Bans, sanctions, and dog-whistles: a review of anti-critical race theory initiatives adopted in the United States since 2020

Labelled as racist, criticized for promoting racial divisions, and accused of indoctrinating vulnerable young people, Critical Race Theory (CRT) has, in recent years, become, a cause célèbre in the conservative movement, across both the Trumpist contingent and the Republican mainstream. We argue tha...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Policy studies 2024-03, Vol.45 (2), p.183-204
Hauptverfasser: Filimon, Luiza-Maria, Ivănescu, Mihaela
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 204
container_issue 2
container_start_page 183
container_title Policy studies
container_volume 45
creator Filimon, Luiza-Maria
Ivănescu, Mihaela
description Labelled as racist, criticized for promoting racial divisions, and accused of indoctrinating vulnerable young people, Critical Race Theory (CRT) has, in recent years, become, a cause célèbre in the conservative movement, across both the Trumpist contingent and the Republican mainstream. We argue that, inscribing itself in a long tradition of dog-whistles, the anti-CRT panic is predicated on the idea that the contemporary American society is one devoid of systemic forms of racial discrimination and that by deviating from this premise, a form of reverse discrimination targeting Whites is becoming, in effect, systemic. Using document analysis, this article examines how the anti-CRT rhetoric has translated into institutionalized forms that prohibit the use of alleged CRT practices in educational contexts (K-12 level and colleges) and public service. In this sense, we review a swath of anti-CRT initiatives that were passed between 2021 and 2022 in 15 state legislatures across the US. These bills sought to determine how issues pertaining to race, racism, and discrimination are addressed. We find that this was achieved through a multi-pronged approach that focused on: (1) defining sets of prohibited concepts; (2) creating mechanisms to detect perceived CRT-offenses; and (3) dispensing penalties and sanctions against potential transgressors.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/01442872.2023.2214088
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_infor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2928741332</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2928741332</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c286t-fbb7eb63fdd5a38a3236038e7e4c58b7cea06174941891d2c83cada245af4c023</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWKs_QQh4dWu-upt6UotfUPCgPYfZJGtTtpuaxJaCP94srVdPmcz7vjPDg9AlJSNKJLkhVAgmKzZihPERY1QQKY_QgIqKFJSQ8hgNek_Rm07RWYxLQghlnA7QzwN08RpH6HRyvi-hM9j4z2K7cDG1Nt5iwMFunN1i32Q1uUIHl5yGFgfQFqeF9WGHXZebkNzGRgzGr5M1udereJ6l_HtPkLIYXZdT-VZyjk4aaKO9OLxDNH96_Ji-FLO359fp_azQTJapaOq6snXJG2PGwCVwxkvCpa2s0GNZV9oCKWklJoLKCTVMS67BABNjaITOTIboaj93HfzXt41JLf136PJKxSYZiqCc967x3qWDjzHYRq2DW0HYKUpUD1r9gVY9aHUAnXN3-5zrGh9WsPWhNSrBrvWhCRmsi4r_P-IXy2-EpA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2928741332</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Bans, sanctions, and dog-whistles: a review of anti-critical race theory initiatives adopted in the United States since 2020</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Access via Taylor &amp; Francis</source><creator>Filimon, Luiza-Maria ; Ivănescu, Mihaela</creator><creatorcontrib>Filimon, Luiza-Maria ; Ivănescu, Mihaela</creatorcontrib><description>Labelled as racist, criticized for promoting racial divisions, and accused of indoctrinating vulnerable young people, Critical Race Theory (CRT) has, in recent years, become, a cause célèbre in the conservative movement, across both the Trumpist contingent and the Republican mainstream. We argue that, inscribing itself in a long tradition of dog-whistles, the anti-CRT panic is predicated on the idea that the contemporary American society is one devoid of systemic forms of racial discrimination and that by deviating from this premise, a form of reverse discrimination targeting Whites is becoming, in effect, systemic. Using document analysis, this article examines how the anti-CRT rhetoric has translated into institutionalized forms that prohibit the use of alleged CRT practices in educational contexts (K-12 level and colleges) and public service. In this sense, we review a swath of anti-CRT initiatives that were passed between 2021 and 2022 in 15 state legislatures across the US. These bills sought to determine how issues pertaining to race, racism, and discrimination are addressed. We find that this was achieved through a multi-pronged approach that focused on: (1) defining sets of prohibited concepts; (2) creating mechanisms to detect perceived CRT-offenses; and (3) dispensing penalties and sanctions against potential transgressors.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0144-2872</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1470-1006</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/01442872.2023.2214088</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Routledge</publisher><subject>anti-critical race theory laws ; Bans ; Critical race theory ; discriminatory practices ; Dog-whistle politics ; education policy ; Ethnic relations ; Legislatures ; Offenses ; Penalties ; Race ; Racial discrimination ; Republican Party ; Reverse discrimination ; Rhetoric ; Sanctions ; State legislatures</subject><ispartof>Policy studies, 2024-03, Vol.45 (2), p.183-204</ispartof><rights>2023 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor &amp; Francis Group 2023</rights><rights>2023 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor &amp; Francis Group</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c286t-fbb7eb63fdd5a38a3236038e7e4c58b7cea06174941891d2c83cada245af4c023</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7916-0562 ; 0000-0001-8111-3303</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/01442872.2023.2214088$$EPDF$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01442872.2023.2214088$$EHTML$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,27875,27933,27934,33783,59656,60445</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Filimon, Luiza-Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ivănescu, Mihaela</creatorcontrib><title>Bans, sanctions, and dog-whistles: a review of anti-critical race theory initiatives adopted in the United States since 2020</title><title>Policy studies</title><description>Labelled as racist, criticized for promoting racial divisions, and accused of indoctrinating vulnerable young people, Critical Race Theory (CRT) has, in recent years, become, a cause célèbre in the conservative movement, across both the Trumpist contingent and the Republican mainstream. We argue that, inscribing itself in a long tradition of dog-whistles, the anti-CRT panic is predicated on the idea that the contemporary American society is one devoid of systemic forms of racial discrimination and that by deviating from this premise, a form of reverse discrimination targeting Whites is becoming, in effect, systemic. Using document analysis, this article examines how the anti-CRT rhetoric has translated into institutionalized forms that prohibit the use of alleged CRT practices in educational contexts (K-12 level and colleges) and public service. In this sense, we review a swath of anti-CRT initiatives that were passed between 2021 and 2022 in 15 state legislatures across the US. These bills sought to determine how issues pertaining to race, racism, and discrimination are addressed. We find that this was achieved through a multi-pronged approach that focused on: (1) defining sets of prohibited concepts; (2) creating mechanisms to detect perceived CRT-offenses; and (3) dispensing penalties and sanctions against potential transgressors.</description><subject>anti-critical race theory laws</subject><subject>Bans</subject><subject>Critical race theory</subject><subject>discriminatory practices</subject><subject>Dog-whistle politics</subject><subject>education policy</subject><subject>Ethnic relations</subject><subject>Legislatures</subject><subject>Offenses</subject><subject>Penalties</subject><subject>Race</subject><subject>Racial discrimination</subject><subject>Republican Party</subject><subject>Reverse discrimination</subject><subject>Rhetoric</subject><subject>Sanctions</subject><subject>State legislatures</subject><issn>0144-2872</issn><issn>1470-1006</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWKs_QQh4dWu-upt6UotfUPCgPYfZJGtTtpuaxJaCP94srVdPmcz7vjPDg9AlJSNKJLkhVAgmKzZihPERY1QQKY_QgIqKFJSQ8hgNek_Rm07RWYxLQghlnA7QzwN08RpH6HRyvi-hM9j4z2K7cDG1Nt5iwMFunN1i32Q1uUIHl5yGFgfQFqeF9WGHXZebkNzGRgzGr5M1udereJ6l_HtPkLIYXZdT-VZyjk4aaKO9OLxDNH96_Ji-FLO359fp_azQTJapaOq6snXJG2PGwCVwxkvCpa2s0GNZV9oCKWklJoLKCTVMS67BABNjaITOTIboaj93HfzXt41JLf136PJKxSYZiqCc967x3qWDjzHYRq2DW0HYKUpUD1r9gVY9aHUAnXN3-5zrGh9WsPWhNSrBrvWhCRmsi4r_P-IXy2-EpA</recordid><startdate>20240303</startdate><enddate>20240303</enddate><creator>Filimon, Luiza-Maria</creator><creator>Ivănescu, Mihaela</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis LLC</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>WZK</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7916-0562</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8111-3303</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240303</creationdate><title>Bans, sanctions, and