Galaxy cluster mass bias from projected mass maps

The determination of the mass of galaxy clusters from observations is subject to systematic uncertainties. Beyond the errors due to instrumental and observational systematic effects, in this work we investigate the bias introduced by modelling assumptions. In particular, we consider the reconstructi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Astronomy and astrophysics (Berlin) 2024-02, Vol.682
Hauptverfasser: Muñoz-Echeverría, M, Macías-Pérez, J F, Artis, E, Cui, W, de Andres, D, De Luca, F, De Petris, M, Ferragamo, A, Giocoli, C, Hanser, C, Mayet, F, Meneghetti, M, Moyer-Anin, A, Paliwal, A, Perotto, L, Rasia, E, Yepes, G
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title Astronomy and astrophysics (Berlin)
container_volume 682
creator Muñoz-Echeverría, M
Macías-Pérez, J F
Artis, E
Cui, W
de Andres, D
De Luca, F
De Petris, M
Ferragamo, A
Giocoli, C
Hanser, C
Mayet, F
Meneghetti, M
Moyer-Anin, A
Paliwal, A
Perotto, L
Rasia, E
Yepes, G
description The determination of the mass of galaxy clusters from observations is subject to systematic uncertainties. Beyond the errors due to instrumental and observational systematic effects, in this work we investigate the bias introduced by modelling assumptions. In particular, we consider the reconstruction of the mass of galaxy clusters from convergence maps employing spherical mass density models. We made use of THE THREE HUNDRED simulations, selecting clusters in the same redshift and mass range as the NIKA2 Sunyaev-Zel’dovich Large Programme sample: 3 ≤ M500/1014 M⊙ ≤ 10 and 0.5 ≤ z ≤ 0.9. We studied different modelling and intrinsic uncertainties that should be accounted for when using the single cluster mass estimates for scaling relations. We confirm that the orientation of clusters and the radial ranges considered for the fit have an important impact on the mass bias. The effect of the projection adds uncertainties to the order of 10–16% to the mass estimates. We also find that the scatter from cluster to cluster in the mass bias when using spherical mass models is less than 9% of the true mass of the clusters.
doi_str_mv 10.1051/0004-6361/202346986
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2928378159</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2928378159</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p1436-f6bb25f241574d95e29b93e7937d9cdf2a58a05c04324190bb81af3aefa7490d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9jk9LxDAUxIMoWFc_gZeC57rv5X-OsugqLHjR8_LSJGBpbW1a0G9vYMXTMMwwv2HsFuEeQeEWAGSjhcYtBy6kdlafsQql4A0Yqc9Z9d-4ZFc5d8VytKJiuKeevn_qtl_zEud6oJxr_0G5TvM41NM8drFdYjgFA035ml0k6nO8-dMNe396fNs9N4fX_cvu4dBMhaubpL3nKnGJysjgVOTOOxGNEya4NiROyhKoFspJiQ68t0hJUExkpIMgNuzutFs-fK0xL8duXOfPgjxyx60wFpUTvx6nRbQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2928378159</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Galaxy cluster mass bias from projected mass maps</title><source>Bacon EDP Sciences France Licence nationale-ISTEX-PS-Journals-PFISTEX</source><source>EDP Sciences</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Muñoz-Echeverría, M ; Macías-Pérez, J F ; Artis, E ; Cui, W ; de Andres, D ; De Luca, F ; De Petris, M ; Ferragamo, A ; Giocoli, C ; Hanser, C ; Mayet, F ; Meneghetti, M ; Moyer-Anin, A ; Paliwal, A ; Perotto, L ; Rasia, E ; Yepes, G</creator><creatorcontrib>Muñoz-Echeverría, M ; Macías-Pérez, J F ; Artis, E ; Cui, W ; de Andres, D ; De Luca, F ; De Petris, M ; Ferragamo, A ; Giocoli, C ; Hanser, C ; Mayet, F ; Meneghetti, M ; Moyer-Anin, A ; Paliwal, A ; Perotto, L ; Rasia, E ; Yepes, G</creatorcontrib><description>The determination of the mass of galaxy clusters from observations is subject to systematic uncertainties. Beyond the errors due to instrumental and observational systematic effects, in this work we investigate the bias introduced by modelling assumptions. In particular, we consider the reconstruction of the mass of galaxy clusters from convergence maps employing spherical mass density models. We made use of THE THREE HUNDRED simulations, selecting clusters in the same redshift and mass range as the NIKA2 Sunyaev-Zel’dovich Large Programme sample: 3 ≤ M500/1014 M⊙ ≤ 10 and 0.5 ≤ z ≤ 0.9. We studied different modelling and intrinsic uncertainties that should be accounted for when using the single cluster mass estimates for scaling relations. We confirm that the orientation of clusters and the radial ranges considered for the fit have an important impact on the mass bias. The effect of the projection adds uncertainties to the order of 10–16% to the mass estimates. We also find that the scatter from cluster to cluster in the mass bias when using spherical mass models is less than 9% of the true mass of the clusters.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0004-6361</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-0746</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/202346986</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Heidelberg: EDP Sciences</publisher><subject>Astronomical models ; Bias ; Estimates ; Galactic clusters ; Red shift ; Uncertainty</subject><ispartof>Astronomy and astrophysics (Berlin), 2024-02, Vol.682</ispartof><rights>2024. This work is licensed under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Muñoz-Echeverría, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Macías-Pérez, J F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Artis, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cui, W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Andres, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Luca, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Petris, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferragamo, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giocoli, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hanser, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mayet, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meneghetti, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moyer-Anin, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paliwal, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perotto, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rasia, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yepes, G</creatorcontrib><title>Galaxy cluster mass bias from projected mass maps</title><title>Astronomy and astrophysics (Berlin)</title><description>The determination of the mass of galaxy clusters from observations is subject to systematic uncertainties. Beyond the errors due to instrumental and observational systematic effects, in this work we investigate the bias introduced by modelling assumptions. In particular, we consider the reconstruction of the mass of galaxy clusters from convergence maps employing spherical mass density models. We made use of THE THREE HUNDRED simulations, selecting clusters in the same redshift and mass range as the NIKA2 Sunyaev-Zel’dovich Large Programme sample: 3 ≤ M500/1014 M⊙ ≤ 10 and 0.5 ≤ z ≤ 0.9. We studied different modelling and intrinsic uncertainties that should be accounted for when using the single cluster mass estimates for scaling relations. We confirm that the orientation of clusters and the radial ranges considered for the fit have an important impact on the mass bias. The effect of the projection adds uncertainties to the order of 10–16% to the mass estimates. We also find that the scatter from cluster to cluster in the mass bias when using spherical mass models is less than 9% of the true mass of the clusters.</description><subject>Astronomical models</subject><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Estimates</subject><subject>Galactic clusters</subject><subject>Red shift</subject><subject>Uncertainty</subject><issn>0004-6361</issn><issn>1432-0746</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9jk9LxDAUxIMoWFc_gZeC57rv5X-OsugqLHjR8_LSJGBpbW1a0G9vYMXTMMwwv2HsFuEeQeEWAGSjhcYtBy6kdlafsQql4A0Yqc9Z9d-4ZFc5d8VytKJiuKeevn_qtl_zEud6oJxr_0G5TvM41NM8drFdYjgFA035ml0k6nO8-dMNe396fNs9N4fX_cvu4dBMhaubpL3nKnGJysjgVOTOOxGNEya4NiROyhKoFspJiQ68t0hJUExkpIMgNuzutFs-fK0xL8duXOfPgjxyx60wFpUTvx6nRbQ</recordid><startdate>20240201</startdate><enddate>20240201</enddate><creator>Muñoz-Echeverría, M</creator><creator>Macías-Pérez, J F</creator><creator>Artis, E</creator><creator>Cui, W</creator><creator>de Andres, D</creator><creator>De Luca, F</creator><creator>De Petris, M</creator><creator>Ferragamo, A</creator><creator>Giocoli, C</creator><creator>Hanser, C</creator><creator>Mayet, F</creator><creator>Meneghetti, M</creator><creator>Moyer-Anin, A</creator><creator>Paliwal, A</creator><creator>Perotto, L</creator><creator>Rasia, E</creator><creator>Yepes, G</creator><general>EDP Sciences</general><scope>8FD</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240201</creationdate><title>Galaxy cluster mass bias from projected mass maps</title><author>Muñoz-Echeverría, M ; Macías-Pérez, J F ; Artis, E ; Cui, W ; de Andres, D ; De Luca, F ; De Petris, M ; Ferragamo, A ; Giocoli, C ; Hanser, C ; Mayet, F ; Meneghetti, M ; Moyer-Anin, A ; Paliwal, A ; Perotto, L ; Rasia, E ; Yepes, G</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p1436-f6bb25f241574d95e29b93e7937d9cdf2a58a05c04324190bb81af3aefa7490d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Astronomical models</topic><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Estimates</topic><topic>Galactic clusters</topic><topic>Red shift</topic><topic>Uncertainty</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Muñoz-Echeverría, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Macías-Pérez, J F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Artis, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cui, W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Andres, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Luca, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Petris, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferragamo, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giocoli, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hanser, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mayet, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meneghetti, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moyer-Anin, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paliwal, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perotto, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rasia, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yepes, G</creatorcontrib><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Astronomy and astrophysics (Berlin)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Muñoz-Echeverría, M</au><au>Macías-Pérez, J F</au><au>Artis, E</au><au>Cui, W</au><au>de Andres, D</au><au>De Luca, F</au><au>De Petris, M</au><au>Ferragamo, A</au><au>Giocoli, C</au><au>Hanser, C</au><au>Mayet, F</au><au>Meneghetti, M</au><au>Moyer-Anin, A</au><au>Paliwal, A</au><au>Perotto, L</au><au>Rasia, E</au><au>Yepes, G</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Galaxy cluster mass bias from projected mass maps</atitle><jtitle>Astronomy and astrophysics (Berlin)</jtitle><date>2024-02-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>682</volume><issn>0004-6361</issn><eissn>1432-0746</eissn><abstract>The determination of the mass of galaxy clusters from observations is subject to systematic uncertainties. Beyond the errors due to instrumental and observational systematic effects, in this work we investigate the bias introduced by modelling assumptions. In particular, we consider the reconstruction of the mass of galaxy clusters from convergence maps employing spherical mass density models. We made use of THE THREE HUNDRED simulations, selecting clusters in the same redshift and mass range as the NIKA2 Sunyaev-Zel’dovich Large Programme sample: 3 ≤ M500/1014 M⊙ ≤ 10 and 0.5 ≤ z ≤ 0.9. We studied different modelling and intrinsic uncertainties that should be accounted for when using the single cluster mass estimates for scaling relations. We confirm that the orientation of clusters and the radial ranges considered for the fit have an important impact on the mass bias. The effect of the projection adds uncertainties to the order of 10–16% to the mass estimates. We also find that the scatter from cluster to cluster in the mass bias when using spherical mass models is less than 9% of the true mass of the clusters.</abstract><cop>Heidelberg</cop><pub>EDP Sciences</pub><doi>10.1051/0004-6361/202346986</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0004-6361
ispartof Astronomy and astrophysics (Berlin), 2024-02, Vol.682
issn 0004-6361
1432-0746
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2928378159
source Bacon EDP Sciences France Licence nationale-ISTEX-PS-Journals-PFISTEX; EDP Sciences; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Astronomical models
Bias
Estimates
Galactic clusters
Red shift
Uncertainty
title Galaxy cluster mass bias from projected mass maps
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T11%3A37%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Galaxy%20cluster%20mass%20bias%20from%20projected%20mass%20maps&rft.jtitle=Astronomy%20and%20astrophysics%20(Berlin)&rft.au=Mu%C3%B1oz-Echeverr%C3%ADa,%20M&rft.date=2024-02-01&rft.volume=682&rft.issn=0004-6361&rft.eissn=1432-0746&rft_id=info:doi/10.1051/0004-6361/202346986&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2928378159%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2928378159&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true