Impacts of U.S. countervailing duties on phosphate fertilizers

Countervailing duties are a trade policy instrument by which importing governments tax imports that are found to benefit from foreign subsidies. Thus, in effect, these duties attempt to remedy market distortions generated by foreign subsidies by further distorting market mechanisms. On March 11, 202...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of agricultural economics 2024-03, Vol.106 (2), p.620-636
Hauptverfasser: Beeler, Ashley, Schaefer, K. Aleks, Sestak, Jacob, Conover, Glenn
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 636
container_issue 2
container_start_page 620
container_title American journal of agricultural economics
container_volume 106
creator Beeler, Ashley
Schaefer, K. Aleks
Sestak, Jacob
Conover, Glenn
description Countervailing duties are a trade policy instrument by which importing governments tax imports that are found to benefit from foreign subsidies. Thus, in effect, these duties attempt to remedy market distortions generated by foreign subsidies by further distorting market mechanisms. On March 11, 2021, the U.S. International Trade Commission issued duties ranging between 19.97% and 47.05% on Moroccan phosphate imports upon finding that Moroccan exports had been receiving unfair government subsidies. In this research, we estimate the impacts of these duties on U.S. diammonium phosphate and triple superphosphate fertilizers, as well as long‐run downstream prices of five U.S. row crops with the largest phosphate usage. Using these results, we assess the implications for gross receipts in the U.S. fertilizer industry and gross margins for American farmers. We also calculate the implied change in expenditure for agricultural end users. We find that the countervailing duties have increased U.S. phosphate fertilizer prices by approximately 34% over counterfactual levels. This corresponds to an expected downstream price response ranging from around 10% for corn, cotton, and sorghum to between 1% and 4% for soybeans and wheat. This market distortion generates a $23 billion increase in gross receipts for a concentrated domestic fertilizer industry while shrinking gross margins for American farmers by 2% and 8% and increasing agricultural user expenditures by approximately $10.84 billion.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/ajae.12401
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2927103008</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2927103008</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3911-ecd7da1cb5f4b5f94a3440b4f8edc38e023001318b46059d6b59b1e331d4111f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMouK5e_AUFb0JrJkk_chGWZf1iwYPuOaTp1O2y29SkVdZfb9YK3gwMYZhn3pl5CbkEmkB4N3qjMQEmKByRCYgsjwuWZ8dkQillsaSSnZIz7zchpSCLCbl93HXa9D6ydbRKXpLI2KHt0X3oZtu0b1E19A2Gaht1a-u7te4xqtH1ofqFzp-Tk1pvPV78_lOyulu8zh_i5fP943y2jA2XADGaKq80mDKtRQgpNBeClqIusDK8QMp42IdDUYqMprLKylSWgJxDJcJZNZ-Sq1G3c_Z9QN-rjR1cG0YqJlkONPQXgboeKeOs9w5r1blmp91eAVUHf9TBH_XjT4CjEUZj28b_oYUEmjKRsYDAiHw2W9z_I6ZmT7PFKPsNtVFwtQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2927103008</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Impacts of U.S. countervailing duties on phosphate fertilizers</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>PAIS Index</source><creator>Beeler, Ashley ; Schaefer, K. Aleks ; Sestak, Jacob ; Conover, Glenn</creator><creatorcontrib>Beeler, Ashley ; Schaefer, K. Aleks ; Sestak, Jacob ; Conover, Glenn</creatorcontrib><description>Countervailing duties are a trade policy instrument by which importing governments tax imports that are found to benefit from foreign subsidies. Thus, in effect, these duties attempt to remedy market distortions generated by foreign subsidies by further distorting market mechanisms. On March 11, 2021, the U.S. International Trade Commission issued duties ranging between 19.97% and 47.05% on Moroccan phosphate imports upon finding that Moroccan exports had been receiving unfair government subsidies. In this research, we estimate the impacts of these duties on U.S. diammonium phosphate and triple superphosphate fertilizers, as well as long‐run downstream prices of five U.S. row crops with the largest phosphate usage. Using these results, we assess the implications for gross receipts in the U.S. fertilizer industry and gross margins for American farmers. We also calculate the implied change in expenditure for agricultural end users. We find that the countervailing duties have increased U.S. phosphate fertilizer prices by approximately 34% over counterfactual levels. This corresponds to an expected downstream price response ranging from around 10% for corn, cotton, and sorghum to between 1% and 4% for soybeans and wheat. This market distortion generates a $23 billion increase in gross receipts for a concentrated domestic fertilizer industry while shrinking gross margins for American farmers by 2% and 8% and increasing agricultural user expenditures by approximately $10.84 billion.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9092</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-8276</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/ajae.12401</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boston, USA: Wiley Periodicals, Inc</publisher><subject>Agriculture ; Cotton ; countervailing duties ; Crops ; Distortion ; downstream impacts ; End users ; Expenditures ; Exports ; Farmers ; fertilizer prices ; Fertilizers ; Imports ; International trade ; Markets ; Phosphate ; Prices ; Sorghum ; Soybeans ; Subsidies ; Tariffs ; Trade policy ; Wheat</subject><ispartof>American journal of agricultural economics, 2024-03, Vol.106 (2), p.620-636</ispartof><rights>2023 Agricultural &amp; Applied Economics Association.</rights><rights>2024 Agricultural and Applied Economics Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3911-ecd7da1cb5f4b5f94a3440b4f8edc38e023001318b46059d6b59b1e331d4111f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3911-ecd7da1cb5f4b5f94a3440b4f8edc38e023001318b46059d6b59b1e331d4111f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9516-7238</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fajae.12401$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fajae.12401$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27866,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Beeler, Ashley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schaefer, K. Aleks</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sestak, Jacob</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conover, Glenn</creatorcontrib><title>Impacts of U.S. countervailing duties on phosphate fertilizers</title><title>American journal of agricultural economics</title><description>Countervailing duties are a trade policy instrument by which importing governments tax imports that are found to benefit from foreign subsidies. Thus, in effect, these duties attempt to remedy market distortions generated by foreign subsidies by further distorting market mechanisms. On March 11, 2021, the U.S. International Trade Commission issued duties ranging between 19.97% and 47.05% on Moroccan phosphate imports upon finding that Moroccan exports had been receiving unfair government subsidies. In this research, we estimate the impacts of these duties on U.S. diammonium phosphate and triple superphosphate fertilizers, as well as long‐run downstream prices of five U.S. row crops with the largest phosphate usage. Using these results, we assess the implications for gross receipts in the U.S. fertilizer industry and gross margins for American farmers. We also calculate the implied change in expenditure for agricultural end users. We find that the countervailing duties have increased U.S. phosphate fertilizer prices by approximately 34% over counterfactual levels. This corresponds to an expected downstream price response ranging from around 10% for corn, cotton, and sorghum to between 1% and 4% for soybeans and wheat. This market distortion generates a $23 billion increase in gross receipts for a concentrated domestic fertilizer industry while shrinking gross margins for American farmers by 2% and 8% and increasing agricultural user expenditures by approximately $10.84 billion.</description><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Cotton</subject><subject>countervailing duties</subject><subject>Crops</subject><subject>Distortion</subject><subject>downstream impacts</subject><subject>End users</subject><subject>Expenditures</subject><subject>Exports</subject><subject>Farmers</subject><subject>fertilizer prices</subject><subject>Fertilizers</subject><subject>Imports</subject><subject>International trade</subject><subject>Markets</subject><subject>Phosphate</subject><subject>Prices</subject><subject>Sorghum</subject><subject>Soybeans</subject><subject>Subsidies</subject><subject>Tariffs</subject><subject>Trade policy</subject><subject>Wheat</subject><issn>0002-9092</issn><issn>1467-8276</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMouK5e_AUFb0JrJkk_chGWZf1iwYPuOaTp1O2y29SkVdZfb9YK3gwMYZhn3pl5CbkEmkB4N3qjMQEmKByRCYgsjwuWZ8dkQillsaSSnZIz7zchpSCLCbl93HXa9D6ydbRKXpLI2KHt0X3oZtu0b1E19A2Gaht1a-u7te4xqtH1ofqFzp-Tk1pvPV78_lOyulu8zh_i5fP943y2jA2XADGaKq80mDKtRQgpNBeClqIusDK8QMp42IdDUYqMprLKylSWgJxDJcJZNZ-Sq1G3c_Z9QN-rjR1cG0YqJlkONPQXgboeKeOs9w5r1blmp91eAVUHf9TBH_XjT4CjEUZj28b_oYUEmjKRsYDAiHw2W9z_I6ZmT7PFKPsNtVFwtQ</recordid><startdate>202403</startdate><enddate>202403</enddate><creator>Beeler, Ashley</creator><creator>Schaefer, K. Aleks</creator><creator>Sestak, Jacob</creator><creator>Conover, Glenn</creator><general>Wiley Periodicals, Inc</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>OQ6</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9516-7238</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202403</creationdate><title>Impacts of U.S. countervailing duties on phosphate fertilizers</title><author>Beeler, Ashley ; Schaefer, K. Aleks ; Sestak, Jacob ; Conover, Glenn</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3911-ecd7da1cb5f4b5f94a3440b4f8edc38e023001318b46059d6b59b1e331d4111f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Cotton</topic><topic>countervailing duties</topic><topic>Crops</topic><topic>Distortion</topic><topic>downstream impacts</topic><topic>End users</topic><topic>Expenditures</topic><topic>Exports</topic><topic>Farmers</topic><topic>fertilizer prices</topic><topic>Fertilizers</topic><topic>Imports</topic><topic>International trade</topic><topic>Markets</topic><topic>Phosphate</topic><topic>Prices</topic><topic>Sorghum</topic><topic>Soybeans</topic><topic>Subsidies</topic><topic>Tariffs</topic><topic>Trade policy</topic><topic>Wheat</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Beeler, Ashley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schaefer, K. Aleks</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sestak, Jacob</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conover, Glenn</creatorcontrib><collection>ECONIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>American journal of agricultural economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Beeler, Ashley</au><au>Schaefer, K. Aleks</au><au>Sestak, Jacob</au><au>Conover, Glenn</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Impacts of U.S. countervailing duties on phosphate fertilizers</atitle><jtitle>American journal of agricultural economics</jtitle><date>2024-03</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>106</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>620</spage><epage>636</epage><pages>620-636</pages><issn>0002-9092</issn><eissn>1467-8276</eissn><abstract>Countervailing duties are a trade policy instrument by which importing governments tax imports that are found to benefit from foreign subsidies. Thus, in effect, these duties attempt to remedy market distortions generated by foreign subsidies by further distorting market mechanisms. On March 11, 2021, the U.S. International Trade Commission issued duties ranging between 19.97% and 47.05% on Moroccan phosphate imports upon finding that Moroccan exports had been receiving unfair government subsidies. In this research, we estimate the impacts of these duties on U.S. diammonium phosphate and triple superphosphate fertilizers, as well as long‐run downstream prices of five U.S. row crops with the largest phosphate usage. Using these results, we assess the implications for gross receipts in the U.S. fertilizer industry and gross margins for American farmers. We also calculate the implied change in expenditure for agricultural end users. We find that the countervailing duties have increased U.S. phosphate fertilizer prices by approximately 34% over counterfactual levels. This corresponds to an expected downstream price response ranging from around 10% for corn, cotton, and sorghum to between 1% and 4% for soybeans and wheat. This market distortion generates a $23 billion increase in gross receipts for a concentrated domestic fertilizer industry while shrinking gross margins for American farmers by 2% and 8% and increasing agricultural user expenditures by approximately $10.84 billion.</abstract><cop>Boston, USA</cop><pub>Wiley Periodicals, Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/ajae.12401</doi><tpages>17</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9516-7238</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0002-9092
ispartof American journal of agricultural economics, 2024-03, Vol.106 (2), p.620-636
issn 0002-9092
1467-8276
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2927103008
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; PAIS Index
subjects Agriculture
Cotton
countervailing duties
Crops
Distortion
downstream impacts
End users
Expenditures
Exports
Farmers
fertilizer prices
Fertilizers
Imports
International trade
Markets
Phosphate
Prices
Sorghum
Soybeans
Subsidies
Tariffs
Trade policy
Wheat
title Impacts of U.S. countervailing duties on phosphate fertilizers
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T07%3A28%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Impacts%20of%20U.S.%20countervailing%20duties%20on%20phosphate%20fertilizers&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20agricultural%20economics&rft.au=Beeler,%20Ashley&rft.date=2024-03&rft.volume=106&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=620&rft.epage=636&rft.pages=620-636&rft.issn=0002-9092&rft.eissn=1467-8276&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/ajae.12401&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2927103008%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2927103008&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true