dog-whistles: a review of anti-critical race theory initiatives adopted in the United States since 2020</title><author>Filimon, Luiza-Maria ; Ivănescu, Mihaela</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c286t-fbb7eb63fdd5a38a3236038e7e4c58b7cea06174941891d2c83cada245af4c023</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>anti-critical race theory laws</topic><topic>Bans</topic><topic>Critical race theory</topic><topic>discriminatory practices</topic><topic>Dog-whistle politics</topic><topic>education policy</topic><topic>Ethnic relations</topic><topic>Legislatures</topic><topic>Offenses</topic><topic>Penalties</topic><topic>Race</topic><topic>Racial discrimination</topic><topic>Republican Party</topic><topic>Reverse discrimination</topic><topic>Rhetoric</topic><topic>Sanctions</topic><topic>State legislatures</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Filimon, Luiza-Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ivănescu, Mihaela</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Policy studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Filimon, Luiza-Maria</au><au>Ivănescu, Mihaela</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Bans, sanctions, and dog-whistles: a review of anti-critical race theory initiatives adopted in the United States since 2020</atitle><jtitle>Policy studies</jtitle><date>2024-03-03</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>183</spage><epage>204</epage><pages>183-204</pages><issn>0144-2872</issn><eissn>1470-1006</eissn><abstract>Labelled as racist, criticized for promoting racial divisions, and accused of indoctrinating vulnerable young people, Critical Race Theory (CRT) has, in recent years, become, a cause célèbre in the conservative movement, across both the Trumpist contingent and the Republican mainstream. We argue that, inscribing itself in a long tradition of dog-whistles, the anti-CRT panic is predicated on the idea that the contemporary American society is one devoid of systemic forms of racial discrimination and that by deviating from this premise, a form of reverse discrimination targeting Whites is becoming, in effect, systemic. Using document analysis, this article examines how the anti-CRT rhetoric has translated into institutionalized forms that prohibit the use of alleged CRT practices in educational contexts (K-12 level and colleges) and public service. In this sense, we review a swath of anti-CRT initiatives that were passed between 2021 and 2022 in 15 state legislatures across the US. These bills sought to determine how issues pertaining to race, racism, and discrimination are addressed. We find that this was achieved through a multi-pronged approach that focused on: (1) defining sets of prohibited concepts; (2) creating mechanisms to detect perceived CRT-offenses; and (3) dispensing penalties and sanctions against potential transgressors.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/01442872.2023.2214088</doi><tpages>22</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7916-0562</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8111-3303</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0144-2872
ispartof Policy studies, 2024-03, Vol.45 (2), p.183-204
issn 0144-2872
1470-1006
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2928741332
source PAIS Index; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Sociological Abstracts; Access via Taylor & Francis
subjects anti-critical race theory laws
Bans
Critical race theory
discriminatory practices
Dog-whistle politics
education policy
Ethnic relations
Legislatures
Offenses
Penalties
Race
Racial discrimination
Republican Party
Reverse discrimination
Rhetoric
Sanctions
State legislatures
title Bans, sanctions, and dog-whistles: a review of anti-critical race theory initiatives adopted in the United States since 2020
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-03T12%3A53%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_infor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Bans,%20sanctions,%20and%20dog-whistles:%20a%20review%20of%20anti-critical%20race%20theory%20initiatives%20adopted%20in%20the%20United%20States%20since%202020&rft.jtitle=Policy%20studies&rft.au=Filimon,%20Luiza-Maria&rft.date=2024-03-03&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=183&rft.epage=204&rft.pages=183-204&rft.issn=0144-2872&rft.eissn=1470-1006&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/01442872.2023.2214088&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_infor%3E2928741332%3C/proquest_infor%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2928741332&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true