrimination are addressed. We find that this was achieved through a multi-pronged approach that focused on: (1) defining sets of prohibited concepts; (2) creating mechanisms to detect perceived CRT-offenses; and (3) dispensing penalties and sanctions against potential transgressors.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0144-2872</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1470-1006</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/01442872.2023.2214088</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Routledge</publisher><subject>anti-critical race theory laws ; Bans ; Critical race theory ; discriminatory practices ; Dog-whistle politics ; education policy ; Ethnic relations ; Legislatures ; Offenses ; Penalties ; Race ; Racial discrimination ; Republican Party ; Reverse discrimination ; Rhetoric ; Sanctions ; State legislatures</subject><ispartof>Policy studies, 2024-03, Vol.45 (2), p.183-204</ispartof><rights>2023 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group 2023</rights><rights>2023 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c286t-fbb7eb63fdd5a38a3236038e7e4c58b7cea06174941891d2c83cada245af4c023</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7916-0562 ; 0000-0001-8111-3303</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/01442872.2023.2214088$$EPDF$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01442872.2023.2214088$$EHTML$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,27875,27933,27934,33783,59656,60445</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Filimon, Luiza-Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ivănescu, Mihaela</creatorcontrib><title>Bans, sanctions, and dog-whistles: a review of anti-critical race theory initiatives adopted in the United States since 2020</title><title>Policy studies</title><description>Labelled as racist, criticized for promoting racial divisions, and accused of indoctrinating vulnerable young people, Critical Race Theory (CRT) has, in recent years, become, a cause célèbre in the conservative movement, across both the Trumpist contingent and the Republican mainstream. We argue that, inscribing itself in a long tradition of dog-whistles, the anti-CRT panic is predicated on the idea that the contemporary American society is one devoid of systemic forms of racial discrimination and that by deviating from this premise, a form of reverse discrimination targeting Whites is becoming, in effect, systemic. Using document analysis, this article examines how the anti-CRT rhetoric has translated into institutionalized forms that prohibit the use of alleged CRT practices in educational contexts (K-12 level and colleges) and public service. In this sense, we review a swath of anti-CRT initiatives that were passed between 2021 and 2022 in 15 state legislatures across the US. These bills sought to determine how issues pertaining to race, racism, and discrimination are addressed. We find that this was achieved through a multi-pronged approach that focused on: (1) defining sets of prohibited concepts; (2) creating mechanisms to detect perceived CRT-offenses; and (3) dispensing penalties and sanctions against potential transgressors.</description><subject>anti-critical race theory laws</subject><subject>Bans</subject><subject>Critical race theory</subject><subject>discriminatory practices</subject><subject>Dog-whistle politics</subject><subject>education policy</subject><subject>Ethnic relations</subject><subject>Legislatures</subject><subject>Offenses</subject><subject>Penalties</subject><subject>Race</subject><subject>Racial discrimination</subject><subject>Republican Party</subject><subject>Reverse discrimination</subject><subject>Rhetoric</subject><subject>Sanctions</subject><subject>State legislatures</subject><issn>0144-2872</issn><issn>1470-1006</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWKs_QQh4dWu-upt6UotfUPCgPYfZJGtTtpuaxJaCP94srVdPmcz7vjPDg9AlJSNKJLkhVAgmKzZihPERY1QQKY_QgIqKFJSQ8hgNek_Rm07RWYxLQghlnA7QzwN08RpH6HRyvi-hM9j4z2K7cDG1Nt5iwMFunN1i32Q1uUIHl5yGFgfQFqeF9WGHXZebkNzGRgzGr5M1udereJ6l_HtPkLIYXZdT-VZyjk4aaKO9OLxDNH96_Ji-FLO359fp_azQTJapaOq6snXJG2PGwCVwxkvCpa2s0GNZV9oCKWklJoLKCTVMS67BABNjaITOTIboaj93HfzXt41JLf136PJKxSYZiqCc967x3qWDjzHYRq2DW0HYKUpUD1r9gVY9aHUAnXN3-5zrGh9WsPWhNSrBrvWhCRmsi4r_P-IXy2-EpA</recordid><startdate>20240303</startdate><enddate>20240303</enddate><creator>Filimon, Luiza-Maria</creator><creator>Ivănescu, Mihaela</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor & Francis LLC</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>WZK</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7916-0562</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8111-3303</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240303</creationdate><title>Bans, sanctions, and dog-whistles: a review of anti-critical race theory initiatives adopted in the United States since 2020</title><author>Filimon, Luiza-Maria ; Ivănescu, Mihaela</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c286t-fbb7eb63fdd5a38a3236038e7e4c58b7cea06174941891d2c83cada245af4c023</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>anti-critical race theory laws</topic><topic>Bans</topic><topic>Critical race theory</topic><topic>discriminatory practices</topic><topic>Dog-whistle politics</topic><topic>education policy</topic><topic>Ethnic relations</topic><topic>Legislatures</topic><topic>Offenses</topic><topic>Penalties</topic><topic>Race</topic><topic>Racial discrimination</topic><topic>Republican Party</topic><topic>Reverse discrimination</topic><topic>Rhetoric</topic><topic>Sanctions</topic><topic>State legislatures</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Filimon, Luiza-Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ivănescu, Mihaela</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Policy studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Filimon, Luiza-Maria</au><au>Ivănescu, Mihaela</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Bans, sanctions, and dog-whistles: a review of anti-critical race theory initiatives adopted in the United States since 2020</atitle><jtitle>Policy studies</jtitle><date>2024-03-03</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>183</spage><epage>204</epage><pages>183-204</pages><issn>0144-2872</issn><eissn>1470-1006</eissn><abstract>Labelled as racist, criticized for promoting racial divisions, and accused of indoctrinating vulnerable young people, Critical Race Theory (CRT) has, in recent years, become, a cause célèbre in the conservative movement, across both the Trumpist contingent and the Republican mainstream. We argue that, inscribing itself in a long tradition of dog-whistles, the anti-CRT panic is predicated on the idea that the contemporary American society is one devoid of systemic forms of racial discrimination and that by deviating from this premise, a form of reverse discrimination targeting Whites is becoming, in effect, systemic. Using document analysis, this article examines how the anti-CRT rhetoric has translated into institutionalized forms that prohibit the use of alleged CRT practices in educational contexts (K-12 level and colleges) and public service. In this sense, we review a swath of anti-CRT initiatives that were passed between 2021 and 2022 in 15 state legislatures across the US. These bills sought to determine how issues pertaining to race, racism, and discrimination are addressed. We find that this was achieved through a multi-pronged approach that focused on: (1) defining sets of prohibited concepts; (2) creating mechanisms to detect perceived CRT-offenses; and (3) dispensing penalties and sanctions against potential transgressors.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/01442872.2023.2214088</doi><tpages>22</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7916-0562</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8111-3303</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0144-2872 |
ispartof | Policy studies, 2024-03, Vol.45 (2), p.183-204 |
issn | 0144-2872 1470-1006 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2928741332 |
source | PAIS Index; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Sociological Abstracts; Access via Taylor & Francis |
subjects | anti-critical race theory laws Bans Critical race theory discriminatory practices Dog-whistle politics education policy Ethnic relations Legislatures Offenses Penalties Race Racial discrimination Republican Party Reverse discrimination Rhetoric Sanctions State legislatures |
title | Bans, sanctions, and dog-whistles: a review of anti-critical race theory initiatives adopted in the United States since 2020 |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-03T12%3A53%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_infor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Bans,%20sanctions,%20and%20dog-whistles:%20a%20review%20of%20anti-critical%20race%20theory%20initiatives%20adopted%20in%20the%20United%20States%20since%202020&rft.jtitle=Policy%20studies&rft.au=Filimon,%20Luiza-Maria&rft.date=2024-03-03&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=183&rft.epage=204&rft.pages=183-204&rft.issn=0144-2872&rft.eissn=1470-1006&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/01442872.2023.2214088&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_infor%3E2928741332%3C/proquest_infor%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2928741332&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |