Rapid Drawdown Analysis Using Pore Pressures from BBM

Accurate pore pressure prediction under transient seepage conditions following the removal of external water loads, such as rapid drawdown (RDD), requires coupling the effect of changes in both hydraulic boundary conditions and stresses. The Barcelona basic model (BBM), which has been used as a coup...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Geotechnical and geological engineering 2024-03, Vol.42 (2), p.1389-1404
Hauptverfasser: Turkson, Prince, VandenBerge, Daniel R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1404
container_issue 2
container_start_page 1389
container_title Geotechnical and geological engineering
container_volume 42
creator Turkson, Prince
VandenBerge, Daniel R.
description Accurate pore pressure prediction under transient seepage conditions following the removal of external water loads, such as rapid drawdown (RDD), requires coupling the effect of changes in both hydraulic boundary conditions and stresses. The Barcelona basic model (BBM), which has been used as a coupled soil constitutive model to predict pore pressures, is used in this paper to predict pore water pressure for RDD stability analysis. RDD stability is evaluated using predicted pore pressures from the BBM for a hypothetical geometry and for the failed Sparmos Dam. The paper compares the pore pressure assumptions for the BBM to other methods of RDD and highlights the limitations of using the BBM in effective stress RDD stability analysis. Sensitivity analysis revealed that pore pressures following RDD are not affected by the values of the BBM parameters, if varied in reasonable bounds. During drawdown, the BBM simulates the influence of shear stresses on predicted pore pressures only related to an elastic response of the soil, which is not realistic for most soils. Despite these limitations, the pore pressures predicted by BBM calculated the most reasonable factor of safety close to unity using the most likely strength parameters for the failed Sparmos Dam when compared to other common RDD procedures.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10706-023-02624-0
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2928737468</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2928737468</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c270t-da6ab85a0759b2744cdf9d034139a0a5290951bfca326b50aff6770f8b84a103</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWKt_wFPAc3SSbJLNsa1WhYpF6jlkP1K2tLs101L6701dwZuHmbk878vwEHLL4Z4DmAfkYEAzEDKNFhmDMzLgykjGlbDnZABWA5M8F5fkCnEFkDDgA6I-_Lap6GP0h6o7tHTU-vURG6Sf2LRLOu9iTeexRtynRUPsNnQ8frsmF8Gvsb75vUOymD4tJi9s9v78OhnNWCkM7FjltS9y5cEoWwiTZWUVbAUy49J68OkzsIoXofRS6EKBD0EbAyEv8sxzkENy19duY_e1r3HnVt0-pg_RCStyI02m80SJnipjhxjr4Lax2fh4dBzcyY7r7bhkx_3Ycadq2Ycwwe2yjn_V_6S-AfFRZYA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2928737468</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Rapid Drawdown Analysis Using Pore Pressures from BBM</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Turkson, Prince ; VandenBerge, Daniel R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Turkson, Prince ; VandenBerge, Daniel R.</creatorcontrib><description>Accurate pore pressure prediction under transient seepage conditions following the removal of external water loads, such as rapid drawdown (RDD), requires coupling the effect of changes in both hydraulic boundary conditions and stresses. The Barcelona basic model (BBM), which has been used as a coupled soil constitutive model to predict pore pressures, is used in this paper to predict pore water pressure for RDD stability analysis. RDD stability is evaluated using predicted pore pressures from the BBM for a hypothetical geometry and for the failed Sparmos Dam. The paper compares the pore pressure assumptions for the BBM to other methods of RDD and highlights the limitations of using the BBM in effective stress RDD stability analysis. Sensitivity analysis revealed that pore pressures following RDD are not affected by the values of the BBM parameters, if varied in reasonable bounds. During drawdown, the BBM simulates the influence of shear stresses on predicted pore pressures only related to an elastic response of the soil, which is not realistic for most soils. Despite these limitations, the pore pressures predicted by BBM calculated the most reasonable factor of safety close to unity using the most likely strength parameters for the failed Sparmos Dam when compared to other common RDD procedures.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0960-3182</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-1529</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10706-023-02624-0</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Boundary conditions ; Civil Engineering ; Constitutive models ; Dams ; Drawdown ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Earth Sciences ; External pressure ; Geotechnical Engineering &amp; Applied Earth Sciences ; Hydraulics ; Hydrogeology ; Hydrostatic pressure ; Levees &amp; battures ; Mathematical models ; Methods ; Original Paper ; Parameters ; Pore pressure ; Pore water ; Pore water pressure ; Safety factors ; Seepage ; Sensitivity analysis ; Shear strength ; Shear stress ; Soil ; Soils ; Stability ; Stability analysis ; Stress analysis ; Stresses ; Terrestrial Pollution ; Waste Management/Waste Technology ; Water pressure</subject><ispartof>Geotechnical and geological engineering, 2024-03, Vol.42 (2), p.1389-1404</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c270t-da6ab85a0759b2744cdf9d034139a0a5290951bfca326b50aff6770f8b84a103</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10706-023-02624-0$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10706-023-02624-0$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Turkson, Prince</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VandenBerge, Daniel R.</creatorcontrib><title>Rapid Drawdown Analysis Using Pore Pressures from BBM</title><title>Geotechnical and geological engineering</title><addtitle>Geotech Geol Eng</addtitle><description>Accurate pore pressure prediction under transient seepage conditions following the removal of external water loads, such as rapid drawdown (RDD), requires coupling the effect of changes in both hydraulic boundary conditions and stresses. The Barcelona basic model (BBM), which has been used as a coupled soil constitutive model to predict pore pressures, is used in this paper to predict pore water pressure for RDD stability analysis. RDD stability is evaluated using predicted pore pressures from the BBM for a hypothetical geometry and for the failed Sparmos Dam. The paper compares the pore pressure assumptions for the BBM to other methods of RDD and highlights the limitations of using the BBM in effective stress RDD stability analysis. Sensitivity analysis revealed that pore pressures following RDD are not affected by the values of the BBM parameters, if varied in reasonable bounds. During drawdown, the BBM simulates the influence of shear stresses on predicted pore pressures only related to an elastic response of the soil, which is not realistic for most soils. Despite these limitations, the pore pressures predicted by BBM calculated the most reasonable factor of safety close to unity using the most likely strength parameters for the failed Sparmos Dam when compared to other common RDD procedures.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Boundary conditions</subject><subject>Civil Engineering</subject><subject>Constitutive models</subject><subject>Dams</subject><subject>Drawdown</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>External pressure</subject><subject>Geotechnical Engineering &amp; Applied Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Hydraulics</subject><subject>Hydrogeology</subject><subject>Hydrostatic pressure</subject><subject>Levees &amp; battures</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Parameters</subject><subject>Pore pressure</subject><subject>Pore water</subject><subject>Pore water pressure</subject><subject>Safety factors</subject><subject>Seepage</subject><subject>Sensitivity analysis</subject><subject>Shear strength</subject><subject>Shear stress</subject><subject>Soil</subject><subject>Soils</subject><subject>Stability</subject><subject>Stability analysis</subject><subject>Stress analysis</subject><subject>Stresses</subject><subject>Terrestrial Pollution</subject><subject>Waste Management/Waste Technology</subject><subject>Water pressure</subject><issn>0960-3182</issn><issn>1573-1529</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWKt_wFPAc3SSbJLNsa1WhYpF6jlkP1K2tLs101L6701dwZuHmbk878vwEHLL4Z4DmAfkYEAzEDKNFhmDMzLgykjGlbDnZABWA5M8F5fkCnEFkDDgA6I-_Lap6GP0h6o7tHTU-vURG6Sf2LRLOu9iTeexRtynRUPsNnQ8frsmF8Gvsb75vUOymD4tJi9s9v78OhnNWCkM7FjltS9y5cEoWwiTZWUVbAUy49J68OkzsIoXofRS6EKBD0EbAyEv8sxzkENy19duY_e1r3HnVt0-pg_RCStyI02m80SJnipjhxjr4Lax2fh4dBzcyY7r7bhkx_3Ycadq2Ycwwe2yjn_V_6S-AfFRZYA</recordid><startdate>20240301</startdate><enddate>20240301</enddate><creator>Turkson, Prince</creator><creator>VandenBerge, Daniel R.</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240301</creationdate><title>Rapid Drawdown Analysis Using Pore Pressures from BBM</title><author>Turkson, Prince ; VandenBerge, Daniel R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c270t-da6ab85a0759b2744cdf9d034139a0a5290951bfca326b50aff6770f8b84a103</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Boundary conditions</topic><topic>Civil Engineering</topic><topic>Constitutive models</topic><topic>Dams</topic><topic>Drawdown</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>External pressure</topic><topic>Geotechnical Engineering &amp; Applied Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Hydraulics</topic><topic>Hydrogeology</topic><topic>Hydrostatic pressure</topic><topic>Levees &amp; battures</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Parameters</topic><topic>Pore pressure</topic><topic>Pore water</topic><topic>Pore water pressure</topic><topic>Safety factors</topic><topic>Seepage</topic><topic>Sensitivity analysis</topic><topic>Shear strength</topic><topic>Shear stress</topic><topic>Soil</topic><topic>Soils</topic><topic>Stability</topic><topic>Stability analysis</topic><topic>Stress analysis</topic><topic>Stresses</topic><topic>Terrestrial Pollution</topic><topic>Waste Management/Waste Technology</topic><topic>Water pressure</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Turkson, Prince</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VandenBerge, Daniel R.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Geotechnical and geological engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Turkson, Prince</au><au>VandenBerge, Daniel R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Rapid Drawdown Analysis Using Pore Pressures from BBM</atitle><jtitle>Geotechnical and geological engineering</jtitle><stitle>Geotech Geol Eng</stitle><date>2024-03-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>1389</spage><epage>1404</epage><pages>1389-1404</pages><issn>0960-3182</issn><eissn>1573-1529</eissn><abstract>Accurate pore pressure prediction under transient seepage conditions following the removal of external water loads, such as rapid drawdown (RDD), requires coupling the effect of changes in both hydraulic boundary conditions and stresses. The Barcelona basic model (BBM), which has been used as a coupled soil constitutive model to predict pore pressures, is used in this paper to predict pore water pressure for RDD stability analysis. RDD stability is evaluated using predicted pore pressures from the BBM for a hypothetical geometry and for the failed Sparmos Dam. The paper compares the pore pressure assumptions for the BBM to other methods of RDD and highlights the limitations of using the BBM in effective stress RDD stability analysis. Sensitivity analysis revealed that pore pressures following RDD are not affected by the values of the BBM parameters, if varied in reasonable bounds. During drawdown, the BBM simulates the influence of shear stresses on predicted pore pressures only related to an elastic response of the soil, which is not realistic for most soils. Despite these limitations, the pore pressures predicted by BBM calculated the most reasonable factor of safety close to unity using the most likely strength parameters for the failed Sparmos Dam when compared to other common RDD procedures.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><doi>10.1007/s10706-023-02624-0</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0960-3182
ispartof Geotechnical and geological engineering, 2024-03, Vol.42 (2), p.1389-1404
issn 0960-3182
1573-1529
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2928737468
source SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Analysis
Boundary conditions
Civil Engineering
Constitutive models
Dams
Drawdown
Earth and Environmental Science
Earth Sciences
External pressure
Geotechnical Engineering & Applied Earth Sciences
Hydraulics
Hydrogeology
Hydrostatic pressure
Levees & battures
Mathematical models
Methods
Original Paper
Parameters
Pore pressure
Pore water
Pore water pressure
Safety factors
Seepage
Sensitivity analysis
Shear strength
Shear stress
Soil
Soils
Stability
Stability analysis
Stress analysis
Stresses
Terrestrial Pollution
Waste Management/Waste Technology
Water pressure
title Rapid Drawdown Analysis Using Pore Pressures from BBM
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T18%3A22%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Rapid%20Drawdown%20Analysis%20Using%20Pore%20Pressures%20from%20BBM&rft.jtitle=Geotechnical%20and%20geological%20engineering&rft.au=Turkson,%20Prince&rft.date=2024-03-01&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=1389&rft.epage=1404&rft.pages=1389-1404&rft.issn=0960-3182&rft.eissn=1573-1529&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10706-023-02624-0&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2928737468%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2928737468&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true