Impacts of U.S. countervailing duties on phosphate fertilizers
Countervailing duties are a trade policy instrument by which importing governments tax imports that are found to benefit from foreign subsidies. Thus, in effect, these duties attempt to remedy market distortions generated by foreign subsidies by further distorting market mechanisms. On March 11, 202...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | American journal of agricultural economics 2024-03, Vol.106 (2), p.620-636 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 636 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 620 |
container_title | American journal of agricultural economics |
container_volume | 106 |
creator | Beeler, Ashley Schaefer, K. Aleks Sestak, Jacob Conover, Glenn |
description | Countervailing duties are a trade policy instrument by which importing governments tax imports that are found to benefit from foreign subsidies. Thus, in effect, these duties attempt to remedy market distortions generated by foreign subsidies by further distorting market mechanisms. On March 11, 2021, the U.S. International Trade Commission issued duties ranging between 19.97% and 47.05% on Moroccan phosphate imports upon finding that Moroccan exports had been receiving unfair government subsidies. In this research, we estimate the impacts of these duties on U.S. diammonium phosphate and triple superphosphate fertilizers, as well as long‐run downstream prices of five U.S. row crops with the largest phosphate usage. Using these results, we assess the implications for gross receipts in the U.S. fertilizer industry and gross margins for American farmers. We also calculate the implied change in expenditure for agricultural end users. We find that the countervailing duties have increased U.S. phosphate fertilizer prices by approximately 34% over counterfactual levels. This corresponds to an expected downstream price response ranging from around 10% for corn, cotton, and sorghum to between 1% and 4% for soybeans and wheat. This market distortion generates a $23 billion increase in gross receipts for a concentrated domestic fertilizer industry while shrinking gross margins for American farmers by 2% and 8% and increasing agricultural user expenditures by approximately $10.84 billion. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/ajae.12401 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2927103008</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2927103008</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3911-ecd7da1cb5f4b5f94a3440b4f8edc38e023001318b46059d6b59b1e331d4111f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMouK5e_AUFb0JrJkk_chGWZf1iwYPuOaTp1O2y29SkVdZfb9YK3gwMYZhn3pl5CbkEmkB4N3qjMQEmKByRCYgsjwuWZ8dkQillsaSSnZIz7zchpSCLCbl93HXa9D6ydbRKXpLI2KHt0X3oZtu0b1E19A2Gaht1a-u7te4xqtH1ofqFzp-Tk1pvPV78_lOyulu8zh_i5fP943y2jA2XADGaKq80mDKtRQgpNBeClqIusDK8QMp42IdDUYqMprLKylSWgJxDJcJZNZ-Sq1G3c_Z9QN-rjR1cG0YqJlkONPQXgboeKeOs9w5r1blmp91eAVUHf9TBH_XjT4CjEUZj28b_oYUEmjKRsYDAiHw2W9z_I6ZmT7PFKPsNtVFwtQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2927103008</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Impacts of U.S. countervailing duties on phosphate fertilizers</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>PAIS Index</source><creator>Beeler, Ashley ; Schaefer, K. Aleks ; Sestak, Jacob ; Conover, Glenn</creator><creatorcontrib>Beeler, Ashley ; Schaefer, K. Aleks ; Sestak, Jacob ; Conover, Glenn</creatorcontrib><description>Countervailing duties are a trade policy instrument by which importing governments tax imports that are found to benefit from foreign subsidies. Thus, in effect, these duties attempt to remedy market distortions generated by foreign subsidies by further distorting market mechanisms. On March 11, 2021, the U.S. International Trade Commission issued duties ranging between 19.97% and 47.05% on Moroccan phosphate imports upon finding that Moroccan exports had been receiving unfair government subsidies. In this research, we estimate the impacts of these duties on U.S. diammonium phosphate and triple superphosphate fertilizers, as well as long‐run downstream prices of five U.S. row crops with the largest phosphate usage. Using these results, we assess the implications for gross receipts in the U.S. fertilizer industry and gross margins for American farmers. We also calculate the implied change in expenditure for agricultural end users. We find that the countervailing duties have increased U.S. phosphate fertilizer prices by approximately 34% over counterfactual levels. This corresponds to an expected downstream price response ranging from around 10% for corn, cotton, and sorghum to between 1% and 4% for soybeans and wheat. This market distortion generates a $23 billion increase in gross receipts for a concentrated domestic fertilizer industry while shrinking gross margins for American farmers by 2% and 8% and increasing agricultural user expenditures by approximately $10.84 billion.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9092</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-8276</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/ajae.12401</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boston, USA: Wiley Periodicals, Inc</publisher><subject>Agriculture ; Cotton ; countervailing duties ; Crops ; Distortion ; downstream impacts ; End users ; Expenditures ; Exports ; Farmers ; fertilizer prices ; Fertilizers ; Imports ; International trade ; Markets ; Phosphate ; Prices ; Sorghum ; Soybeans ; Subsidies ; Tariffs ; Trade policy ; Wheat</subject><ispartof>American journal of agricultural economics, 2024-03, Vol.106 (2), p.620-636</ispartof><rights>2023 Agricultural & Applied Economics Association.</rights><rights>2024 Agricultural and Applied Economics Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3911-ecd7da1cb5f4b5f94a3440b4f8edc38e023001318b46059d6b59b1e331d4111f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3911-ecd7da1cb5f4b5f94a3440b4f8edc38e023001318b46059d6b59b1e331d4111f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9516-7238</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fajae.12401$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fajae.12401$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27866,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Beeler, Ashley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schaefer, K. Aleks</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sestak, Jacob</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conover, Glenn</creatorcontrib><title>Impacts of U.S. countervailing duties on phosphate fertilizers</title><title>American journal of agricultural economics</title><description>Countervailing duties are a trade policy instrument by which importing governments tax imports that are found to benefit from foreign subsidies. Thus, in effect, these duties attempt to remedy market distortions generated by foreign subsidies by further distorting market mechanisms. On March 11, 2021, the U.S. International Trade Commission issued duties ranging between 19.97% and 47.05% on Moroccan phosphate imports upon finding that Moroccan exports had been receiving unfair government subsidies. In this research, we estimate the impacts of these duties on U.S. diammonium phosphate and triple superphosphate fertilizers, as well as long‐run downstream prices of five U.S. row crops with the largest phosphate usage. Using these results, we assess the implications for gross receipts in the U.S. fertilizer industry and gross margins for American farmers. We also calculate the implied change in expenditure for agricultural end users. We find that the countervailing duties have increased U.S. phosphate fertilizer prices by approximately 34% over counterfactual levels. This corresponds to an expected downstream price response ranging from around 10% for corn, cotton, and sorghum to between 1% and 4% for soybeans and wheat. This market distortion generates a $23 billion increase in gross receipts for a concentrated domestic fertilizer industry while shrinking gross margins for American farmers by 2% and 8% and increasing agricultural user expenditures by approximately $10.84 billion.</description><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Cotton</subject><subject>countervailing duties</subject><subject>Crops</subject><subject>Distortion</subject><subject>downstream impacts</subject><subject>End users</subject><subject>Expenditures</subject><subject>Exports</subject><subject>Farmers</subject><subject>fertilizer prices</subject><subject>Fertilizers</subject><subject>Imports</subject><subject>International trade</subject><subject>Markets</subject><subject>Phosphate</subject><subject>Prices</subject><subject>Sorghum</subject><subject>Soybeans</subject><subject>Subsidies</subject><subject>Tariffs</subject><subject>Trade policy</subject><subject>Wheat</subject><issn>0002-9092</issn><issn>1467-8276</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMouK5e_AUFb0JrJkk_chGWZf1iwYPuOaTp1O2y29SkVdZfb9YK3gwMYZhn3pl5CbkEmkB4N3qjMQEmKByRCYgsjwuWZ8dkQillsaSSnZIz7zchpSCLCbl93HXa9D6ydbRKXpLI2KHt0X3oZtu0b1E19A2Gaht1a-u7te4xqtH1ofqFzp-Tk1pvPV78_lOyulu8zh_i5fP943y2jA2XADGaKq80mDKtRQgpNBeClqIusDK8QMp42IdDUYqMprLKylSWgJxDJcJZNZ-Sq1G3c_Z9QN-rjR1cG0YqJlkONPQXgboeKeOs9w5r1blmp91eAVUHf9TBH_XjT4CjEUZj28b_oYUEmjKRsYDAiHw2W9z_I6ZmT7PFKPsNtVFwtQ</recordid><startdate>202403</startdate><enddate>202403</enddate><creator>Beeler, Ashley</creator><creator>Schaefer, K. Aleks</creator><creator>Sestak, Jacob</creator><creator>Conover, Glenn</creator><general>Wiley Periodicals, Inc</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>OQ6</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9516-7238</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202403</creationdate><title>Impacts of U.S. countervailing duties on phosphate fertilizers</title><author>Beeler, Ashley ; Schaefer, K. Aleks ; Sestak, Jacob ; Conover, Glenn</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3911-ecd7da1cb5f4b5f94a3440b4f8edc38e023001318b46059d6b59b1e331d4111f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Cotton</topic><topic>countervailing duties</topic><topic>Crops</topic><topic>Distortion</topic><topic>downstream impacts</topic><topic>End users</topic><topic>Expenditures</topic><topic>Exports</topic><topic>Farmers</topic><topic>fertilizer prices</topic><topic>Fertilizers</topic><topic>Imports</topic><topic>International trade</topic><topic>Markets</topic><topic>Phosphate</topic><topic>Prices</topic><topic>Sorghum</topic><topic>Soybeans</topic><topic>Subsidies</topic><topic>Tariffs</topic><topic>Trade policy</topic><topic>Wheat</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Beeler, Ashley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schaefer, K. Aleks</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sestak, Jacob</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conover, Glenn</creatorcontrib><collection>ECONIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>American journal of agricultural economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Beeler, Ashley</au><au>Schaefer, K. Aleks</au><au>Sestak, Jacob</au><au>Conover, Glenn</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Impacts of U.S. countervailing duties on phosphate fertilizers</atitle><jtitle>American journal of agricultural economics</jtitle><date>2024-03</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>106</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>620</spage><epage>636</epage><pages>620-636</pages><issn>0002-9092</issn><eissn>1467-8276</eissn><abstract>Countervailing duties are a trade policy instrument by which importing governments tax imports that are found to benefit from foreign subsidies. Thus, in effect, these duties attempt to remedy market distortions generated by foreign subsidies by further distorting market mechanisms. On March 11, 2021, the U.S. International Trade Commission issued duties ranging between 19.97% and 47.05% on Moroccan phosphate imports upon finding that Moroccan exports had been receiving unfair government subsidies. In this research, we estimate the impacts of these duties on U.S. diammonium phosphate and triple superphosphate fertilizers, as well as long‐run downstream prices of five U.S. row crops with the largest phosphate usage. Using these results, we assess the implications for gross receipts in the U.S. fertilizer industry and gross margins for American farmers. We also calculate the implied change in expenditure for agricultural end users. We find that the countervailing duties have increased U.S. phosphate fertilizer prices by approximately 34% over counterfactual levels. This corresponds to an expected downstream price response ranging from around 10% for corn, cotton, and sorghum to between 1% and 4% for soybeans and wheat. This market distortion generates a $23 billion increase in gross receipts for a concentrated domestic fertilizer industry while shrinking gross margins for American farmers by 2% and 8% and increasing agricultural user expenditures by approximately $10.84 billion.</abstract><cop>Boston, USA</cop><pub>Wiley Periodicals, Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/ajae.12401</doi><tpages>17</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9516-7238</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0002-9092 |
ispartof | American journal of agricultural economics, 2024-03, Vol.106 (2), p.620-636 |
issn | 0002-9092 1467-8276 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2927103008 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; PAIS Index |
subjects | Agriculture Cotton countervailing duties Crops Distortion downstream impacts End users Expenditures Exports Farmers fertilizer prices Fertilizers Imports International trade Markets Phosphate Prices Sorghum Soybeans Subsidies Tariffs Trade policy Wheat |
title | Impacts of U.S. countervailing duties on phosphate fertilizers |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T07%3A28%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Impacts%20of%20U.S.%20countervailing%20duties%20on%20phosphate%20fertilizers&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20agricultural%20economics&rft.au=Beeler,%20Ashley&rft.date=2024-03&rft.volume=106&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=620&rft.epage=636&rft.pages=620-636&rft.issn=0002-9092&rft.eissn=1467-8276&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/ajae.12401&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2927103008%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2927103008&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |