Analysis of flux footprints in fragmented, heterogeneous croplands

An accurate quantification of fluxes from heterogeneous sites and further bifurcation into contributing homogeneous fluxes is an active field of research. Among such sites, fragmented croplands with varying surface roughness characteristics pose formidable challenges for footprint analysis. We condu...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Meteorology and atmospheric physics 2024-04, Vol.136 (2), p.9, Article 9
Hauptverfasser: Kumari, Shweta, Kambhammettu, B. V. N. P., Adams, Mark. A., Niyogi, Dev
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 2
container_start_page 9
container_title Meteorology and atmospheric physics
container_volume 136
creator Kumari, Shweta
Kambhammettu, B. V. N. P.
Adams, Mark. A.
Niyogi, Dev
description An accurate quantification of fluxes from heterogeneous sites and further bifurcation into contributing homogeneous fluxes is an active field of research. Among such sites, fragmented croplands with varying surface roughness characteristics pose formidable challenges for footprint analysis. We conducted two flux monitoring experiments in fragmented croplands characterized by two dissimilar surfaces with objectives to: (i) evaluate the performance of two analytical footprint models in heterogeneous canopy considering aggregated roughness parameters and (ii) analyze the contribution of fluxes from individual surfaces under changing wind speed. A set of three eddy covariance (EC) towers (one each capturing the homogenous fluxes from individual surfaces and a third, high tower capturing the heterogeneous mixed fluxes) was used for method validation. High-quality EC fluxes that fulfill stationarity and internal turbulence tests were analyzed considering daytime, unstable conditions. In the first experiment, source area contribution from a surface is gradually reduced by progressive cut, and its effect on high-tower flux measurements is analyzed. Two footprint models (Kormann and Meixner ‘KM’; analytical solution to Lagrangian model ‘FFP’) with modified surface roughness parameters were applied under changing source area contributions. FFP model has consistently over predicted the footprints (RMSE FFP  = 0.31 m −1 , PBIAS FFP  = 19.00), whereas KM model prediction was gradually changed from over prediction to under prediction towards higher upwind distances (RMSE KM  = 0.02 m −1 , PBIAS KM  = 8.50). Sensitivity analysis revealed that the models are more sensitive to turbulent conditions than surface characteristics. This motivated to conduct the second experiment, where the fractional contribution of individual surfaces ( α and β ) to the heterogeneous fluxes measured by the high tower (T3) was estimated using the principle of superposition (FT3 =  α FT1 +  β FT2). Results showed that α and β are dynamic during daylight hours and strongly depend on mean wind speed ( U ) and friction velocity ( u *). The contribution of fluxes from adjoining fields [1 − ( α  +  β )] is significant beyond 80% isopleth. Our findings provide guidelines for future analysis of fluxes in heterogeneous, fragmented croplands.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00703-023-01004-w
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2926970254</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2926970254</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-356a53fb990c10ae13937334eca04d39e3d3bc62203ea173016852236e9e09983</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UMFOwzAMjRBIjMEPcKrElYITt8lyHBMDpElc4BxlrTM2dc1IWo39PRlF4sbBtmz5Pb33GLvmcMcB1H1MDTAHkSodinx_wka8QJmXIMtTNgKuVK604ufsIsYNpF0KPmIP09Y2h7iOmXeZa_qvzHnf7cK67WK2bjMX7GpLbUf1bfZBHQW_opZ8H7Mq-F1j2zpesjNnm0hXv3PM3uePb7PnfPH69DKbLvIKJXY5ltKW6JZaQ8XBEkeNCrGgykJRoyascVlJIQDJcoXA5aQUAiVpAq0nOGY3A-8u-M-eYmc2vg9JfjRCC6kViLJIX2L4SvpiDORMMrO14WA4mGNWZsjKpKzMT1Zmn0A4gOLR-YrCH_U_qG_-rWu5</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2926970254</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Analysis of flux footprints in fragmented, heterogeneous croplands</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Kumari, Shweta ; Kambhammettu, B. V. N. P. ; Adams, Mark. A. ; Niyogi, Dev</creator><creatorcontrib>Kumari, Shweta ; Kambhammettu, B. V. N. P. ; Adams, Mark. A. ; Niyogi, Dev</creatorcontrib><description>An accurate quantification of fluxes from heterogeneous sites and further bifurcation into contributing homogeneous fluxes is an active field of research. Among such sites, fragmented croplands with varying surface roughness characteristics pose formidable challenges for footprint analysis. We conducted two flux monitoring experiments in fragmented croplands characterized by two dissimilar surfaces with objectives to: (i) evaluate the performance of two analytical footprint models in heterogeneous canopy considering aggregated roughness parameters and (ii) analyze the contribution of fluxes from individual surfaces under changing wind speed. A set of three eddy covariance (EC) towers (one each capturing the homogenous fluxes from individual surfaces and a third, high tower capturing the heterogeneous mixed fluxes) was used for method validation. High-quality EC fluxes that fulfill stationarity and internal turbulence tests were analyzed considering daytime, unstable conditions. In the first experiment, source area contribution from a surface is gradually reduced by progressive cut, and its effect on high-tower flux measurements is analyzed. Two footprint models (Kormann and Meixner ‘KM’; analytical solution to Lagrangian model ‘FFP’) with modified surface roughness parameters were applied under changing source area contributions. FFP model has consistently over predicted the footprints (RMSE FFP  = 0.31 m −1 , PBIAS FFP  = 19.00), whereas KM model prediction was gradually changed from over prediction to under prediction towards higher upwind distances (RMSE KM  = 0.02 m −1 , PBIAS KM  = 8.50). Sensitivity analysis revealed that the models are more sensitive to turbulent conditions than surface characteristics. This motivated to conduct the second experiment, where the fractional contribution of individual surfaces ( α and β ) to the heterogeneous fluxes measured by the high tower (T3) was estimated using the principle of superposition (FT3 =  α FT1 +  β FT2). Results showed that α and β are dynamic during daylight hours and strongly depend on mean wind speed ( U ) and friction velocity ( u *). The contribution of fluxes from adjoining fields [1 − ( α  +  β )] is significant beyond 80% isopleth. Our findings provide guidelines for future analysis of fluxes in heterogeneous, fragmented croplands.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0177-7971</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1436-5065</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00703-023-01004-w</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Vienna: Springer Vienna</publisher><subject>Agricultural land ; Aquatic Pollution ; Atmospheric Sciences ; Daylight ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Earth Sciences ; Eddy covariance ; Exact solutions ; Fluctuations ; Fluxes ; Footprint analysis ; Math. Appl. in Environmental Science ; Mathematical models ; Mean winds ; Meteorology ; Nomograms ; Original Paper ; Parameter modification ; Parameters ; Predictions ; Roughness parameters ; Sensitivity analysis ; Surface properties ; Surface roughness ; Terrestrial Pollution ; Towers ; Turbulence ; Waste Water Technology ; Water Management ; Water Pollution Control ; Wind ; Wind speed</subject><ispartof>Meteorology and atmospheric physics, 2024-04, Vol.136 (2), p.9, Article 9</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2024</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2024. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-356a53fb990c10ae13937334eca04d39e3d3bc62203ea173016852236e9e09983</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-356a53fb990c10ae13937334eca04d39e3d3bc62203ea173016852236e9e09983</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3843-5304</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00703-023-01004-w$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00703-023-01004-w$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kumari, Shweta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kambhammettu, B. V. N. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adams, Mark. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Niyogi, Dev</creatorcontrib><title>Analysis of flux footprints in fragmented, heterogeneous croplands</title><title>Meteorology and atmospheric physics</title><addtitle>Meteorol Atmos Phys</addtitle><description>An accurate quantification of fluxes from heterogeneous sites and further bifurcation into contributing homogeneous fluxes is an active field of research. Among such sites, fragmented croplands with varying surface roughness characteristics pose formidable challenges for footprint analysis. We conducted two flux monitoring experiments in fragmented croplands characterized by two dissimilar surfaces with objectives to: (i) evaluate the performance of two analytical footprint models in heterogeneous canopy considering aggregated roughness parameters and (ii) analyze the contribution of fluxes from individual surfaces under changing wind speed. A set of three eddy covariance (EC) towers (one each capturing the homogenous fluxes from individual surfaces and a third, high tower capturing the heterogeneous mixed fluxes) was used for method validation. High-quality EC fluxes that fulfill stationarity and internal turbulence tests were analyzed considering daytime, unstable conditions. In the first experiment, source area contribution from a surface is gradually reduced by progressive cut, and its effect on high-tower flux measurements is analyzed. Two footprint models (Kormann and Meixner ‘KM’; analytical solution to Lagrangian model ‘FFP’) with modified surface roughness parameters were applied under changing source area contributions. FFP model has consistently over predicted the footprints (RMSE FFP  = 0.31 m −1 , PBIAS FFP  = 19.00), whereas KM model prediction was gradually changed from over prediction to under prediction towards higher upwind distances (RMSE KM  = 0.02 m −1 , PBIAS KM  = 8.50). Sensitivity analysis revealed that the models are more sensitive to turbulent conditions than surface characteristics. This motivated to conduct the second experiment, where the fractional contribution of individual surfaces ( α and β ) to the heterogeneous fluxes measured by the high tower (T3) was estimated using the principle of superposition (FT3 =  α FT1 +  β FT2). Results showed that α and β are dynamic during daylight hours and strongly depend on mean wind speed ( U ) and friction velocity ( u *). The contribution of fluxes from adjoining fields [1 − ( α  +  β )] is significant beyond 80% isopleth. Our findings provide guidelines for future analysis of fluxes in heterogeneous, fragmented croplands.</description><subject>Agricultural land</subject><subject>Aquatic Pollution</subject><subject>Atmospheric Sciences</subject><subject>Daylight</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Eddy covariance</subject><subject>Exact solutions</subject><subject>Fluctuations</subject><subject>Fluxes</subject><subject>Footprint analysis</subject><subject>Math. Appl. in Environmental Science</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Mean winds</subject><subject>Meteorology</subject><subject>Nomograms</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Parameter modification</subject><subject>Parameters</subject><subject>Predictions</subject><subject>Roughness parameters</subject><subject>Sensitivity analysis</subject><subject>Surface properties</subject><subject>Surface roughness</subject><subject>Terrestrial Pollution</subject><subject>Towers</subject><subject>Turbulence</subject><subject>Waste Water Technology</subject><subject>Water Management</subject><subject>Water Pollution Control</subject><subject>Wind</subject><subject>Wind speed</subject><issn>0177-7971</issn><issn>1436-5065</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UMFOwzAMjRBIjMEPcKrElYITt8lyHBMDpElc4BxlrTM2dc1IWo39PRlF4sbBtmz5Pb33GLvmcMcB1H1MDTAHkSodinx_wka8QJmXIMtTNgKuVK604ufsIsYNpF0KPmIP09Y2h7iOmXeZa_qvzHnf7cK67WK2bjMX7GpLbUf1bfZBHQW_opZ8H7Mq-F1j2zpesjNnm0hXv3PM3uePb7PnfPH69DKbLvIKJXY5ltKW6JZaQ8XBEkeNCrGgykJRoyascVlJIQDJcoXA5aQUAiVpAq0nOGY3A-8u-M-eYmc2vg9JfjRCC6kViLJIX2L4SvpiDORMMrO14WA4mGNWZsjKpKzMT1Zmn0A4gOLR-YrCH_U_qG_-rWu5</recordid><startdate>20240401</startdate><enddate>20240401</enddate><creator>Kumari, Shweta</creator><creator>Kambhammettu, B. V. N. P.</creator><creator>Adams, Mark. A.</creator><creator>Niyogi, Dev</creator><general>Springer Vienna</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L7M</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3843-5304</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240401</creationdate><title>Analysis of flux footprints in fragmented, heterogeneous croplands</title><author>Kumari, Shweta ; Kambhammettu, B. V. N. P. ; Adams, Mark. A. ; Niyogi, Dev</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-356a53fb990c10ae13937334eca04d39e3d3bc62203ea173016852236e9e09983</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Agricultural land</topic><topic>Aquatic Pollution</topic><topic>Atmospheric Sciences</topic><topic>Daylight</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Eddy covariance</topic><topic>Exact solutions</topic><topic>Fluctuations</topic><topic>Fluxes</topic><topic>Footprint analysis</topic><topic>Math. Appl. in Environmental Science</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Mean winds</topic><topic>Meteorology</topic><topic>Nomograms</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Parameter modification</topic><topic>Parameters</topic><topic>Predictions</topic><topic>Roughness parameters</topic><topic>Sensitivity analysis</topic><topic>Surface properties</topic><topic>Surface roughness</topic><topic>Terrestrial Pollution</topic><topic>Towers</topic><topic>Turbulence</topic><topic>Waste Water Technology</topic><topic>Water Management</topic><topic>Water Pollution Control</topic><topic>Wind</topic><topic>Wind speed</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kumari, Shweta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kambhammettu, B. V. N. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adams, Mark. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Niyogi, Dev</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Meteorology and atmospheric physics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kumari, Shweta</au><au>Kambhammettu, B. V. N. P.</au><au>Adams, Mark. A.</au><au>Niyogi, Dev</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Analysis of flux footprints in fragmented, heterogeneous croplands</atitle><jtitle>Meteorology and atmospheric physics</jtitle><stitle>Meteorol Atmos Phys</stitle><date>2024-04-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>136</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>9</spage><pages>9-</pages><artnum>9</artnum><issn>0177-7971</issn><eissn>1436-5065</eissn><abstract>An accurate quantification of fluxes from heterogeneous sites and further bifurcation into contributing homogeneous fluxes is an active field of research. Among such sites, fragmented croplands with varying surface roughness characteristics pose formidable challenges for footprint analysis. We conducted two flux monitoring experiments in fragmented croplands characterized by two dissimilar surfaces with objectives to: (i) evaluate the performance of two analytical footprint models in heterogeneous canopy considering aggregated roughness parameters and (ii) analyze the contribution of fluxes from individual surfaces under changing wind speed. A set of three eddy covariance (EC) towers (one each capturing the homogenous fluxes from individual surfaces and a third, high tower capturing the heterogeneous mixed fluxes) was used for method validation. High-quality EC fluxes that fulfill stationarity and internal turbulence tests were analyzed considering daytime, unstable conditions. In the first experiment, source area contribution from a surface is gradually reduced by progressive cut, and its effect on high-tower flux measurements is analyzed. Two footprint models (Kormann and Meixner ‘KM’; analytical solution to Lagrangian model ‘FFP’) with modified surface roughness parameters were applied under changing source area contributions. FFP model has consistently over predicted the footprints (RMSE FFP  = 0.31 m −1 , PBIAS FFP  = 19.00), whereas KM model prediction was gradually changed from over prediction to under prediction towards higher upwind distances (RMSE KM  = 0.02 m −1 , PBIAS KM  = 8.50). Sensitivity analysis revealed that the models are more sensitive to turbulent conditions than surface characteristics. This motivated to conduct the second experiment, where the fractional contribution of individual surfaces ( α and β ) to the heterogeneous fluxes measured by the high tower (T3) was estimated using the principle of superposition (FT3 =  α FT1 +  β FT2). Results showed that α and β are dynamic during daylight hours and strongly depend on mean wind speed ( U ) and friction velocity ( u *). The contribution of fluxes from adjoining fields [1 − ( α  +  β )] is significant beyond 80% isopleth. Our findings provide guidelines for future analysis of fluxes in heterogeneous, fragmented croplands.</abstract><cop>Vienna</cop><pub>Springer Vienna</pub><doi>10.1007/s00703-023-01004-w</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3843-5304</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0177-7971
ispartof Meteorology and atmospheric physics, 2024-04, Vol.136 (2), p.9, Article 9
issn 0177-7971
1436-5065
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2926970254
source SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Agricultural land
Aquatic Pollution
Atmospheric Sciences
Daylight
Earth and Environmental Science
Earth Sciences
Eddy covariance
Exact solutions
Fluctuations
Fluxes
Footprint analysis
Math. Appl. in Environmental Science
Mathematical models
Mean winds
Meteorology
Nomograms
Original Paper
Parameter modification
Parameters
Predictions
Roughness parameters
Sensitivity analysis
Surface properties
Surface roughness
Terrestrial Pollution
Towers
Turbulence
Waste Water Technology
Water Management
Water Pollution Control
Wind
Wind speed
title Analysis of flux footprints in fragmented, heterogeneous croplands
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T11%3A29%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Analysis%20of%20flux%20footprints%20in%20fragmented,%20heterogeneous%20croplands&rft.jtitle=Meteorology%20and%20atmospheric%20physics&rft.au=Kumari,%20Shweta&rft.date=2024-04-01&rft.volume=136&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=9&rft.pages=9-&rft.artnum=9&rft.issn=0177-7971&rft.eissn=1436-5065&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00703-023-01004-w&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2926970254%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2926970254&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true