Antifungal strains M1-8 and M6-4 as biocontrol agents against Aspergillus flavus on peanut kernels
Aspergillus flavus is the main pathogenic fungi for peanut kernels, and it has highly negative economic and health impacts. To explore the biological control agent against A. flavus, two antagonistic strains were screened from 70 bacteria isolates from moldy stuff and identified as Burkholderia plan...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Quality assurance and safety of crops & food 2023-01, Vol.15 (4), p.116-124 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 124 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 116 |
container_title | Quality assurance and safety of crops & food |
container_volume | 15 |
creator | Yi, Yanjie Shan, Youtian Lou, Yu Ning, Zhiwen Zhang, Qingyao Yang, Yingao Liang, Yuqian Shi, Jinsheng Hou, Zhipeng |
description | Aspergillus flavus is the main pathogenic fungi for peanut kernels, and it has highly negative economic and health impacts. To explore the biological control agent against A. flavus, two antagonistic strains were screened from 70 bacteria isolates from moldy stuff and identified as Burkholderia plantarii M1-8 and Burkholderia glumae M6-4. In vitro pathogen inhibition determination indicated culture filtrates of M1-8 and M6-4 had distinct inhibition zones and could decrease the mycelial growth of A. flavus. Furthermore, the biocontrol assay showed moldy rates of peanut seeds treated with culture filtrate were much lower than that of the control group. The biocontrol -efficacy of M1-8 and M6-4 culture filtrate reached 88.6% and 84.2%, respectively, which were higher than that of the sorbic acid treatment group. Moreover, culture filtrate of M1-8 was tolerant to proteinase K, high light, pH and temperature (below 70°C), and had good stability of antifungal activity. The results indicate that these two antifungal strains could be used as biocontrol agents for controlling A. flavus during the peanut supply and -storage period. |
doi_str_mv | 10.15586/qas.v15i4.1186 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2927859860</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2927859860</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c269t-f74e4cd3837b5d34117bffe631648f2e73b2905ad3667d5acccea74b125d22703</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kL1OwzAUhS0EEqUws1piThrb8U_GquJPasUCEpvlJHaVEpzU16nE2_RZ-mSkLWI6Z_h079GH0D3JUsK5ErOtgXRHeJOnhChxgSZEcpkoJj8v_7sg1-gGYJNlQgpJJ6ie-9i4wa9NiyEG03jAK5IobHyNVyLJsQFcNl3V-Ri6Fpu19RHGOJLxsJ9Db8O6adsBsGvNboDDvvO4t8YPEX_Z4G0Lt-jKmRbs3V9O0cfT4_viJVm-Pb8u5sukoqKIiZO5zauajZNLXrOcEFk6ZwUjIleOWslKWmTc1EwIWXNTVZU1Mi8J5TWlMmNT9HC-24duO1iIetMNwY8vNS2oVLxQ4kjNzlQVOoBgne5D823CjyaZPqnUo0p9UqmPKtkvE_NqGA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2927859860</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Antifungal strains M1-8 and M6-4 as biocontrol agents against Aspergillus flavus on peanut kernels</title><source>Wageningen Academic Publishers Open Access</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Yi, Yanjie ; Shan, Youtian ; Lou, Yu ; Ning, Zhiwen ; Zhang, Qingyao ; Yang, Yingao ; Liang, Yuqian ; Shi, Jinsheng ; Hou, Zhipeng</creator><creatorcontrib>Yi, Yanjie ; Shan, Youtian ; Lou, Yu ; Ning, Zhiwen ; Zhang, Qingyao ; Yang, Yingao ; Liang, Yuqian ; Shi, Jinsheng ; Hou, Zhipeng</creatorcontrib><description>Aspergillus flavus is the main pathogenic fungi for peanut kernels, and it has highly negative economic and health impacts. To explore the biological control agent against A. flavus, two antagonistic strains were screened from 70 bacteria isolates from moldy stuff and identified as Burkholderia plantarii M1-8 and Burkholderia glumae M6-4. In vitro pathogen inhibition determination indicated culture filtrates of M1-8 and M6-4 had distinct inhibition zones and could decrease the mycelial growth of A. flavus. Furthermore, the biocontrol assay showed moldy rates of peanut seeds treated with culture filtrate were much lower than that of the control group. The biocontrol -efficacy of M1-8 and M6-4 culture filtrate reached 88.6% and 84.2%, respectively, which were higher than that of the sorbic acid treatment group. Moreover, culture filtrate of M1-8 was tolerant to proteinase K, high light, pH and temperature (below 70°C), and had good stability of antifungal activity. The results indicate that these two antifungal strains could be used as biocontrol agents for controlling A. flavus during the peanut supply and -storage period.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1757-8361</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1757-837X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.15586/qas.v15i4.1186</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Brisbane: Codon Publications</publisher><subject>Antifungal activity ; Antifungal agents ; Aspergillus flavus ; Bacteria ; Biological control ; Endopeptidase K ; Filtrate ; Food contamination & poisoning ; Fungicides ; Legumes ; Maximum likelihood method ; Peanuts ; Proteinase ; Seeds ; Sorbic acid ; Strains (organisms) ; Temperature tolerance ; Variance analysis</subject><ispartof>Quality assurance and safety of crops & food, 2023-01, Vol.15 (4), p.116-124</ispartof><rights>2023. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c269t-f74e4cd3837b5d34117bffe631648f2e73b2905ad3667d5acccea74b125d22703</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yi, Yanjie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shan, Youtian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lou, Yu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ning, Zhiwen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Qingyao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Yingao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liang, Yuqian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shi, Jinsheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hou, Zhipeng</creatorcontrib><title>Antifungal strains M1-8 and M6-4 as biocontrol agents against Aspergillus flavus on peanut kernels</title><title>Quality assurance and safety of crops & food</title><description>Aspergillus flavus is the main pathogenic fungi for peanut kernels, and it has highly negative economic and health impacts. To explore the biological control agent against A. flavus, two antagonistic strains were screened from 70 bacteria isolates from moldy stuff and identified as Burkholderia plantarii M1-8 and Burkholderia glumae M6-4. In vitro pathogen inhibition determination indicated culture filtrates of M1-8 and M6-4 had distinct inhibition zones and could decrease the mycelial growth of A. flavus. Furthermore, the biocontrol assay showed moldy rates of peanut seeds treated with culture filtrate were much lower than that of the control group. The biocontrol -efficacy of M1-8 and M6-4 culture filtrate reached 88.6% and 84.2%, respectively, which were higher than that of the sorbic acid treatment group. Moreover, culture filtrate of M1-8 was tolerant to proteinase K, high light, pH and temperature (below 70°C), and had good stability of antifungal activity. The results indicate that these two antifungal strains could be used as biocontrol agents for controlling A. flavus during the peanut supply and -storage period.</description><subject>Antifungal activity</subject><subject>Antifungal agents</subject><subject>Aspergillus flavus</subject><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>Biological control</subject><subject>Endopeptidase K</subject><subject>Filtrate</subject><subject>Food contamination & poisoning</subject><subject>Fungicides</subject><subject>Legumes</subject><subject>Maximum likelihood method</subject><subject>Peanuts</subject><subject>Proteinase</subject><subject>Seeds</subject><subject>Sorbic acid</subject><subject>Strains (organisms)</subject><subject>Temperature tolerance</subject><subject>Variance analysis</subject><issn>1757-8361</issn><issn>1757-837X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kL1OwzAUhS0EEqUws1piThrb8U_GquJPasUCEpvlJHaVEpzU16nE2_RZ-mSkLWI6Z_h079GH0D3JUsK5ErOtgXRHeJOnhChxgSZEcpkoJj8v_7sg1-gGYJNlQgpJJ6ie-9i4wa9NiyEG03jAK5IobHyNVyLJsQFcNl3V-Ri6Fpu19RHGOJLxsJ9Db8O6adsBsGvNboDDvvO4t8YPEX_Z4G0Lt-jKmRbs3V9O0cfT4_viJVm-Pb8u5sukoqKIiZO5zauajZNLXrOcEFk6ZwUjIleOWslKWmTc1EwIWXNTVZU1Mi8J5TWlMmNT9HC-24duO1iIetMNwY8vNS2oVLxQ4kjNzlQVOoBgne5D823CjyaZPqnUo0p9UqmPKtkvE_NqGA</recordid><startdate>20230101</startdate><enddate>20230101</enddate><creator>Yi, Yanjie</creator><creator>Shan, Youtian</creator><creator>Lou, Yu</creator><creator>Ning, Zhiwen</creator><creator>Zhang, Qingyao</creator><creator>Yang, Yingao</creator><creator>Liang, Yuqian</creator><creator>Shi, Jinsheng</creator><creator>Hou, Zhipeng</creator><general>Codon Publications</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PYYUZ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230101</creationdate><title>Antifungal strains M1-8 and M6-4 as biocontrol agents against Aspergillus flavus on peanut kernels</title><author>Yi, Yanjie ; Shan, Youtian ; Lou, Yu ; Ning, Zhiwen ; Zhang, Qingyao ; Yang, Yingao ; Liang, Yuqian ; Shi, Jinsheng ; Hou, Zhipeng</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c269t-f74e4cd3837b5d34117bffe631648f2e73b2905ad3667d5acccea74b125d22703</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Antifungal activity</topic><topic>Antifungal agents</topic><topic>Aspergillus flavus</topic><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>Biological control</topic><topic>Endopeptidase K</topic><topic>Filtrate</topic><topic>Food contamination & poisoning</topic><topic>Fungicides</topic><topic>Legumes</topic><topic>Maximum likelihood method</topic><topic>Peanuts</topic><topic>Proteinase</topic><topic>Seeds</topic><topic>Sorbic acid</topic><topic>Strains (organisms)</topic><topic>Temperature tolerance</topic><topic>Variance analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yi, Yanjie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shan, Youtian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lou, Yu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ning, Zhiwen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Qingyao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Yingao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liang, Yuqian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shi, Jinsheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hou, Zhipeng</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Quality assurance and safety of crops & food</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yi, Yanjie</au><au>Shan, Youtian</au><au>Lou, Yu</au><au>Ning, Zhiwen</au><au>Zhang, Qingyao</au><au>Yang, Yingao</au><au>Liang, Yuqian</au><au>Shi, Jinsheng</au><au>Hou, Zhipeng</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Antifungal strains M1-8 and M6-4 as biocontrol agents against Aspergillus flavus on peanut kernels</atitle><jtitle>Quality assurance and safety of crops & food</jtitle><date>2023-01-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>116</spage><epage>124</epage><pages>116-124</pages><issn>1757-8361</issn><eissn>1757-837X</eissn><abstract>Aspergillus flavus is the main pathogenic fungi for peanut kernels, and it has highly negative economic and health impacts. To explore the biological control agent against A. flavus, two antagonistic strains were screened from 70 bacteria isolates from moldy stuff and identified as Burkholderia plantarii M1-8 and Burkholderia glumae M6-4. In vitro pathogen inhibition determination indicated culture filtrates of M1-8 and M6-4 had distinct inhibition zones and could decrease the mycelial growth of A. flavus. Furthermore, the biocontrol assay showed moldy rates of peanut seeds treated with culture filtrate were much lower than that of the control group. The biocontrol -efficacy of M1-8 and M6-4 culture filtrate reached 88.6% and 84.2%, respectively, which were higher than that of the sorbic acid treatment group. Moreover, culture filtrate of M1-8 was tolerant to proteinase K, high light, pH and temperature (below 70°C), and had good stability of antifungal activity. The results indicate that these two antifungal strains could be used as biocontrol agents for controlling A. flavus during the peanut supply and -storage period.</abstract><cop>Brisbane</cop><pub>Codon Publications</pub><doi>10.15586/qas.v15i4.1186</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1757-8361 |
ispartof | Quality assurance and safety of crops & food, 2023-01, Vol.15 (4), p.116-124 |
issn | 1757-8361 1757-837X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2927859860 |
source | Wageningen Academic Publishers Open Access; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals |
subjects | Antifungal activity Antifungal agents Aspergillus flavus Bacteria Biological control Endopeptidase K Filtrate Food contamination & poisoning Fungicides Legumes Maximum likelihood method Peanuts Proteinase Seeds Sorbic acid Strains (organisms) Temperature tolerance Variance analysis |
title | Antifungal strains M1-8 and M6-4 as biocontrol agents against Aspergillus flavus on peanut kernels |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T01%3A28%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Antifungal%20strains%20M1-8%20and%20M6-4%20as%20biocontrol%20agents%20against%C2%A0Aspergillus%20flavus%C2%A0on%20peanut%20kernels&rft.jtitle=Quality%20assurance%20and%20safety%20of%20crops%20&%20food&rft.au=Yi,%20Yanjie&rft.date=2023-01-01&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=116&rft.epage=124&rft.pages=116-124&rft.issn=1757-8361&rft.eissn=1757-837X&rft_id=info:doi/10.15586/qas.v15i4.1186&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2927859860%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2927859860&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |